Disparities at the Intersection of Race and Ethnicity: Examining Trends and Outcomes in Hispanic Women With Breast Cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00381
Author(s):  
Cosette D. Champion ◽  
Samantha M. Thomas ◽  
Jennifer K. Plichta ◽  
Edgardo Parrilla Castellar ◽  
Laura H. Rosenberger ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: We sought to examine tumor subtype, stage at diagnosis, time to surgery (TTS), and overall survival (OS) among Hispanic patients of different races and among Hispanic and non-Hispanic (NH) women of the same race. METHODS: Women 18 years of age or older who had been diagnosed with stage 0-IV breast cancer and who had undergone lumpectomy or mastectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014). Tumor subtype and stage at diagnosis were compared by race/ethnicity. Multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to estimate associations between race/ethnicity and adjusted TTS and OS, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 44,374 Hispanic (American Indian [AI]: 79 [0.2%]; Black: 1,011 [2.3%]; White: 41,126 [92.7%]; Other: 2,158 [4.9%]) and 858,634 NH women (AI: 2,319 [0.3%]; Black: 97,206 [11.3%]; White: 727,270 [84.7%]; Other: 31,839 [3.7%]) were included. Hispanic Black women had lower rates of triple-negative disease (16.2%) than did NH Black women (23.5%) but higher rates than did Hispanic White women (13.9%; P < .001). Hispanic White women had higher rates of node-positive disease (23.2%) versus NH White women (14.4%) but slightly lower rates than Hispanic (24.6%) and NH Black women (24.5%; P < .001). Hispanic White women had longer TTS versus NH White women regardless of treatment sequence (adjusted means: adjuvant chemotherapy, 42.71 v 38.60 days; neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 208.55 v 201.14 days; both P < .001), but there were no significant racial differences in TTS among Hispanic patients. After adjustment, Hispanic White women (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.74 to 0.81]) and Black women (hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.96]) had improved OS versus NH White women (reference) and Black women (hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.18]; all P < .05). CONCLUSION: Hispanic women had improved OS versus NH women, but racial differences in tumor subtype and nodal stage among Hispanic women highlight the importance of disaggregating racial/ethnic data in breast cancer research.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (36) ◽  
pp. 4398-4404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alana Biggers ◽  
Yushu Shi ◽  
John Charlson ◽  
Elizabeth C. Smith ◽  
Alicia J. Smallwood ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate the role of out-of-pocket cost supports through the Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy on disparities in breast cancer hormonal therapy persistence and adherence by race or ethnicity. Methods A nationwide cohort of women age ≥ 65 years with a breast cancer operation between 2006 and 2007 and at least one prescription filled for oral breast cancer hormonal therapy was identified from all Medicare D enrollees. The association of race or ethnicity with nonpersistence (90 consecutive days with no claims for a hormonal therapy prescription) and nonadherence (medication possession rate < 80%) was examined. Survival analyses were used to account for potential differences in age, comorbidity, or intensity of other treatments. Results Among the 25,111 women in the study sample, 77% of the Hispanic and 70% of the black women received a subsidy compared with 21% of the white women. By 2 years, 69% of black and 70% of Hispanic patients were persistent compared with 61% of white patients. In adjusted analyses, patients in all three unsubsidized race or ethnicity groups had greater discontinuation than subsidized groups (white patients: hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.70 to 1.95; black patients: HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.51; Hispanic patients: HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.37 to 3.89). Racial or ethnic persistence disparities that were present for unsubsidized patients were not present or reversed among subsidized patients. All three subsidized race or ethnicity groups also had higher adherence than all three unsubsidized groups, although with the smallest difference occurring in black women. Conclusion Receipt of a prescription subsidy was associated with substantially improved persistence to breast cancer hormonal therapy among white, black, and Hispanic women and lack of racial or ethnic disparities in persistence. Given high subsidy enrollment among black and Hispanic women, policies targeted at low-income patients have the potential to also substantially reduce racial and ethnic disparities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (12) ◽  
pp. 1828-1836
Author(s):  
Mary Peeler ◽  
Munish Gupta ◽  
Patrice Melvin ◽  
Allison S. Bryant ◽  
Hafsatou Diop ◽  
...  

Objectives. To examine the extent to which differences in medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in pregnancy and infant neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) outcomes are associated with maternal race/ethnicity. Methods. We performed a secondary analysis of a statewide quality improvement database of opioid-exposed deliveries from January 2017 to April 2019 from 24 hospitals in Massachusetts. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to model the association between maternal race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or Hispanic) and prenatal receipt of MOUD, NOWS severity, early intervention referral, and biological parental custody at discharge. Results. Among 1710 deliveries to women with opioid use disorder, 89.3% (n = 1527) were non-Hispanic White. In adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black women (AOR = 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.18, 0.66) and Hispanic women (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.27, 0.68) were less likely to receive MOUD during pregnancy compared with non-Hispanic White women. We found no statistically significant associations between maternal race/ethnicity and infant outcomes. Conclusions. We identified significant racial/ethnic differences in MOUD prenatal receipt that persisted in adjusted models. Research should focus on the perspectives and treatment experiences of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women to ensure equitable care for all mother–infant dyads.


Author(s):  
Margaret H. Bogardus ◽  
Timothy Wen ◽  
Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman ◽  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Dena Goffman ◽  
...  

Objective This study aimed to determine whether race and ethnicity contribute to risks associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Study Design This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized the 2000–2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample to analyze risk of peripartum hysterectomy and associated severe maternal morbidity, mortality, surgical injury, reoperation, surgical-site complications, and mortality by maternal race and ethnicity. Race and ethnicity were categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other, and unknown. Multivariable log-linear regression models including patient, clinical, and hospital risk factors were performed with adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Of 59,854,731 delivery hospitalizations, there were 45,369 peripartum hysterectomies (7.6 per thousand). Of these, 37.8% occurred among non-Hispanic white, 13.9% among non-Hispanic black, and 22.8% among Hispanic women. In adjusted analyses, non-Hispanic black (aRR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.17–1.29) and Hispanic women (aRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.22–1.29) were at increased risk of hysterectomy compared with non-Hispanic white women. Risk for severe morbidity was increased for non-Hispanic black (aRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.19–1.33), but not for Hispanic (aRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97–1.07) women. Between these three groups, risk for intraoperative complications was highest among non-Hispanic white women, risk for reoperation was highest among Hispanic women, and risk for surgical-site complications was highest among non-Hispanic black women. Evaluating maternal mortality, non-Hispanic black women (RR: 3.83, 95% CI: 2.65–5.53) and Hispanic women (RR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.74–3.59) were at higher risk than non-Hispanic white women. Conclusion Peripartum hysterectomy and related complications other than death differed modestly by race. In comparison, mortality differentials were large supporting that differential risk for death in the setting of this high-risk scenario may be an important cause of disparities. Key Points


Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara C Kovell ◽  
Claire Meyerovitz ◽  
Didem Ayturk ◽  
Stephen P Juraschek ◽  
Tiffany A Moore Simas ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hypertension (HTN) is the most important modifiable risk factor of serious maternal mortality and morbidity. Social determinants, including economic stability and access to healthcare, influence HTN outcomes and are critical to understanding and addressing racial and ethnic differences in HTN control. Objective: To assess social determinants and co-morbidities in US women of child-bearing age with HTN by race/ethnicity Methods: We studied women (age 20-50) with HTN in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2001-2018. Social determinants and co-morbid conditions were examined in groups categorized by race/ethnicity - Non-Hispanic White (White), Non-Hispanic Black (Black), and Hispanic. Demographics, anthropometric measures, and co-morbid conditions were compared with White women as reference. Results: In all women with HTN, the mean (SE) age was 36.0 (0.3) years and 63% were on BP medication. Compared to white women, Black and Hispanic women had lower food security, poverty income ratio, smoking use, and private insurance (all p<0.0001, Table ). Black women had higher BP medication use, BMI, and BP compared to White women (all p<0.0001). Hispanic women had higher rates of diabetes (p=0.009) and no place to go for healthcare (p=0.005) compared to White women. Food insecurity was present in 34% of Hispanic women. Conclusions: Despite effective diagnostics and therapy, health inequity is common in women of child-bearing age with HTN, with differences by race/ethnicity in social determinants and co-morbid conditions. Each racial/ethnic group with HTN brings social determinants and comorbid conditions important for providers to recognize.


Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (24) ◽  
pp. e3438-e3447
Author(s):  
Muzi Na ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
Mengying Li ◽  
Stefanie N. Hinkle ◽  
Cuilin Zhang ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo determine whether the incidence and risk factors of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in pregnancy differ by race/ethnicity, we estimated relative risks of demographic, socioeconomic, and nutritional factors in association with risk of any incident RLS in pregnancy in a cohort of 2,704 healthy pregnant women without prior RLS.MethodsUsing data from the multicenter, multiracial National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Fetal Growth Studies–Singletons, we examined the incidence of RLS from early pregnancy to near delivery through up to 6 assessments. Multivariable Poisson models with robust variance were applied to estimate relative risks (RRs).ResultsThe cumulative incidence of RLS in pregnancy was 18.1% for all women, 20.3% for White women, 15.4% for Black women, 17.1% for Hispanic women, and 21.1% for Asian women. Among Hispanic women, older age (RR [reference ≤25 years]: 25–35 years, 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–2.16; ≥35 years, 1.58; 95% CI 0.93–2.68), anemia (RR [reference no]: yes, 2.47; 95% CI 1.31–4.64), and greater total skinfolds of the subscapular and triceps sites, independent of body mass index (RR [reference quartile 1]: quartile 5, 2.54; 95% CI 1.30–4.97; p trend = 0.01) were associated with higher risk of RLS, while multiparity was associated with a lower risk (RR [reference nulliparity]: 0.69; 95% CI 0.50–0.96). In Black women, greater skinfolds and waist circumference were associated with higher risk of pregnancy RLS, although the trends were less clear.ConclusionsThe incidence of RLS in pregnancy was high and differed by race/ethnicity, which is likely accounted for by differences in other risk factors, such as age, parity, and nutritional factors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6587-6587
Author(s):  
Demetria Joy Smith-Graziani ◽  
Patricia A. Parker ◽  
Susan K. Peterson ◽  
Isabelle Bedrosian ◽  
Yu Shen ◽  
...  

6587 Background: Women with nonhereditary breast cancer are increasingly undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). We examined pain severity and the impact of pain on the lives of women who underwent CPM compared to those who did not. We also examined the associations between age, race/ethnicity, reconstruction and pain outcomes. Methods: Between 2012 and 2015, we recruited women with newly diagnosed nonhereditary breast cancer who were planned for surgery. We assessed pain with the Brief Pain Inventory at initial surgical consultation and at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery. The repeated measures model was used to assess the association between pain severity or interference and CPM status over different time points adjusting for other covariates. Results: Of 288 women enrolled (mean age 56 years, 58% non-Hispanic White, 17% non-Hispanic Black), 50 underwent CPM, 163 had unilateral mastectomy, and 75 had breast conserving surgery. Mean pain severity was higher at 1 month (2.78 vs 1.9, p = .01) and 6 months (2.79 vs 1.96, p = .03) after surgery in women with CPM versus those without. In the multivariable repeated measures model adjusted for time, age, race/ethnicity and reconstruction status, there was a significant interaction between time and CPM for pain severity (p < .01) but not interference (p = .13). This suggests that CPM patients had higher pain severity in the first 6 months after surgery, but their pain scores decreased by 12 months becoming similar to women without CPM. Black women had higher pain severity (mean difference 1.35, standard error [SE] 0.35; p < .01) and interference (mean difference 0.91, SE 0.32; p < .01) compared to White women with or without CPM. There was no association between age or reconstruction status and pain severity or interference. Conclusions: Pain severity in patients undergoing CPM is highest during the first 6 months after surgery. Women considering CPM should be counseled about this potential outcome. Race/ethnic disparities exist in pain management, pain perceptions and communication of pain. Black women undergoing breast surgery report worse pain outcomes than White women regardless of CPM status.


2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C Spencer ◽  
Jason S Rotter ◽  
Jan M Eberth ◽  
Whitney E Zahnd ◽  
Robin C Vanderpool ◽  
...  

Abstract The financial implications of breast cancer diagnosis may be greater among rural and black women. Women with incident breast cancer were recruited as part of the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. We compared unadjusted and adjusted prevalence of cancer-related job or income loss, and a composite measure of either outcome, by rural residence and stratified by race. We included 2435 women: 11.7% were rural; 48.5% were black; and 38.0% reported employment changes after diagnosis. Rural women more often reported employment effects, including reduced household income (43.6% vs 35.4%, two-sided χ2 test P = .04). Rural white, rural black, and urban black women each more often reported income reduction (statistically significant vs. urban white women), although these groups did not meaningfully differ from each other. In multivariable regression, rural differences were mediated by socioeconomic factors, but racial differences remained. Programs and policies to reduce financial toxicity in vulnerable patients should address indirect costs of cancer, including lost wages and employment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18526-e18526
Author(s):  
Surbhi Warrior ◽  
Ruta D. Rao

e18526 Background: Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy. While there have been significant advances in diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, there are gaps in care leading to high mortality rates in low socio-economic populations and ethnic minorities. This inequality is attributed to poor access to care and later stages at diagnosis. Methods: All female breast cancer patients between 2000-2020 (N=8,444) were included. Statistical analysis was done with X2 testing for categorical variables and T-tests for continuous variables. A univariate logistic regression was used to understand impact of each characteristic. Results: Black women were more likely to have poor prognostic factors for breast cancer compared to white women: distant metastatic disease at diagnosis (4.6% vs 3.2%, p=0.02), triple negative disease (25% vs 13.6%, p<0.01), high oncotype dx score >25 (37.2% vs 26.1%, p=0.04), recurrence (14.9% vs 12.1%, p=0.04), and mortality rate (24.2% vs 15.6%, p<0.01). Despite these high-risk factors, white women were more likely to have a mastectomy than black women (43.8% vs 35.4%, p<0.01), and the average age at diagnosis was higher in black women at 59.2±13.5 years compared to white women at 57.5±12.8 years (p<0.01). The most prominent poor prognostic factor in black women was having triple negative breast cancer with OR 2.13 (95% CI 1.7- 2.6) compared to others in Table. Hispanic women were more likely to have higher stage at diagnosis (OR 1.21), lymph node involvement (OR 1.03), metastatic disease (OR 1.43), and tumor size >1cm (OR 1.06) than nonHispanic women, but only lymph node involvement at diagnosis was statistically significant (29.1% vs 24.5%, p=0.02). Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of racial and ethnic disparities in women with breast cancer. Black women are more likely to have poor prognostic factors including metastatic disease at diagnosis and triple negative breast cancer, leading to higher recurrence and mortality rates. Hispanic women are also more likely to have poor prognostic factors, but this data was not statistically significant due to small sample size. Efforts to improve access to health care leading to earlier diagnosis may decrease the gap in mortality rate for minority women with predisposition to high-risk malignancies.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document