Analysis of minimal residual disease in bone marrow by NGF and in peripheral blood by mass spectrometry in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8010-8010
Author(s):  
Noemi Puig ◽  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
Teresa Contreras ◽  
M. Teresa Cedena ◽  
Laura Rosiñol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Minimal Residual

8010 Background: Analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) in the bone marrow (BM) of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is accepted by the IMWG to evaluate treatment efficacy and is a well-established prognostic factor. However, there is an unmet need to explore the clinical value of MRD in peripheral blood (PB). Methods: Newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 trial received six induction (Ind) cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 2 further cycles of consolidation (Cons) with VRD. MRD was analyzed in BM using Next Generation Flow (NGF) and in serum by Mass Spectrometry (MS) using IgG/A/M, κ, λ, free κ and free λ specific beads, both after Ind, at day 100 after ASCT, and after Cons. Sequential samples from the first 184 patients were analyzed. Results: Results of both methods were in agreement (NGF+/MS+ and NGF-/MS-) in 83% of cases post-Ind (152/184), 80% post-ASCT (139/174) and 76% post-Cons (128/169). Stratifying by the log range of MRD by NGF, discordances (NGF+/MS- and NGF-/MS+) seemed to increase at the lower MRD ranges, being 22%, 21% and 19% from ≥10−5 to <10−4 and 21%, 21%, 23% at ≥x10−6(post-Ind, ASCT and Cons, respectively). Analysis of discordances showed that they could be partly explained by the higher percentages of cases found to be positive by MS as compared by NGF at part of the time-points analyzed and at each log range of MRD. From ≥10−5 to <10−4, MRD was detected by NGF in 36%, 28%, 20% of cases post-Ind, ASCT and Cons, respectively vs MS in 37%, 29%, 21% of them; at ≥x10−6, NGF was positive in 11%, 14%, 19% of cases vs MS in 23%, 19% and 16% of them. Considering NGF as a reference, the negative predictive value (NPV) of MS per MRD range (≥10−5 to <10−4 and ≥x10−6, respectively) was: post-Ind: 83% (p<0,0001), 94% (p=0,034); post-ASCT 86% (p<0,0001), 90% (p=0,022); post-Cons 89% (p<0,0001), 85% (p=0,0469). Despite these discordances, the prognostic value of each technique in terms of undetectable MRD and progression-free survival (PFS) was consistent at all time-points (Table) and further, discordant cases (NGF+/MS- and NGF-/MS+) did not display a significantly different PFS as compared to NGF-/MS- cases. Conclusions: The results of MRD assessed by NGF in BM and by MS in PB show a significant concordance and are associated with a similar prognostic value analyzed in terms of PFS. Given its high NPV, MRD in peripheral blood by MS provides a gateway for BM aspiration/biopsy and MRD assessment by NGF.[Table: see text]

Using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for tracking of minimal residual disease in peripheral blood from patients with multiple myeloma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19525-e19525
Author(s):  
Marion Eveillard ◽  
Even Rustad ◽  
Mikhail Roshal ◽  
Yanming Zhang ◽  
Amanda Ciardiello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Active Disease

e19525 Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity after completed therapy is associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Current standard of care for MRD testing use flow cytometry and/or next generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays applied on bone marrow (BM) aspirate samples. To develop a strategy for MRD tracking in peripheral blood (PB), we were motivated to evaluate MALDI-TOF head-to-head with established bone marrow-based MRD assays. Methods: We used MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to detect M-proteins in PB. Our cohort included patients who had serum samples available at 2 timepoints including during active disease and within 60 days of MRD results as determined by flow cytometry of BM aspirates. The cohort enrolled 71 patients (26 females, 45 males) with a median age of 61 years (37-78 years). Twenty-seven patients had high-risk cytogenetics at baseline. Patients were classified at diagnosis as ISS1 (n = 38), ISS2 (n = 18) or ISS3 (n = 6). The flow cytometry based MRD assay was performed using MSKCCs 10-color, single-tube method. MALDI-TOF analysis was performed as described by Mills et al. Samples taken during active disease were used to identify the mass/charge ratio of the M-protein at baseline and in follow-up samples. MALDI-TOF results were compared to flow cytometry bone marrow-based MRD results. Results: The median time between diagnosis and the MRD timepoint was 13.4 months (3.4-91 months). MALDI-TOF in PB and flow cytometry BM-based MRD results were concordant for 44/71 (62%) patients (8+/+, 36 -/- respectively) while 27 were discordant (10 +/-, 17-/+). Fifty-four of 71 patients were in complete response (CR) (45/54 in sCR) at the time of MRD. MALDI-TOF was still positive in 13 of these 54 CR patients. In this cohort, the median PFS since MRD assessment was not reached in the 2 subgroups of double negative patients (n = 31) or in patients with a positive result in at least one technique (n = 23) with a median follow-up of 11.2 months (0-34.6 months). Conclusions: In 44/71 (62%) samples, MALDI-TOF of PB results and flow cytometry BM-based MRD results were concordant. MALDI-TOF of PB may be useful for detecting measurable residual disease and for the monitoring of MM patients during maintenance therapy with the future goal to rule out early recurrent disease.

Consolidation and Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.01045
Author(s):  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Meral Beksac ◽  
Bronno van der Holt ◽  
Sara Aquino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Consolidation Treatment ◽  
Minimal Residual

PURPOSE To address the role of consolidation treatment for newly diagnosed, transplant eligible patients with multiple myeloma in a controlled clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS The EMN02/HOVON95 trial compared consolidation treatment with two cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) or no consolidation after induction and intensification therapy, followed by continuous lenalidomide maintenance. Primary study end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Eight hundred seventy-eight eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive VRD consolidation (451 patients) or no consolidation (427 patients). At a median follow-up of 74.8 months, median PFS with adjustment for pretreatment was prolonged in patients randomly assigned to VRD consolidation (59.3 v 42.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.96; P = .016). The PFS benefit was observed across most predefined subgroups, including revised International Staging System (ISS) stage, cytogenetics, and prior treatment. Revised ISS3 stage (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.86) and ampl1q (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.04) were significant adverse prognostic factors. The median duration of maintenance was 33 months (interquartile range 13-86 months). Response ≥ complete response (CR) after consolidation versus no consolidation before start of maintenance was 34% versus 18%, respectively ( P < .001). Response ≥ CR on protocol including maintenance was 59% with consolidation and 46% without ( P < .001). Minimal residual disease analysis by flow cytometry in a subgroup of 226 patients with CR or stringent complete response or very good partial response before start of maintenance demonstrated a 74% minimal residual disease–negativity rate in VRD-treated patients. Toxicity from VRD was acceptable and manageable. CONCLUSION Consolidation treatment with VRD followed by lenalidomide maintenance improves PFS and depth of response in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma as compared to maintenance alone.

Comparison of minimal residual disease levels in bone marrow and peripheral blood in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Leukemia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 1154-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Kotrova ◽  
Antonia Volland ◽  
Britta Kehden ◽  
Heiko Trautmann ◽  
Matthias Ritgen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual

Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease in NPM1 Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) – a Single Center Experience in 27 Patients.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4672-4672
Author(s):  
Dana Dvorakova ◽  
Zdenek Racil ◽  
Ivo Palasek ◽  
Marketa Protivankova ◽  
Ivana Jeziskova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Mgb Probe ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 4672 Background Mutations within NPM1 gene occurs in about 60% of adult cytogenetic normal AML (CN-AML) and represent the single most frequent molecular aberration in this subgroups of patients. These mutations usually occur at exon 12 and induce most frequently a net insertion of four base pairs. Aims To examine the applicability and sensitivity of DNA-based real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) with mutation-specific reverse primers and common minor groove binding (MGB) probe and to evaluate whether minimal residual disease levels are of prognostic relevance in CN-AML patients with NPM1 mutations. Methods Patients were treated within different AML trials and follow-up samples of peripheral blood or bone marrow were referred to perform an RQ-PCR. Samples were analysed at diagnosis, during, and after therapy. The NPM1 mutations were A (17 pts), B (1 pt), D (2 pts) and 7 patients with individual rare types. For all cases, levels of minimal residual disease were determined by DNA-based RQ-PCR with mutation-specific reverse primer, one common forward primer and one common MGB probe. The NPM1 mutation value was normalized on the number of albumin gene copies and expressed as the number of NPM1 mutations every 106 genomic equivalents. This assay is highly specific as no wildtype NPM1 could be detected. Maximal reproducible sensitivity was 10 plasmide molecules per reaction. Results A total of 950 samples of bone marrow and/or peripheral blood from 27 patients have been analyzed. Twenty of 27 patients (74%) achieved molecular remission (MR), twenty-six of 27 patients (96%) achieved hematological remission (HR). 6 of 27 (22%) patients achieved HR without MR and one patient failed therapy. 8 of 20 patients (40%) with MR after treatment relapsed at molecular level and except one in all these patients hematological relaps occured (one patient is still in HR with bone marrow blast present, but < 5%). Considering relapsed patients, time from molecular to hematological relapse was 1 to 5 months (median: 3 months). Considering all 14 patients with HR without MR (6 pts) or with molecular relapse (8 pts), in 11 of them hematological relaps occured (79%) and molecular positivity anticipating hematological relaps with median of 3,5 month (1-7 months). 3 of these 14 patients are still in HR. Conclusions Mutations within NPM1 gene are a sensitive marker for monitoring minimal residual disease in CN-AML patients. RQ-PCR using a MGB probe is an efficient approach to long-term follow-up of residual leukemia cells and frequent quantitative monitoring is useful for reliably predicting hematological relapse. Achievement of negativity appears to predict favorable clinical outcome. This work was partially supported by research grant No. MSM0021622430 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Status of Minimal Residual Disease Determines Outcome of Autologous HSCT in Adults with High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2321-2321
Author(s):  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
Beata Stella-Holowiecka ◽  
Malgorzata Krawczyk-Kulis ◽  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
Dieter Hoelzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 2321 Poster Board II-298 The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a subject of controversies as several prospective studies failed to prove its advantage over maintenance chemotherapy. Those studies, however, did not take into account the status of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is now recognized a potent predictor for relapse among patients treated with conventional-dose chemotherapy. The goal of this analysis was to determine the impact of MRD on outcome of autoHSCT. Data on 123 autoHSCT recipients collected from 6 study groups cooperating in the European Leukemia Net were analyzed. Median age of 77 B-lineage and 46 T-lineage high-risk ALL patients was 31 (16-59) years. Ph+ ALL was recognized in 20 cases. All patients were in first complete remission (CR) lasting 6 (1.5-22) months. Peripheral blood was used as a source of stem cells in 67 patients whereas bone marrow, in 56 cases. Conditioning was based on chemotherapy alone (n=76) or total body irradiation (n=47). MRD was evaluated in bone marrow with the use of either multiparametric flow cytometry (n=79) or molecular techniques (n=44). MRD level of 0.1% bone marrow cells was used as a cut-off point for the purpose of this study. At the time of autoHSCT MRD was &0.1% in 93 patients and ≧0.1% in 30 cases. With the median follow up of 5 years, the probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 5 years for the whole group equaled 48% (+/-5). Three patients died of transplantation-related complications. The LFS rate was significantly higher for patients with the MRD level at transplantation &0.1% compared to those with MRD ≧0.1% (57% vs. 19%, p=0.0002). The difference was particularly pronounced for peripheral blood HSCT (66% vs. 20%, p=0.0006) and for T-lineage ALL (62% vs. 8%, p=0.001). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for other potential prognostic factors (age, CR duration, Ph+ ALL, immunophenotype, source of stem cells, type of conditioning), the MRD status &0.1% remained the only independent factor associated with increased LFS (HR=2.5, p=0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: MRD status is the most important predictor for LFS after autoHSCT in adults with ALL. More than half of patients with high risk disease and low MRD level at the time of transplantation may be cured. This observation may contribute to re-evaluation of the role of autoHSCT in the therapy of adult ALL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Sequencing-Based Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Underwent Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1788-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Takamatsu ◽  
Ryoichi Murata ◽  
Jianbiao Zheng ◽  
Martin Moorhead ◽  
Naoki Takezako ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in conjunction with therapeutic drugs such as bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide can dramatically improve response rates and the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, most patients with MM are considered to be incurable, and relapse owing to minimal residual disease (MRD) is the main cause of death among these patients. Here we utilized a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach for MRD assessment, which offers at least 1 to 2 logs greater sensitivity (10-6) compared to allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR (ASO-PCR) and flow cytometry, respectively (Faham et al Blood 2012). Previous studies have shown that NGS-based MRD assessment 90 days post-ASCT has prognostic value (Martinez-Lopez et al Blood 2014). In this study, we compared the prognostic value of MRD assessment in autografts and bone marrow (BM) samples from MM patients in the ASCT setting. Methods: One hundred and twenty-three Japanese patients with newly diagnosed MM who received various induction regimens prior to ASCT were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received ASCT and were followed between June 15, 2004 and April 25, 2015. All patients had achieved a partial response (PR) or better after ASCT. Analyzed samples included: (1) BM slides from 96 MM patients at diagnosis, (2) fresh/frozen BM cells from 27 MM patients at diagnosis, (3) autografts and/or (4) post-ASCT BM cells obtained at the time of best response based on serum and urine tests. IGH-based ASO-PCR was performed as described previously (Methods Mol Biol 2009). NGS-based MRD assessment was performed using the immunosequencing platform (Adaptive Biotechnologies, South San Francisco, CA) (Martinez-Lopez et al Blood 2014). Results: We compared MRD results in 51 samples assessed by ASO-PCR and NGS. We observed a high correlation between NGS and ASO-PCR results at MRD levels of 10-5 or higher (r=0.86, P<0.0001). Twenty-seven samples were positive by NGS and negative by ASO-PCR, demonstrating the higher sensitivity of NGS (10-6 or higher) vs ASO-PCR (10-4-10-5). We evaluated the association of clinical outcome with post-ASCT BM MRD assessment. Patients who were MRD negative by NGS (defined as <10-6) in post-ASCT BM cases (N=21) showed a significantly better progression free survival (PFS) compared to MRD positive patients (N=31) (P =0.005) (Fig 1A). When restricting the analysis to the 39 patients in complete response (CR), patients who were MRD negative by NGS (N=20) showed a significantly better PFS than those that were MRD positive (N=19) (P =0.042). We also evaluated the association of clinical outcome with autograft MRD assessment. 53 patients received post-ASCT therapy using novel agents such as bortezomib/lenalidomide/thalidomide, and 45 patients did not. Among the 45 patients who did not receive post ASCT treatment, patients with NGS-based MRD negativity in the autograft (N=11) had a significantly better PFS (P=0.012) and tended to have a better OS (p=0.203) than those who were MRD positive (N=34), with prognosis clearly stratified by the quantitative level of MRD (Figs 1B, 1C). MRD assessment from the 53 patients who did receive post ASCT treatment tended to show a similar pattern. Finally, we studied whether clinical outcomes would have been altered by treatment in this cohort. Patients whose autografts were negative by NGS-based MRD assessment (N=19) had 100% PFS and OS at 5 years post ASCT irrespective of whether or not they received post ASCT treatment. Conversely, post ASCT treatment had a significant effect on the outcome of patients whose autografts were MRD positive by NGS. Specifically, the NGS-based MRD positive patients who received post ASCT treatment (N=45) had a significantly better PFS (P=0.003) and tended to have a better OS than those that were untreated (N=34) (Figs 1D, 1E). Conclusions: In this study, we show the prognostic value of NGS-based MRD assessment in autografts of patients with MM. The NGS platform has improved sensitivity compared with ASO-qPCR in detecting MRD in autografts. Importantly, this retrospective study suggests that therapeutic intervention based on NGS-based MRD positivity has a significant effect on patient outcome in the post-ASCT setting. Disclosures Zheng: Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moorhead:Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Faham:Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp.: Employment, Other: Stockholder.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document