scholarly journals Medicare D Subsidies and Racial Disparities in Persistence and Adherence With Hormonal Therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (36) ◽  
pp. 4398-4404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alana Biggers ◽  
Yushu Shi ◽  
John Charlson ◽  
Elizabeth C. Smith ◽  
Alicia J. Smallwood ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate the role of out-of-pocket cost supports through the Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy on disparities in breast cancer hormonal therapy persistence and adherence by race or ethnicity. Methods A nationwide cohort of women age ≥ 65 years with a breast cancer operation between 2006 and 2007 and at least one prescription filled for oral breast cancer hormonal therapy was identified from all Medicare D enrollees. The association of race or ethnicity with nonpersistence (90 consecutive days with no claims for a hormonal therapy prescription) and nonadherence (medication possession rate < 80%) was examined. Survival analyses were used to account for potential differences in age, comorbidity, or intensity of other treatments. Results Among the 25,111 women in the study sample, 77% of the Hispanic and 70% of the black women received a subsidy compared with 21% of the white women. By 2 years, 69% of black and 70% of Hispanic patients were persistent compared with 61% of white patients. In adjusted analyses, patients in all three unsubsidized race or ethnicity groups had greater discontinuation than subsidized groups (white patients: hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.70 to 1.95; black patients: HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.51; Hispanic patients: HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.37 to 3.89). Racial or ethnic persistence disparities that were present for unsubsidized patients were not present or reversed among subsidized patients. All three subsidized race or ethnicity groups also had higher adherence than all three unsubsidized groups, although with the smallest difference occurring in black women. Conclusion Receipt of a prescription subsidy was associated with substantially improved persistence to breast cancer hormonal therapy among white, black, and Hispanic women and lack of racial or ethnic disparities in persistence. Given high subsidy enrollment among black and Hispanic women, policies targeted at low-income patients have the potential to also substantially reduce racial and ethnic disparities.

2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00381
Author(s):  
Cosette D. Champion ◽  
Samantha M. Thomas ◽  
Jennifer K. Plichta ◽  
Edgardo Parrilla Castellar ◽  
Laura H. Rosenberger ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: We sought to examine tumor subtype, stage at diagnosis, time to surgery (TTS), and overall survival (OS) among Hispanic patients of different races and among Hispanic and non-Hispanic (NH) women of the same race. METHODS: Women 18 years of age or older who had been diagnosed with stage 0-IV breast cancer and who had undergone lumpectomy or mastectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014). Tumor subtype and stage at diagnosis were compared by race/ethnicity. Multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to estimate associations between race/ethnicity and adjusted TTS and OS, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 44,374 Hispanic (American Indian [AI]: 79 [0.2%]; Black: 1,011 [2.3%]; White: 41,126 [92.7%]; Other: 2,158 [4.9%]) and 858,634 NH women (AI: 2,319 [0.3%]; Black: 97,206 [11.3%]; White: 727,270 [84.7%]; Other: 31,839 [3.7%]) were included. Hispanic Black women had lower rates of triple-negative disease (16.2%) than did NH Black women (23.5%) but higher rates than did Hispanic White women (13.9%; P < .001). Hispanic White women had higher rates of node-positive disease (23.2%) versus NH White women (14.4%) but slightly lower rates than Hispanic (24.6%) and NH Black women (24.5%; P < .001). Hispanic White women had longer TTS versus NH White women regardless of treatment sequence (adjusted means: adjuvant chemotherapy, 42.71 v 38.60 days; neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 208.55 v 201.14 days; both P < .001), but there were no significant racial differences in TTS among Hispanic patients. After adjustment, Hispanic White women (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.74 to 0.81]) and Black women (hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.96]) had improved OS versus NH White women (reference) and Black women (hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.18]; all P < .05). CONCLUSION: Hispanic women had improved OS versus NH women, but racial differences in tumor subtype and nodal stage among Hispanic women highlight the importance of disaggregating racial/ethnic data in breast cancer research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19061-e19061
Author(s):  
Kirsten A. Nyrop ◽  
Allison Mary Deal ◽  
Hyman B. Muss ◽  
Emily Damone ◽  
Michael Lorentsen ◽  
...  

e19061 Background: Both comorbidities and obesity (body mass index/BMI 30 or higher) are observed in women at the time of early breast cancer (EBC) diagnosis. This study investigates age and obesity and their association with disparities in comorbidities between black and white women at EBC diagnosis. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of women with EBC (Stage I-III) treated at a single institution. Relative risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for individual comorbidities are calculated for black compared to white patients, adjusted for age and BMI. Results: In a sample of 548 women, 26% are black and 74% are white. 18% of black patients vs 28% of white patients were age 65 or older (p = .01). 62% of black vs 33% of white patients had obesity (p < .0001). 63% of black vs 47% of white patients had 2 or more total comorbidities at diagnosis (p = .003). 33% of black vs 10% of white patients had 2 or more obesity-related comorbidities (p < .0001). 60% of black vs 32% of white patients had hypertension (p < .0001); 23% of black vs 6% of white patients had diabetes (p < .0001); and 28% of black vs 18% of white patients had high cholesterol (p = .02). In multivariable (MV) analysis adjusted for age and BMI, black women had 45% higher risk for hypertension [RR 1.45 (1.19-1.75), p = .0002)] and 44% higher risk for diabetes [RR 1.44 (1.02-5.86), p < .0001)] at EBC diagnosis. However, after adjustment, differences by race were no longer seen for > = 2 total comorbidities, > = 2 obesity-related comorbidities, heart disease, or thyroid disease. Conclusions: This study documents significant disparities between black and white women with EBC with regard to high rates of obesity, overall comorbidities and obesity-related comorbidities. Future research should assess the potential impact of weight management (avoiding weight gain) interventions in the first 2 years post diagnosis on improving OS and BCSS among patients with obesity and in reducing OS and BCSS disparities between black and white women.


Author(s):  
Margaret H. Bogardus ◽  
Timothy Wen ◽  
Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman ◽  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Dena Goffman ◽  
...  

Objective This study aimed to determine whether race and ethnicity contribute to risks associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Study Design This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized the 2000–2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample to analyze risk of peripartum hysterectomy and associated severe maternal morbidity, mortality, surgical injury, reoperation, surgical-site complications, and mortality by maternal race and ethnicity. Race and ethnicity were categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other, and unknown. Multivariable log-linear regression models including patient, clinical, and hospital risk factors were performed with adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Of 59,854,731 delivery hospitalizations, there were 45,369 peripartum hysterectomies (7.6 per thousand). Of these, 37.8% occurred among non-Hispanic white, 13.9% among non-Hispanic black, and 22.8% among Hispanic women. In adjusted analyses, non-Hispanic black (aRR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.17–1.29) and Hispanic women (aRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.22–1.29) were at increased risk of hysterectomy compared with non-Hispanic white women. Risk for severe morbidity was increased for non-Hispanic black (aRR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.19–1.33), but not for Hispanic (aRR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97–1.07) women. Between these three groups, risk for intraoperative complications was highest among non-Hispanic white women, risk for reoperation was highest among Hispanic women, and risk for surgical-site complications was highest among non-Hispanic black women. Evaluating maternal mortality, non-Hispanic black women (RR: 3.83, 95% CI: 2.65–5.53) and Hispanic women (RR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.74–3.59) were at higher risk than non-Hispanic white women. Conclusion Peripartum hysterectomy and related complications other than death differed modestly by race. In comparison, mortality differentials were large supporting that differential risk for death in the setting of this high-risk scenario may be an important cause of disparities. Key Points


2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 620-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena P. Lamb ◽  
F. Elizabeth Pritchard ◽  
Simonne S. Nouer ◽  
Elizabeth A. Tolley ◽  
Brandon S. Boyd ◽  
...  

Although significant progress has been made in improving breast cancer survival, disparities among racial, ethnic, and underserved groups still exist. The goal of this investigation is to quantify racial disparities in the context of breast cancer care, examining the outcomes of recurrence and mortality in the city of Memphis. Patients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of breast cancer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2012, were obtained from the tumor registry. Black patients were more likely to have advanced (II, III, or IV) clinical stage of breast cancer at diagnosis versus white patients. Black breast cancer patients had a two times higher odds of recurrence (95% confidence interval: 1.4, 3.0) after adjusting for race and clinical stage. Black breast cancer patients were 1.5 times more likely to die (95% confidence interval: 1.2, 1.8), after adjusting for race; age at diagnosis; clinical stage; ER, PR, HER2 status; and recurrence. Black women with stages 0, I, II, and III breast cancer all had a statistically significant longer median time from diagnosis to surgery than white women. Black patients were more likely to have advanced clinical stages of breast cancer at diagnosis versus white patients on a citywide level in Memphis. Black breast cancer patients have higher odds of recurrence and mortality when compared with white breast cancer patients, after adjusting for appropriate demographic and clinical attributes. More work is needed to develop, evaluate, and disseminate interventions to decrease inequities in timeliness of care for breast cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18526-e18526
Author(s):  
Surbhi Warrior ◽  
Ruta D. Rao

e18526 Background: Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy. While there have been significant advances in diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, there are gaps in care leading to high mortality rates in low socio-economic populations and ethnic minorities. This inequality is attributed to poor access to care and later stages at diagnosis. Methods: All female breast cancer patients between 2000-2020 (N=8,444) were included. Statistical analysis was done with X2 testing for categorical variables and T-tests for continuous variables. A univariate logistic regression was used to understand impact of each characteristic. Results: Black women were more likely to have poor prognostic factors for breast cancer compared to white women: distant metastatic disease at diagnosis (4.6% vs 3.2%, p=0.02), triple negative disease (25% vs 13.6%, p<0.01), high oncotype dx score >25 (37.2% vs 26.1%, p=0.04), recurrence (14.9% vs 12.1%, p=0.04), and mortality rate (24.2% vs 15.6%, p<0.01). Despite these high-risk factors, white women were more likely to have a mastectomy than black women (43.8% vs 35.4%, p<0.01), and the average age at diagnosis was higher in black women at 59.2±13.5 years compared to white women at 57.5±12.8 years (p<0.01). The most prominent poor prognostic factor in black women was having triple negative breast cancer with OR 2.13 (95% CI 1.7- 2.6) compared to others in Table. Hispanic women were more likely to have higher stage at diagnosis (OR 1.21), lymph node involvement (OR 1.03), metastatic disease (OR 1.43), and tumor size >1cm (OR 1.06) than nonHispanic women, but only lymph node involvement at diagnosis was statistically significant (29.1% vs 24.5%, p=0.02). Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of racial and ethnic disparities in women with breast cancer. Black women are more likely to have poor prognostic factors including metastatic disease at diagnosis and triple negative breast cancer, leading to higher recurrence and mortality rates. Hispanic women are also more likely to have poor prognostic factors, but this data was not statistically significant due to small sample size. Efforts to improve access to health care leading to earlier diagnosis may decrease the gap in mortality rate for minority women with predisposition to high-risk malignancies.[Table: see text]


1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 2693-2699 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Edwards ◽  
J W Gamel ◽  
W P Vaughan ◽  
W R Wrightson

PURPOSE Breast cancer has a poorer prognosis among black women than among white women. This review was conducted to determine whether this disparity reflects the direct impact of race on likelihood of cure or on time to death from breast cancer or stems from the interaction of race with tumor stage and patient age. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed data from 115,838 patients with localized (node-negative) and regionally metastatic (node-positive) breast cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute. Parametric analysis was used to determine the independent prognostic value of age, stage, and race. Linear regression and distribution analyses were also used to examine the interaction of these covariates. RESULTS The prevalence of regionally metastatic disease, relative to localized disease, declined with increased age among white patients and those classified as "other," but remained relatively constant among black patients. Parametric analysis showed a smaller cured fraction and shorter time to death when patients with regional disease were compared with those with localized disease. A similar disparity was found when black patients were compared with those classified as white or other. CONCLUSION Age and race have a significant association with tumor stage. In addition, our data show that race has an independent impact on the clinical course of breast cancer and diminishes both the likelihood of cure and time to death among uncured patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (22) ◽  
pp. 2610-2618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie McCarthy ◽  
Mirar Bristol ◽  
Susan M. Domchek ◽  
Peter W. Groeneveld ◽  
Younji Kim ◽  
...  

Purpose Racial disparities in BRCA1/2 testing have been documented, but causes of these disparities are poorly understood. The study objective was to investigate whether the distribution of black and white patients across cancer providers contributes to disparities in BRCA1/2 testing. Patients and Methods We conducted a population-based study of women in Pennsylvania and Florida who were 18 to 64 years old and diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2007 and 2009, linking cancer registry data, the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, and patient and physician surveys. The study included 3,016 women (69% white, 31% black), 808 medical oncologists, and 732 surgeons. Results Black women were less likely to undergo BRCA1/2 testing than white women (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.48; P < .001). This difference was attenuated but not eliminated by adjustment for mutation risk, clinical factors, sociodemographic characteristics, and attitudes about testing (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P < .001). The care of black and white women was highly segregated across surgeons and oncologists (index of dissimilarity 64.1 and 61.9, respectively), but adjusting for clustering within physician or physician characteristics did not change the size of the testing disparity. Black women were less likely to report that they had received physician recommendation for BRCA1/2 testing even after adjusting for mutation risk (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; P < .001). Adjusting for physician recommendation further attenuated the testing disparity (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.02; P = .06). Conclusion Although black and white patients with breast cancer tend to see different surgeons and oncologists, this distribution does not contribute to disparities in BRCA1/2 testing. Instead, residual racial differences in testing after accounting for patient and physician characteristics are largely attributable to differences in physician recommendations. Efforts to address these disparities should focus on ensuring equity in testing recommendations.


Author(s):  
Fouad Chouairi ◽  
Michael Fuery ◽  
Katherine A. Clark ◽  
Clancy W. Mullan ◽  
James Stewart ◽  
...  

Background Racial and ethnic disparities contribute to differences in access and outcomes for patients undergoing heart transplantation. We evaluated contemporary outcomes for heart transplantation stratified by race and ethnicity as well as the new 2018 allocation system. Methods and Results Adult heart recipients from 2011 to 2020 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database and stratified into 3 groups: Black, Hispanic, and White. We analyzed recipient and donor characteristics, and outcomes. Among 32 353 patients (25% Black, 9% Hispanic, 66% White), Black and Hispanic patients were younger, more likely to be women and have diabetes mellitus or renal disease (all, P <0.05). Over the study period, the proportion of Black and Hispanic patients listed for transplant increased: 21.7% to 28.2% ( P =0.003) and 7.7% to 9.0% ( P =0.002), respectively. Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to undergo transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.87; CI, 0.84–0.90; P <0.001), but had a higher risk of post‐transplant death (aHR, 1.14; CI, 1.04–1.24; P =0.004). There were no differences in transplantation likelihood or post‐transplant mortality between Hispanic and White patients. Following the allocation system change, transplantation rates increased for all groups ( P <0.05). However, Black patients still had a lower likelihood of transplantation than White patients (aHR, 0.90; CI, 0.79–0.99; P =0.024). Conclusions Although the proportion of Black and Hispanic patients listed for cardiac transplantation have increased, significant disparities remain. Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to be transplanted, even with the new allocation system, and had a higher risk of post‐transplantation death.


2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (12) ◽  
pp. 1828-1836
Author(s):  
Mary Peeler ◽  
Munish Gupta ◽  
Patrice Melvin ◽  
Allison S. Bryant ◽  
Hafsatou Diop ◽  
...  

Objectives. To examine the extent to which differences in medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in pregnancy and infant neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) outcomes are associated with maternal race/ethnicity. Methods. We performed a secondary analysis of a statewide quality improvement database of opioid-exposed deliveries from January 2017 to April 2019 from 24 hospitals in Massachusetts. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to model the association between maternal race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or Hispanic) and prenatal receipt of MOUD, NOWS severity, early intervention referral, and biological parental custody at discharge. Results. Among 1710 deliveries to women with opioid use disorder, 89.3% (n = 1527) were non-Hispanic White. In adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black women (AOR = 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.18, 0.66) and Hispanic women (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.27, 0.68) were less likely to receive MOUD during pregnancy compared with non-Hispanic White women. We found no statistically significant associations between maternal race/ethnicity and infant outcomes. Conclusions. We identified significant racial/ethnic differences in MOUD prenatal receipt that persisted in adjusted models. Research should focus on the perspectives and treatment experiences of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women to ensure equitable care for all mother–infant dyads.


2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 205-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen Kimmick ◽  
Fabian Camacho ◽  
Kristi Long Foley ◽  
Edward A. Levine ◽  
Rajesh Balkrishnan ◽  
...  

Purpose Suboptimal care among minority and low-income patients may explain poorer survival. There is little information describing patterns of health care in Medicaid-insured women with breast cancer in the United States. Using a previously created and validated database linking Medicaid claims and state-wide tumor registry data, we describe patterns of breast cancer care within a low-income population. Methods Sample characteristics were described by frequencies and means. Logistic regressions were used to determine predictors of type of surgery, use of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results The sample consisted of 974 women. The dataset included only white (58%) and black (42%) women. Sixty-seven percent were treated with mastectomy; 43% received adjuvant chemotherapy; and 67% of women receiving BCS received adjuvant radiation. In multivariate analysis, predictors of BCS were young age, black race, and smaller tumor size. Furthermore, there was a trend toward more black than white women with tumors 4 cm or larger having BCS (18% v 8%; P = .06). Race was not related to use of adjuvant radiation therapy after BCS or to use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion In this group of patients with breast cancer enrolled in Medicaid, black women were more likely than white women to have BCS. Race was not associated with adjuvant radiation therapy or chemotherapy use. Factors affecting the quality of care delivered to low-income and minority patients are complex, and better care lies in exploring areas that need improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document