Randomized phase II study of olaparib with or without cediranib in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 111-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Rana R. McKay ◽  
Mary-Ellen Taplin ◽  
Nancy B. Davis ◽  
Paul Monk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Tumor Biopsy

111 Background: Cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppresses expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51 and increases sensitivity of tumors to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in vitro. Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, demonstrates clinical efficacy in men with DNA repair deficient, mCRPC. We therefore performed a randomized phase 2 trial comparing olaparib with or without cediranib in men with mCRPC. Methods: Men with a minimum of one prior line of systemic therapy for mCRPC were randomized 1:1 to receive cediranib 30mg po daily plus olaparib 200mg po BID (Arm A) or olaparib 300mg BID alone (Arm B). At radiographic progression, patients (pts) in Arm B could crossover to Arm A. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and PSA50 decline rate (PSA50). Tumor biopsy specimens were obtained for biomarker analyses pre- and on-treatment. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 90 pts enrolled are summarized below. The median rPFS was 11.1 versus 4.0 months in Arm A and Arm B, respectively (Hazard Ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.317, 0.928, p=0.026). Trends toward a higher ORR (19% and 12%), Disease Control Rate (Stable Disease + Partial Response) (77% and 64%,) and PSA50 (29% and 17%) were observed in Arm A compared to Arm B, respectively. Thirteen pts in Arm B crossed over to Arm A. One pt had a PR after crossover. Grade 3/4 adverse events (G3/4 AEs), irrespective of attribution, occurred in 77% and 58% of Arm A and Arm B pts, respectively. G3/4 AEs occurring in >10% of pts were hypertension (32%), fatigue (23%) and diarrhea (11%) in Arm A, and anemia (16%) and lymphopenia (11%) in Arm B. Conclusions: The cediranib/olaparib combination significantly improves rPFS in unselected, mCRPC pts. AEs were manageable. Analyses of mutation status in homologous recombination DNA repair genes are pending and will be key in interpreting the data. Clinical trial information: NCT02893917. [Table: see text]

Preliminary efficacy data of platinum-pretreated small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cohort of NCI 9881 study: A phase II study of cediranib in combination with olaparib in advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9065-9065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Navid Hafez ◽  
Hatem Hussein Soliman ◽  
Siqing Fu ◽  
Shumei Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

9065 Background: Cediranib, a pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppresses expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51 and increases sensitivity of tumors to poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in vitro. Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors carrying a germline BRCA mutation. We therefore tested the anti-tumor activity of cediranib and olaparib combination in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Here, we report the data from the SCLC cohort. Methods: This multi-institutional, two-stage, phase 2 study enrolled pts with metastatic SCLC previously treated with a minimum of one prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced setting. Patients were treated with cediranib 30mg po daily plus olaparib 200mg po BID until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Baseline tumor biopsies were obtained for biomarker analyses. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 25 pts enrolled are summarized below. The overall ORR rate was 28% (95% CI: 0.104,0.456). Median duration of response was 3.8 months (mos). Six of 8 pts had an objective response lasting longer than 3 mos up to 10.3 months. Disease control rate (# of pts with CR, PR or SD / # evaluable pts) was 88% (95% CI: 0.75,1.01). Median progression free survival was 4.1 mos (95% CI: 2.3, 6.2). Median OS was 5.5 mos (95% CI: 3.4, NA). Grade 3/4 adverse events (G3/4 AEs), irrespective of attribution, occurred in 14 of 25 (56%). G3/4 AEs occurring in > 10% of pts were hypertension (21%), fatigue (17%) and weight loss (13%). Conclusions: The cediranib/olaparib combination resulted in promising clinical activity with ORR of 28% in biomarker-unselected pts with platinum-pretreated SCLC. The regimen required prompt initiation of antihypertensives, but AEs were overall manageable. Analyses of mutation status in homologous recombination DNA repair genes are going and will be correlated with clinical activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02498613. [Table: see text]

TALAPRO-1: Phase II study of talazoparib (TALA) in patients (pts) with DNA damage repair alterations (DDRm) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Johann S. De Bono ◽  
Niven Mehra ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Consuelo Buttigliero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Measurable Disease

93 Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) show antitumor activity in mCRPC/DDRm pts treated with novel hormonal therapy (NHT). TALAPRO-1 is an open-label study evaluating TALA (a potent PARP inhibitor/trapper) in men with mCRPC/DDRm. We report a planned interim analysis (IA; Dec 2019). Updated results at a Sep 4 2020 cut-off, available in November 2020, will be presented at the meeting. Methods: TALAPRO-1 (NCT03148795) is enrolling pts (N ≈ 100) with measurable soft tissue disease, progressive mCRPC, and DDRm likely to sensitize to PARPi ( ATM, ATR, BRCA1/2, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C), who received 1–2 chemotherapy regimens (≥1 taxane-based) for metastatic disease and progressed on ≥1 NHT (enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate) given for mCRPC. DDRm are defined as known/likely pathogenic variants or homozygous deletions. Pts receive oral TALA 1 mg/day (moderate renal impairment 0.75 mg/day) until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or death. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints: time to objective response; response duration; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50%; circulating tumor cell (CTC) count conversion (to CTC = 0 and <5 per 7.5 mL blood); time to PSA progression; radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS); overall survival; safety. A planned efficacy/safety IA was done when 60 pts with DDRm and measurable disease completed ≥6 months of TALA/no longer followed. Radiographic responses are based on investigator assessments. Results: 113 pts received TALA (cut-off Dec 12 2019); 75 pts were evaluable for IA, with DDRm, had measurable disease, received ≥16 weeks’ treatment, and were assessed for ORR (54.7% BRCA1/2, 4.0% PALB2, 22.7% ATM; 18.7% other DDRm).All pts evaluable for IA had prior docetaxel; 45.3% cabazitaxel. Confirmed ORR, rPFS, and composite response (investigator-assessed) in pts who received TALA for ≥16 weeks are in the table. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events: anemia (42.5%); nausea (32.7%). Conclusions: TALA monotherapy has encouraging antitumor activity in docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC pts with BRCA1/2 alterations and was generally well tolerated. Funding: Pfizer Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03148795. [Table: see text]

Molecular and clinical characterization of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients achieving deep PSA responses to bipolar androgen therapy (BAT).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 127-127
Author(s):  
Mark Christopher Markowski ◽  
Sushant Kachhap ◽  
Angelo M De Marzo ◽  
Samuel R. Denmeade ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Clinical Responses

127 Background: BAT is an emerging treatment strategy for men with mCRPC, whereby testosterone concentrations are cycled from supraphysiologic to castrate levels each month. BAT has been shown to be safe, and induces clinical responses in a proportion of patients, some of which are extreme. We explored the clinical and molecular characteristics of mCRPC pts that achieved deep PSA responses on BAT. Methods: We identified N= 22/114 (19%) mCRPC pts who achieved >70% PSA reductions on treatment with BAT. All pts were treated on-protocol at Johns Hopkins using 400mg testosterone cypionate intramuscularly every 28 days, together with continuous LHRH agonist therapy. Pts remained on study until clinical or radiographic progression, as per protocol. Clinical-grade molecular sequencing was obtained using commercially available assays. Results: Next-generation somatic DNA sequencing was obtained on 15/22 (68%) pts. Of these 15 pts with sequencing data who achieved a >70% PSA response on BAT, 14/15 (93%) harbored a pathogenic mutation in TP53 and/or a homologous recombination DNA repair (HRD) gene. Among patients with measureable disease (N=15), 10 pts (67%) achieved an objective response including one pt with a complete response. The median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) of these deep PSA responders on BAT was 11.3 (95% CI, 7.9-25) months. Conclusions: We observed an enrichment of TP53 and/or HRD mutations in mCRPC pts with extreme PSA responses to BAT, with durability lasting about a year These data support the hypothesis that BAT may work best in DNA repair-deficient mCRPC pts. Further study of BAT in biomarker selected mCRPC populations (i.e. TP53/HRD mutated) is warranted. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Cabozantinib As Salvage Therapy for Patients With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Phase II International Thyroid Oncology Group Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (29) ◽  
pp. 3315-3321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria E. Cabanillas ◽  
Jonas A. de Souza ◽  
Susan Geyer ◽  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Michael E. Menefee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor

Purpose Sorafenib and lenvatinib are oral multikinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and approved for radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, there are no approved second- or third-line therapies. MET is implicated in resistance to VEGFR inhibitors. Cabozantinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET in addition to VEGFR and is approved for medullary thyroid cancer. In a phase I study of cabozantinib, five of eight patients with DTC previously treated with a VEGFR-targeted therapy had an objective response to cabozantinib. Patients and Methods Patients with RAI-refractory disease with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) measurable disease and evidence of progression on prior VEGFR-targeted therapy were enrolled in this single-arm phase II study. The cabozantinib starting dose was 60 mg/day orally but could be escalated to 80 mg if the patient did not experience a response. Patients underwent tumor assessment according to RECIST v1.1 every 8 weeks. In this study, if at least five of 25 response-evaluable patients had an objective response, cabozantinib would be considered a promising agent in this patient population. Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, and 64% of patients were men. Twenty-one patients had received only one prior VEGFR-targeted therapy (sorafenib, pazopanib, or cediranib), and four patients had received two such therapies. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, weight loss, diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and hypertension. One drug-related death was noted. Of the 25 patients, 10 (40%) had a partial response, 13 (52%) had stable disease, and two (8%) had nonevaluable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.7 months and 34.7 months, respectively. Conclusion Cabozantinib demonstrated clinically significant, durable objective response activity in patients with RAI-refractory DTC who experienced disease progression while taking prior VEGFR-targeted therapy.

Activity of tivozanib (AV-951) in patients (Pts) with different histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 327-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bhargava ◽  
B. Esteves ◽  
M. Al-Adhami ◽  
D. Nosov ◽  
O. N. Lipatov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Papillary Rcc ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Histologic Subtypes

327 Background: This phase 2 randomized discontinuation trial evaluated tivozanib, a potent and selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -3 kinase inhibitor. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in all pts was 11.8 mo, and the objective response rate (ORR) was 27%. Methods: Pts received 1.5 mg/d tivozanib (3 wk on, 1 wk off = 1 cycle). A retrospective analysis evaluated efficacy and safety by histologic subtype. Response was evaluated by independent radiology review using standard RECIST criteria. Results: 272 pts were enrolled: 70% were male; median age was 56 y (range, 26–79). 226 (83%) pts had clear cell (CC) RCC; 46 had non–clear cell (NCC) RCC, including 11 with papillary RCC. Of pts with CC RCC, 176 (78%) had undergone nephrectomy; of pts with NCC RCC, 23 (50%) had undergone nephrectomy. Median treatment duration was 8.5 mo (range, 0.03– 23.8) as of the data cutoff. Median PFS was 12.5 mo (range, 9.9–17.7) for pts with CC RCC, not yet reached for pts with papillary RCC, and 5.4 mo (range, 3.7–12.0) for pts with other NCC subtypes. ORR and disease control rate (DCR; ORR + stable disease), respectively, were 29% and 85% for pts with CC RCC, 18% and 100% for pts with papillary RCC, and 17% and 74% for pts with other NCC subtypes. For pts with CC RCC, median PFS, ORR, and DCR, respectively, were 14.8 mo, 32%, and 88% for those who had undergone nephrectomy and 8.9 mo, 18%, and 76% for those who had not. Among pts with NCC RCC, median PFS was 6.6 mo for pts who had undergone nephrectomy and 7.2 mo for pts without nephrectomy; ORR was 17% for both NCC subgroups, with a DCR of 78% for pts who had undergone nephrectomy and 83% for pts who had not. Common drug- related adverse events (AEs) for pts with CC and NCC RCC, respectively, included hypertension (49% and 48%), dysphonia (22% and 22%), asthenia (12% and 13%), and diarrhea (13% and 9%). The most common grade ≥3 drug-related AE was hypertension (CC, 8%; NCC, 4%). Conclusions: Disease control was observed for pts with all RCC histologic subtypes. The rate of AEs was similar among patients with CC and NCC RCC and consistent with that of a selective VEGFR inhibitor with minimal off-target toxicities. Tivozanib is currently being tested in a phase 3 trial in pts with CC RCC. [Table: see text]

Trial of rucaparib in prostate indications 3 (TRITON3): An international, multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 study of rucaparib vs physician’s choice of therapy for patients (Pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5087-TPS5087
Author(s):  
Charles J. Ryan ◽  
Simon Paul Watkins ◽  
Darrin Despain ◽  
Chris Alan Karlovich ◽  
Andrew Simmons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Dna Repair Gene ◽  
Brca1 Brca2

TPS5087 Background: Pts with mCRPC often initially receive androgen receptor-targeted therapy (eg, abiraterone or enzalutamide), but they almost always progress. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (eg, olaparib) have demonstrated clinical activity in pts with mCRPC with a deleterious mutation in a homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair gene; 14 of 16 evaluable pts with mCRPC and a tumor alteration in an HR gene, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM, responded to olaparib (Mateo et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1697-708). The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is approved in the US for treatment of pts with ovarian carcinoma that harbors a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (germline and/or somatic) who have received ≥2 chemotherapies. These data support investigating rucaparib as a treatment option in pts with mCRPC with HRD. Methods: TRITON3 (NCT02975934)is a phase 3 study evaluating rucaparib (600 mg BID) vs physician’s choice (abiraterone, enzalutamide, or docetaxel) in pts with mCRPC who have a deleterious germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM as determined by local and/or central testing. All pts must have progressed on abiraterone or enzalutamide in the mCRPC setting; pts who received prior chemotherapy for mCRPC or PARP inhibitor treatment are excluded. Pts will be randomized 2:1 to rucaparib or physician’s choice of comparator therapy; pts randomized to physician’s choice may cross over to rucaparib on radiographic progression confirmed by independent radiology review (IRR). The primary endpoint is IRR-confirmed radiographic progression-free survival (modified RECIST version 1.1/PCWG3 criteria). Secondary objectives include overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, pt-reported outcomes, and safety. Pretreatment blood samples will be collected from all pts to enable development of a plasma-based companion diagnostic to identify pts who may benefit from rucaparib treatment. Pts (≈400) will be enrolled at > 100 sites worldwide. Clinical trial information: NCT02975934.

The GAIN-C study (BP25438): Randomized phase II trial of RG7160 (GA201) plus FOLFIRI, compared to cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI alone in second-line KRAS wild type (WT) or mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3637-TPS3637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Cervantes-Ruiperez ◽  
Ben Markman ◽  
Salvatore Siena ◽  
Carles Pericay ◽  
Giuseppe Aprile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Egfr Expression ◽  
To Receive

TPS3637 Background: GA201 is a novel, dual-acting, humanized, glycoengineered IgG1 anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity in combination with signal inhibition. GA201 demonstrates significantly enhanced in vitro/vivo activity compared to cetuximab (cet) both as a single agent and in combination with irinotecan, in both KRAS mutant and BRAF mutant models and promising clinical activity in ph I and neo-adjuvant trials (Paz Ares et al, JCO 2011) including KRAS mutant mCRC. A randomized ph II program was launched: one study in NSCLC and GAIN-C in mCRC (NCT01326000), which is presented here. Methods: Main inclusion criteria are progression on 1L containing oxaliplatin, ECOG 0-1, and adequate hematological and liver function. Main exclusion criteria: prior anti-EGFR treatment. A total of 160 patients in 2L mCRC (stratified for EGFR expression, disease progression before or after 6 months after starting 1L, prior treatment with bevacizumab Y vs N) will be randomized to receive either GA201 (day 1, 8 of cycle 1 then q2W) or cet (qW) + FOLFIRI q2W (KRAS WT) or to receive GA201+ FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI alone (KRAS mutant). Collection of archival tumor plus a mandatory fresh tumor biopsy at baseline were implemented because ph I data showed that EGFR expression is not concordant between the two specimen types and to optimize assessment of potential immune related biomarkers. The fresh tumor biopsy will be centrally analyzed for EGFR (immunohistochemistry) and KRAS status. Primary objective is progression free survival; secondary endpoints are to define objective response rates, the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A comprehensive biomarker program (blood and tumor), mainly immune-phenotyping, immunohistochemistry in tumor samples (Ventana) and immune functional tests (including adaptive responses) were set up to investigate potential predictive biomarkers and the mode of action of GA201. Study is ongoing worldwide in 9 countries with the safety run-in phase completed in Nov 2011. Recruitment is planned to be completed by end of April 2012.

BEACON CRC (binimetinib [BINI], encorafenib [ENCO], and cetuximab [CTX] combined to treat BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer [mCRC]): A multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-arm phase III study of ENCO plus CTX plus or minus BINI vs irinotecan (IRI)/CTX or infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/IRI (FOLFIRI)/CTX with a safety lead-in of ENCO + BINI + CTX in patients (Pts) with BRAFV600E mCRC.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3622-TPS3622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne Huijberts ◽  
Jan H. M. Schellens ◽  
Marwan Fakih ◽  
Marc Peeters ◽  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Egfr Inhibition ◽  
Metastatic Setting

TPS3622 Background: BRAF mutations are found in ≈10% of mCRC cases. Pts with BRAFV600E mCRC have a poor prognosis, with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than pts with BRAFwt mCRC (Van Cutsem et al 2011; Modest et al 2012; Sorbye et al 2015). The benefits of combined BRAF + EGFR inhibition in mCRC have been demonstrated in vitro (Corcoran et al 2012; Prahallad et al 2012; Yang et al 2012), and preclinical evidence suggests that adding MEK signaling inhibition improves antitumor activity. Early clinical data indicate that BRAF + EGFR + MEK inhibition has greater activity than BRAF + EGFR inhibition in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC (Van Cutsem et al 2016). Our study will examine the combination of BINI (a MEK inhibitor) + ENCO (a selective BRAF kinase inhibitor) + CTX (an anti-EGFR antibody) and of ENCO + CTX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. Methods: BEACON CRC (NCT02928224) is enrolling pts with BRAFV600E mCRC whose disease has progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. A safety lead-in phase (≈30 pts) will determine the safety and tolerability of oral ENCO 300 mg QD + oral BINI 45 mg BID + intravenous CTX 400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 QW. In the phase 3 portion, ≈615 pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to triplet (ENCO + BINI + CTX), doublet (ENCO + CTX), or control (investigator’s choice of IRI/CTX or FOLFIRI/CTX) arms. Pts will be treated in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy, or death. The primary endpoint is OS (triplet vs control). Secondary endpoints include OS (doublet vs control), confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate according to RECIST version 1.1 (triplet or doublet vs control; triplet vs doublet), PFS (triplet or doublet vs control), duration of response, time to response, pharmacokinetics, and pt-reported outcomes. Safety will be summarized using standard adverse event reporting. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.

Evolve: A post PARP inhibitor clinical translational phase II trial of cediranib-olaparib in ovarian cancer—A Princess Margaret Consortium – GCIG Phase II Trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5521-5521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Lheureux ◽  
Ana Oaknin ◽  
Swati Garg ◽  
Jeffrey Bruce ◽  
Neesha C. Dhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Ps Ii

5521 Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved therapies in high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). There are few studies after PARPi progression and correlation with dynamic changes in resistance. We hypothesized that PARPi resistance could be overcome by adding an anti-angiogenic. Methods: We report the first phase 2 trial assessing the combination of olaparib and cediranib after PARPi failure in HGSOC. This investigator initiated study included three cohorts of 10 evaluable patients (pts): i) platinum sensitive post PARPi (PS), ii) platinum resistant post PARPi (PR) and iii) exploratory cohort of pts re-challenged with chemotherapy post PARPi progression (PE) (NCT02681237). The primary objective was to determine objective response rate by RECIST v1.1 and progression free survival (PFS) at 16 weeks. Secondary objectives were to evaluate safety, PFS, overall survival (OS) and mechanisms of PARPi resistance. Pts who had radiographic progression on any PARPi were eligible. Archival tumor at initial diagnosis and baseline tumor biopsy at PARPi progression were mandatory. Pts received olaparib tablets 150mg BID with cediranib 20mg QD until progression or unacceptable toxicity. CT scans were performed every 8 weeks. Whole exome and RNA sequencing were performed on paired tumors tissues. Results: Thirty-four pts were enrolled. BRCA1/2 mutations were found in 9/11 PS, 8/10 PR and 7/13 PE pts. By RECIST1.1, four partial responses were observed (2 in PR and 2 in PE cohorts) and 18 stable disease. The 16−week PFS was 54.5% (31.8−93.6) in PS, 50% (26.9−92.9) in PR and 36% (15.6−82.8) in PE, respectively. OS at 1 year was 81.8% (61.9−100) in PS, 64.8% (39.3−100) in PR and 39.1% (14.7−100) in PE. Main related adverse events were anemia, hypertension, diarrhea and fatigue, grade 3 < 10%. Molecular analyses identified different mechanisms of PARPi resistance in ~77% of evaluable pts with matched pre-post PARPi progression biopsies such as reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 and other homologous repair (HR) genes; BRCA, HR and MDR upregulation, CCNE amplification and RIG-I like receptor downregulation. Conclusions: Treatment with olaparib-cediranib after PARPi failure was feasible and met the predefined bar for efficacy in each cohort. This is the largest clinical trial prospectively evaluating PARPi failure and correlating tissue genomic mechanisms of resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT02681237.

Anlotinib in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Juxiang Xiao ◽  
Wentao Fang ◽  
Ping Lu ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Loss Of Appetite

95 Background: The treatment option for ESCC patients (pts) progressing after chemotherapy is still uncertain. Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor involved in tumor angiogenesis and growth, such as vascular endothelia growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 2/3, etc. Methods: Eligible pts were advanced ESCC who had progressed after platinum or taxane containing chemotherapy. Between January 6, 2016 and May 22, 2018, a total of 165 pts from 13 centers in China were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to anlotinib arm (n=110), and placebo arm (n=55). Pts were given anlotinib (12 mg/day) or placebo orally from day 1 to day 14 in a 21-day cycle until disease progression or had unacceptable toxic effects. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Median PFS was 3.0 months with anlotinib and 1.4 months with placebo (HR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P<0.0001). Complete response occured in 2 pts with anlotinib and 0 pt with placebo. The objective response rates were 7% in the anlotinib group and 4% in the placebo group (P=0.498), and the disease control rates (DCR) were 64% and 18%, respectively (P<0.0001). In anlotinib arm, median duration of response was 5.8 months (range, 3.1-19.7+). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 36.7% and 11.0% of the two group pts, and grade 5 TRAE were 2.8% and 0%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 TRAE (>5%) in anlotinib arm were hypertension (15.6%) and loss of appetite (5.5%). Median overall survival were similar between the groups (6.1 months vs 7.2 months; HR 1.2, 95%CI 0.8-1.8, P=0.4261). The ratio of pts received post study treatments was 41.2% (40/97) in anlotinib arm and 72.7% (40/55) in placebo arm (P=0.0002), including chemotherapy (23.7% vs 54.6%), PD-1 inhibitors (4.1% vs 11.0%), and Apatinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, (10.3% vs 20.0%), etc. Conclusions: In pretreated advanced ESCC pts, anlotinib significantly improved PFS and DCR compared with placebo, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02649361.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document