A phase (Ph) 1b/2 study of ribociclib (R) in combination with docetaxel (D) plus prednisone (P) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5043-5043
Author(s):  
Ivan de Kouchkovsky ◽  
Arpit Rao ◽  
Benedito A. Carneiro ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Catriona Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Increased Risk

5043 Background: The survival benefit of D in mCRPC is modest. CDK4/6 inhibitors such as R have shown synergistic activity with taxanes in pre-clinical cancer models. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of R + D + P in mCRPC patients (pts). Methods: This was a Ph 1b/2 multicenter, open-label single arm trial of mCRPC pts with progression (PD) on ≥ 1 prior androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) who had not previously received D for mCRPC (NCT02494921). Pts were treated with escalating doses of R in combination with D + P for 6-9 cycles, followed by single agent maintenance R until radiographic or clinical PD. The Ph 2 primary endpoint was 6-month (mo) radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) rate by PCWG2 criteria, with a target rate of 55% and null hypothesis of 35%. Ph 2 pts underwent baseline circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration and genome sequencing (Epic Sciences). Cox proportional hazard model and log-rank test were used to test for associations between rPFS and CTC burden and copy number (CN) variants, respectively. Results: 43 pts were enrolled from 11/2015 to 6/2019. Median age was 68 (range 55-84). 20.9% of pts had visceral metastases. 33 (77%) had PD on prior abiraterone, 27 (63%) on enzalutamide, and 17 (40%) on both. In Ph 1b, 19 pts were enrolled. In the first cohort (D 75 mg/m2 day [d] 1, R 200 mg/d d2-14 of every 21d cycle), 2 pts experienced DLTs (febrile neutropenia [FN] and grade 4 neutropenia). With an alternative dosing schema of D 60 mg/m2 on d1, and R daily on d1-4 and 8-15 of cycle, with daily G-CSF support on d5-7, the MTD was not reached and D 60 mg/m2 + R 400 mg/d was chosen as the recommended Ph 2 dose (RP2D). In total, 30 pts were treated at RP2D; median number of D cycles was 8.5 and 60% went on to receive maintenance R. The Ph 2 primary endpoint was met with a 6-mo rPFS rate of 65% (95% CI 50-85%). Median rPFS was 8.0 mos (95% CI 4.1-10.0). PSA response rate (RR) defined as ≥50% reduction was 27.6% (95% CI 12.7-47.2%) and objective RR was 30.8% (95% CI 9.1-61.4%). Among pts treated at RP2D, the most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (n= 11, 36.7%), lymphocytopenia (n=3, 10%); no cases of FN were observed. Baseline CTC burden was associated with an increased risk of radiographic PD or death (HR 1.038, 95% CI 1.001-1.074, p = 0.038). Pts harboring CTCs without MYC (4/11 pts) or CDK6 CN gain (7/11 pts) had prolonged rPFS compared to those with gene amplification (median rPFS 10.76 vs 4.11 mos, p = 0.03, and 7.01 vs 1.92 mos, p = 0.053, respectively). Conclusions: The combination of R + D was well tolerated and showed promising activity in mCRPC pts who had progressed on an ARSi. The Ph 2 study met its primary endpoint, with an encouraging 6-mo rPFS rate of 65%. Lack of MYC or CDK6 amplification on CTC sequencing was associated with longer rPFS. Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, PCF YIA. Managed by the PCCTC. Clinical trial information: NCT02494921.

Nonpegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (NPLED) and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: Final results of a phase II study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15544-e15544
Author(s):  
Daniela Sambataro ◽  
Melania Caruso ◽  
Concetta Di Blasi ◽  
Giuseppe Lavenia ◽  
Salvatore Asero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resistant Refractory ◽  
Platinum Resistant

e15544 Background: Platinum resistant-refractory ovarian cancer (PRROC) patients have a poor outcome; single-agent therapy is still the gold standard, with overall response rate lesser than 20% and progression-free-survival is not higher than 4 months. Methods: We tested safety and activity of a two-drugs-regimen containing NPLED and cyclophosphamide in a phase II open label study. From October 2007 to October 2011 thirty-two patients with platinum-resistant/refractory disease were enrolled. Enrolled patients were pretreated with a median number of 2 lines of chemotherapy, ranging from 1 to 5. NPLED and cyclophosphamide were administered at the dose of 60 mg. and 600 mg p.s.m. respectively. Results: Patients received a median number of three cycles of chemotherapy. A total of 145 cycles were administered: as G3 toxicities we registered emesis (6%), diaorrhea (3%), asthenia, and alopecia. No grade 4 adverse events occurred. Among the 30 patients evaluable for response we observed 5 (17%) partial responses and 10 (33%) stable diseases. The median progression-free-survival was 13 weeks and the median survival was 46 weeks. Conclusions: These results are similar to other data reported in literature. In conclusion we may affirm that the association of NPLED and cyclophosphamide is active and safe when administered in PRROC, but it don’t modify the prognosis of this subset of patients.

A phase II trial of trabectedin (T) in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, according to xeroderma pigmentosum gene (XPG) expression.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS652-TPS652
Author(s):  
Ahmad Awada ◽  
Javier Cortes ◽  
Miguel Martin ◽  
Philippe Aftimos ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Metastatic Setting

TPS652 Background: Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) is currently associated with 3-4 years overall survival in the metastatic setting and, after ≥2 relapses, therapeutic approaches are reduced. XPG expression is frequently modified in BC. T is a cytotoxic agent that forms a complex with the XPG, inducing cell apoptosis. As a single agent, T has shown anti-tumor activity in patients with poor prognosis BC, and a better response to T in BC patients with XPG RNA overexpression has been observed. Methods: This is an open-label, phase II study of T (1.3 mg/m2 in 3-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced BC, according to their primary tumor’s XPG expression. Primary endpoint: to evaluate the efficacy of T in terms of progression free survival rate at 4 months (PFS4) according to the patient’s XPG expression. Secondary endpoints: Comparison of PFS, overall response rate, duration of response, overall survival and safety profile in XPG-high and XPG-low patients. Assignment: BC patients who have previously received anthracyclins and/or taxanes and who progressed after 2-5 chemotherapy lines will be assigned according to their XPG expression from paraffin embedded tumor samples to stratum A (XPG-high [>3]) or to stratum B (XPG-low [≤3]) (threshold was selected from median XPG expression values observed in a previous trial). Statistical methods: A two-stage design was chosen: at a first stage 20 patients will be enrolled in each stratum. A futility analysis (O’Brien Fleming boundary) based on the primary endpoint (PFS4) will be conducted once 40 evaluable patients have been recruited. If ≥ 7 out of 20 patients achieve PFS4, recruitment will continue to a maximum sample size of 50 evaluable patients per stratum. If ≥ 22 out of 50 patients achieve PFS4, T will be considered active in this group (alpha error: 0.025, power: 80%). To date, 35 patients (16 XPG-high and 15 XPG-low) have been enrolled from three countries and five centers. Recruitment is ongoing.

An open-label study of sunitinib (SU) plus exemestane (E) in the first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12019-e12019 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Ahlgren ◽  
M. Thirlwell ◽  
R. O’Regan ◽  
C. Mormont ◽  
L. Levesque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Setting

e12019 Background: SU, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, FLT3, CSF-1R and RET has activity in heavily pretreated pts with MBC. The aromatase inhibitor (AI), E, has proven 1st-line activity that compares favorably with tamoxifen in pts with HR+ BC in the adjuvant setting (Jones et al. 2008). Combining agents that target different signaling pathways may have additive/synergistic activity; combining the AI letrozole with the anti-VEGF agent bevacizumab prolonged progression-free survival to >14 mos as 1st-line therapy for HR+ MBC (Dickler et al. 2008). An open-label, phase I, dose-finding study of first-line SU + E was conducted in HR+ MBC pts. Methods: Eligible pts (postmenopausal; female; ≥18 yrs) had an ECOG PS ≤1, LVEF ≥50% and locally recurrent (unresectable) or MBC. Exclusion criteria included HER2+ BC (unless pt had progressed after trastuzumab) and prior treatment in the metastatic setting. Pts received SU 37.5 mg/d + E 25 mg/d on a continuous daily dosing regimen; if dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were experienced by >1/6 pts in the first 8 wks then further pts would be enrolled at SU 25 mg/d + E 25 mg/d. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were performed for each drug and the active SU metabolite SU12662. Results: As of December 2008, enrollment was completed (N=6; mean age 59 ± 11 yrs; 50% of pts had ≥3 metastatic sites). No DLTs were observed and no dose reductions were required throughout the treatment period. An overview of key data is shown below. One death occurred on study (non treatment-related Enterobacter sepsis). No treatment-related G4/5 AEs occurred. PK parameter values determined for SU and E suggested increases in the systemic exposure of both drugs when administered concurrently. Conclusions: These data indicate that SU + E was tolerable with manageable toxicities, with increases in PK parameters and a similar AE profile to that of either single agent alone. This combination should be considered in future clinical trials. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

MM-003: A phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study of pomalidomide (POM) plus low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) versus high-dose dexamethasone (HiDEX) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8510-8510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesùs F. San-Miguel ◽  
Katja C. Weisel ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Martha Lacy ◽  
Kevin W. Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Intent To Treat

8510 Background: RRMM patients (pts) who have exhausted treatment (Tx) with bortezomib (BORT) and lenalidomide (LEN) or thalidomide have a poor prognosis with short overall survival (OS). HiDEX is a well-established standard Tx in RRMM. POM has demonstrated clinical efficacy in pts refractory to LEN and BORT. MM-003 compared POM + LoDEX vs. HiDEX in RRMM pts who failed LEN and BORT and who progressed on their last Tx. Methods: Pts must have been refractory to last prior Tx (progressive disease [PD] during Tx or within 60 days) and failed LEN and BORT after ≥ 2 consecutive cycles of each (alone or in combination). Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive 28-day cycles of POM 4 mg D1–21 + DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 y) weekly or DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 y) D1–4, 9–12, and 17–20. Tx continued until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included OS, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), and safety. Analyses were based on intent to treat. Results: 455 pts were randomized to POM + LoDEX (n = 302) or HiDEX (n = 153). The median number of prior Tx was 5 (range 1-17). 72% were refractory to LEN and BORT. Median follow-up was 4 months. POM + LoDEX significantly extended median PFS (3.6 vs. 1.8 months, HR = 0.45, P < .001) and OS (not reached vs. 7.8 months, HR = 0.53, P < .001) vs. HiDEX. The OS benefit was observed despite 29% of HiDEX pts receiving POM after PD. The trial met the primary endpoint of PFS, crossed the upper boundary for OS superiority, and the Data Monitoring Committee recommended crossover from HiDEX to POM ± DEX. With updated data, the ORR was 21% for POM + LoDEX vs. 3% for HiDEX (P < .001) and 24% vs 3% for pts randomized ≥ 6 months post-enrollment (P < .001). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) for POM + LoDEX vs. HiDEX were neutropenia (42% vs. 15%), anemia (27% vs. 29%), and infection (24% vs. 23%). Discontinuation due to AEs was infrequent (7% vs. 6%). Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: POM + LoDEX significantly extended PFS and OS vs. HiDEX in pts who failed LEN and BORT. POM + LoDEX should become a standard of care in RRMM pts who have exhausted Tx with LEN and BORT. Clinical trial information: NCT01311687.

Overall survival (OS) of sorafenib (So) plus interleukin-2 (IL-2) versus So alone in patients with treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Final update of the ROSORC trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 356-356
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Procopio ◽  
Elena Verzoni ◽  
Sergio Bracarda ◽  
Sergio Ricci ◽  
Laura Ridolfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Naïve

356 Background: A randomized phase II trial evaluating So plus IL-2 versus So alone as first-line treatment of mRCC, did not show any difference in progression-free survival (PFS) (primary endpoint) between the two groups. The final overall survival analysis is here reported. Methods: In this open-label phase II study, 128 patients with mRCC were randomized to receive either oral So 400 mg bid continuous dosing plus IL-2 4.5 MIU subcutaneously administered 5 times weekly for 6 weeks every 8 weeks (Arm A), or So alone (Arm B). At relapse, most patients of the two arms underwent treatment with other targeted therapies (TTs) including sunitinib, everolimus, and axitinib. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by two-sided log-rank test. Results: According to Motzer criteria 55 % of the patients were low risk in both arms, and 41% and 39% were intermediate risk in Arm A and B respectively. After a median follow-up time of 58 months (interquartile range: 28-63 months), the median OS was 38 and 33 months in Arm A and B, respectively (p = 0.667). Five-year OS was 26.3% (95% CI: 15.9-43.5) for the combination arm and 23.1% (95% CI: 13.2-40.5) for single agent arm. The overall number of death was 85, 42 of whom in the So monotherapy group. Median PFS survival was 7.3 and 6.9 months for Arm A and B, respectively (p = 0.109). Overall, 49 (77%) and 48 (75%) patients in Arm A and B, respectively, received at least one subsequent targeted therapy (TTs). The most common adverse events (AEs) in both arms were asthenia, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension and diarrhoea. Grade 3-4 AEs were documented in 38% of patients treated with the combination regimen and in 25% of those undergoing single agent treatment. Conclusions: The OS results suggest an improved outcome in patients with mRCC treated with TTs which appears independent of the treatment initially administered. This prospective study, regarding use of sorafenib in first line of treatment, was associated with a surprising median OS. Clinical trial information: NCT00609401.

Clinical factors associated with AR-V7 detection in ARMOR3-SV, a randomized trial of galeterone (Gal) vs enzalutamide (Enz) in men with AR-V7+ metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5005-5005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary-Ellen Taplin ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Karen J. Ferrante ◽  
Kerry Horgan ◽  
Brent A. Blumenstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Psa Progression ◽  
Study Designs

5005 Background: Presence of the AR-V7 splice variant may predict resistance to Enz and abiraterone in men with mCRPC. Gal is an oral agent that disrupts AR signaling via AR degradation, CYP17 lyase inhibition, and AR antagonism. ARMOR3-SV was designed to test the hypothesis that in mCRPC patients with AR-V7+ CTCs, Gal could improve radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) versus Enz. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 study (NCT02438007), men with treatment-naïve mCRPC were screened for CTC-specific AR-V7 (Qiagen), and AR-V7+ men were randomized 1:1 to Gal or Enz. rPFS (by independent blinded central review) was the primary endpoint. Planned sample size was 148, with 120 rPFS events to achieve 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of ≤0.55. Results: 953 patients were screened globally for AR-V7 from Sept 2015 through study closure; 73 men (8%; 95% CI 6-10%) were AR-V7+, 250 (26%) AR-V7–, and 630 (66%) had no CTCs/AR present (unevaluable). AR-V7 detection was associated with higher PSA levels ( > vs < median; P < 0.01), more bone metastases ( > 20 vs 11-20 vs 6-10 vs 0-5; P < 0.01), presence of M1 disease at diagnosis (dx) (yes vs no; P = 0.04), shorter time from dx to screening ( < vs > median; P < 0.01), higher ECOG (≥1 vs 0; P = 0.02), prior antiandrogen use (yes vs no; P < 0.01) and prior docetaxel use (yes vs no; P < 0.01). Among the AR-V7+ men, 38 were randomized (19 Gal, 19 Enz), 31 screen failed, and 4 were discontinued from screening at study halt. Baseline characteristics were balanced. On the recommendation of the DSMB, the study was closed early as it was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint. At the time of the study closure, in the Gal and Enz arms respectively, median time on therapy was 2.0 vs 2.8 mo, median time to PSA progression (PCWG1) was 3.9 vs 3.8 mo, PSA50 response rates in evaluable patients were 2/16 (13%) and 8/19 (42%), and there were no new safety signals. Conclusions: In treatment-naïve mCRPC patients, AR-V7 detection is more common in men with higher disease burden and portends a poor prognosis. Novel study designs and alternative treatment approaches are urgently needed for AR-V7+ mCRPC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02438007.

Selinexor, daratumumab, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8510-8510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
Natalie Scott Callander ◽  
Sascha Tuchman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Open Label Phase

8510 Background: Selinexor is a first-in-class oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates exportin 1 (XPO1). Selinexor in combination with low dose dexamethasone (Sel-dex) was approved by the FDA, based on data from the STORM study, wherein Sel-dex induced an overall response rate (ORR) of 26.2% in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Single agent daratumumab has demonstrated an ORR of 29% in MM reftactory to proteasome inhibitors (PIs)/immunomodulatory drug (IMiDs). We evaluated the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the combination of Sel-dex and daratumumab (SDd) in pts with MM refractory to PIs/IMiDs. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b/2 dose escalation and expansion study. Pts were eligible if they had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including a PI and an IMiD, or whose MM was refractory to a PI and an IMiD. In the expansion phase, pts were required to be anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-naïve. One dose level was tested at each schedule: selinexor once-weekly (QW at 100 mg) or twice-weekly (BIW at 60 mg) with dexamethasone 40 mg. Daratumumab 16 mg/kg IV was administered per label. Primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and assess safety, tolerability and efficacy of SDd in pts with RRMM. Results: A total of 34 pts were enrolled; 3 in the 60 mg BIW and 31 in the 100 mg QW cohorts. Median age was 69 and median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 1–10). Out of 34 pts, 62% and 65% were refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide respectively. Common treatment related adverse events (all grades, grades 3/4) included: thrombocytopenia (71%, 47%), fatigue (62%, 18%), nausea (71%, 9%), anemia (62%, 32%) and neutropenia (50%, 26%). Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in the 60 mg BIW cohort: Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and Grade 2 fatigue requiring dose reduction in selinexor to 100 mg QW. In the 100 mg QW escalation cohort (n = 6), no DLTs occured. 32 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 73% (11 VGPR, 11 PR) for 30 daratumumab-naïve pts. Median progression-free survival was 12.5 months in both groups. Conclusions: Based on tolerability and efficacy, the RP2D of SDd is selinexor 100 mg, daratumumab 16 mg/kg and dexamethasone 40 mg, administered QW. In pts with PI and IMiD refractory MM, weekly SDd demonstrated promising activity with an ORR of 73% in daratumumab-naïve pts and a median PFS of 12.5 months. This supports further development of a novel non-PI, non-IMiD backbone in earlier lines of therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02343042 .

TALAPRO-1: A phase II study of talazoparib (TALA) in men with DNA damage repair mutations (DDRmut) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)—First interim analysis (IA).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 119-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann S. De Bono ◽  
Niven Mehra ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Consuelo Buttigliero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

119 Background: Phase 2 and 3 studies with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have demonstrated antitumor activity in patients (pts) with mCRPC with DDRmut who were previously treated with novel hormonal therapy (NHT). We report the first IA of a Phase 2 study of TALA, a potent inhibitor and trapper of PARP. Methods: TALAPRO-1 (NCT03148795) is enrolling pts (N ≈ 100) with measurable soft tissue disease, progressive mCRPC, and DDRmut likely to sensitize to PARPi (including ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C), who received 1–2 chemotherapy regimens (≥1 taxane-based) and progressed on ≥1 NHT (enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate). Pts receive oral TALA 1 mg/d (moderate renal impairment, 0.75 mg/d) until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR; blinded independent review). Secondary endpoints are time to OR, duration of response, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50%, circulating tumor cell (CTC) count conversion (to CTC = 0 and <5 per 7.5 mL of blood), time to PSA progression, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival, safety, pt-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. A planned IA of safety and efficacy was performed after 20 pts with BRCA1/2 mutations were on treatment for ≥8 wks. Results: 81 pts received TALA as of June 5, 2019; 43 pts enrolled by Feb 12, 2019 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (20 BRCA1/2, 2 PALB2, 14 ATM, 7 other). All had received docetaxel and 49% prior cabazitaxel. Overall ORR (95% CI) was 25.6% (13.5–41.2), ORRBRCA1/2 50.0% (27.2–72.8), ORRATM 7.1% (0.2–33.9). Overall median (95% CI) rPFS was 5.6 months (mo) (3.5–8.2), rPFSBRCA1/2 8.2 mo (5.6–NE), rPFSATM 3.5 mo (1.7–8.1). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥20%) were anemia, nausea, asthenia, decreased appetite, constipation, and platelet count decreased. Conclusions: TALA monotherapy demonstrates encouraging antitumor activity in docetaxel-pretreated mCRPC pts, especially those with BRCA1/2mut, and was generally well tolerated. This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03148795.

Pilot study of anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) antibody J591 for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and unfavorable circulating tumor cell (CTC) count.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 120-120
Author(s):  
Justin M Lebenthal ◽  
Michael Sun ◽  
Jones T. Nauseef ◽  
Muhammad Junaid Niaz ◽  
Dunya Imad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Psma Pet ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
A Prospective Study

120 Background: Elevated CTC counts are associated with a poor prognosis in men with mCRPC. PSMA targeted radionuclide therapy has been associated with decline in CTC count, but it remains unclear whether this effect results from radionuclide-induced cytotoxicity. J591 was engineered to have antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. A subset of patients was observed to have CTC count decline following imaging with 111In-J591, so a prospective study was launched to test the hypothesis that “naked” J591 leads to CTC count decline. Methods: In a Simon 2-stage dose de-escalation study, men with progressive mCRPC and unfavorable CTC count (CellSearch > 4) received a single dose of J591. Initial dose cohort 300 mg with de-escalation to 20 mg. CTC count was re-assessed 4, 8, and 12 weeks following therapy along with PSA and standard imaging. An optional PSMA PET was included prior to treatment. The primary endpoint was proportion of subjects with conversion to favorable CTC count ( < 5 CTCs/7.5 mL blood) and/or > 30% decline from baseline within 12 weeks post-treatment. Results: 10 men were enrolled, 9 of whom were evaluable (1 died of progressive mCRPC prior to post-treatment CTC count). Median age was 71.5 years (range 60-81), 78% had prior chemo, ECOG PS 1 in 45% and 2 in 55%. 7 of 9 (78%) evaluable subjects were Halabi CALGB prognostic poor risk category and 2 (22%) intermediate. 6 of 9 had pre-treatment PSMA PET/CT (three 89Zr-J591 and three 68Ga-PSMA11). Though not required, all scans showed > 1 lesion with SUVmax > liver SUV (range 9.12-70.15). 2 of 6 in the 300 mg cohort had CTC count decline; 1 of 6 converted to favorable count (9 to 0 with decrease of 35 to 12 in other). 3 were treated with 20 mg; 1 had CTC count decline of 316 to 112, but 0 converted to favorable count. Across both cohorts, 3 of 9 had a CTC count decline at any point in time, ranging from 65-100% decline. With the pre-specified 2-stage design, enrollment was halted for futility based upon the primary endpoint of 12-week CTC count. PSA values post-treatment increased in 8 (89%) patients and remained unchanged in 1 (11%) patient. Conclusions: Single-agent anti-PSMA antibody J591 may lead to decline in CTC count, though the study did not meet its primary endpoint. A combination or maintenance approach might be preferable and is worthy of exploration.

Sunitinib (SU) in combination with docetaxel (D) versus D alone for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA1010-LBA1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bergh ◽  
R. Greil ◽  
N. Voytko ◽  
A. Makhson ◽  
J. Cortes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recommended Treatment

LBA1010 Background: Taxane-based chemotherapy (CT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed HER2-negative metastatic BC (MBC). SU, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (MTKI), demonstrated antitumor activity in combination with D in a phase I/II study in pts with MBC. A randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial in pts with newly diagnosed ABC tested the hypothesis that addition of a MTKI to D improves PFS vs. D alone. Methods: Eligible pts (female; ≥18 yrs) had an ECOG PS ≤1, and newly diagnosed HER2-negative MBC or ABC. If (neo)adjuvant therapy included a taxane, relapse must have occurred ≥12 mos after CT. Pts were randomized (1:1) to treatment (tx) with D 75 mg/m2 iv on day 1 and SU 37.5 mg/day po from day 2–15 q3w (Schedule 2/1; Arm A), or to D 100 mg/m2 iv 1-hr infusion q3w (Arm B) that could be given until progression. If D was discontinued in Arm A for reasons other than progressive disease (PD), single-agent SU 37.5 mg daily was permitted until PD. Median, independently assessed, PFS (primary endpoint) was compared between tx arms using stratified and unstratified log-rank tests. Overall objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), pt-reported outcomes, and safety were secondary endpoints. Results: As of the data cutoff (February 1, 2010), the ITT population comprised 593 pts (SU+D, n=296; D, n=297). The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of prolonging PFS based on the independent radiologic assessment or in prolonging OS. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Median relative dose intensity (RDI) was 94.2% and 92.4% for SU+D, and 92.6% for D arms, respectively. Median PFS was 8.6 mos (95% CI 8.2–10.3) in the SU+D arm vs 8.3 mos (95% CI 7.7–9.6) for the D arm (HR 0.922). Median OS was 24.8 mos (95% CI 21.5–33.1) in SU+D arm vs 25.5 mos (95% CI 22.8–27.8) for D arm (HR 1.207). ORR was significantly better for SU+D (51%) vs. D (39%) (p=0.0018). Frequent all causality grade 3/4 adverse events (≥10%) were neutropenia (46%), hand–foot syndrome (17%), and fatigue (12%) in the SU+D arm and neutropenia (44%) in the D arm. Conclusions: Based on these data, SU+D is not a recommended treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed ABC. Strategies using antiangiogenic TKIs that increase RR but not OS may need to be revisited. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document