Analysis of hematologic adverse events (HeAEs) in trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI)-treated patients (pts) with or without renal/hepatic impairment (RI/HI): Pooled safety analyses from TAGS and RECOURSE.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 145-145
Author(s):  
Ben George ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Robert J. Mayer ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Total Bilirubin ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Normal Hepatic Function ◽  
Time To Onset ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

145 Background: FTD/TPI has shown clinical benefit and consistent safety in pretreated pts with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC) in the phase 3 RECOURSE and TAGS trials, respectively. HeAEs were the most frequent AEs with FTD/TPI treatment. Methods: Pts in this analysis received ≥1 FTD/TPI dose in the TAGS and RECOURSE trials. Subgroups included pts with normal renal function (nRF; CrCl ≥90 mL/min), mild RI (CrCl 60–89 mL/min), moderate (mod) RI (CrCl 30–59 mL/min), normal hepatic function (nHF) and mild HI (total bilirubin <1.5 X ULN, or AST >ULN). Results: FTD/TPI was administered to 868 pts in the overall pooled population (OPP; n=335, TAGS [mGC/GEJC]; n=533, RECOURSE [mCRC]); 52%, 36%, and 11% had nRF, mild and moderate RI, and 66% and 33% had nHF and mild HI, respectively. Frequencies of any-cause grade (gr) ≥3 HeAEs were similar across subgroups and the OPP, except for gr ≥3 anemia and gr ≥3 leukopenia, which were higher with mod RI (table). In the OPP, most gr 3/4 neutropenia events occurred within the first 2 cycles (median time to onset [mTTO], 49 d). Median time to resolution (mTTR) was 8 d. Gr 3/4 neutropenia TTO and TTR in most subgroups were consistent with the OPP, except with mod RI (mTTO, 29 d). HeAE management and correlative efficacy analyses will be presented. Conclusions: In this pooled analysis of pts with mCRC and mGC/GEJC, HeAEs with FTD/TPI in pts with mild to mod RI and mild HI were manageable and not largely different from those in the OPP. Clinical trial information: NCT02500043 and NCT01607957. [Table: see text]

Nivolumab safety profile in Asian and Western patients with chemotherapy-refractory (CTx-R) advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (adv G/GEJ) cancer from the ATTRACTION-2 and CheckMate-032 trials.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 90-90
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Li-Tzong Chen ◽  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Taroh Satoh ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Racial Differences ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Time To Onset ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

90 Background: Nivolumab (NIVO) monotherapy demonstrated a survival benefit and durable responses in pts with CTx-R adv G/GEJ cancer (Boku N et al ESMO 2017; Janjigian Y et al ASCO 2017). Here we describe the safety profile of NIVO in Asian (A) and Western (W) pts with CTx-R adv G/GEJ who had received ≥ 2 prior CTx in the ATTRACTION-2 and CheckMate-032 trials, respectively. Methods: The safety population included pts who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug at the data cutoff of August 2016 for ATTRACTION-2 and March 2016 for CheckMate-032. TRAEs, serious TRAEs, and select TRAEs (sTRAE; with a potential immune-related etiology) were assessed. sTRAEs were managed using protocol-specified algorithms, which included corticosteroids as immune-modulating treatment (tx). Time to onset and resolution of sTRAEs were also assessed. Results: Median duration of NIVO tx was 1.9 mo in A and 2.3 mo in W pts. TRAEs (any grade) were reported in 43% of A and 64% of W pts; grade 3–4 TRAEs (A pts:10%; W pts:14%), serious TRAEs (A pts:10%; W pts:7%) and TRAEs leading to discontinuation (≤ 3% of pts in both groups) were infrequent. Most sTRAEs were grade 1–2 (Table) and occurred within the first 3 mo of NIVO tx. In A and W pts, median time to resolution of sTRAEs ranged from 3–19 wk. For those sTRAEs that required tx with immune-modulating agents, the median time to resolution of most sTRAEs ranged from 3–35 wk. Conclusions: NIVO demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in both A and W pts with CTx-R adv G/GEJ cancers with no clinically meaningful racial differences. Most sTRAEs were grade 1–2 in both cohorts and manageable using the recommended tx algorithms. Clinical trial information: NCT02267343 ATTRACTION-2 and NCT01928394 CheckMate 032. [Table: see text]

Pooled safety analysis from phase 3 studies of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients (pts) with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/mGEJC) and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4039-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Robert J. Mayer ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Ecog Ps

4039 Background: FTD/TPI was approved in 2015 for pretreated pts with mCRC based on the phase 3 RECOURSE trial. FTD/TPI recently demonstrating significantly improved overall survival vs placebo in pretreated pts with mGC/mGEJC in the phase 3 TAGS trial. Methods: We evaluated the pooled safety of FTD/TPI in TAGS and RECOURSE in all pts who received ≥1 dose of FTD/TPI (safety population). Pts were required to have ECOG PS 0/1 and to have received ≥2 previous chemotherapy lines. Results: FTD/TPI and placebo were administered to 335 and 168 pts, respectively, in TAGS, and 533 and 265 pts in RECOURSE. Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups and reflected the disease populations. In the pooled population, 66% of pts were men and 75% had received ≥3 prior systemic treatments. The safety profile of FTD/TPI was comparable between studies (table). In TAGS and RECOURSE, the most common any-cause grade (gr) ≥3 AEs in FTD/TPI-treated pts were neutropenia (34%; 35%), anemia (19%; 17%), and leukopenia (9%; 13%). Gr ≥3 febrile neutropenia occurred in 2% and 4% of pts and gr ≥3 GI AEs in 21% and 12%. Gr ≥3 cardiac AEs were reported in 1% of FTD/TPI-treated pts (both studies), in contrast to results obtained with other third-line agents. Similar proportions of FTD/TPI-treated pts in both studies had AEs leading to dosing delay, dose reduction, or treatment discontinuation. Dosing delay was used more often than dose reduction to manage AEs. TRAEs leading to death occurred in one FTD/TPI-treated pt ( < 1%) in each trial. Conclusions: In a pooled analysis, FTD/TPI was well tolerated with a consistent safety profile in pts with mGC/mGEJC or mCRC. The most frequent AEs were hematologic and GI, which were managed with dosing delays/dose reductions. Clinical trial information: NCT02500043; NCT01607957. [Table: see text]

Effect of dose modifications on response to duvelisib in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL in the DUO trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7523-7523
Author(s):  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Marco Montillo ◽  
Árpád Illés ◽  
Gabriel Etienne ◽  
Julio Delgado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Effective Management ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Dose Modification ◽  
First Response ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Dose Modifications ◽  
Time To Onset ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

7523 Background: Duvelisib (DUV), a first-in-class oral dual PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, is approved for treatment (tx) of R/R CLL/SLL after ≥ 2 prior therapies. In the phase 3 DUO trial, DUV 25 mg BID significantly improved efficacy vs ofatumumab (OFA; mPFS, 13.3 vs 9.9 mo; HR, 0.52 [ P < .0001]; ORR, 74% vs 45% [ P < .0001]) in pts with R/R CLL/SLL. Tx-emergent AEs (TEAEs) of special interest (AESIs) such as infections, diarrhea, colitis, neutropenia, rash, ALT/AST elevation, and pneumonitis, were moderate and manageable with early intervention and dose modification. We examined dose-modification patterns and their impact on response to DUV in the DUO trial. Methods: Dose interruptions (DI) or reductions (DR) to 15, 10, or 5 mg BID were permitted per study protocol to manage TEAEs. Responses were assessed by IRC. Results: Among 158 DUV-treated pts, median duration of DUV exposure was 11.6 mo (vs 5.3 mo, OFA). DI and DR occurred in 80% (126/158) and 27% (43/158) of pts, respectively. The most common cause of DI was diarrhea (23%), followed by neutropenia (12%) and pneumonia or colitis (11% each). Among responders (n = 118), median time to first response on DUV was 1.9 mo and estimated median duration of response was 11.1 mo. Median time to first DI was 3.9 mo and median duration of DI was 15 d (range, 1-133 d). Response to DUV was improved or maintained in most pts evaluated for response who had ≥ 1 DI for > 1 wk (84% [42/50]) or > 2 wk (82% [31/38]) followed by ≥ 3 wk on DUV. In a landmark analysis, median PFS was similar in pts with DI and those without DI for > 1 wk (17.8 vs 16.3 mo) or > 2 wk (17.8 vs 16.3 mo) within the first 3 mo. The median time to DR after CR/PR was 5.6 mo (n = 25) and median duration was 3.4 mo. Median time to onset across AESIs after starting DUV ranged from 2.2 to 4.3 mo; median time to resolution was within 4 wk across AESIs. Proportions of pts experiencing AESIs were stable or decreased over time after 3-6 mo: 0-3 mo, 64% (101/158); > 3-6 mo, 63% (86/137); > 6-9 mo, 47% (54/114); > 9-12 mo, 52% (52/100), and seldom led to discontinuation of DUV (≤ 10%). Conclusions: DI/DR can contribute to the effective management of TEAEs with DUV. These findings suggest that DI of > 1-2 weeks or more do not appear to significantly impact response to DUV or PFS. Clinical trial information: NCT02004522.

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Ramucirumab in the Treatment of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hongqiong Yang ◽  
Yaojun Zhou ◽  
Liangzhi Wang ◽  
Tianyi Gu ◽  
Mengjia Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Five electronic databases were searched for eligible records. Outcomes were presented and analyzed according to the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and overall survival (OS) rate. Five records involving 2,024 participants were included in the study. The pooled analysis of OS and PFS were longer with ramucirumab (RAM) therapy than without RAM for OS (odds ratio OR = 0.90 , 95% confidence interval CI = 0.82 – 1.00 , p = 0.05 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.74 , 95 % CI = 0.57 – 0.96 , p = 0.02 ). Moreover, compared with the current first-line chemotherapy, the OS ( OR = 0.93 , 95 % CI = 0.83 – 1.04 , p = 0.19 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.82 , 95 % CI = 0.64 – 1.06 , p = 0.13 ) results were not significantly higher with RAM. The ORRs of the patients in the RAM therapy groups were significantly higher than those in the groups without RAM ( OR = 1.40 , 95 % CI = 1.14 – 1.73 , p = 0.001 ).

Pooled Analysis Safety Profile of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Combination Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (34) ◽  
pp. 3815-3822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Sznol ◽  
Pier Francesco Ferrucci ◽  
David Hogg ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Pascal Wolter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Programmed Death 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Time To Onset

Purpose The addition of nivolumab (anti–programmed death-1 antibody) to ipilimumab (anti–cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte–associated 4 antibody) in patients with advanced melanoma improves antitumor response and progression-free survival but with a higher frequency of adverse events (AEs). This cross-melanoma study describes the safety profile of the approved nivolumab plus ipilimumab regimen. Methods This retrospective safety review on data from three trials (phase I, II, and III) included patients with advanced melanoma who received at least one dose of nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks × 4 and then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity while following established guidelines for AE management. Analyses were of all treatment-related AEs, select (immune-related) AEs, time to onset and resolution, and use of immune-modulating agents and their effects on outcome. Results Among 448 patients, median duration of follow-up was 13.2 months. Treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 55.5% of patients; 35.7% had treatment-related AEs that led to discontinuation. The most frequent treatment-related select AEs of any grade were skin (64.3%) and GI (46.7%) and of grade 3/4, hepatic (17.0%) and GI (16.3%); 30.1% developed a grade 2 to 4 select AE in more than one organ category. Median time to onset of grade 3/4 treatment-related select AEs ranged from 3.1 (skin) to 16.3 (renal) weeks, and with the exclusion of endocrine AEs, median time to resolution from onset ranged from 1.9 (renal) to 4.5 (pulmonary) weeks, with resolution rates between 79% and 100% while using immune-modulating agents. Four (< 1%) on-study deaths were attributed to therapy. Conclusion Frequency of grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs was higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and occurred earlier than historical experience with either agent alone, but resolution rates were similar.

scholarly journals A phase 3 study of nivolumab in previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (ATTRACTION-2): 2-year update data

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 510-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Tzong Chen ◽  
Taroh Satoh ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
Yee Chao ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Background Nivolumab showed improvement in overall survival (OS) in ATTRACTION-2, the first phase 3 study in patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer treated with ≥ 2 chemotherapy regimens. The 2-year follow-up results of ATTRACTION-2 are presented herein. Methods ATTRACTION-2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (49 sites; Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). The median (min–max) follow-up period was 27.3 (24.1–36.3) months. The primary endpoint was OS. A subanalysis of OS was performed based on best overall response and tumor-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression status. Results Overall, 493 of 601 screened patients were randomized (2:1) to receive nivolumab (330) or placebo (163). OS (median [95% confidence interval; CI]) was significantly longer in the nivolumab group (5.26 [4.60–6.37] vs 4.14 [3.42–4.86] months in placebo group) at the 2-year follow-up (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.62 [0.51–0.76]; P < 0.0001). A higher OS rate was observed in the nivolumab vs placebo group at 1 (27.3% vs 11.6%) and 2 years (10.6% vs 3.2%). The OS benefit was observed regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. Among patients with a complete or partial response (CR or PR) in the nivolumab group, the median OS (95% CI) was 26.6 (21.65—not applicable) months; the OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 87.1% and 61.3%, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions Nivolumab treatment resulted in clinically meaningful long-term improvements in OS in patients with previously treated G/GEJ cancer. The long-term survival benefit of nivolumab was most evident in patients with a CR or PR.

Temporal characteristics of treatment-emergent adverse events and dose modifications with tivozanib and sorafenib in the phase 3 TIVO-3 study of relapsed or refractory mRCC.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4567-4567
Author(s):  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
David F. McDermott ◽  
Bernard Escudier ◽  
Thomas E. Hutson ◽  
Camillo Porta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Temporal Characteristics ◽  
Dose Modifications ◽  
Time To Onset ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Dose Reductions ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

4567 Background: The randomized phase 3 TIVO-3 study met the primary endpoint of improved PFS with tivozanib (TIVO) vs sorafenib (SOR) in patients with relapsed/refractory mRCC with fewer dose reductions, interruptions and discontinuations despite a longer time on therapy. Greater insight into temporal characteristics of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) may enable proactive supportive care strategies and improve patient experience. Methods: Updated safety from the previously reported TIVO-3 study with a data cutoff August 15, 2019, was analyzed by treatment arm for time-to-onset (TTO, days [d]) of the most commonly reported TEAEs, and TTO of first dose reduction, interruption, and discontinuation occurring with TIVO and SOR. Duration of TEAE (median d and IQ range), and rate of dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation due to the TEAE was calculated for each arm. Results: Patients in the safety analysis randomly assigned to TIVO (n = 173) or SOR (n = 170) received 11.9 and 6.7 cycles, or 336 and 192 mean days of treatment exposure, respectively. Incidence of any Gr, Gr >3, and TTO of any Gr TEAE of special interest occurring with >20% frequency in either arm is shown in Table 1. While TIVO was associated with less Gr>3 diarrhea, rash and PPE and more HTN than SOR, there were few differences in the TTO or duration of these TEAEs. Overall, dose reductions, interruptions, and discontinuations due to TEAEs were less frequent with TIVO than SOR, and TTO of first dose reduction (85 vs 45 d), interruption (81 vs 50 d), and discontinuation (114 vs 49 d) was longer for TIVO than SOR. Among those experiencing the same TEAE in either arm, resulting dose modifications were less frequent with TIVO than SOR. Conclusions: TIVO-3 demonstrated improved PFS with TIVO compared to SOR in mRCC, with longer duration of TIVO exposure, but fewer all Gr and Gr >3 TEAEs. Temporal characteristics of TEAEs were similar, but time to dose modifications was longer with TIVO than SOR. Among those with the same TEAEs, unmodified treatment was continued more often with TIVO than SOR. Clinical trial information: NCT02627963. [Table: see text]

The impact of prior therapies on outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in the phase III TAGS trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 247-247
Author(s):  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Ben George ◽  
Julien Taieb ◽  
Raghav Sundar ◽  
Marwan Fakih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
The Impact

247 Background: It is unclear whether prior treatment with ramucirumab (RAM) or RAM plus paclitaxel (PAC), standard second-line treatments for metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC), can influence outcomes with third-line chemotherapy in this patient (pt) population (pop). In the phase 3 TAGS trial, FTD/TPI showed a survival benefit vs placebo (PBO) in pts with mGC/GEJC who had received ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Post hoc analyses were performed to assess the impact of prior RAM, PAC or RAM+PAC treatment on the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in TAGS. Methods: Pts in the TAGS trial were categorized into 5 subgroups based on prior treatment received as follows: A) RAM (alone or combined with other agents), B) no RAM, C) PAC (but no RAM), D) RAM+PAC (sequentially or in combination) and E) neither PAC nor RAM. While subgroups A and B were prespecified, all other subgroups were identified post hoc. Efficacy (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS]) and safety were assessed in these subgroups. Results: In the overall pop (N=507), 33% had received prior RAM (alone/combined); 30% prior RAM+PAC; 27% prior PAC but no RAM; and 40% had received neither PAC nor RAM. As only 3% of all pts received prior RAM but no PAC, that subgroup was not considered in this analysis. FTD/TPI treatment was consistently associated with benefits in OS and PFS vs placebo across all pt subgroups (Table). Among pts randomized to FTD/TPI, OS benefit was similar between pts who received RAM+PAC vs those who received neither (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.84–1.58) and between pts who received PAC (but no RAM) vs those who received neither (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66–1.25). The FTD/TPI safety profile was consistent across all subgroups, with similar overall incidences of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). Minor variations in hematologic toxicities were noted (Table). Conclusions: In the phase 3 TAGS trial, FTD/TPI treatment in the third or later line provided efficacy benefits vs PBO and demonstrated a consistent safety profile in pts with mGC/GEJC regardless of prior treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT02500043. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document