The GAIN-C study (BP25438): Randomized phase II trial of RG7160 (GA201) plus FOLFIRI, compared to cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI alone in second-line KRAS wild type (WT) or mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3637-TPS3637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Cervantes-Ruiperez ◽  
Ben Markman ◽  
Salvatore Siena ◽  
Carles Pericay ◽  
Giuseppe Aprile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Egfr Expression ◽  
To Receive

TPS3637 Background: GA201 is a novel, dual-acting, humanized, glycoengineered IgG1 anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity in combination with signal inhibition. GA201 demonstrates significantly enhanced in vitro/vivo activity compared to cetuximab (cet) both as a single agent and in combination with irinotecan, in both KRAS mutant and BRAF mutant models and promising clinical activity in ph I and neo-adjuvant trials (Paz Ares et al, JCO 2011) including KRAS mutant mCRC. A randomized ph II program was launched: one study in NSCLC and GAIN-C in mCRC (NCT01326000), which is presented here. Methods: Main inclusion criteria are progression on 1L containing oxaliplatin, ECOG 0-1, and adequate hematological and liver function. Main exclusion criteria: prior anti-EGFR treatment. A total of 160 patients in 2L mCRC (stratified for EGFR expression, disease progression before or after 6 months after starting 1L, prior treatment with bevacizumab Y vs N) will be randomized to receive either GA201 (day 1, 8 of cycle 1 then q2W) or cet (qW) + FOLFIRI q2W (KRAS WT) or to receive GA201+ FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI alone (KRAS mutant). Collection of archival tumor plus a mandatory fresh tumor biopsy at baseline were implemented because ph I data showed that EGFR expression is not concordant between the two specimen types and to optimize assessment of potential immune related biomarkers. The fresh tumor biopsy will be centrally analyzed for EGFR (immunohistochemistry) and KRAS status. Primary objective is progression free survival; secondary endpoints are to define objective response rates, the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A comprehensive biomarker program (blood and tumor), mainly immune-phenotyping, immunohistochemistry in tumor samples (Ventana) and immune functional tests (including adaptive responses) were set up to investigate potential predictive biomarkers and the mode of action of GA201. Study is ongoing worldwide in 9 countries with the safety run-in phase completed in Nov 2011. Recruitment is planned to be completed by end of April 2012.

Bexarotene and Erlotinib for Aerodigestive Tract Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (34) ◽  
pp. 8757-8764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantin H. Dragnev ◽  
W. Jeffrey Petty ◽  
Sumit Shah ◽  
Adrian Biddle ◽  
Neil B. Desai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Aerodigestive Tract ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Lung Carcinogenesis ◽  
Egfr Expression

Purpose The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cyclin D1 are overexpressed in lung carcinogenesis. The rexinoid, bexarotene, represses cyclin D1 and EGFR expression in vitro. It was hypothesized that combining bexarotene with the EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, would augment clinical activity. Patients and Methods In vitro studies and a phase I clinical trial were performed. Twenty-four patients with advanced aerodigestive tract cancers were enrolled; 79% had non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose. Clinical activity was a secondary objective. Results Combining erlotinib with bexarotene enhanced growth suppression in vitro compared with each single-agent treatment. This cooperatively repressed cyclin D1 expression. Clinically, the most frequent toxicities were mild hypertriglyceridemia and skin rash. Two serious treatment-related adverse events occurred (creatine phosphokinase elevation attributed to antilipid therapy and a case of generalized pain). Five objective responses (four partial and one minor) were observed in NSCLC patients. Responses were observed in males and smokers. EGFR sequence analyses did not reveal activating mutations in tumors from assessable responding patients. Median time to progression was 2.0 months; overall survival time was 14.1 months; and 1-year survival rate was 73.8%. Conclusion The recommended phase II doses are erlotinib 150 mg/d and bexarotene 400 mg/m2/d orally. These agents can be administered in combination at the recommended single-agent doses without added toxicity. Overall survival and clinical features of responding patients differ from prior reports of single-agent erlotinib treatment. These findings are encouraging and warrant further investigation of this regimen.

scholarly journals Safety and Clinical Activity of Pembrolizumab and Multisite Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (16) ◽  
pp. 1611-1618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason J. Luke ◽  
Jeffrey M. Lemons ◽  
Theodore G. Karrison ◽  
Sean P. Pitroda ◽  
James M. Melotek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Interferon Γ ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Biopsy Specimens

Purpose Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may stimulate innate and adaptive immunity to augment immunotherapy response. Multisite SBRT is an emerging paradigm for treating metastatic disease. Anti-PD-1–treatment outcomes may be improved with lower disease burden. In this context, we conducted a phase I study to evaluate the safety of pembrolizumab with multisite SBRT in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Patients and Methods Patients progressing on standard treatment received SBRT to two to four metastases. Not all metastases were targeted, and metastases > 65 mL were partially irradiated. SBRT dosing varied by site and ranged from 30 to 50 Gy in three to five fractions with predefined dose de-escalation if excess dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Pembrolizumab was initiated within 7 days after completion of SBRT. Pre- and post-SBRT biopsy specimens were analyzed in a subset of patients to quantify interferon-γ–induced gene expression. Results A total of 79 patients were enrolled; three patients did not receive any treatment and three patients only received SBRT. Patients included in the analysis were treated with SBRT and at least one cycle of pembrolizumab. Most (94.5%) of patients received SBRT to two metastases. Median follow-up for toxicity was 5.5 months (interquartile range, 3.3 to 8.1 months). Six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities with no radiation dose reductions. In the 68 patients with imaging follow-up, the overall objective response rate was 13.2%. Median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI, 6.5 months to undetermined) and median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 3.4 months). Expression of interferon-γ–associated genes from post–SBRT tumor biopsy specimens significantly correlated with nonirradiated tumor response. Conclusion Multisite SBRT followed by pembrolizumab was well tolerated with acceptable toxicity. Additional studies exploring the clinical benefit and predictive biomarkers of combined multisite SBRT and PD-1–directed immunotherapy are warranted.

A phase II, multicenter study of bendamustine HCl plus rituximab in relapsed indolent B-cell and mantle-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7528-7528 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Williams ◽  
P. Cohen ◽  
A. Tulpule ◽  
R. H. Van der Jagt ◽  
J. A. Herst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Mantle Cell

7528 Background: Bendamustine HCl, a novel alkylating hybrid agent, has single-agent activity in multiple hematologic and solid tumors. In vitro data have demonstrated the multifunctional mechanisms of bendamustine by which cell death occurs via both apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe. Bendamustine has shown activity in NHL cell lines that are refractory to conventional alkylator chemotherapies. The combination of bendamustine and rituximab has shown a synergistic effect on NHL cells. The efficacy and safety of bendamustine in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed NHL were evaluated. Methods: This phase II, multicenter study enrolled adult patients with relapsed, indolent, rituximab-sensitive B-cell or mantle-cell NHL. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on days 2 and 3 of a 28-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles. An additional dose of rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV was given 1 week prior to the first cycle of bendamustine and 4 weeks after the last cycle. Results: The intent-to-treat population included 67 patients (57% males; median age, 60 years) with indolent NHL (81%) or mantle-cell NHL (16%) (data not available [3%]). A total of 81% of patients had stage III/IV disease. Patients had relapsed from a median of 1 prior therapy; 37% had prior treatment with rituximab. In the 57 evaluable patients, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 87% (complete response [CR], 33%). The ORR for the 9 evaluable mantle-cell NHL patients was 89% (CR, 33%). For all patients, the median duration of response and progression-free survival had not been reached after a median follow-up of 3.7 months (range, 0–14.2 months). This therapy was well tolerated. Most commonly reported nonhematologic toxicities were grade 1/2 gastrointestinal events, with nausea being the greatest (38%). The primary grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (29%), with 1 event of sepsis. Conclusions: Bendamustine in combination with rituximab was well tolerated and produced high response rates in patients with relapsed indolent and mantle-cell NHL. These results suggest bendamustine in combination with rituximab provides a potential benefit over single-agent rituximab therapy. [Table: see text]

Vandetanib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of at least one prior cytotoxic chemotherapy: A randomized, double-blind phase III trial (ZEST)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8009-8009
Author(s):  
R. B. Natale ◽  
S. Thongprasert ◽  
F. A. Greco ◽  
M. Thomas ◽  
C. M. Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Equivalent Efficacy ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

8009 Background: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of VEGFR, EGFR and RET signaling. This phase III study compared the efficacy of vandetanib vs erlotinib in patients (pts) with advanced, previously treated NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts (stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, PS 0–2, 1–2 prior chemotherapies; all histologies permitted) were randomized 1:1 to receive vandetanib 300 mg/day or erlotinib 150 mg/day until progression/toxicity. The primary objective was to show superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) for vandetanib vs erlotinib. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), time to deterioration of symptoms (TDS; EORTC QoL Questionnaire) and safety. Results: Between Oct 06-Nov 07, 1240 pts (mean age 61 yrs; 38% female; 22% squamous) were randomized to receive vandetanib (n=623) or erlotinib (n=617). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Median duration of follow-up was 14 months, with 88% pts progressed and 67% dead. There was no difference in PFS for pts treated with vandetanib vs erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95.22% CI 0.87–1.10; P=0.721), and no difference in the secondary endpoints of OS (HR 1.01, 95.08% CI 0.89–1.16; P=0.830), ORR (both 12%) and TDS (pain: HR 0.92, P=0.289; dyspnea: HR 1.07, P=0.407; cough: HR 0.94, P=0.455). A preplanned non-inferiority analysis for PFS and OS demonstrated equivalent efficacy for vandetanib and erlotinib. The adverse events (AEs) observed for vandetanib were generally consistent with previous NSCLC studies with vandetanib 300 mg. There was a higher incidence of some AEs (any grade) with vandetanib vs erlotinib, including diarrhea (50% vs 38%) and hypertension (16% vs 2%); rash was more frequent with erlotinib (38% vs 28%). The overall incidence of CTCAE grade ≥3 AEs was also higher with vandetanib (50% vs 40%). The incidence of protocol-defined QTc prolongation in the vandetanib arm was 5%. Conclusions: The study did not meet its primary objective of demonstrating PFS prolongation with vandetanib vs erlotinib in pts with previously treated advanced NSCLC. However, vandetanib and erlotinib showed equivalent efficacy for PFS and OS in a preplanned non-inferiority analysis. [Table: see text]

IMAGE, a randomized phase Ib/II study of elisidepsin (E) as a single agent in pretreated advanced gastroesophageal (GE) cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 92-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Salazar ◽  
Jean Philippe Metges ◽  
David Alan Anthoney ◽  
Gianluca Laus ◽  
Maria Alsina Maqueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Flat Dose

92 Background: E is a new marine compound with broad in vitro/in vivo antitumor activity. Low μM concentrations lead to cell-death through membrane permeabilization. E has shown evidence of activity in pre-treated GE patients (pts) in phase I trials. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the tolerability and efficacy of E in pts with GE cancer after 1-2 prior chemotherapy (CT) lines. Initially, dose was optimized (Phase Ib) in two different schedules: a fixed flat dose (FD) of intravenous (i.v) E (8 and 10 mg), in 24h, biweekly (Arm A) and i.v E (3.0 and 3.75mg), in 3h, weekly (Arm B). After dose optimization patients were included and stratified by histology to each optimal dose (Phase II) to determine the rate of progression-free survival at week 16 ± 1 (PFS4) in an intention to treat analysis. If at least two out of 15 pts reached PFS4, recruitment would continue to a maximum of 40 pts per arm. Results: A total of 45 pts were recruited, 12 pts into Phase Ib (Arm A/B: 6/6 pts) and 33 pts into Phase II (Arm A/B: 15/18 pts). Median age was 60 years (35–81 years), 39 were males and ECOG PS was 1 in 75% of pts. Tumour sites were gastric (32% pts), esophageal (39% pts) and esophago-gastric junction (30% pts). Ninety percent of pts had metastatic disease, 31.8% of which had liver metastasis; 55% of pts had two prior lines of CT . No DLTs occurred during the first cycle in the Phase Ib. The optimal dose for Arm A was 10 mg FD, 24h, biweekly; the optimal dose for Arm B was 3.75mg FD, 3h, weekly. Two patients reached PFS4 in Phase Ib (Arm A). Only one patient reached PFS4 in Phase II (Arm A). No objective responses were observed. Therefore, protocol criteria for further recruitment were not met. The safety profile showed grade 1-2 toxicity pruritus (29.5%), nausea (15.9%), vomiting (6.8%) and fatigue (25%). Grade 3-4 toxicity consisted of asymptomatic reversible liver enzyme increases in 20.5% of patients. Conclusions: E is a very tolerable drug with a unique mechanism of action. In the current setting of non-stratified advanced GE patients, E has insufficient antitumor activity to warrant further investigation. Clinical trial information: 2010-020325-40.

Assessment of the Fanconi anemia repair pathway as a predictor of clinical activity of pembrolizumab (PEM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Villalona-Calero ◽  
John Paul Diaz ◽  
Zuanel Diaz ◽  
Wenrui Duan ◽  
Eric Douglas Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

2555 Background: Given the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient tumors, we evaluated if homologous recombination repair deficiency associates with solid tumor response to ICI. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial (NCT03274661) of PEM in metastatic solid tumor patients progressing on standard of care and for whom PEM had no FDA approved indication. We evaluated a triple stain (FANCD2foci/DAPI/Ki67) immunofluorescence functional assay of the Fanconi Anemia pathway (FATSI) in treated patients’ archived tumors as a correlative biomarker. Patients with microsatellite unstable tumors were not eligible. The primary objective was objective response rate (iORR, CR+PR) by Immune Response Criteria, with the hypothesis that patients with FATSI negative tumors will have better clinical outcome. Secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), 6 months PFS and survival. PEM was given every 3 weeks and computed tomography scans were performed every 6 weeks. We utilized a two-stage phase II trial design to detect an iORR ≥ 20% in the whole population tested vs. the null hypothesis that the true iORR ≤5%. If ≥ 2 of the first 20 evaluable patients had an objective response the trial proceeded to full accrual of 39 evaluable patients. Outcomes were evaluated according to FATSI staining. Results: 42 patients (40 evaluable) (35F,7M; median age 62[36-83]) enrolled. Median # of prior regimens was 2[1-7]. Primary Dx included ovarian/fallopian (13), endometrial (10), colorectal (3), cervix (2), pancreatic(2), vaginal (2) and 1 each of various others. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Response evaluation showed 2 CR, 5 PR, 11 SD, 22 PD and 2 NE (iORR 18%). FATSI tumor analyses results are available in 34 patients; 25 FATSI positive, 9 negative. 2 PR, 8 SD, 14 PD, 1 NE occurred among the FATSI (+) (iORR 8%) and 2 CR, 2 PR, 2 SD, 3 PD among the FATSI (-) patients (iORR 44%). mPFS and 6m-PFS were 54 days and 12% (3/25) in FATSI (+), versus 248 days and 56% (5/9) in FATSI (-) patients; p = 0.017. Conclusions: PEM has meaningful antitumor activity in non MSI-high malignancies with no current FDA approved indications. Evaluation of FATSI as a biomarker supports a biomarker selected population approach. Clinical trial information: NCT03274661.

Results of the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase 3 trial: avelumab maintenance following first-line (1L) chemotherapy (CTx) vs continuation of CTx for HER2− advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 278-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus H. Moehler ◽  
Mikhail Dvorkin ◽  
Mustafa Ozguroglu ◽  
Min-hee Ryu ◽  
Alina Simona Muntean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Post Induction

278 Background: We report the primary analysis of JAVELIN Gastric 100, which compared avelumab (anti–PD-L1) maintenance after 1L CTx vs continued CTx in patients (pts) with GC/GEJC. Methods: In this global, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT02625610), eligible pts had previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced/metastatic (LA/M) HER2− GC/GEJC. Pts without progressive disease (PD) after 12 weeks of 1L oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine induction were randomized 1:1 to avelumab 10 mg/kg Q2W switch maintenance or continued CTx, stratified by region (Asia vs non-Asia). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) post induction in all randomized or PD-L1+ (≥1% of tumor cells, 73-10 assay) pts. Results: 805 pts received induction CTx and 499 pts were randomized (avelumab, n = 249; CTx, n = 250). At data cutoff (Sep 13, 2019), minimum follow-up was 18 months. In the avelumab and CTx arms, median OS post induction/randomization was 10.4 months (95% CI 9.1-12.0) vs 10.9 months (95% CI 9.6-12.4), hazard ratio (HR) 0.91 (95% CI 0.74-1.11; p = 0.1779); 24-month OS rates were 22.1% (95% CI 16.8-28.0) vs 15.5% (95% CI 10.8-20.9), respectively. The HR for OS in PD-L1+ pts (n = 54) was 1.13 (95% CI 0.57-2.23). No OS trend was seen in Asian pts (n = 114; HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.59-1.36]) or other subgroups, except for a potential benefit with avelumab in pts with no metastatic sites at randomization (n = 60; HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.28-0.98]). Progression-free survival was similar between arms (HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.85-1.28]). In the avelumab vs CTx arms, objective response rates (post randomization only) were 13.3% (95% CI 9.3-18.1) vs 14.4% (95% CI 10.3-19.4), and 12-month rates for duration of response were 62.3% (95% CI 40.9-77.9) vs 28.4% (95% CI 13.2-45.7), respectively. Treatment-related adverse event rates (all grades/grade ≥3) were 61.3%/12.8% with avelumab and 77.3%/32.8% with CTx. Conclusions: Avelumab maintenance showed clinical activity and favorable safety vs continued CTx in pts with LA/M GE/GEJC; however, JAVELIN Gastric 100 did not meet its primary objective of demonstrating superior OS in the randomized or PD-L1+ population. Clinical trial information: NCT02625610.

Evolve: A post PARP inhibitor clinical translational phase II trial of cediranib-olaparib in ovarian cancer—A Princess Margaret Consortium – GCIG Phase II Trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5521-5521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Lheureux ◽  
Ana Oaknin ◽  
Swati Garg ◽  
Jeffrey Bruce ◽  
Neesha C. Dhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Ps Ii

5521 Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved therapies in high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). There are few studies after PARPi progression and correlation with dynamic changes in resistance. We hypothesized that PARPi resistance could be overcome by adding an anti-angiogenic. Methods: We report the first phase 2 trial assessing the combination of olaparib and cediranib after PARPi failure in HGSOC. This investigator initiated study included three cohorts of 10 evaluable patients (pts): i) platinum sensitive post PARPi (PS), ii) platinum resistant post PARPi (PR) and iii) exploratory cohort of pts re-challenged with chemotherapy post PARPi progression (PE) (NCT02681237). The primary objective was to determine objective response rate by RECIST v1.1 and progression free survival (PFS) at 16 weeks. Secondary objectives were to evaluate safety, PFS, overall survival (OS) and mechanisms of PARPi resistance. Pts who had radiographic progression on any PARPi were eligible. Archival tumor at initial diagnosis and baseline tumor biopsy at PARPi progression were mandatory. Pts received olaparib tablets 150mg BID with cediranib 20mg QD until progression or unacceptable toxicity. CT scans were performed every 8 weeks. Whole exome and RNA sequencing were performed on paired tumors tissues. Results: Thirty-four pts were enrolled. BRCA1/2 mutations were found in 9/11 PS, 8/10 PR and 7/13 PE pts. By RECIST1.1, four partial responses were observed (2 in PR and 2 in PE cohorts) and 18 stable disease. The 16−week PFS was 54.5% (31.8−93.6) in PS, 50% (26.9−92.9) in PR and 36% (15.6−82.8) in PE, respectively. OS at 1 year was 81.8% (61.9−100) in PS, 64.8% (39.3−100) in PR and 39.1% (14.7−100) in PE. Main related adverse events were anemia, hypertension, diarrhea and fatigue, grade 3 < 10%. Molecular analyses identified different mechanisms of PARPi resistance in ~77% of evaluable pts with matched pre-post PARPi progression biopsies such as reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 and other homologous repair (HR) genes; BRCA, HR and MDR upregulation, CCNE amplification and RIG-I like receptor downregulation. Conclusions: Treatment with olaparib-cediranib after PARPi failure was feasible and met the predefined bar for efficacy in each cohort. This is the largest clinical trial prospectively evaluating PARPi failure and correlating tissue genomic mechanisms of resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT02681237.

Phase I study of irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) with sunitinib for advanced gastroesophageal cancers (EGC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15569-e15569
Author(s):  
Sarbajit Mukherjee ◽  
Christos Fountzilas ◽  
Patrick McKay Boland ◽  
Kristopher Attwood ◽  
Wei Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Free Survival

e15569 Background: Sunitinib (S) is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against VEGFR, PDGRF, KIT, FLT-3, and RET. S is synergistic with chemotherapy in preclinical models. We hypothesized that S+FOLFIRI combination will have increased efficacy in advanced EGC. Methods: This was a phase I study for patients with advanced chemo naïve EGC. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability and safety of S+FOLFIRI. Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: Twenty-three patients participated in the study (Male 78%, Female 22%). Median age was 60 (Range: 37-77) years. Median follow up time was 67.5 (95% CI: 58.9, 76) months. The most frequently reported adverse events were neutropenia (78%; G3/4: 43%), nausea (74%; G3/4:13%), diarrhea (65%; G3/4: 4%), vomiting (61%, G3/4: 9%) lymphopenia (52%; G3/4: 13%) and fatigue (52%; G3/4:17%).Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were noted each at dose level (DL) 1 and 1A, one at DL 1B and 3 at DL 2 (Table 1). Maximum tolerated dose was determined at DL 1B. At the time of data reporting 21 patients had died. Two patients came off the study per investigator request. All patients were evaluated for efficacy. The median OS and PFS were 12.4 (95% CI: 8.9, 16.5) months and 6.2 (95% CI: 3.4, 13.5) months, respectively. Conclusions: S+FOLFIRI was reasonably tolerated, with a manageable safety profile and signs of clinical activity in patients with advanced EGC. This study was supported by a research grant from Pfizer, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT00524186. [Table: see text]

Preliminary efficacy data of platinum-pretreated small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cohort of NCI 9881 study: A phase II study of cediranib in combination with olaparib in advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9065-9065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Navid Hafez ◽  
Hatem Hussein Soliman ◽  
Siqing Fu ◽  
Shumei Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

9065 Background: Cediranib, a pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, suppresses expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51 and increases sensitivity of tumors to poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in vitro. Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors carrying a germline BRCA mutation. We therefore tested the anti-tumor activity of cediranib and olaparib combination in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Here, we report the data from the SCLC cohort. Methods: This multi-institutional, two-stage, phase 2 study enrolled pts with metastatic SCLC previously treated with a minimum of one prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced setting. Patients were treated with cediranib 30mg po daily plus olaparib 200mg po BID until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Baseline tumor biopsies were obtained for biomarker analyses. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 25 pts enrolled are summarized below. The overall ORR rate was 28% (95% CI: 0.104,0.456). Median duration of response was 3.8 months (mos). Six of 8 pts had an objective response lasting longer than 3 mos up to 10.3 months. Disease control rate (# of pts with CR, PR or SD / # evaluable pts) was 88% (95% CI: 0.75,1.01). Median progression free survival was 4.1 mos (95% CI: 2.3, 6.2). Median OS was 5.5 mos (95% CI: 3.4, NA). Grade 3/4 adverse events (G3/4 AEs), irrespective of attribution, occurred in 14 of 25 (56%). G3/4 AEs occurring in > 10% of pts were hypertension (21%), fatigue (17%) and weight loss (13%). Conclusions: The cediranib/olaparib combination resulted in promising clinical activity with ORR of 28% in biomarker-unselected pts with platinum-pretreated SCLC. The regimen required prompt initiation of antihypertensives, but AEs were overall manageable. Analyses of mutation status in homologous recombination DNA repair genes are going and will be correlated with clinical activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02498613. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document