Inpatient Psychotherapy of Bullying Victims

Author(s):  
Josef Schwickerath ◽  
Dieter Zapf
2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 979-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Theriot ◽  
Catherine N. Dulmus ◽  
Karen M. Sowers ◽  
Toni K. Johnson
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Amalia Hana Firdausi ◽  
Maria Goretti Adiyanti

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of assertiveness techniquestraining to improve bullying victims’ self-esteem. This study was a quasi experiment withuntreated control group with pre-test and double post-test design. The data werecollected by using adaptation instrument of Peer Interactions in Primary School (PIPS)Questionnaire, assertiveness scale, and self-esteem scale. The subjects were 18 students in4 th -5 th grade who are indicated as bullying victims and have self-esteem scores categorizedin low to moderate levels (8 students in experimental group and 10 students in controlgroup). The result of the Mann Whitney U test showed that there was no difference inself-esteem scores between the experimental and control group during the pretest (p >0.05). After being treated, the differences in self-esteem scores were significant with Z = -3.113; p = 0.002 (p < 0,01) between the experimental group and control group, in which themean score of self-esteem in the experimental group was higher than the control group


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Erin Ratna Kustanti

This study aims to investigate the correlation of attachment and self-esteem to social adjustment on victims of bullying. Bullying victims encounter adverse effects that can prolong until adulthood. They also experience poor social adjustment. Good social adjustment associated with self-esteem. A warm and rewarding parenting practices facilitate high self-esteem. Emotional closeness creates strong bonds. Therefore attachment influences the formation of a sense of security for the survival of the child’s life in the future. The study population is students who were also bullying victims. The participants were 50 students that were identified using purposive sampling technique. The Social Adjustment Scale, the Attachment Scale, and the Self-Esteem Scale were used to collect data. The results of multiple regression analysis indicated that attachment and self-esteem predict social adjustment on victims of bullying  (F(2,47) = 5,576; p = 0,007; R2= 0,192). Partially, attachment predicts social adjustment on victims of bullying (F(1,48) = 5,201; p = 0,027; R2= 0,098) and self-esteem predicts social adjustment on victims of bullying (F(1,48) = 10,713; p = 0,002; R2= 0,182).


2000 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter H. Seidler

The article outlines the empirical verification of a self-relatedness construct theoretically elaborated elsewhere for its suitability as a way of describing changes achieved in the framework of inpatient psychotherapy. The study centres on two hypotheses: (1) during inpatient therapy lasting 12 weeks, patients display identifiable changes in the form of an increase in self-referentiality; (2) an increase in self-referentiality correlates with a decrease in symptomatology. The study was conducted in a practice-near design involving 76 patients in the framework of a multi-level approach. The article presents the findings gained with newly devised instruments for the identification of features of (a) self-relatedness and (b) of symptomatology and the experience of illness. First, it was again possible to show that these instruments satisfy various quality criteria. Of the two hypotheses, the first may safely be said to stand confirmed. Assessment of the second hypothesis calls for a differentiation regarding the increase of self-referentiality and symptom change in that this increase differs according to symptom area: whereas the increase of self-referentiality is bound up with a reduction of somatic and social symptoms, there is no demonstrable connection of this kind with regard to psychic symptoms, although the individual scales also show a reduction. The findings are interpreted with all due caution as indicating that the new instruments may have touched on, or indeed identified, a `capacity for symbolization `factor underlying both structure formation and symptomatology.


1986 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Michael Kahn ◽  
Patricia B. Webster ◽  
Michael J. Storck

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document