scholarly journals Once-Weekly Somapacitan Versus Daily Growth Hormone in Growth Hormone Deficiency: 2-Year Efficacy Results From REAL 3, a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A680-A680
Author(s):  
Lars S Sävendahl ◽  
Tadej Battelino ◽  
Michael Højby Rasmussen ◽  
Reiko Horikawa ◽  
Paul Saenger
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
First Year ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Second Year

Abstract Current treatment for growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) requires daily injections, which can be burdensome for the patients/caregivers. Once-weekly somapacitan is a long-acting GH derivative currently in phase 3 for use in children with GHD and phase 2 for short children born small for gestational age. A phase 2, multinational, randomized, open-label, controlled trial (NCT02616562) investigated the efficacy and safety of somapacitan in children compared with daily GH (Norditropin®). GH-treatment-naïve prepubertal children with GHD received 0.04 (n=16), 0.08 (n=15) or 0.16 mg/kg/week (n=14) subcutaneous (s.c.) somapacitan, or s.c. daily GH 0.034 mg/kg/day (0.24 mg/kg/week; n=14) for 52 weeks, followed by a 104-week safety extension. In the extension phase, all patients on somapacitan received 0.16 mg/kg/week; daily GH dose remained unaltered. The 52-week efficacy and safety results have been reported previously. We report here the efficacy results after 104 weeks of GH treatment. At week 104, mean (standard deviation [SD]) height velocity (HV) in the first year of the safety extension was: 10.6 (1.4), 10.0 (1.6) and 9.2 (1.7) cm/year for 0.04/0.16 mg/kg/week (n=13), 0.08/0.16 mg/kg/week (n=15) and 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/week (n=14) somapacitan, respectively, versus 9.0 (2.3) cm/year for daily GH (n=11). Mean (SD) change from baseline in HV standard deviation score (SDS) was 8.04 (2.52), 6.21 (2.90) and 6.40 (3.04) for somapacitan, respectively, versus 6.58 (3.15) for daily GH. Compared with week 52, mean HV and HV SDS at week 104 were increased in children in the somapacitan 0.04/0.16 mg/kg/week and 0.08/0.16 mg/kg/week treatment groups. Height SDS values improved during the second year of treatment with somapacitan and daily GH, with the greatest change from baseline in the somapacitan 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/week treatment group. The mean (SD) change in height SDS from baseline to week 104 was 1.73 (0.76), 1.87 (0.81) and 2.18 (1.18) for somapacitan, respectively, versus 1.72 (0.65) for daily GH. The observed mean (SD) change in insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) SDS from baseline was similar between the somapacitan 0.08/0.16 and 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/week treatment groups (3.15 [1.17] and 3.21 [1.12], respectively), and slightly higher compared with IGF-I SDS in the 0.04/0.16 mg/kg/week group (2.99 [1.05]) and the daily GH group (3.06 [1.26]). Mean IGF-I SDS values remained below the upper limit (+2) of the normal range for all treatment groups throughout the 104-week trial duration. Somapacitan was well tolerated at all doses investigated, with no new safety or local tolerability issues identified during the 104 weeks of treatment. In conclusion, at week 104, height-based outcomes were similar between somapacitan 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/week and daily GH, with comparable mean change in IGF-I SDS. Furthermore, the key improvements observed in the first year were maintained in the second year of the study.

scholarly journals Once-Weekly Somapacitan vs Daily GH in Children With GH Deficiency: Results From a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. e1847-e1861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Sävendahl ◽  
Tadej Battelino ◽  
Meryl Brod ◽  
Michael Højby Rasmussen ◽  
Reiko Horikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Hormone Deficiency ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Daily Growth ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Treatment Naïve

Abstract Context Daily growth hormone (GH) injections can be burdensome for patients and carers. Somapacitan is a long-acting, reversible albumin-binding GH derivative in development for once-weekly administration in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-weekly somapacitan vs once-daily GH. Design REAL 3 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind (somapacitan doses), phase 2 study with a 26-week main and 26-week extension phase (NCT02616562). Setting This study took place at 29 sites in 11 countries. Patients Fifty-nine GH treatment-naive prepubertal children with GHD were randomly assigned; 58 completed the trial. Interventions Interventions comprised 3 somapacitan doses (0.04 [n = 16], 0.08 [n = 15], or 0.16 mg/kg/wk [n = 14]) and daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/d [n = 14]), administered subcutaneously. Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was height velocity (HV) at week 26. Secondary efficacy end points included HV SD score (SDS) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) SDS. Results At week 26, mean (SD) annualized HV for the somapacitan groups was 8.0 (2.0), 10.9 (1.9), and 12.9 (3.5) cm/year, respectively, vs 11.4 (3.3) cm/year for daily GH; estimated treatment difference (somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week—daily GH): 1.7 [95% CI –0.2 to 3.6] cm/year. HV was sustained at week 52, and significantly greater with somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week vs daily GH. Mean (SD) change from baseline in HV SDS at week 52 was 4.72 (2.79), 6.14 (3.36), and 8.60 (3.15) for the somapacitan groups, respectively, vs 7.41 (4.08) for daily GH. Model-derived mean (SD) IGF-I SDS for the somapacitan groups was −1.62 (0.86), −1.09 (0.78), and 0.31 (1.06), respectively, vs −0.40 (1.50) observed for daily GH. Safety and tolerability were consistent with the profile of daily GH. Conclusions In children with GHD, once-weekly somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week provided the closest efficacy match with similar safety and tolerability to daily GH after 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. A short visual summary of our work is available (1).

scholarly journals SAT-LB15 24-Month Efficacy and Safety of Once Weekly and Every Other Week Administration of GX-H9, Hybrid FC-Fused Long-Acting Human Growth Hormone: A Phase 2 Study in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg Malievskiy ◽  
Aryaev Mykola ◽  
Nataliya Zelinska ◽  
Elena Bolshova ◽  
Ganna Senatorova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Hormone Deficiency ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
First Year ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Long Acting

Abstract Objectives GX-H9 is a long-acting form of recombinant human GH under clinical development for both adults and children with GHD. In this report, 24-month efficacy and safety of once weekly and every other week (EOW) administration of GX-H9 were evaluated, in addition to Genotropin® switch-ability to GX-H9 after 12-month of treatment. Methods Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either one of three doses of GX-H9 (0.8 mg/kg/week, 1.2 mg/kg/week or 2.4 mg/kg every other week) or 0.03 mg/kg/day of Genotropin®. Treatment duration is 24-month for all patients in GX-H9 arms while patients in Genotropin® arm were re-randomized to one of three doses of GX-H9 at the completion of the first 12-month of treatment. Doses of GX-H9 were adjusted throughout the treatment period whenever necessary, based on IGF-1 levels. Results Out of 56 randomized, 54 received either GX-H9 or Genotropin®. Fifty subjects completed the 12-month treatment period. Of 50, 45 subjects completed the next 12-month, comprising 33 patients from GX-H9 and 12 patients who switched from Genotropin®. First year/second year mean±SD annualized height velocity (aHV) for 0.8 mg/kg/week, 1.2 mg/kg/week or 2.4 mg/kg every other week of GX-H9 were 10.50±2.54/9.14±1.96, 11.76±1.96/9.88±1.92 and 11.03±2.92/9.72±1.90 cm/year, respectively. First year mean±SD aHV for Genotropin® was 9.14±3.09 cm/year. Patients switched to one of the three doses of GX-H9 in the second year showed comparable aHV in the second year (8.73±2.69/7.60±0.90/9.13±1.07 cm/year for 0.8 mg/kg/week, 1.2 mg/kg/week and 2.4 mg/kg/EOW GX-H9, respectively). No significant slow-down of the growth was observed in the second year from patients who received GX-H9 throughout and patients who switched from Genotropin®. Mean change in height SDS after 12 months/24 months of GX-H9 treatment throughout from baseline treatment improved continuously (+1.10/+1.61 and +1.31/+1.89 and +1.15/+1.69 for 0.8 mg/kg/week, 1.2 mg/kg/week and 2.4 mg/kg EOW GX-H9, respectively). First year mean change in height SDS for Genotropin® was +0.92 SDS, and showed comparable improvement in height SDS after switching to GX-H9 weekly arms (+0.76 and +0.79 SDS for 0.8 mg/kg/week and 1.2 mg/kg/week, respectively). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated as unrelated to the study drug and were mild or moderate in severity. No new safety concerns were observed throughout 24 months of long-term GX-H9 treatment or after switching to GX-H9 from Genotropin®.Conclusions Growth response and safety profile of GX-H9 in children with GHD is comparable to those of daily GH, achieving robust growth rates after 24-month treatment. Subjects switched from Genotropin® in the second year, also showed substantial catch-up growth indicated by improvement in height SDS. GX-H9 has a unique potential to be a convenient long-term GH providing not only weekly but also twice-monthly treatment.

Growth hormone therapy in achondroplasia

1993 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 394-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Nishi ◽  
Michi Kajiyama ◽  
Shinichiro Miyagawa ◽  
Mitsuhiro Fujiwara ◽  
Kazuko Hamamoto
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Growth Hormone Therapy ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
First Year ◽  
Gh Therapy ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Gh Secretion ◽  
The Status ◽  
Second Year

The status of growth hormone (GH) secretion together with the effect of GH therapy was studied in six children with achondroplasia. One patient had impaired GH secretion, which may, in part, be due to obesity. The pre-GH-treatment height velocity was 3.8±0.7 cm/year, but this increased to 6.0±1.0 cm/year in the first year of treatment and to 4.4±0.6 cm/year in the second year. One patient who underwent GH therapy for 4 years showed good response in height velocity. A considerable variation was observed in response to GH therapy within the treated cases.

scholarly journals SAT-LB12 Once-Weekly Somapacitan vs Daily Growth Hormone in Growth Hormone Deficiency: 2-Year Safety Results From Real 3, a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars S Savendahl ◽  
Michael Højby Rasmussen
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Injection Site ◽  
Gh Deficiency ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hormone Deficiency ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Injection Site Reactions

Abstract Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy currently requires daily injections. Somapacitan is a long-acting GH-derivative being developed for once-weekly (OW) use in children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD). A phase 2, multinational, randomized, open-label, controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02616562) investigated the efficacy and safety of OW somapacitan compared with daily GH (Norditropin® FlexPro®). GH-treatment-naïve prepubertal children with GH deficiency received 0.04 (n=16), 0.08 (n=15) or 0.16 mg/kg/wk (n=14) subcutaneous (sc) OW somapacitan, or sc GH 0.034 mg/kg/day (0.24 mg/kg/wk; n=14) for 52 wks, followed by a 104-wk safety extension with all patients on somapacitan receiving 0.16 mg/kg/wk while GH dose was unaltered. Safety endpoints included frequency of adverse events (AEs), including injection-site reactions, and occurrence of anti-somapacitan/anti-human growth hormone (hGH) antibodies. The 52-wk efficacy and safety results have been reported. We report here safety results at 104 wks’ total treatment. Number of AEs (% of patients) was as follows: OW somapacitan 0.04/0.16 mg/kg/wk, 51 (75%); 0.08/0.16 mg/kg/wk, 89 (80%); 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk, 89 (100%); and for daily GH, 82 (100%). Nasopharyngitis, influenza, allergic rhinitis and gastroenteritis were the most common AEs across all treatment groups. Pyrexia was more common in the OW somapacitan 0.04/0.16 mg/kg/wk (43.8%) and 0.08/0.16 mg/kg/wk (26.7%) groups vs the higher-dose OW somapacitan and daily GH groups (7.1% each). Most AEs were mild to moderate and unlikely related to treatment. Ten serious AEs were reported in five (8.5%) children and unlikely related to treatment, except two AEs of moderate severity during the first 26 wks: generalized edema and vomiting in one child on 0.16 mg/kg/wk OW somapacitan, rated as probably related to treatment although she was also given intravenous antibiotics for suspected infection. Injection-site reactions were reported in the 0.04/0.16 mg/kg/wk (n=2) and 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk (n=1) OW somapacitan groups and in the daily GH group (n=1). Four children (0.04/0.16 mg/kg/wk) and one child (0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk) had transient anti-somapacitan antibodies; one child (0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk) had low-titer anti-somapacitan antibodies at two consecutive visits; in one child (daily GH group) with persistent low-titer anti-hGH antibodies, treatment was discontinued at wk 52. All antibodies were non-neutralizing. In conclusion, OW somapacitan was well tolerated at all doses, with no new safety or tolerability issues identified after up to 104 wks of treatment. The frequency, severity and type of AEs were similar in the OW somapacitan and daily GH treatment groups except for pyrexia, which was unlikely related to treatment and more frequently reported in the lowest dose somapacitan group.

Impact of Overweight on Effectiveness of Treatment with Human Growth Hormone in Growth Hormone Deficient Children: Analysis of German KIGS Data

2011 ◽  
Vol 119 (09) ◽  
pp. 544-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Reinehr ◽  
S. Bechtold-Dalla Pozza ◽  
M. Bettendorf ◽  
H.-G. Doerr ◽  
B. Gohlke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Growth Velocity ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
First Year ◽  
Overweight Children ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Prepubertal Children ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Group A

AbstractWe hypothesized that overweight children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) demonstrate a lower response to growth hormone (GH) as a result of a misclassification since obesity is associated with lower GH peaks in stimulation tests.Anthropometric data, response, and responsiveness to GH in the first year of treatment were compared in 1.712 prepubertal children with GHD from the German KIGS database according to BMI (underweight=group A, normal weight=group B, overweight=group C) (median age: group A, B, C: 7.3, 7.28, and 8.4 years).Maximum GH levels to tests (median: group A, B, C: 5.8, 5.8, and 4.0 µg/ml) were significantly lower in group C. IGF-I SDS levels were not different between the groups. Growth velocity in the first year of GH treatment was significantly lower in the underweight cohort (median: group A, B, C: 8.2, 8.8, and 9.0 cm/yr), while the gain in height was not different between groups. The difference between observed and predicted growth velocity expressed as Studentized residuals was not significantly different between groups. Separating the 164 overweight children into obese children (BMI>97th centile; n=71) and moderate overweight children (BMI>90th to 97th centile, n=93) demonstrated no significant difference in any parameter.Overweight prepubertal children with idiopathic GHD demonstrated similar levels of responsiveness to GH treatment compared to normal weight children. Furthermore, the IGF-I levels were low in overweight children. Therefore, a misclassification of GHD in overweight prepubertal children within the KIGS database seems unlikely. The first year growth prediction models can be applied to overweight and obese GHD children.

Correlation Between the Responses to Growth Hormone (GH) Treatment During Childhood and Adulthood in a Monocentric Cohort of GH-Deficient Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 462-468
Author(s):  
Sarah Thilmany ◽  
Leila Mchirgui ◽  
Chloé Brunelle ◽  
Véronique Beauloye ◽  
Dominique Maiter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Growth Velocity ◽  
Significant Positive Correlation ◽  
Growth Parameters ◽  
Hormone Deficiency ◽  
First Year ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Igf I

AbstractOur aim was to analyze a cohort of patients with childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency (GHD) to evaluate if there is some correlation between the response to GH treatment during childhood and adulthood, respectively. This was an observational retrospective monocentric cohort study of 47 patients treated with GH during childhood and adulthood. Changes in growth parameters during childhood were compared with the increase of IGF-I z-score and other indexes of GH response (body composition, lipid profile) after 1 year of treatment in adulthood. The only significant positive correlation was observed between final growth velocity during the last year of childhood GH treatment and increase in IGF-I z-score in GH-treated adults (r=0.592, p=< 0.01). No correlation was observed between growth-promoting effects of GH as child and metabolic changes induced by GH as adult. We also observed a negative correlation between weight at the end of childhood GH treatment and the IGF-I response during first year of treatment in adults (r=− 0.335, p <0.05). No significant positive correlation could be observed between the main parameters that evaluate response to GH treatment in children and adults. However, the final growth velocity, which may be considered as one of the main criteria of end of GH treatment in children, was identified as parameter that could predict future response to GH treatment in adulthood.

Growth Hormone Therapy in Children with Kabuki Syndrome: 1-year Treatment Results

2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 258-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina A. Schott ◽  
Willem J.M. Gerver ◽  
Constance T.R.M. Stumpel
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Gh Deficiency ◽  
Standard Deviation Score ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
Kabuki Syndrome ◽  
Body Proportions ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Rhgh Treatment

Background/Aims: Kabuki syndrome (KS) is a rare genetic malformation syndrome, resulting in characteristic features such as short stature. We investigate whether growth hormone (GH) treatment increases linear height and influences body proportions in KS children. Methods: In this prospective study, 18 genetically confirmed prepubertal KS children (9 females and 9 males) aged from 3.8 to 10.1 years (mean 6.8 ± 2.1 years) were treated with recombinant human GH (rhGH) for 1 year. Calculations for height, height velocity, BMI, sitting height, and subischial leg length were made. Bone age, insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I), and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) were also measured. Results: This study showed an increase in height standard deviation score (SDS) for the whole group from –2.40 to –1.69 (p < 0.05) after 1 year of rhGH treatment. The change in height SDS within 1 year was >0.7 SDS for 10 subjects and >0.5 SDS for 3 subjects. The mean IGF-I SDS at the start of the study was –0.70 (±1.07), which increased after 12 months to 1.41 (±0.91) (p < 0.05). KS children who received rhGH at a younger age displayed significantly greater increases in height than those who started when they were older. The same was true for both gene mutation KMT2D versus KDM6A and for GH deficiency versus non-GH deficiency KS children (p < 0.05). Throughout the course of rhGH treatment, the subjects’ body proportions remained normal. Conclusions: All participants experienced catch-up growth during the year of rhGH treatment, but without an influence on body proportions.

Response to growth hormone treatment in very young patients with growth hormone deficiencies and mini-puberty

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semra Çetinkaya ◽  
Şükran Poyrazoğlu ◽  
Firdevs Baş ◽  
Oya Ercan ◽  
Metin Yıldız ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Gh Deficiency ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
First Year ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Length Gain

Abstract Background: The aim of the study was to assess the response to growth hormone (GH) treatment in very young patients with GH deficiency (GHD) through a national, multi-center study. Possible factors affecting growth response were assessed (especially mini-puberty). Methods: Medical reports of GHD patients in whom treatment was initiated between 0 and 3 years of age were retrospectively evaluated. Results: The cohort numbered 67. The diagnosis age was 12.4±8.6 months, peak GH stimulation test response (at diagnosis) as 1.0±1.4 ng/mL. The first and second years length gain was 15.0±4.3 and 10.4±3.4 cm. Weight gain had the largest effect on first year growth response; whereas weight gain and GH dose were both important factors affecting second year growth response. In the multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) group (n=50), first year GH response was significantly greater than in the isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) group (n=17) (p=0.030). In addition first year growth response of infants starting GH between 0 and 12 months of age (n=24) was significantly greater than those who started treatment between 12 and 36 months of age (n=43) (p<0.001). These differences were not seen in the second year. Δ Length/height standard deviation score (SDS), Δ body weight SDS, length/height SDS, weight SDS in MPHD without hypogonadism for the first year of the GH treatment were found as significantly better than MPHD with hypogonadism. Conclusions: Early onsets of GH treatment, good weight gain in the first year of the treatment and good weight gain-GH dose in the second year of the treatment are the factors that have the greatest effect on length gain in early onset GHD. The presence of the sex steroid hormones during minipubertal period influence growth pattern positively under GH treatment (closer to the normal percentage according to age and gender).

Basal characteristics and first year responses to human growth hormone (GH) vary according to diagnostic criteria in children with non-acquired GH deficiency (naGHD): observations from a single center over a period of five decades

2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Ranke ◽  
Roland Schweizer ◽  
Gerhard Binder
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Human Growth Hormone ◽  
Human Growth ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
First Year ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Igfbp 3

Abstract Background Children with non-acquired (na) growth hormone deficiency (GHD) diagnosed over decades in one center may provide perspective insight. Methods naGHD is divided into idiopathic GHD (IGHD), GHD of known cause (cGHD) and GHD neurosecretory dysfunction (NSD); time periods: <1988 (I); 1988–1997 (II); 1998–2007 (III); 2008–2015 (IV). Descriptive analyses were performed at diagnosis and during first year GH treatment. Results Patients (periods, N): I, 87; II, 141; III, 356; IV, 51. In cGHD (all), age, maximum GH, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) (5.1 years, 3.6 μg/L, −5.3 standard deviation score [SDS], −3.7 SDS) were lower than in IGHD (all) (6.8 years 5.8 μg/L, −2.5 SDS, −1.0 SDS), but not height (−3.1 vs. −3.2 SDS). Characteristics of NSD were similar to that of IGHD. Patients with IGHD – not cGHD – diagnosed during 2008–2015 (IV) were the youngest with most severe GHD (maxGH, IGF-I, IGFBP-3), and first year height velocity (HV) and ∆ IGF-I (10.5 cm/year, 4.0 SDS) but not ∆ height SDS were the highest on recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) (27 μg/kg/day). Conclusions Although during 1988–2007 patient characteristics were similar, the recently (>2008) stipulated more stringent diagnostic criteria – HV before testing, sex steroid priming, lower GH cut-off – have restricted diagnoses to more severe cases as they were observed before the rhGH era.

scholarly journals SAT-106 Growth Hormone Treatment Response in Children

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell Rath ◽  
Daniele Pacaud ◽  
Karin Winston ◽  
Josephine Ho ◽  
Jonathan M Dawrant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Turner Syndrome ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Stimulation Test ◽  
Height Velocity ◽  
First Year ◽  
Gh Therapy ◽  
Gh Treatment ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
The Mean

Abstract OBJECTIVES: Growth hormone (GH) therapy is an effective treatment in addressing growth failure in children with GH deficiency (GHD). It has also been increasingly used in non-GH deficient (nGHD) conditions. We sought to report the growth response of GHD and nGHD patients who received GH therapy at a tertiary care center. METHODS: Data was collected from health records of patients followed in the endocrinology clinic at Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Canada, from 2005 to 2019, and used to analyze clinical responses based on indication for GH treatment. RESULTS: A total of 167 patient records (87 males and 80 females) were used for analysis. The average age at the start of GH therapy was 7.3 years (range 0.25 to 16.98 yrs). 74 patients were in the GHD group while 93 were nGHD. Of the patients in the nGHD group, the most common diagnosis were: idiopathic short stature (ISS)(n=45), Turner syndrome (TS)(n=26), and Prader Willi Syndrome (PWS)(n=8). The mean height velocity (HV) in year 1 was highest in the GHD group at 11.68 cm/year (n= 62, sd = 5.93), followed by ISS at 9.41cm/year (n = 52, sd = 4.34). The mean first year HV of those who had received chemotherapy (n= 5, mean = 5.48, sd = 1.92) or had Turner syndrome (n= 24, mean = 7.20, sd = 2.15) was significantly lower than both the GHD and ISS groups. GH peak during a GH stimulation test at baseline was not correlated to the first year height velocity while on GH treatment. However there was a negative linear correlation between baseline IGF1 level and first year height velocity (Spearman’s rho = 0.312216, p-value= 0.01516). Age at GH initiation was negatively correlated with height velocity during GH treatment. Height velocity over time decreased sharply from year 1 to year 3, and became stable for the remaining years of GH therapy. For the entire group, HV for years 1-5 was 9.81 (sd=4.83), 7.40 (sd=2.89), 6.29 (sd=2.38), 5.92 (sd=2.56), 5.66 (sd=2.51). There is no significant correlation between GH dose and height velocity response after adjusting for diagnosis. CONCLUSION: In our population, the response to GH therapy was consistent with those reported in the literature. Response to GH therapy was not associated with GH peak on stimulation but rather to baseline IGF-1 level and age at initiation. Although peak GH to stimulation is required to obtain public funding for GH therapy, these findings demonstrate that GH stimulation test results may not indicate which patients may benefit the most from GH therapy. Follow-up until final adult height will allow us to have a better understanding of the efficacy of GH therapy in patients with both GHD and nGHD conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document