scholarly journals Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Coactivator-1α Interacts with the Androgen Receptor (AR) and Promotes Prostate Cancer Cell Growth by Activating the AR

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Akira Yokomizo ◽  
Yasuhiro Tada ◽  
Junichi Inokuchi ◽  
Katsunori Tatsugami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor ◽  
Castration Resistant

Abstract There are currently few successful therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). CRPC is thought to result from augmented activation of the androgen/androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway, which could be enhanced by AR cofactors. In this study, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) was found to be an AR cofactor. PGC-1α interacted with the N-terminal domain of AR, was involved in the N- and C-terminal interaction of AR, and enhanced the DNA-binding ability of AR to androgen-responsive elements in the prostate-specific antigen enhancer and promoter regions to increase the transcription of AR target genes. Silencing of PGC-1α suppressed cell growth of AR-expressing prostate cancer (PCa) cells by inducing cell-cycle arrest at the G1 phase, similar to inhibition of androgen/AR signaling. Furthermore, PGC-1α knock-down also suppressed cell growth in the castration-resistant LNCaP-derivatives. These findings indicate that PGC-1α is involved in the proliferation of AR-expressing PCa cells by acting as an AR coactivator. Modulation of PGC-1α expression or function may offer a useful strategy for developing novel therapeutics for PCa, including CRPC, which depends on AR signaling by overexpressing AR and its coactivators.

scholarly journals Human heterochromatin protein 1 isoform HP1β enhances androgen receptor activity and is implicated in prostate cancer growth

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 455-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Shiota ◽  
Y Song ◽  
A Yokomizo ◽  
Y Tada ◽  
K Kuroiwa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Androgen Receptor Activity

There are currently few successful therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). CRPC is thought to result from augmented activation of the androgen/androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway, which could be enhanced by AR cofactors. In this study, heterochromatin protein 1β (HP1β), but not HP1α or HP1γ was found to be an AR cofactor. HP1β interacted with the AR, and enhanced the DNA-binding ability of AR to androgen-responsive element in the prostate-specific antigen enhancer and promoter regions, and to increase the transcription of AR target genes. In prostate cancer (PCa) tissues, HP1β expressions correlated with Gleason score and tri-methylation levels of histone H3 lysine 9. Silencing of HP1β suppressed the growth of AR-expressing PCa cells by inducing cell-cycle arrest at the G1 phase, similar to inhibition of androgen/AR signaling. Furthermore, HP1β was overexpressed in castration-resistant LNCaP derivative CxR cells, and HP1β knockdown also suppressed the cell growth in CxR cells. These findings indicate that HP1β is involved in the proliferation of AR-expressing PCa cells and progression to CRPC as an AR coactivator. Modulation of HP1β expression or function might be a useful strategy for developing novel therapeutics for PCa, even in CRPC.

scholarly journals Treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: focus on second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Saad ◽  
Martin Bögemann ◽  
Kazuhiro Suzuki ◽  
Neal Shore
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Conventional Imaging ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
Consensus Statements

Abstract Background Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is defined as a rising prostate-specific antigen concentration, despite castrate levels of testosterone with ongoing androgen-deprivation therapy or orchiectomy, and no detectable metastases by conventional imaging. Patients with nmCRPC progress to metastatic disease and are at risk of developing cancer-related symptoms and morbidity, eventually dying of their disease. While patients with nmCRPC are generally asymptomatic from their disease, they are often older and have chronic comorbidities that require long-term concomitant medication. Therefore, careful consideration of the benefit–risk profile of potential treatments is required. Methods In this review, we will discuss the rationale for early treatment of patients with nmCRPC to delay metastatic progression and prolong survival, as well as the factors influencing this treatment decision. We will focus on oral pharmacotherapy with the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide, and the importance of balancing the clinical benefit they offer with potential adverse events and the consequential impact on quality of life, physical capacity, and cognitive function. Results and conclusions While the definition of nmCRPC is well established, the advent of next-generation imaging techniques capable of detecting hitherto undetectable oligometastatic disease in patients with nmCRPC has fostered debate on the criteria that inform the management of these patients. However, despite these developments, published consensus statements have maintained that the absence of metastases on conventional imaging suffices to guide such therapeutic decisions. In addition, the prolonged metastasis-free survival and recently reported positive overall survival outcomes of the three second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors have provided further evidence for the early use of these agents in patients with nmCRPC in order to delay metastases and prolong survival. Here, we discuss the benefit–risk profiles of apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide based on the data available from their pivotal clinical trials in patients with nmCRPC.

scholarly journals Isoform specific activities of androgen receptor and its splice variants in prostate cancer cells

Endocrinology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harika Nagandla ◽  
Matthew J Robertson ◽  
Vasanta Putluri ◽  
Nagireddy Putluri ◽  
Cristian Coarfa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Splice Variants ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Specific Activities ◽  
Lncap Prostate Cancer Cell

Abstract Androgen receptor (AR) signaling continues to drive castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in spite of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Constitutively active shorter variants of AR, lacking the ligand binding domain, are frequently expressed in CRPC and have emerged as a potential mechanism for prostate cancer to escape ADT. ARv7 and AR v567es are two of the most commonly detected variants of AR in clinical samples of advanced, metastatic prostate cancer. It is not clear if variants of AR merely act as weaker substitutes for AR or can mediate unique isoform specific activities different from AR. In this study, we employed LNCaP prostate cancer cell lines with inducible expression of ARv7 or AR v567es to delineate similarities and differences in transcriptomics, metabolomics and lipidomics resulting from the activation of AR, ARv7 or AR v567es. While the majority of target genes were similarly regulated by the action of all three isoforms, we found a clear difference in transcriptomic activities of AR versus the variants, and a few differences between ARv7 and AR v567es. Some of the target gene regulation by AR isoforms was similar in the VCaP background as well. Differences in downstream activities of AR isoforms were also evident from comparison of the metabolome and lipidome in an LNCaP model. Overall our study implies that shorter variants of AR are capable of mediating unique downstream activities different from AR and some of these are isoform specific.

scholarly journals Activation of GPR56, a novel adhesion GPCR, is necessary for nuclear androgen receptor signaling in prostate cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Pratibha Singh ◽  
Manisha Dagar ◽  
Gunjan Dagar ◽  
Sudhir Rawal ◽  
Ravi Datta Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Prostate Tumor ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Pka Pathway ◽  
Adhesion Gpcr

AbstractThe androgen receptor (AR) is activated in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) despite low circulating levels of androgen, suggesting that intracellular signaling pathways and non-androgenic factors may contribute to AR activation. Many G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) and their ligands are also activated in these cells indicating a role for these in CRPC. Although a cross talk has been suggested between the two pathways, yet, the identity of GPCRs which may play a role in androgen signaling, is not established yet. We demonstrate that adhesion GPCR 205, also known as GPR56, can be activated by androgens to stimulate the Rho signaling pathway, a pathway that plays an important role in prostate tumor cell metastasis. Testosterone stimulation of GPR56 also activates the cAMP/ Protein kinase A (PKA) pathway, that is necessary for AR signaling. Knocking down the expression of GPR56 using siRNA, disrupts nuclear translocation of AR and transcription of prototypic AR target genes such as PSA. GPR56 expression is higher in all prostate tumor samples tested and cells expressing GPR56 exhibit increased proliferation. These findings provide new insights about androgen signaling and identify GPR56 as a possible therapeutic target in advanced prostate cancer patients.

scholarly journals Randomized, Noncomparative, Phase II Trial of Early Switch From Docetaxel to Cabazitaxel or Vice Versa, With Integrated Biomarker Analysis, in Men With Chemotherapy-Naïve, Metastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (28) ◽  
pp. 3181-3188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Giuseppe Galletti ◽  
Daniel Worroll ◽  
Karla Ballman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Historical Control ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Biomarker Analysis

Purpose The TAXYNERGY trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01718353) evaluated clinical benefit from early taxane switch and circulating tumor cell (CTC) biomarkers to interrogate mechanisms of sensitivity or resistance to taxanes in men with chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to docetaxel or cabazitaxel. Men who did not achieve ≥ 30% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline by cycle 4 (C4) switched taxane. The primary clinical endpoint was confirmed ≥ 50% PSA decline versus historical control (TAX327). The primary biomarker endpoint was analysis of post-treatment CTCs to confirm the hypothesis that clinical response was associated with taxane drug-target engagement, evidenced by decreased percent androgen receptor nuclear localization (%ARNL) and increased microtubule bundling. Results Sixty-three patients were randomly assigned to docetaxel (n = 41) or cabazitaxel (n = 22); 44.4% received prior potent androgen receptor–targeted therapy. Overall, 35 patients (55.6%) had confirmed ≥ 50% PSA responses, exceeding the historical control rate of 45.4% (TAX327). Of 61 treated patients, 33 (54.1%) had ≥ 30% PSA declines by C4 and did not switch taxane, 15 patients (24.6%) who did not achieve ≥ 30% PSA declines by C4 switched taxane, and 13 patients (21.3%) discontinued therapy before or at C4. Of patients switching taxane, 46.7% subsequently achieved ≥ 50% PSA decrease. In 26 CTC-evaluable patients, taxane-induced decrease in %ARNL (cycle 1 day 1 v cycle 1 day 8) was associated with a higher rate of ≥ 50% PSA decrease at C4 ( P = .009). Median composite progression-free survival was 9.1 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 11.7 months); median overall survival was not reached at 14 months. Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included fatigue (13.1%) and febrile neutropenia (11.5%). Conclusion The early taxane switch strategy was associated with improved PSA response rates versus TAX327. Taxane-induced shifts in %ARNL may serve as an early biomarker of clinical benefit in patients treated with taxanes.

scholarly journals Human heterochromatin protein 1 isoforms regulate androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Momoe Itsumi ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Akira Yokomizo ◽  
Eiji Kashiwagi ◽  
Ario Takeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
22Rv1 Cell

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is critical for the tumorigenesis and development of prostate cancer, as well as the progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer. We previously showed that the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) β isoform plays a critical role in transactivation of AR signaling as an AR coactivator that promotes prostate cancer cell proliferation. However, the roles of other HP1 isoforms, HP1α and HP1γ, in AR expression and prostate cancer remain unclear. Here, we found that knockdown of HP1γ, but not HP1α, reduced AR expression and cell proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest at G1 phase in LNCaP cells. Conversely, overexpression of full-length HP1α and its C-terminal deletion mutant increased AR expression and cell growth, whereas overexpression of HP1γ had no effect. Similarly, HP1α overexpression promoted 22Rv1 cell growth, whereas HP1γ knockdown reduced the proliferation of CxR cells, a castration-resistant LNCaP derivative. Taken together, HP1 isoforms distinctly augment AR signaling and cell growth in prostate cancer. Therefore, silencing of HP1β and HP1γ may be a promising therapeutic strategy for treatment of prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Targeting Androgen Receptor and DNA Repair in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results From NCI 9012

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 991-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Hussain ◽  
Stephanie Daignault-Newton ◽  
Przemyslaw W. Twardowski ◽  
Costantine Albany ◽  
Mark N. Stein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Repair Defect

Purpose To determine whether cotargeting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 plus androgen receptor is superior to androgen receptor inhibition in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and whether ETS fusions predict response. Patients and Methods Patients underwent metastatic site biopsy and were stratified by ETS status and randomly assigned to abiraterone plus prednisone without (arm A) or with veliparib (arm B). Primary objectives were: confirmed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (RR) and whether ETS fusions predicted response. Secondary objectives were: safety, measurable disease RR (mRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and molecular biomarker analysis. A total of 148 patients were randomly assigned to detect a 20% PSA RR improvement. Results A total of 148 patients with mCRPC were randomly assigned: arm A, n = 72; arm B, n = 76. There were no differences in PSA RR (63.9% v 72.4%; P = .27), mRR (45.0% v 52.2%; P = .51), or median PFS (10.1 v 11 months; P = .99). ETS fusions did not predict response. Exploratory analysis of tumor sequencing (80 patients) revealed: 41 patients (51%) were ETS positive, 20 (25%) had DNA-damage repair defect (DRD), 41 (51%) had AR amplification or copy gain, 34 (43%) had PTEN mutation, 33 (41%) had TP53 mutation, 39 (49%) had PIK3CA pathway activation, and 12 (15%) had WNT pathway alteration. Patients with DRD had significantly higher PSA RR (90% v 56.7%; P = .007) and mRR (87.5% v 38.6%; P = .001), PSA decline ≥ 90% (75% v 25%; P = .001), and longer median PFS (14.5 v 8.1 months; P = .025) versus those with wild-type tumors. Median PFS was longer in patients with normal PTEN (13.5 v 6.7 months; P = .02), TP53 (13.5 v 7.7 months; P = .01), and PIK3CA (13.8 v 8.3 months; P = .03) versus those with mutation or activation. In multivariable analysis adjusting for clinical covariates, DRD association with PFS remained significant. Conclusion Veliparib and ETS status did not affect response. Exploratory analysis identified a novel DRD association with mCRPC outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document