Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination among cancer patients: Results from an Internet-based survey.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2621-2621
Author(s):  
Brian Loew ◽  
Richard Tsai ◽  
John Hervey ◽  
Kathleen D. Hoffman ◽  
John Novack ◽  
...  

2621 Background: The rapid development of safe and effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 may stem the global COVID-19 pandemic. However, since individuals with cancer were under-represented during clinical vaccine trials, experience with COVID-19 vaccines among cancer patients is limited. Methods: An internet-based survey was conducted January 15 - February 10, 2021 among members of the Inspire online health community. The 63-item survey was emailed to members of the Inspire community who had opted-in for research. Results: Out of 19,152 respondents, 4895 (25%) self-reported a cancer diagnosis. Of these, 1337 (27%) were receiving active therapy. Cancer respondents were 66% female, 77% white, 44% college educated, with a median age range 55-65 years. 88% had solid tumors and 12% hematologic malignancies. 241 (5%) had prior COVID-19 and 148 (3%) thought they had had it but were not tested. Among cancer patients with COVID-19 approximately 30% reported ongoing late symptoms. At the time of survey, 1335 (27%) cancer patients had received a COVID-19 vaccine (Moderna 51% Pfizer-BioNTech 46%, Astra-Zeneca 3%, Other/unknown >1%). Following the first injection, 63% had local adverse events (AEs): injection site pain (51%), swelling (8%), redness (6%), and itching (4%). 34% reported systemic AEs including myalgia (32%), fatigue (18%), headache (12%), joint pain (5%), and chills (5%). 199 (15%) had received the second (booster) vaccination. 76% reported local AEs including pain (69%), swelling (14%), itching (8%), and redness (7%). 67% reported systemic AEs including fatigue (49%), myalgia (30%), headache (29%), chills (23%), fever (16%), joint pain (15%), and nausea (12%). AEs were comparable to the clinical trial results obtained from the general population (fda.gov/media/144245/download & 144434/download). Conclusions: In this internet-based survey drawn from the Inspire online health community 1335 cancer patients reported receiving COVID-19 vaccinations. By self-report the vaccines were well tolerated with AEs patterns mimicking clinical trial results conducted in the general population. These safety results should be reassuring to cancer patients although attention to COVID-19 vaccine efficacy is required (and will be studied during follow-up surveys).[Table: see text]

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2575-2575 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Gurney ◽  
M. T. Hueman ◽  
M. M. Woll ◽  
G. B. Ryan ◽  
C. E. Storrer ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zandra Engelbak Nielsen ◽  
Stefan Eriksson ◽  
Laurine Bente Schram Harsløf ◽  
Suzanne Petri ◽  
Gert Helgesson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Research and cancer care are closely intertwined; however, it is not clear whether physicians and nurses believe that clinical trials offer the best treatment for patients and, if so, whether this belief is justified. The aim of this study was therefore: (i) to explore how physicians and nurses perceive the benefits of clinical trial participation compared with standard care and (ii) whether it is justified to claim that clinical trial participation improves outcomes for cancer patients. Methods A mixed methods approach was used employing semi-structured interviews with 57 physicians and nurses in oncology and haematology and a literature review of the evidence for trial superiority, i.e. the idea that receiving treatment in a clinical trial leads to a better outcome compared with standard care. Inductive thematic analysis was used to examine the interview data. A literature review comprising nine articles was conducted according to a conceptual framework developed by Peppercorn et al. and evaluated recent evidence on trial superiority. Results Our findings show that many physicians and nurses make claims supporting trial superiority, however very little evidence is available in the literature comparing outcomes for trial participants and non-participants that supports their assertions. Conclusions Despite the recent rapid development and use of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, we find no support for trial participation to provide better outcomes for cancer patients than standard care. Hence, our present results are in line with previous results from Peppercorn et al. A weaker version of the superiority claim is that even if a trial does not bring about a direct positive effect, it brings about indirect positive effects. However, as the value of such indirect effects is dependent on the individual’s specific circumstances and preferences, their existence cannot establish the general claim that treatment in trials is superior. Belief in trial superiority is therefore unfounded. Hence, if such beliefs are communicated to patients in a trial recruitment context, it would provide misleading information. Instead emphasis should be on patients volunteering to give an altruistic contribution to the furthering of knowledge and to the potential benefit of future patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1604-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura B. Dunn ◽  
Jim Wiley ◽  
Sarah Garrett ◽  
Fay Hlubocky ◽  
Christopher Daugherty ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-115
Author(s):  
Carlos J Roldan ◽  
Saba Javed ◽  
Juan Cata

The sacroiliac (SI) joint can be directly jeopardized by malignancy and indirectly by ergonomic changes of pelvic obliquity that introduces uneven weight distribution. Cancer treatment can exacerbate preexisting arthritis and cause diffuse arthropathies, but these are unlikely to be isolated to the SI joint. The cancer population is exposed to unique stressors that might facilitate development of SI joint pain that includes cancer itself and therapy-related complications. Like the general population, cancer patients are subject to aging and BMI and musculoskeletal structural changes that affect symmetric body functioning and posturing. No frank association between sacroiliitis and cancer has been identified. Therefore, we believe there is a need to characterize any relationship between cancer and SI joint dysfunction and pain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. S250
Author(s):  
C. Bourgier ◽  
S. Rivera ◽  
M.C. Vozenin ◽  
P. Boisselier ◽  
D. Azria ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. S51-S52
Author(s):  
S. Loeb ◽  
S. Ray ◽  
C. Salter ◽  
D. Wittmann ◽  
C. Nelson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document