Impact of Thyroid Disease on Bone Mineral Density Preservation in Patients With Osteoporosis and Idiopathic Hypercalciuria

Abstract Background: Idiopathic hypercalciuria (IHC) is associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. It is not known if thyroid disease impacts the degree of urine and bone mineral abnormalities in patients with IHC and osteoporosis (OPO). Methods: Retrospective chart review from a private endocrinology clinic identified 62 consecutive patients with OPO (fragility fracture and/or t-score ≤-2.5 on bone density scan) and concomitant diagnosis of IHC (urine calcium > 4.0 mg/kg weight/d when intaking low-moderate calcium amounts). Patients were classified into two groups: those with thyroid disease (Thy+, if presence of autoimmune thyroid disease [AITD] with high antibody titers and/or long-term thyroid medication use) and those without (Thy-). Comparisons were made between the two groups for severity of renal disease (urine calcium) and bone disease (number of fragility fractures, and BMD response to therapy). Results: Of 55 women and 7 men identified with both OPO and IHC, 30 were Thy+ (4 with Graves’, 11 with confirmed Hashimoto’s, 13 taking levothyroxine for presumed Hashimoto’s and 2 with thyroid cancer), and 32 were Thy- (including 2 with type 1 DM, 1 with vitiligo, and 6 with non-toxic nodular goiters requiring biopsies). Thy+ were compared to Thy- with respect to: mean age (70.7 ± 7.3 vs. 70.8 ± 9.3 y), sex (97% vs. 81% women), 24-hr urine calcium at diagnosis (317 ± 75 vs. 311 ± 68 mg), presence of fragility fracture (50% vs. 59%), use of thiazide (83% vs. 78%), and use of anti-fracture pharmacotherapy (73% vs. 84%). 50 patients had adequate comparative longitudinal BMD data. A (+) BMD response was based on consistent increases in BMD and/or t-scores across all spine and hip sites, and a (-) BMD response was classified by decreased BMD and/or t-scores across all sites. For Thy+ vs. Thy- patients, there were 25% vs. 69% (+) BMD response, 38% vs. 12% (-) BMD response, 21% vs. 4% with no significant BMD response, and 17% vs. 15% with mixed BMD responses. Conclusions: In this group at high risk for future fragility fractures, much lower rates of BMD preservation was seen in the Thy+ as compared to the Thy- patients. Overall, AITD and medical thyroid disease was very common (48%) in this cohort of patients with IHC and OP. However, this high rate may be confounded by the selective nature of the specialty clinic population. Further research needs to delineate the impact of AITD and thyroid medication use on the progression and treatment of patients with IHC and OPO.

Download Full-text

Prevalence of subclinical contributors to low bone mineral density and/or fragility fracture

Acta Endocrinologica ◽

10.1530/eje-13-0102 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 169 (2) ◽

pp. 225-237 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

Cristina Eller-Vainicher ◽

Elisa Cairoli ◽

Volha V Zhukouskaya ◽

Valentina Morelli ◽

Serena Palmieri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Fragility Fracture ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Hypovitaminosis D ◽

Urinary Calcium ◽

Idiopathic Hypercalciuria ◽

Primary Osteoporosis ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Low Bone Mineral Density

ObjectiveThe prevalence of subclinical contributors to low bone mineral density (BMD) and/or fragility fracture is debated. We evaluated the prevalence of subclinical contributors to low BMD and/or fragility fracture in the presence of normal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHVitD) levels.DesignProspective observational study.MethodsAmong 1095 consecutive outpatients evaluated for low BMD and/or fragility fractures, 602 (563 females, age 65.4±10.0 years) with apparent primary osteoporosis were enrolled. A general chemistry profile, phosphate, 25OHVitD, cortisol after 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test, antitissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies and testosterone (in males) were performed. Serum and urinary calcium and parathyroid hormone levels were also evaluated after 25OHVitD levels normalization. Vertebral deformities were assessed by radiograph.ResultsIn total, 70.8% of patients had low 25OHVitD levels. Additional subclinical contributors to low BMD and/or fragility fracture were diagnosed in 45% of patients, with idiopathic hypercalciuria (IH, 34.1%) and primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT, 4.5%) being the most frequent contributors, apart from hypovitaminosis D. Furthermore, 33.2% of IH and 18.5% of PHPT patients were diagnosed only after 25OHVitD levels normalization. The subclinical contributors to low BMD and/or fragility fracture besides hypovitaminosis D were associated inversely with age (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% CI 1–1.04, P=0.04) and BMI (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.05–1.17, P=0.0001) and directly with fragility fractures (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.31–2.73, P=0.001), regardless of BMD.ConclusionsSubclinical contributors to low BMD and/or fragility fracture besides hypovitaminosis D are present in more than 40% of the subjects with apparent primary osteoporosis. Hypovitaminosis D masks a substantial proportion of IH and PHPT patients.

Download Full-text

O41 Percentage body fat as a predictor for fragility fracture: an observational study

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keaa110.040 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

Dominic T Beith ◽

Marwan Bukhari

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Fracture Risk ◽

Body Mass ◽

Body Fat ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Fragility Fracture ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Percentage Body Fat

Abstract Background A body mass index (BMI) of less than 19 is a known risk factor for the development of osteoporosis and thus increases the propensity of one having a fragility fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) referrals are aided by the FRAX™ tool, which contains BMI in order to calculate the ten-year fracture risk. We aimed to investigate the effect of percentage body fat on risk of fracture referred for BMD estimation. Methods Between June 2004 and October 2015, patients were referred for bone mineral density (BMD) estimation in a scanner in the North West of England. All patients were referred with all FRAX™ indications including rheumatoid arthritis, excess alcohol, steroids, family history of fracture and secondary osteoporosis. The cohort was divided into quintiles of ascending body mass percentage. Logistical regression was then applied before adjusting for age at scan, gender and total left BMD comparing patients with a fracture and those that had not. Results 35,759 patients were referred for scanning during the period. 22,765 (63.66%) were referred for BMD estimation and had body fat percentage measured. Mean age at scan was 63.16 (SD 12.86) and 18,961 (88.29%) of the cohort were females. 8,072 (35.46%) had a fracture. More fractures were seen in higher quintiles of percentage body fat, 1,693 (20.97%) compared to 1,580 (19.57%) in females (p = <0.05). Predictors shown in the Table 1 below adjusted for age at scan, gender and total left BMD. Logistical regression of the quintiles after adjustment shows statistical significance in quintiles 3, 4 and 5 as well as for age at scan and total left BMD. Other predictors did not shows statistical significance p > 0.05. Conclusion Our study of 22,765 patients referred for BMD estimations opposes current literature on the effect of BMI on fragility fractures. The data shows that increasing percentage body fat in associated with an increased propensity of fragility fractures in those with BMI as a FRAX™ indicator. Currently percentage body fact is not featured in the FRAX™ tool and further work needs to be done to show the relationship between fracture risk and percentage body fat. Disclosures D.T. Beith: None. M. Bukhari: None.

Download Full-text

Relationship between bone mineral density and fragility fracture risk: a case-control study in Changsha, China

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-021-04616-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Hong-Li Li ◽

Yi Shen ◽

Li-Hua Tan ◽

Song-bo Fu ◽

Ru-Chun Dai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Fracture Risk ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Fragility Fracture ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Control Group ◽

Reference Database ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Background Fragility fracture is associated with bone mineral density (BMD), and most databases used in related researches are instrument-matched. Little is known about the relationship between BMD and fragility fracture risk of native Chinese, especially using local databases as reference databases. Objective To investigate relationship between BMD and risk of fragility fracture in native China. Methods 3,324 cases, including 2,423 women (67.7 ± 8.9 years) and 901 men (68.4 ± 11.6 years) having radiological fragility fractures and 3,324 age- and gender-matched controls participated in the study. We measured BMD at posteroanterior spine and hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), calculated BMD measurement parameters based on our own BMD reference database. Results BMDs and mean T-scores were lower in case group (with clinical fragility) than in control group (without clinical fragility). In patients with fragility fractures, prevalence of lumbar osteoporosis, low bone mass, and normal BMD were 78.9 %, 19.3 %, and 1.8 %, respectively, in women, and 49.5, 44.8 %, and 5.7 %, respectively, in men. In hip, these prevalence rates were 67.2 %, 28.4 %, and 4.4 % in females, and 43.2 %, 45.9 %, and 10.9 % in males, respectively, showing differences between females and males. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that after adjusting age, height, weight, and body mass index, fracture hazard ratio (HR) increased by 2.7–2.8 times (95 % CI 2.5–3.1) and 3.6–4.1 times (95 %CI 3.0–5.1) for women and men respectively with decreasing BMD parameters. In both sexes, risk of fragility fracture increased approximately 1.6–1.7 times (95 % CI 1.5–1.8) for every 1 T-score reduction in BMD. Conclusions Risk of clinical fragility fracture increases with decreasing BMD measurement parameters and anthropometric indicators in native China, and fracture HR varies from gender and site.

Download Full-text

Dietary calcium intake in a cohort of individuals evaluated for low bone mineral density: a multicenter Italian study

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research ◽

10.1007/s40520-021-01856-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Elisa Cairoli ◽

◽

Carmen Aresta ◽

Luca Giovanelli ◽

Cristina Eller-Vainicher ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Calcium Intake ◽

Mineral Metabolism ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Dietary Calcium ◽

Dietary Calcium Intake ◽

Idiopathic Hypercalciuria ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Low Calcium

Abstract Background A low calcium intake is a well-known factor that influences the bone mineral density (BMD) maintenance. In the presence of inadequate calcium intake, secondary hyperparathyroidism develops, leading to an increased bone turnover and fracture risk. Aims To assess the dietary calcium intake in relation with osteoporosis and fragility fracture in a cohort of Italian individuals evaluated for low BMD. Methods A 7-day food-frequency questionnaire was administered to 1793 individuals, who were consecutively referred at the Centers of the Italian Society for Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism and Skeletal Diseases (SIOMMMS) for low BMD. Results In 30.3% and 20.9% of subjects, the calcium intake was inadequate (< 700 mg/day) and adequate (> 1200 mg/day), respectively. As compared with patients with adequate calcium intake, those with inadequate calcium intake were younger (65.5 ± 10.8 vs 63.9 ± 11.5 years, p = 0.03) and they more frequently reported adverse reactions to food (3.2% vs 7.2% p = 0.01) and previous major fragility fractures (20.8% vs 27.0%, p = 0.03). Patients with calcium intake < 700 mg/day showed a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, idiopathic hypercalciuria and food allergy/intolerance (8.1%, 5.1%, 7.2%, respectively) than patients with calcium intake > 700 mg/day (5.3%, 3.0%, 4.1%, respectively, p < 0.04 for all comparisons), also after adjusting for age, gender and body mass index. In 30.3% of fractured subjects, the calcium intake was < 700 mg/day. Discussion In Italy, a low calcium intake is highly prevalent in individuals at risk for low BMD. Importantly, an inadequate calcium intake is highly prevalent even in patients with history of fragility fractures. Conclusions Only about a fifth of patients being assessed for low BMD in an Italian SIOMMMS referral Centre have an adequate calcium intake.

Download Full-text

P129 Predictors of low bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keab247.124 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Malika A Swar ◽

Marwan Bukhari

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Family History ◽

Bone Loss ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Fragility Fracture ◽

Mineral Density ◽

History Of

Abstract Background/Aims Osteoporosis (OP) is an extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that leads to increased fracture susceptibility due to a variety of reasons including immobility and cytokine driven bone loss. Bone loss in other populations has well documented risk factors. It is unknown whether bone loss in RA predominantly affects the femoral neck or the spine. This study aimed to identify independent predictors of low bone mineral density (BMD) in patients RA at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck. Methods This was a retrospective observational cohort study using patients with Rheumatoid arthritis attending for a regional dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary between 2004 and 2014. BMD in L1-L4 in the spine and in the femoral neck were recorded. The risk factors investigated were steroid use, family history of osteoporosis, smoking, alcohol abuse, BMI, gender, previous fragility fracture, number of FRAX(tm) risk factors and age. Univariate and Multivariate regression analysis models were fitted to explore bone loss at these sites using BMD in g/cm2 as a dependant variable. . Results 1,527 patients were included in the analysis, 1,207 (79%) were female. Mean age was 64.34 years (SD11.6). mean BMI was 27.32kg/cm2 (SD 5.570) 858 (56.2%) had some steroid exposure . 169(11.1%) had family history of osteoporosis. fragility fracture history found in 406 (26.6%). 621 (40.7%) were current or ex smokers . There was a median of 3 OP risk factors (IQR 1,3) The performance of the models is shown in table one below. Different risk factors appeared to influence the BMD at different sites and the cumulative risk factors influenced BMD in the spine. None of the traditional risk factors predicted poor bone loss well in this cohort. P129 Table 1:result of the regression modelsCharacteristicB femoral neck95% CIpB spine95%CIpAge at scan-0.004-0.005,-0.003<0.01-0.0005-0.002,0.00050.292Sex-0.094-0.113,-0.075<0.01-0.101-0.129,-0.072<0.01BMI (mg/m2)0.0080.008,0.0101<0.010.01130.019,0.013<0.01Fragility fracture-0.024-0.055,0.0060.12-0.0138-0.060,0.0320.559Smoking0.007-0.022,0.0350.650.0286-0.015,0.0720.20Alcohol0.011-0.033,0.0 5560.620.0544-0.013,0.1120.11Family history of OP0.012-0.021,0.0450.470.0158-0.034,0.0650.53Number of risk factors-0.015-0.039,0.0080.21-0.039-0.075,-0.0030.03steroids0.004-0.023,0.0320.030.027-0.015,0.0690.21 Conclusion This study has shown that predictors of low BMD in the spine and hip are different and less influential than expected in this cohort with RA . As the FRAX(tm) tool only uses the femoral neck, this might underestimate the fracture risk in this population. Further work looking at individual areas is ongoing. Disclosure M.A. Swar: None. M. Bukhari: None.

Download Full-text

DXA parameters, Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD), in fracture risk prediction in endocrine-mediated secondary osteoporosis

Endocrine ◽

10.1007/s12020-021-02806-x ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Enisa Shevroja ◽

Francesco Pio Cafarelli ◽

Giuseppe Guglielmi ◽

Didier Hans

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Trabecular Bone ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Trabecular Bone Score ◽

Bone Microarchitecture ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Endocrine Disorders ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Increased Risk

AbstractOsteoporosis, a disease characterized by low bone mass and alterations of bone microarchitecture, leading to an increased risk for fragility fractures and, eventually, to fracture; is associated with an excess of mortality, a decrease in quality of life, and co-morbidities. Bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), has been the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Trabecular bone score (TBS), a textural analysis of the lumbar spine DXA images, is an index of bone microarchitecture. TBS has been robustly shown to predict fractures independently of BMD. In this review, while reporting also results on BMD, we mainly focus on the TBS role in the assessment of bone health in endocrine disorders known to be reflected in bone.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of association of fragility fracture and bone mineral density in Nepalese population

Nepal Journal of Medical Sciences ◽

10.3126/njms.v2i2.8956 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 130-134

Author(s):

Md. Farid Amanullah ◽

BP Shrestha ◽

GP Khanal ◽

NK Karna ◽

S Ansari ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Risk Factor ◽

Alcohol Consumption ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Fragility Fracture ◽

High Energy ◽

Medical Illness ◽

Mineral Density ◽

T Score ◽

Study Results

Background: Fragility fractures are one of the major health problems. Many factors are associated with it some of which are modifiable and some are not. If we know the value of T-score at which fragility fracture occurs and associated factors responsible for fragility fracture than we will be able to control this burden to the society. The objective of this study is to determine association between fragility fracture and bone mineral density (BMD) using bone densitometry and to know the value of T-score at which fragility fracture occurs. Methods: Patients presenting to B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences with fragility fracture of distal end of radius, fracture around hip and vertebral fractures were included in the study to know the value of T-score at which fragility fracture occurs and their associated risk factor. Patients less than 50 years of age, high energy trauma fracture and pathological fractures were excluded from the study. Results: We found that being multipara, smoking, alcohol consumption, post-hysterectomized patients and steroid intake had significant association with fragility fracture. There was no association with religion, geographic location, associated medical illness, age, sex, associated injury and site of injury. Conclusion: The patients with risk factor for fragility fracture like smoking, alcohol consumption, multipara women, post-hysterectomized women and those who are on long term steroid therapy should undergo BMD test and the value at -3.254 are prone to fragility fracture and should be treated accordingly. Nepal Journal of Medical Sciences | Volume 02 | Number 02 | July-December 2013 | Page 130-134 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njms.v2i2.8956

Download Full-text

93 Does Spinal Bone Mineral Density Predict An Absolute 10 Year Probability of Sustaining A Major Osteoporotic Fracture

Age and Ageing ◽

10.1093/ageing/afab030.54 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. i12-i42

Author(s):

A Nandi ◽

N Obiechina ◽

A Timperley ◽

F Al-Khalidi

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Osteoporotic Fracture ◽

Negative Correlation ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Fragility Fractures ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Major Osteoporotic Fracture ◽

T Score ◽

The Mean

Abstract Introduction Spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) have previously been shown to predict the risk of sustaining future fractures. Although these have been shown in population studies, there is a paucity of trials looking at the relationship between BMD and 10 year probability of major osteoporotic fractures (Using FRAX UK without BMD) in patients with previous fragility fractures. Aims To evaluate the correlation between spinal T-score and an absolute 10 year probability of sustaining a major osteoporotic fracture (using FRAX without BMD) in patients with prior fragility fractures. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 202 patients (29 males and 173 females) with prior fragility fractures attending a fracture prevention clinic between January and August 2019 was performed. Patients with pathological and high impact traumatic fractures were excluded. The BMD at the spine was determined using the lowest T-score of the vertebrae from L1 to L4. Using the FRAX (UK) without BMD, the absolute 10 year probability of sustaining a major osteoporotic fracture was calculated for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26 software. Results The mean T-score at the spine was −1.15 (SD +/− 1.90) for all patients, −0.68 (SD +/− 0.45) for males and − 1.23 (SD +/− 0.14) for females. The mean FRAX score without BMD for major osteoporotic fracture was 18.5% (SD +/− 8.84) for all patients, 11.41% (SD +/−0.62) and 19.7% (SD +/−0.68) for males and females respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient showed a statistically significant, slightly negative correlation between spinal T- score and the FRAX (UK) without BMD (r = −0.157; p < 0.05). Correlation was not statistically significant when males (r = 0.109; p = 0.59) and females (r = 0.148; p = 0.053) were considered independently. Conclusion In patients with prior fragility fracture spinal BMD has a statistically significant negative correlation with an absolute 10 year probability of sustaining a major osteoporotic fracture.

Download Full-text

Beyond Bone Mineral Density: A New Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Index of Bone Strength to Predict Fragility Fractures, the Bone Strain Index

Frontiers in Medicine ◽

10.3389/fmed.2020.590139 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 ◽

Author(s):

Fabio Massimo Ulivieri ◽

Luca Rinaudo

Keyword(s):

Bone Mineral Density ◽

Density Distribution ◽

Bone Strength ◽

Bone Quality ◽

Bone Mineral ◽

Fragility Fracture ◽

Bone Strain ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Strain Index ◽

X Ray

For a proper assessment of osteoporotic fragility fracture prediction, all aspects regarding bone mineral density, bone texture, geometry and information about strength are necessary, particularly in endocrinological and rheumatological diseases, where bone quality impairment is relevant. Data regarding bone quantity (density) and, partially, bone quality (structure and geometry) are obtained by the gold standard method of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data about bone strength are not yet readily available. To evaluate bone resistance to strain, a new DXA-derived index based on the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a greyscale of density distribution measured on spine and femoral scan, namely Bone Strain Index (BSI), has recently been developed. Bone Strain Index includes local information on density distribution, bone geometry and loadings and it differs from bone mineral density (BMD) and other variables of bone quality like trabecular bone score (TBS), which are all based on the quantification of bone mass and distribution averaged over the scanned region. This state of the art review illustrates the methodology of BSI calculation, the findings of its in reproducibility and the preliminary data about its capability to predict fragility fracture and to monitor the follow up of the pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis.

Download Full-text