Phase I or II Study of Ribociclib in Combination With Topotecan-Temozolomide or Everolimus in Children With Advanced Malignancies: Arms A and B of the AcSé-ESMART Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.01152
Author(s):  
Francisco Bautista ◽  
Xavier Paoletti ◽  
Jonathan Rubino ◽  
Caroline Brard ◽  
Keyvan Rezai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Molecular Alterations ◽  
Activity Assessment ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Blast Count ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

PURPOSE AcSé-ESMART is a proof-of-concept, phase I or II, platform trial, designed to explore targeted agents in a molecularly enriched cancer population. Arms A and B aimed to define the recommended phase II dose and activity of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib with topotecan and temozolomide (TOTEM) or everolimus, respectively, in children with recurrent or refractory malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ribociclib was administered orally once daily for 16 days after TOTEM for 5 days (arm A) or for 21 days with everolimus orally once daily continuously in a 28-day cycle (arm B). Dose escalation followed the continuous reassessment method, and activity assessment the Ensign design. Arms were enriched on the basis of molecular alterations in the cell cycle or PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were included, 14 in arm A and 18 in arm B, and 31 were treated. Fourteen patients had sarcomas (43.8%), and 13 brain tumors (40.6%). Main toxicities were leukopenia, neutropenia, and lymphopenia. The recommended phase II dose was ribociclib 260 mg/m2 once a day, temozolomide 100 mg/m2 once a day, and topotecan 0.5 mg/m2 once a day (arm A) and ribociclib 175 mg/m2 once a day and everolimus 2.5 mg/m2 once a day (arm B). Pharmacokinetic analyses confirmed the drug-drug interaction of ribociclib on everolimus exposure. Two patients (14.3%) had stable disease as best response in arm A, and seven (41.2%) in arm B, including one patient with T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia with significant blast count reduction. Alterations considered for enrichment were present in 25 patients (81%) and in eight of nine patients with stable disease; the leukemia exhibited CDKN2A/B and PTEN deficiency. CONCLUSION Ribociclib in combination with TOTEM or everolimus was well-tolerated. The observed activity signals initiated a follow-up study of the ribociclib-everolimus combination in a population enriched with molecular alterations within both pathways.

scholarly journals Phase I trial of the MET inhibitor tepotinib in Japanese patients with solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 859-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Kentaro Yamazaki ◽  
Takahiro Tsushima ◽  
Tateaki Naito ◽  
Nobuaki Matsubara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Met Inhibitor ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

Abstract Objectives Tepotinib (MSC2156119J) is an oral, potent and highly selective small molecule mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) inhibitor for which the recommended Phase II dose of 500 mg once daily has been defined, based on the first-in-man trial conducted in the USA and Europe. We carried out a multicenter Phase I trial with a classic `3 + 3' design to determine the recommended Phase II dose in Japanese patients with solid tumors (NCT01832506). Methods Patients aged ≥20 years with advanced solid tumors (refractory to standard therapy or for whom no effective standard therapy was available) received tepotinib at 215, 300 or 500 mg once daily in a 21-day cycle. Occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1 was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics were also evaluated to support the dose assessment. Results Twelve patients were treated. Tepotinib was generally well tolerated with no observed dose-limiting toxicities; treatment-related adverse events were mainly grades 1–2. The tolerability profile of tepotinib was similar to that observed in non-Japanese populations. Pharmacokinetics in Japanese and Western patients was comparable. One patient with gastric cancer and one patient with urachal cancer had stable disease of ≥12 weeks in duration. The observed safety profile and pharmacokinetics are comparable with those in patients from the USA and Europe, and the recommended Phase II dose of tepotinib in Japanese patients was confirmed as 500 mg once daily. Conclusions These results, including initial signals of antitumor activity, support further development of tepotinib in Japanese patients with cancer.

Phase I Dose Escalation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Enzastaurin, an Oral Protein Kinase C Beta Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (25) ◽  
pp. 4092-4099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Carducci ◽  
Luna Musib ◽  
Merrill S. Kies ◽  
Roberto Pili ◽  
Mylene Truong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase C ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Kinase C

Purpose This phase I study was conducted to determine the recommended dose of enzastaurin, an oral protein kinase C beta (PKCβ) inhibitor, for phase II trials. Secondary objectives were maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), toxicity, and response. Patients and Methods Patients at least 18 years of age with advanced cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 lower received enzastaurin orally once daily at a starting dose of 20 mg. Dose escalation proceeded using a modified Simon design. Results All 47 patients enrolled (mean age, 58 years) received at least one dose of enzastaurin, with a median of two cycles (range, one to 17 cycles). Prevalent malignancies were lung (n = 10) and head and neck cancers (n = 9). Although no MTD was identified up to 700 mg/d, 525 mg was chosen as the recommended dose, and 12 additional patients were accrued at that level. Three dose-limiting toxicities (QTc changes) occurred: one at the 700-mg dose (patient discontinued), and two in the expansion cohort at the 525-mg dose. Total analytes (enzastaurin and its metabolites) exposure increased with increasing doses up to 240 mg, and appeared to plateau at 525 and 700 mg. Grade 1 chromaturia, fatigue, and other GI toxicities were the most common, while no clinically significant grade 3/4 toxicities occurred. Two deaths, unrelated to enzastaurin, occurred. Twenty-one patients (45%) achieved stable disease (SD) for two to 16 cycles. Conclusion On the basis of plasma exposures and safety data, enzastaurin 525 mg once daily is the recommended phase II dose. Enzastaurin is well tolerated up to 700 mg/d. Evidence of early activity was seen with significant stable disease.

scholarly journals Phase I/Phase II Study of Blinatumomab in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (36) ◽  
pp. 4381-4389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arend von Stackelberg ◽  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Rupert Handgretinger ◽  
Tanya M. Trippett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽  
Recommended Dosage ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Minimal Residual

Purpose Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct targeting CD19 on B-cell lymphoblasts. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, recommended dosage, and potential for efficacy of blinatumomab in children with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Methods This open-label study enrolled children < 18 years old with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL in a phase I dosage-escalation part and a phase II part, using 6-week treatment cycles. Primary end points were maximum-tolerated dosage (phase I) and complete remission rate within the first two cycles (phase II). Results We treated 49 patients in phase I and 44 patients in phase II. Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1 (phase I). Three experienced grade 4 cytokine-release syndrome (one attributed to grade 5 cardiac failure); one had fatal respiratory failure. The maximum-tolerated dosage was 15 µg/m2/d. Blinatumomab pharmacokinetics was linear across dosage levels and consistent among age groups. On the basis of the phase I data, the recommended blinatumomab dosage for children with relapsed/refractory ALL was 5 µg/m2/d for the first 7 days, followed by 15 µg/m2/d thereafter. Among the 70 patients who received the recommended dosage, 27 (39%; 95% CI, 27% to 51%) achieved complete remission within the first two cycles, 14 (52%) of whom achieved complete minimal residual disease response. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse events were anemia (36%), thrombocytopenia (21%), and hypokalemia (17%). Three patients (4%) and one patient (1%) had cytokine-release syndrome of grade 3 and 4, respectively. Two patients (3%) interrupted treatment after grade 2 seizures. Conclusion This trial, which to the best of our knowledge was the first such trial in pediatrics, demonstrated antileukemic activity of single-agent blinatumomab with complete minimal residual disease response in children with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL. Blinatumomab may represent an important new treatment option in this setting, requiring further investigation in curative indications.

Preliminary analysis of a U.S. phase II study of the safety and tolerability of proxalutamide (GT0918) in subjects with mCRPC who had progressed on either abiraterone (Abi) or enzalutamide (Enza).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Vogelzang ◽  
Richard Levin ◽  
Arash Rezazadeh ◽  
Chandler H. Park ◽  
Britt Haley Bolemon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Early Discontinuation ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Experimental Therapies ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Good Treatment Option ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

99 Background: GT0918, an androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, is a new chemical entity with reduced drug accumulation in the CNS. In a phase I dose escalation trial (NCT02826772), GT0918 was well tolerated with some durable responses in mCRPC patients (pts) who had progressed on ≥2 lines of standard and experimental therapies. This Phase 2 was designed to study the safety and efficacy of GT0918 400 mg vs. 500 mg oral daily in mCRPC pts who had progressed on either Abi or Enza with or without prior docetaxel. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed mCRPC who had progressed on either Abi or Enza with or without prior docetaxel were eligible and randomized to 400 mg or 500 mg of GT0918 administered once daily orally. Pts continued treatment with GT0918 at their assigned dose until disease progression, intolerable toxicities or withdrawal of consent. PSA and labs were checked monthly. Imaging scans (CT/MRI and bone scan), circulating tumor cells and cf-DNA/RNA were performed every 3 months. Results: 61 pts were enrolled at 9 US sites and randomized 1:1 to 400 mg (n = 31) or 500 mg (n = 30) daily dose. All pts had progressed on either Abi (n = 34) or Enza (n = 27). Most of the reported AEs related to GT0918 were grade 1 or 2 as per CTCAE v4.03, but 22 AEs (5.3%) were reported as grade ≥ 3, such as fatigue, increase ALT/AST, rhabdomyolysis, or muscle weakness. Some AEs were due to drug-drug interaction with lipid-lowering medications leading to early discontinuation (26.2%). As of 5 October 2020, twelve pts finished 6 cycles. Among them, three finished 12 cycles and remained on the treatment. Treatment duration showed more pts in the 400 mg cohort with stable disease (SD) on imaging (9/31 finished 6 cycles) compared to the 500 mg cohort (3/30 finished 6 cycles). Further, all three pts who finished 12 cycles had progressed on Abi indicating that GT0918 might be a good treatment option for pts who had progressed on Abi. Conclusions: Proxalutamide (GT0918) administrated orally once a day is well tolerated and resulted in SD in pts who had progressed on either Abi or Enza. The 400 mg/day will be considered as the recommended phase II dose for further clinical trials. GT0918 is warranted for pts failed either Abi or Enza. Clinical trial information: NCT03899467.

Low-dose metronomic topotecan and pazopanib in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: A C17 Canadian phase I trial (TOPAZ).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10020-10020
Author(s):  
Arif Manji ◽  
Daniel A. Morgenstern ◽  
Yvan Samson ◽  
Rebecca Deyell ◽  
Donna Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Relapsed Disease

10020 Background: Low-dose metronomic topotecan (mTP) represents a novel approach to chemotherapy delivery which, in preclinical models, may work synergistically with pazopanib (PZ) in targeting angiogenesis. This study was designed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mTP/PZ in pediatric patients with solid tumors, while describing the safety and toxicity of this regimen. Methods: A phase I dose-escalation, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of mTP/PZ was conducted at ten sites across Canada, enrolling pediatric patients aged 2-21 years with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. Patients were treated with oral mTP and PZ suspension daily without interruption in 28-day cycles, with dose escalation in accordance with the rolling-six design. Five dose levels (0.12/125, 0.16/125, 0.22/125, 0.22/160, and 0.3/160 mg/m2/day of mTP/PZ) were evaluated. PK studies were performed on day 1 and at steady state, and PD studies included circulating angiogenic factors VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGF, endoglin and placental growth factor. Results: Thirty patients (pts) were enrolled, of whom 26 were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), with median age 12 years (3-20). The most common diagnoses included osteosarcoma (8), neuroblastoma (NB, 7), Ewing sarcoma/PNET (4), and rhabdomyosarcoma (4). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) related to protocol therapy were neutropenia (18%), thrombocytopenia (11%), lymphocytopenia (11%), AST elevation (11%), and lipase elevation (11%). Only 2 cycle-1 DLTs were observed on study, both at the 0.3/160 mg/m2 mTP/PZ dose level (2/5 pts) comprising persistent grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 ALT elevation. No AEs experienced beyond cycle-1 required treatment discontinuation. Best response was stable disease in 10/25 pts (40%) for a median duration of 6.4 months (1.7-45.1). One patient with refractory NB achieved stable disease for 45 months and continued on mTP/PZ via compassionate access after study closure. PK and PD results are pending at this time. Conclusions: The combination of oral mTP and PZ is safe and tolerable in pediatric patients with solid tumors, with a RP2D of mTP 0.22 mg/m2/day and PZ suspension 160 mg/m2/day. Ten patients achieved stable disease for a median of 6 months. The lack of objective responses suggests that this combination is likely of limited benefit for relapsed disease, but may play a role as maintenance therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02303028.

The Combination of Quizartinib with Azacitidine or Low Dose Cytarabine Is Highly Active in Patients (Pts) with FLT3-ITD Mutated Myeloid Leukemias: Interim Report of a Phase I/II Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 388-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Low Dose Cytarabine

Abstract Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with early relapse and poor survival. Quizartinib potently and selectively inhibits FLT3 kinase activity. In a phase I and II studies the composite response rate (CRR) was approximately 50% among patients with FLT3-ITD. There is in-vitro synergy between quizartinib and 5-AZA or LDAC. We hypothesize that adding quizartinib to a hypomethylating agent such as 5-azacitidine (AZA) or cytarabine may improve the response rate expected from the use of either agent alone. Objectives: The primary objective of phase I part is to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of quizartinib (AC220) with either AZA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC); for phase II is to determine the clinical activity of both combinations. This planned interim analysis reports on the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and first futility analysis. Methods: For phase I, patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or AML were eligible irrespective of FLT3 mutation and salvage status. For phase II, presence of FLT3-ITD is a requisite. Phase II enrollment is limited to patients >60 years with untreated MDS/CMML/AML, or any age receiving first salvage treatment. Additional eligibilities include performance status ECOG ≤2, adequate organ function, normal electrolytes (potassium, calcium and magnesium). Important exclusions include QTcF> 450 mSec, concomitant drugs that prolong QT/QTc interval or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers with the exception of antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals that are used as standard of care. Treatment cycle is defined as 28 days. Treatment comprises of AZA 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SQ) or intravenously (IV) for 7 days of every cycle (Days 1-7), or cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily for 10 days of every cycle (Days 1-10) along with quizartinib at two planned dose levels: 60 mg (dose level 1) or 90 mg orally daily (dose level 2) uninterrupted. Patients are assigned to AZA or LDAC arm by physician choice or slot availability. Planned accrual for each arm in phase 2 is 26 pts each and an ORR of ≥50% will be considered favorable. Accrual of 26 pts will give a 95% credible interval for overall response rate of (0.32, 0.68). The study will be stopped for toxicity (>30%) and/or futility (ORR <50%) at interim analysis for each arm. Results: Twenty-six (Phase I=12, phase II=14) pts have been enrolled: 18 to AZA arm and 8 to LDAC arm. Median age is 62 years (range, 25-79 years), 7 (27%) are female. Cytogenetics are diploid=14, +8=2, -7=2, miscellaneous=6, 11q and t(8;21)= 1 each. Median number of prior therapies is 2 (range, 0-7), 7 patients received prior FLT3 inhibitor. For both schedules quizartinib 60 mg daily was identified as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on emerging results from separate dose-finding study. Eighteen [5 in LDAC arm (63%) and 13 (72%) in AZA arm; all with FLT3-ITD mutation without D835 mutation] of 26 total pts (69%) have responded (CR=1/ CRp=3/ CRi=2/ MLFS=10/PR=1/HI=1). Among patients with FLT3-ITD (N=22), ORR is 82%. Four of 7 (57%) patients with prior FLT3 inhibitor exposure responded. Median number of days to respond is 57 days (range, 25-102 days). Among responders two patients died (MLFS=1, PR=1): one with gastro-intestinal bleeding and other with progressive pneumonia. Three additional responders have discontinued therapy for stem cell transplant (1), withdrawal of consent (1), and loss of response with emergence of D835 mutation (1). Nine responders (CR=1, CRi=1, CRp=1, PR=1, MLS=5) had >50% reduction of FLT3-ITD allelic burden and 2 additional pts (CR=1, CRi=1) had no detectable FLT3-ITD at response. Number of pts with treatment emergent grade 3/4 toxicities irrespective of attribution include hypokalemia (15), hypophosphatemia (5), hyponatremia (4), hypocalcemia (4), hyperbilirubinemia (3), increase in ALT (1), hypernatremia (1hyperglycemia (1), hypotension (1), QTcF prolongation (1, grade 3). Conclusion: Combination of quizartinib and AZA or LDAC is highly active among patients with AML/MDS/CMML with FLT3-ITD . Response rates appear higher than expected with either agent alone. Clinically significant QTcF prolongation is infrequent. Accrual to both arms of the current trial continues. Disclosures Cortes: Ambit Biosciences: Research Funding.

A Phase I/II Study of the Combination of Oral Rigosertib and Azacitidine in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3252-3252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyamala C. Navada ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Francois Wilhelm ◽  
Katherine Hearn ◽  
Rosalie Odchimar-Reissig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Blood Count ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
Count Recovery

Abstract Background:Rigosertib is a small molecule anti-cancer agent targeting PI3/polo-like kinase pathways that promotes G2/M arrest and has effects on the B-Raf and Ras pathways. It is currently being tested as a single agent with the intravenous (IV) formulation in patients (pts) who have relapsed or are refractory to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) as well as with the oral formulation in lower-risk, red-cell transfusion-dependent MDS patients. Azacitidine (AZA) is first-line therapy for pts with higher-risk MDS. In vitro, the combination of rigosertib with AZA acts synergistically to inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of leukemic cells (Skidan et al 2006). This effect appears to be sequence dependent, requiring exposure to rigosertib first, followed by AZA. These nonclinical results provided the rationale to combine the 2 agents in a phase I/II study in pts with MDS and AML. Methods: Pts with MDS and non-proliferative AML, who were previously untreated or had failed or progressed on an HMA were included in the phase I component of the study. Oral rigosertib was administered twice daily from day 1 through day 21 of a 28-d cycle. AZA 75 mg/m2/d was administered for 7 days starting on day 8 of the 28-d cycle. Pts were entered in 3 escalating-dose cohorts of rigosertib in a classic 3+3 design: [1] 140 mg twice daily; [2] 280 mg twice daily; [3] 560 mg qAM and 280 mg qPM. A CBC was performed weekly and a bone marrow (BM) aspirate and/or biopsy was performed at baseline and every 4-8 weeks afterwards. Results: Eighteen pts have been treated with the combination of oral rigosertib and AZA. Pts had diagnoses of intermediate-1 MDS (3), intermediate-2 MDS (6), high-risk MDS (2), CMML (1), and AML (6); median age was 70.5 years; 61% of pts were male. Pts have received 1-10+ cycles of treatment with the total number of cycles administered thus far being 58. Cytogenetic profiles by IPSS were good (8 pts), poor (8 pts), and intermediate (2 pts). 11of 18 patients were transfusion dependent at baseline [RBC (11), platelet (6)]. One patient became RBC transfusion independent after 3 cycles of treatment. 5 additional patients have had a reduction in their RBC and platelet transfusion requirements. 56% of patients received prior treatment with HMAs: AZA (6 pts), decitabine (4 pts). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) in Cycle 1 included constipation, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, hypotension, and pneumonia. The AEs did not differ significantly among the 3 cohorts. Elevation in creatinine in 1 pt in cohort 1 was a possibly related grade 3 dose-limiting toxicity that required subsequent expansion of the cohort. Drug-related dysuria/cystitis was not reported in this pt population. Responses according to IWG 2006 criteria were observed in the BM and peripheral blood: Complete Response (CR) (1 pt), Cri (CR with incomplete blood count recovery) (4 pts), stable disease (2), hematologic improvement-erythroid (1). Six pts received fewer than 4 cycles of treatment and are too early to evaluate. Six pts came off study for the following reasons: progression of disease (1), pt request (1), death from pneumonia (2), received stem cell transplant (1), persistent fungal pneumonia (1). Two evaluable pts have responded to the combination after progression or failure on HMA alone. Conclusions: The combination oforalrigosertib at 560/280 mg BID (recommended phase II dose) and standard-dose AZA can be safely administered and appears to be well tolerated in repetitive cycles in pts with MDS and non-proliferative AML. The AE profile does not differ significantly from that of AZA alone. Data from the Phase I component of this study suggest activity in patients with MDS after HMA failure. Additional data are required to evaluate this observation. The Phase II segment of this study is underway to further assess the response of the combination. Table Patient ID Diagnosis Prior HMA % Blasts in BM at Baseline % Blasts in BM after Treatment IWG Response 1 MDS No 2 1 CRi 2 AML No 40 0 CRi 3 AML No 22 N/A NE 4 MDS Azacitidine 0 0 NE 5 AML No 59 N/A NE 6 MDS No 21 <5 CRi 7 MDS No 2 1 CR 8 MDS No 2.5 2 SD 9 AML Decitabine 25 N/A NE 10 MDS Decitabine 12 3 CRi 11 CMML Azacitidine 2 3 SD 12 MDS Azacitidine 4 1 HI-E 13 AML Azacitidine 47 40 TE 14 AML Decitabine 7 7 TE 15 MDS No 9 5 TE 16 AML No 25 6 TE 17 AML No 15 19 TE 18 AML Azacitidine 64 45 TE IWG = International Working Group CR = Complete Response CRi = Complete Response with incomplete blood count recovery NE = Not Evaluable SD = Stable Disease HI-E = Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid TE = Too Early Disclosures Wilhelm: Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Demakos:Onconova: Consultancy. Azarnia:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Silverman:Onconova: with Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Patents & Royalties.

The Combination of Quizartinib with Azacitidine or Low Dose Cytarabine Is Highly Active in Patients (Pts) with FLT3-ITD Mutated Myeloid Leukemias: Interim Report of a Phase I/II Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1642-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waleed Abdelall ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Keyur P. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Low Dose Cytarabine

Abstract Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with early relapse and poor survival. Quizartinib inhibits FLT3 kinase activity potently and selectively. In phase I and II studies, the composite response rate (CRR) was approximately 50% among patients with FLT3-ITD. There is in-vitro synergy between quizartinib and 5-AZA or LDAC. We hypothesize that adding quizartinib to a hypomethylating agent- such as 5-azacitidine (AZA) -or to cytarabine may improve the response rate expected from the use of either agent alone. Objectives: The primary objective of phase I is to determine dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of combination of quizartinib with either AZA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC); for phase II is to determine the clinical activity of both combinations. This planned interim analysis reports on the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and first futility analysis. Methods: For phase I, pts with relapsed/refractory high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or AML were eligible irrespective of FLT3 mutation and salvage status. For phase II: presence of FLT3-ITD is a requisite, pts must be >60 years with untreated MDS/CMML/AML or any age receiving first salvage treatment. Other requisites: performance status ECOG ≤2, adequate organ function and normal electrolytes (potassium, calcium and magnesium). Important exclusions include: QTcF> 450 msec, administration of drugs that prolong QT/QTc interval or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers; with the exception of antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals that are used as standard of care. Treatment cycle is 28 days and comprises of AZA 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SQ) or intravenously (IV) for 7 days of every cycle, or cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily for 10 days of every cycle along with quizartinib at two planned dose levels: 60 mg (dose level 1) or 90 mg orally daily (dose level 2), uninterrupted. Patients are assigned to AZA or LDAC arm by physician choice or slot availability. Planned accrual for each arm in phase II is 26 pts each and an ORR of ≥50% will be considered favorable. Accrual of 26 pts will give a 95% credible interval for ORR of (0.32, 0.68). The study will be stopped for toxicity (>30%) and/or futility (ORR <50%) at interim analysis for each arm. Results: Fifty-two (Phase I=12, phase II=40) pts have been enrolled: 38 to AZA arm and 14 to LDAC arm. Median age is 67 years (range, 23-83 years), 24 (46%) are female. Cytogenetics are diploid=24, +8=5, monosomy 7=3, miscellaneous=17, 11q=2 and t(8;21)= 1. Median number of prior therapies is 1 (range, 0-7); 7 patients had received prior FLT3 inhibitor: sorafenib (5), crenolanib (1), quizartinib (1). For both combinations quizartinib 60 mg daily was identified as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Thirty-five Pts [8 in LDAC arm (23%) and 27 in AZA arm (77%)] of total 52 have responded with ORR 67 % (CR=8, CRp=7, CRi=18, PR=2); all with FLT3-ITD mutation without D835 mutation. ORR is 73% among pts with FLT3-ITD (N=48). Three of eight pts (38%) with prior FLT3 inhibitor exposure responded. Median time to response is 35 days (range, 14-187days). Among responders, two pts died (in CRi=1, PR=1): one with GI bleed and one with progressive pneumonia. Twelve responders discontinued therapy: 11 to receive a SCT and 1 due to loss of response with emergence of D835 mutation. Fifteen responders (CR=2, CRi=8, CRp=3, PR=2) had >50% reduction of FLT3-ITD allelic burden and eight additional pts (CR=5, CRi=1, CRp=2) had no detectable FLT3-ITD at response. The median survival was: 14.8 mo for the total study group: 7.5 mo for LDAC arm and not reached for AZA arm; median EFS has not been reached for either arm (Figure). Treatment emergent grade 3/4 toxicities irrespective of attribution include hypokalemia (15), hypotension (7), hypophosphatemia (7), hyponatremia (7), hypocalcemia (7), hyperbilirubinemia (1), elevated ALT (5), hypernatremia (2) hyperglycemia (1), QTcF prolongation (1, grade 3). Conclusion: Combination of quizartinib and AZA or LDAC is highly active among patients with AML/MDS/CMML with FLT3-ITD mutation in absence of D835 mutation. Response rates appear higher than expected with either agent alone. Clinically significant QTcF prolongation is infrequent. Accrual to the study continues. Figure Figure. Disclosures Jabbour: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Konopleva:Calithera: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Pemetrexed in combination with paclitaxel: A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial in patients with solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2051-2051 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Graefe ◽  
C. Bolling ◽  
C. Lubbing ◽  
J. Latz ◽  
J. Blatter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

2051 Background: Pemetrexed (Alimta [AL]) and paclitaxel (P) are clinically active in a variety of tumors. The primary objective of this trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the ALP combination; secondary objectives were: determination of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), definition of a recommended phase II dose, pharmacokinetic (PK) characterization and the anecdotal collection of antitumor activity. Methods: Escalating doses of P (3h infusion, d1 and d8) and AL (10 min infusion, d8 prior to P) were given in a 21d cycle. Results: 59 patients (pts) were enrolled. DLTs occurred at the following ALP (mg/m2) doses: 400/30 [G3 bilirubin (b), G3 and G4 thrombocytopenia (plts)]; 500/30 (G4 plts); 500/40 (G3 b); 500/75 (G4 ANC); 500/100 (G4 leukopenia, G4 ANC). With G4 leukopenia and G4 ANC in 4/6 pts and febrile neutropenia in 1 pt, the MTD was reached at the ALP (mg/m2) dose of 500/120. To confirm safety at the recommended dose-level, another 6 patients were treated at the ALP (mg/m2) dose of 500/100. 18 pts [mesothelioma (3), esophagus (2), lung (1), liver (1), renal (1), stomach (1), thyroid (9)] showed stable disease as best response. 4/14 (29%) pts with thyroid carcinoma showed long lasting partial responses [duration (months) 29+, 22, 18, 15]. One additional PR (2) was observed in a pt with penile carcinoma. AL PK when administered with P were consistent with those for AL administered as a single-agent. Conclusions: The ALP combination is safe and shows broad clinical activity. 500/100 mg/m2 is the recommended dose for further studies. Promising antitumor activity was observed in thyroid cancer. A phase II trial in thyroid carcinoma will be conducted. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of nilotinib administered to imatinib resistant or intolerant patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in blast crisis (BC) or relapsed/refractory Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7040-7040 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Larson ◽  
O. Ottman ◽  
H. Kantarjian ◽  
P. le Coutre ◽  
M. Baccarani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

7040 Background: Nilotinib is a highly selective Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is 30-fold more potent than imatinib. In a phase I trial, nilotinib demonstrated efficacy and favorable tolerability in these pts. These results expand upon the phase I experience Methods: This phase II open-label study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in adult imatinib-resistant or - intolerant BC pts or pts with relapsed/refractory Ph+ALL. Primary endpoint was investigator assessment of best hematologic response for BC and complete response for Ph+ALL pts. Nilotinib was started at 400mg BID with escalation to 600mg BID if no adequate response. Results: Safety and efficacy data are reported for 120 BC (27 lymphoid, 87 myeloid, 6 unknown) and 41 Ph+ALL pts (37 active disease, 4 residual disease, 38 relapsed, 3 refractory). 60% of pts had >35% Ph+ metaphases for BC and 31% for Ph+ALL. Median ages was 54 yrs for BC and 46 yrs for Ph+ALL pts. Chromosomal abnormalities other than Ph+ were noted in 64 (53%) BC and 12 (29%) Ph+ALL pts. Extramedullary involvement was present in 44 (37%) BC and 3 (7%) Ph+ALL pts. Treatment is ongoing for 21 (18%) BC and 4 (10%) Ph+ALL pts. Majority of discontinuations were due to disease progression [61 (51%) in BC; 26 (63%) in Ph+ALL). Median treatment duration was 53 (1–441) and 72 (3–363) days for BC and Ph+ALL, respectively. Median dose intensity was 800mg/day for both pt groups. CHR was reported in 25 (21%) pts, marrow responses in 7 (6%) pts, and return to chronic phase in 10 (8%) pts. Complete response was reported in 10 (24%) Ph+ALL; of which, 1 patient had minimal residual disease. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (41%), neutropenia (28%), pneumonia (11%), and anemia (27%) in BC and thrombocytopenia (24%) in Ph+ALL pts. During study period death occurred in 9 (8%) BC and 3 (7%) Ph+ALL pts. No Ph+ALL pt developed CNS disease while on therapy. Conclusions: Nilotinib has significant clinical activity and is well tolerated in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant BC and relapsed/refractory Ph+ALL pts. Nilotinib represents an important new treatment option for these pts in which there remains a high unmet medical need. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document