Protection potential – carbon steel

2022 ◽  
pp. 121-139
Author(s):  
Chris Googan
1987 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Atsushi Nishikata ◽  
Bao-Rong Hou ◽  
Dae-Hi Jeon ◽  
Tooru Tsuru ◽  
Shiro Haruyama

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2158
Author(s):  
Andrea Brenna ◽  
Silvia Beretta ◽  
Marco Ormellese

Cathodic protection (CP), in combination with an insulating coating, is a preventative system to control corrosion of buried carbon steel pipes. The corrosion protection of coating defects is achieved by means of a cathodic polarization below the protection potential, namely −0.85 V vs. CSE (CSE, copper-copper sulfate reference electrode) for carbon steel in aerated soil. The presence of alternating current (AC) interference, induced by high-voltage power lines (HVPL) or AC-electrified railways, may represent a corrosion threat for coated carbon steel structures, although the potential protection criterion is matched. Nowadays, the protection criteria in the presence of AC, as well as AC corrosion mechanisms in CP condition, are still controversial and discussed. This paper deals with a narrative literature review, which includes selected journal articles, conference proceedings and grey literature, on the assessment, acceptable criteria and corrosion mechanism of carbon steel structures in CP condition with AC interference. The study shows that the assessment of AC corrosion likelihood should be based on the measurement of AC and DC (direct current) related parameters, namely AC voltage, AC and DC densities and potential measurements. Threshold values of the mentioned parameters are discussed. Overprotection (EIR-free < −1.2 V vs. CSE) is the most dangerous condition in the presence of AC: the combination of strong alkalization close to the coating defect due to the high CP current density and the action of AC interference provokes localized corrosion of carbon steel.


Author(s):  
Y. L. Chen ◽  
J. R. Bradley

Considerable effort has been directed toward an improved understanding of the production of the strong and stiff ∼ 1-20 μm diameter pyrolytic carbon fibers of the type reported by Koyama and, more recently, by Tibbetts. These macroscopic fibers are produced when pyrolytic carbon filaments (∼ 0.1 μm or less in diameter) are thickened by deposition of carbon during thermal decomposition of hydrocarbon gases. Each such precursor filament normally lengthens in association with an attached catalyst particle. The subject of filamentous carbon formation and much of the work on characterization of the catalyst particles have been reviewed thoroughly by Baker and Harris. However, identification of the catalyst particles remains a problem of continuing interest. The purpose of this work was to characterize the microstructure of the pyrolytic carbon filaments and the catalyst particles formed inside stainless steel and plain carbon steel tubes. For the present study, natural gas (∼; 97 % methane) was passed through type 304 stainless steel and SAE 1020 plain carbon steel tubes at 1240°K.


2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 2797-2808
Author(s):  
Rustem Bagramov, Daniele Mari, Willy Benoi

1993 ◽  
Vol 90 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 917-922
Author(s):  
Y. Matsuda ◽  
M. Nishino ◽  
J. Ikeda

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-135
Author(s):  
Sattar H A Alfatlawi

One of ways to improve properties of materials without changing the product shape toobtain the desired engineering applications is heating and cooling under effect of controlledsequence of heat treatment. The main aim of this study was to investigate the effect ofheating and cooling on the surface roughness, microstructure and some selected propertiessuch as the hardness and impact strength of Medium Carbon Steel which treated at differenttypes of heat treatment processes. Heat treatment achieved in this work was respectively,heating, quenching and tempering. The specimens were heated to 850°C and left for 45minutes inside the furnace as a holding time at that temperature, then quenching process wasperformed in four types of quenching media (still air, cold water (2°C), oil and polymersolution), respectively. Thereafter, the samples were tempered at 200°C, 400°C, and 600°Cwith one hour as a soaking time for each temperature, then were all cooled by still air. Whenthe heat treatment process was completed, the surface roughness, hardness, impact strengthand microstructure tests were performed. The results showed a change and clearimprovement of surface roughness, mechanical properties and microstructure afterquenching was achieved, as well as the change that took place due to the increasingtoughness and ductility by reducing of brittleness of samples.


2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-82
Author(s):  
Simona CAPRARESCU ◽  
◽  
Violeta PURCAR ◽  
Cristina MODROGAN ◽  
◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 102-106
Author(s):  
Shota Ohki ◽  
Shingo Mineta ◽  
Mamoru Mizunuma ◽  
Soichi Oka ◽  
Masayuki Tsuda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document