A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of KN046 in combination with chemotherapy in subjects with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9060-9060
Author(s):  
Yunpeng Yang ◽  
Wenfeng Fang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Xingya Li ◽  
Siyuan Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Doublet Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Doublet

9060 Background: Dual blockade of PD-1 and CTLA-4 has shown improved overall survival (OS) in combination with a short course of chemotherapy. KN046 is a novel bispecific antibody that blocks both PD-L1 interaction with PD-1/CD80 and CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86. We hypothesized that KN046 could be combined with a full course of chemotherapy and build more durable clinical benefit. Methods: This study enrolled systemic treatment naive, stage IV NSCLC patients (pts). Eligible pts received KN046 plus platinum doublet chemotherapy until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent or death. Efficacy evaluation was performed by investigators per RECIST 1.1. Safety and tolerability were assessed per NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Results: As of the Jan. 19, 2021, 87 pts [Cohort 1 (n = 51), Cohort 2 (n = 36)] have been enrolled with 83 pts having tumor PD-L1 expression data (PD-L1 ≥1%: 55.4%; PD-L1 < 1%: 44.6%). 33.3% pts remained on the study treatment and 66.7% pts discontinued treatment due to disease progression (27.6%), TEAE (13.8%), death (9.2%) and other reasons (16%). The median treatment duration of KN046 was 21 weeks (range: 1.6̃68.7 weeks). Treatment related TEAE (TRAE) occurred in 92% pts. 25.3% pts experienced Grade≥3 TRAE [diarrhoea (5.7%), alanine aminotransferase increased (4.6%), infusion related reaction (3.4%), rash (3.4%), aspartate aminotransferase increased, dermatitis allergic and immune-mediated pneumonitis (2.3%, respectively), anaphylactoid reaction, autoimmune hepatitis, back pain, bilirubin conjugated increased, hypertension, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, pneumonitis, rash maculo-papular, septic shock and white blood cell count decreased (1.1%, respectively). In 81 efficacy evaluable pts, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 50.6% (95% CI: 39.3%,61.9%) and disease control rate (DCR) was 87.7% (95% CI: 78.5%-93.9%). The ORR and DCR in pts with non-squamous NSCLC (n = 48) were 45.8% (95% CI: 31.4%, 60.8%) and 89.6% (95% CI: 77.3%, 96.5%). The ORR and DCR in pts with squamous NSCLC (n = 33) were 57.6% (95% CI: 39.2%, 74.5%) and 84.8% (95% CI: 68.1%, 94.9). Progression free survival (PFS) and OS events have occurred in 53% and 18% patients. Median PFS was 5.9 (95%CI: 5.3, 8.7) months. Median OS was not reached. OS rate at 12 and 15 months were both 74.9%. Similar OS curves have been observed in PD-L1 ≥1% and PD-L1 < 1% pts. In PD-L1 ≥1% patients, median PFS was 6.7 months (10.8 months for PD-L1 ≥1% squamous NSCLC pts). Conclusions: KN046 combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy is tolerated and has shown promising clinical benefit as IL treatment for stage IV NSCLC particularly in PD-L1≥1% tumors and squamous histology. Pivotal Phase III trial in advanced unresectable or metastatic squamous NSCLC is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04054531.

A phase II, multicenter, open-label study of YM155 plus docetaxel in subjects with stage III (unresectable) or stage IV melanoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8587-8587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Leta Steinberg ◽  
Agop Y. Bedikian ◽  
D. Scott Ernst ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Bruce Redman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Benefit Rate

8587 Background: Survivin is a microtubule-associated protein implicated in both preservation of cell viability and regulation of mitosis in tumor cells. It is over-expressed in melanoma, breast, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. YM155 is a first in class survivin inhibitor. Methods: The study had 2 parts: Part 1 established the dose of docetaxel that was tolerable in combination withYM155 at 5 mg/m2/day continuous infusion over 168 hours q 3 weeks. Part 2 utilized the dose of docetaxel established in Part 1 to further evaluate the tolerability and activity of the combination. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate, 1-year overall survival (OS), time from first response to progression, clinical benefit rate, time to response, and safety. Results: 64 patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with docetaxel followed by continuous infusion YM155. 7 patients were treated with 100mg/m2 of docetaxel and 57 patients were treated with 75mg/m2 of docetaxel. Median age was 59, with 44 men and 20 women treated. 6-month PFS per Independent Review Committee (IRC) was 34.8% (95% CI 21.3 – 48.6%). Overall objective response rate per IRC was 12.5%, with no complete responses (CR) and 8 patients with partial responses (PR). The Stable disease (SD) rate was 51.6%, leading to a clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD) of 64.1%. Estimated 1-year overall survival is 50.5%. 87.5% of patients experienced a Grade 3 (G3) or Grade 4 (G4) event attributable to either YM155 or docetaxel. The clinically pertinent G3 or 4 toxicities occurring in greater than 5% of patients treated included neutropenia (59.4%), febrile neutropenia (12.5%), mucositis (9.4%), fatigue (7.8%), diarrhea (6.3%), and dehydration (6.3%). There were 3 deaths on study, all attributable to disease progression. Conclusions: YM155 is a novel agent that shows modest activity when combined with docetaxel in patients with melanoma. YM155 was generally well tolerated, but the pre-determined primary endpoint for efficacy was not achieved.

scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Jun Nie ◽  
Ling Dai ◽  
Weiheng Hu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Doublet Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Doublet

Abstract Background The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253). Conclusions The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.

Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic mucosal melanoma: Interim analysis of an open-label phase II trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9511-9511
Author(s):  
Lu Si ◽  
Meiyu Fang ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Lili Mao ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mucosal Melanoma ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Full Analysis ◽  
Ecog Ps

9511 Background: Mucosal melanoma is a rare malignant melanoma in Caucasians but ranks the second most common subtype in the Asian population. It is more often diagnosed at an advanced stage and responds poorly to current PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Here we report the interim analysis results of ML41186, an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II study, aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients (pts) with advanced mucosal melanoma. Methods: Eligible pts aged 18 to 75 years with histologically confirmed unresectable locally advanced or metastatic mucosal melanoma had at least one measurable lesion per RECIST version 1.1 at baseline, with an ECOG PS 0 or 1 and adequate hematologic and organ function. ML41186 is a Simon two-stage design study, if 22 pts completed ORR evaluation and more than 3 pts respond in stage I, the study then continue to Stage II. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab were administered at a fixed dose of 1200 mg and 7.5 mg/kg Q3W respectively (on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), duration of objective response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results: By the cut-off date of 9th September 2020, 35 pts has been enrolled, among whom 22 pts in the stage I analysis set has completed two efficacy evaluation, while 28 pts (full analysis set) has completed at least one efficacy evaluation. In ITT populations (n=35), mean age was 58.9 years with 10 (28%) pts had ECOG PS of 1. LDH level elevated in 9 (25.7%) pts. More than half pts (19, 54.3%) had metastatic mucosal melanoma, of whom 3 (15.8%) pts had more than 3 metastasis sites and 4 (21.1%) pts had liver metastasis. In stage I analysis set (n=22), the best confirmed ORR was 36.4% (95% CI, 17.0%-59.3%). Median progression-free survival was 5.32 months (95% CI, 1.58-not reached), and the best confirmed DCR was 59.1% (95%CI, 36.4%-79.3%). The median confirmed DoR was not reached (95% CI, 2.76-NR). In the full analysis set (n=28), the unconfirmed ORR was 42.9% (95%CI, 24.5%-62.8%). In ITT populations (n=35), 28 pts (80%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE) and 5 pts (14.3%) experienced at least one grade 3-4 AEs. Only one patient experienced AE leading to treatment discontinuation. One patient died of autoimmune lung disease. Conclusions: The combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab showed promising benefit and was tolerable in pts with advanced mucosal melanoma. At the time of this interim analysis, the primary endpoint did not cross the futility boundary, thus the study will run into Stage II. Clinical trial information: NCT04091217.

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

PULSE: A randomized phase II open label study of panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy after progression on anti-EGFR therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS143-TPS143
Author(s):  
John H. Strickler ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab ◽  
Christine Megerdichian Parseghian ◽  
Andrea Cercek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Genomic Alterations ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

TPS143 Background: Patients with KRAS and NRAS ( RAS) wild-type mCRC benefit from the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (Abs) panitumumab and cetuximab, but nearly all patients experience resistance. Blood-based profiling of cell free DNA (cfDNA) can identify genomic alterations that drive acquired EGFR Ab resistance. After discontinuation of anti-EGFR Abs, acquired genomic alterations decay over time to undetectable levels. Some studies have suggested clinical benefit from EGFR Ab rechallenge, but there is limited evidence that EGFR Ab rechallenge improves survival compared to standard of care (SOC) therapies. We hypothesize that cfDNA profiling will identify patients appropriate for panitumumab rechallenge, and that these molecularly selected patients will have improved survival compared to current SOC therapies. Methods: This is a randomized phase II, open label study designed to compare the overall survival (OS) of panitumumab rechallenge versus SOC (investigator choice TAS-102 or regorafenib). Secondary objectives include comparisons of progression free survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and quality of life as measured by the linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) questionnaire. Eligible patients have radiographically measurable KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF codon 600 wild-type mCRC based on tumor tissue testing, and must have experienced progression or intolerance to treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, an anti-VEGF Ab, and an anti-PD-1 Ab if the tumor has mismatch repair deficiency or is MSI-H. Progression after at least 4 months treatment with an anti-EGFR Ab is required. All patients must be enrolled in the COLOMATE cfDNA screening protocol (NCT03765736) and meet molecular eligibility based on Guardant360 cfDNA profiling (absence of amplification of ERBB2, KRAS, NRAS, and MET; absence of mutations of BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, NRAS, and MET [mutant allele frequency > 0.5%]). Greater than 90 days must have elapsed between the most recent treatment with an anti-EGFR Ab and cfDNA profiling. Dosing for all study drugs is according to clinical SOC. 120 patients will be randomized 1:1 to panitumumab rechallenge or SOC. With 83 OS events, this study will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 6.5 to 10 months (HR=0.65; 1-sided α= 0.15). This study began enrollment in 6/2020. Recruitment is ongoing at 16 sites in the Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) network (ACCRU-GI-1623). Clinical trial information: NCT03992456.

A phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of proxalutamide (GT0918) in subjects with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108
Author(s):  
Tie Zhou ◽  
Dingwei Ye ◽  
Zhongquan Sun ◽  
Qinggui Meng ◽  
Dalin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Psa Progression

108 Background: GT0918 is a 2nd generation of AR antagonist and capability to down-regulate AR level. This study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, Ph II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy in patients with mCRPC, and to determine the optimal dose for Ph III study. Methods: Patients with historically confirmed mCRPC who progressed after/intolerant to/reluctant to receive Docetaxel and previously treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide were excluded. All the patients received up to 6 cycles or, unacceptable toxicity, or loss of clinical benefit as recommended by PCWG3. Primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints included time to PSA progression (TTPP), objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profiles. Results: As of June 30, 2019, 108 treated with GT0918 at three dose levels: 100 mg (n =37), 200 mg (n = 35) and 300 mg (n = 36), the median age of patients was 70.0 years (range 63-77), 88% of patients had stage IV disease at the initial diagnosis and 69.4% had Gleason score ≥ 8. The median duration of disease was 2.88 years. All received prior endocrine therapy, 35.2% received prior chemotherapy, 29.6% received Docetaxel. The median PSA at baseline was 35.285ng/ml, PSA response rate (≥50 % reduction from baseline) was 41.9%. The median time to PSA progression was not reached. There was no significant difference among three arms. Of 19 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 15.8% (all were PR) assessed by IRC with RECIST v 1.1, with 20.0% (1/5), 22.2% (2/9), 0 (0/5) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. The DCR assessed by IRC was 78.9% (CR 0+PR15.8%+SD 63.2%). Of 26 evaluable patients with target lesions at baseline, the ORR was 19.2% assessed by investigators (CR 3.8%+PR 15.4%), with 11.1% (1/9), 20.0% (2/10), 28.6% (2/7) at 100, 200, 300 dose level, respectively. Overall, AEs were experienced by most of patients (94.4 %, n=102). AEs leading to drug interruption were reported in 13 patients (12.0%), 9 (8.3%)of them were suspected to be drug related. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 6 patients (5.6%), 3(2.8%) were possibly related to GT0918. 14 patients (13.0%) experienced Grade 3 and 4 AEs. 17 patients (15.7%)experienced SAE, 5(4.6%) of them were suspected to be related to study drug. Most of AEs were mild or moderate. The common suspected AE (≥10%) were asthenia (17.6%, n=19), anemia (14.8%, n=16), AST increased (14.8%, n=16), ALT increased (13.0%, n=14), decreased appetite (13.0%, N=14), white blood cell count decreased (12.0%, n=13), proteinuria (12.0%, n=13). Conclusions: GT0918 showed a manageable safety profile. This study provided preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with mCRPC. 200mg/day is recommended dose for Ph III trial. Clinical trial information: CTR20170177.

A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of NOV-002 in combination with paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) versus paclitaxel and carboplatin alone for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA7007-LBA7007 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Fidias ◽  
T. A. Ciuleanu ◽  
O. Gladkov ◽  
G. M. Manikhas ◽  
I. N. Bondarenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Positive Results

LBA7007 Background: NOV-002 is a formulation of disodium glutathione disulfide (GSSG). GSSG is a naturally occurring substance that functions as a component of the glutathione (GSH) pathway, vital to the regulation of the intracellular redox state. A key function of the GSH/GSSG redox couple is to dynamically regulate protein functions, including cell signaling pathways, through the reversible formation of mixed disulfides between protein cysteines and GSH (S-glutathionylation). Based on positive results from a randomized, phase I/II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) with or without NOV-002, as well as positive results from 2 ex-U.S. phase II studies with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, an international phase III randomized trial was launched. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages wet IIIB and IV, inclusive of all histological subtypes) were eligible if they had a PS of 0-1 and adequate end-organ function. Patients with CNS metastases were excluded. Eligible patients were randomized to C (AUC 6), P (200 mg/m2), and NOV-002 (Group A) or C and P alone (Group B). NOV-002 was administered as two-60 mg IV boluses on day -1 of cycle 1 and as one IV bolus on day 1 of each cycle, followed by daily 60-mg subcutaneous injections. A total of 725 events were required to detect a difference in overall survival (OS) from 10.0 to 12.5 months with 85% power and a two-sided significance level of 0.05. No interim analysis was performed. Results: From 11/06 until 9/09, 903 patients were randomized, with target enrollment reached in March 2008. Patient characteristics for Groups A and B were as follows: stage IV (91.5/90.8%), PS 1 (76.6/72.6%), male (69.9/72.4%), never smoker (22.3/19.1%) median age (59.6/59.5), and histology (adenocarcinoma [40.0/36.8%] squamous [41.2/40.8%]). The median overall survival for Groups A and B was 10.2/10.8 months (p = 0.375), median progression-free survival was 5.3/5.6 months, objective response rate was 26.6/26.0% and 54/53% of patients completed at least six cycles of chemotherapy. Major toxicities for Groups A and B included grade 3/4 neutropenia (29.7/26.3%), febrile neutropenia (2.2/1.8%), grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (3.8/2.9%), and grade 3/4 neuropathy (2.9/2.4%). Adverse events resulting in death in Groups A and B were reported in 5.6 and 3.1%, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of NOV-002 to CP does not improve overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC. NOV002 does not appear to add to the overall toxicity of chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

An international, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study (MONET1) of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA7512-LBA7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Scagliotti ◽  
I. Vynnychenko ◽  
Y. Ichinose ◽  
K. Park ◽  
K. Kubota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Model ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nonsquamous Nsclc

LBA7512 Background: This study evaluated whether motesanib (a selective oral inhibitor of VEGFR 1, 2 and 3; PDGFR and Kit) plus C/P improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo + C/P in patients (pts) with nonsquamous NSCLC and in a subset of pts with adenocarcinoma. Methods: Pts had stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC and no prior systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC. The study initially enrolled all histologies but was amended to exclude pts with squamous NSCLC owing to a high rate of hemoptysis. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive up to six 3-wk cycles of C (AUC 6 mg/mL·min) and P (200 mg/m2) with either motesanib 125 mg QD (Arm A) or placebo QD (Arm B) orally continuously. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR) and association between placental growth factor (PLGF) change and OS. OS was evaluated using a stratified Cox model and 2-sided log-rank test (α=0.03 for nonsquamous pts and α=0.02 for adenocarcinoma pts). Results: 1090 pts with nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized (Arm A/B, n=541/549); 890 had adenocarcinoma (n=448/442). 61% were men; median age was 60 years (range 21–87); 83% had stage IV disease. At the time of analysis, 753 pts had died (608 pts with adenocarcinoma). Median follow-up was 10.6 mo. OS was not significantly improved in Arm A compared with Arm B (Table). In Arm A, PLGF analysis did not show an association with OS. The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs in Arms A/B was 73/59%. Grade ≥3 AEs occurring more frequently in Arm A than B included neutropenia (22/15%), diarrhea (9/1%), hypertension (7/1%) and cholecystitis (3/0%). The incidence of grade 5 AEs was 14/9% in Arms A/B. Conclusions: In pts with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, treatment with motesanib + C/P did not significantly improve OS compared with C/P alone. [Table: see text]

SELECT: Randomized phase III study of docetaxel (D) or pemetrexed (P) with or without cetuximab (C) in recurrent or progressive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based therapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7502-7502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward S. Kim ◽  
Marcus A. Neubauer ◽  
Allen Lee Cohn ◽  
Lee Steven Schwartzberg ◽  
Lawrence E. Garbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Staining Intensity ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Independent Review ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

7502 Background: SELECT investigated whether the addition of C to standard chemotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with recurrent or progressive NSCLC after failure of platinum-based therapy. Methods: SELECT was a multicenter, open label, randomized phase III trial. Per investigator choice, pts received either P (500 mg/m2) or D (75 mg/m2) on day 1 and then were randomized within each group to chemotherapy plus C (400/250 mg/m2) (initial/weekly) or chemotherapy alone. Therapy was given for up to six 3-week cycles; pts randomized to C continued weekly monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was PFS for PC vs. P as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by IRC, and safety. Preplanned subgroup analyses for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) staining intensity by immunohistochemistry and histology were performed. Results for PC vs. P only are presented. Results: Between Jan 2005 and Feb 2010, 938 total pts were randomized. Baseline demographics were comparable between PC (n=301) and P (n=304): median age 64 years; male 60%; Caucasian 88%; KPS 80-100/60-70 84%/16%; squamous/non-squamous 24%/76%. Median PFS (months) PC: 2.89 and P: 2.76 (hazard ratio [HR] =1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.87-1.21]; p=0.76). Median OS (months) PC: 6.93 and P: 7.79 (HR=1.01 [95% CI=0.86-1.20]; p=0.86). ORR PC: 6.6% and P: 4.3% (odds ratio =1.59 [95% CI=0.78-3.26]; p=0.20). Median DOR (months) PC: 4.17 and P: 6.93 (HR=1.58 [95% CI=0.74-3.36]; p=0.24). There were no statistical differences in efficacy based on histology or EGFR staining intensity. More drug-related AEs/SAEs were observed in the PC arm, with differences mainly attributable to skin toxicities, GI (diarrhea/stomatitis), and hypomagnesemia. Conclusions: The addition of C to P did not improve efficacy in this pt population. Further biomarker analyses are planned. The safety profiles for C and P were consistent with existing data and no new safety signals were observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document