The Vulnerable Child Protection Act and Transgender Children's Health

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 508-516
Author(s):  
Sahar Sadjadi

Abstract A recent spate of legislation such as South Dakota's HB 1057, known as the Vulnerable Child Protection Act, seeks to criminalize medical treatment for gender transition in minors under sixteen. This essay argues that these laws do not safeguard children's health but are part of a broader attack on transgender rights that uses the protection of children as a powerful pretense to scapegoat a minority. It suggests that the analyses and insights of the field of transgender studies could inform, enrich, and reconfigure current clinical and public-policy debates around gender-variant children. This essay also aims at drawing the attention of supporters of transgender children to aspects of current medical treatments and their potential implications for young people that might get lost in this explosive political climate.

Author(s):  
Susana Mourão ◽  
Sónia F. Bernardes

AbstractAimTo investigate the diversity and specificity of the determinants of immigrant caregivers’ adherence to child primary care (CPC) health recommendations.BackgroundImmigrant caregiver’s adherence to CPC health recommendations is of utmost importance to minimize their children’s health-related vulnerabilities. Some research has been conducted on the determinants of immigrants’ access to health services, but much less is known about the determinants of their adherence to health professionals’ recommendations once they get there, especially in a primary health care context. This study contributes to bridge these gaps.MethodsInterviews and focus groups were conducted, with immigrant and non-immigrant caregivers living in Portugal (n=35), from heterogeneous socioeconomic backgrounds. Focus group and individual interview scripts were developed to explore caregivers’ understanding and use of CPC services and, particularly, their adherence to CPC recommendations. A socio-demographic questionnaire was also administered. Qualitative data were analyzed using a grounded theory methodology.Findings‘Adherence to CPC health recommendations’ is a core and multidimensional concept. Several determinants were identified at individual, interpersonal, organizational and structural levels. Some determinants were highlighted both by immigrant and non-immigrant caregivers: valuing children’s health, usefulness of recommendations, perceived health-care professionals’ competence, central role of vaccination in CPC and caregivers’ socio-economic conditions. Other determinants were specifically mentioned by immigrant caregivers: expectations about traditional versus pharmacological treatments, cultural mismatches in children’s care practices, perceived quality of Portuguese CPC services versus CPC from countries of origin. These results provide innovative theoretical and empirical contributions to the field of primary health care and, particularly, to immigrant caregivers’ adherence behaviors. Implications for research on treatment adherence in primary care contexts, the development of interventions that promote caregivers’ adherence to CPC health recommendations and for child protection will be discussed.


1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 323-326
Author(s):  
Laurel K. Leslie ◽  
W. Thomas Boyce

Historical Perspective In 1964, Green and Solnit first described a constellation of clinical features comprising a "vulnerable child syndrome" based on a cohort of 25 families. Each of the families had a child who had suffered a life-threatening illness in infancy. The authors observed that the parents, particularly the mothers, shared a continuing and unfounded anxiety concerning their children's health. Green and Solnit hypothesized that the parents persisted in fearing that their child was destined to die in childhood. The parents' perception of their child as uniquely vulnerable led to myriad maladaptive behaviors and difficulties in parent-child interactions (Tables 1 and 2). The parents overprotected the child, were unable to set age-appropriate limits, and displayed excessive concerns in medical settings about their children's health. The children, responding to their parents' expectations of vulnerability, evidenced exaggerated separation anxiety, out-of-control behavior, school underachievement, and distorted perceptions of their own health. Interestingly, these behaviors were not noted in the parents' interaction with their other children. As clinicians began to identify families that had this constellation of clinical features, additional details about the vulnerable child syndrome were elucidated. Parental perception of their child as medically vulnerable was not a universal legacy of severe illness in infancy, but more likely a reflection of how an individual family responded to an illness in their child.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Smith

This special issue of the QUT Law Review focuses on contemporary legal and ethical problems in the sphere of children’s health and reproduction. The special issue arises from a multidisciplinary colloquium hosted at the Queensland University of Technology in July 2017, by the Australian Centre for Health Law Research (‘ACHLR’). This colloquium was attended by a diverse group of experts in the field, including legal scholars, legal practitioners, bioethicists and health practitioners. It was encouraging to see a number of attendees from the colloquium submit papers to this special issue, as well as a range of other leading scholars in the field. The focus on children’s rights is timely in the current Australian social and political climate and the research undertaken by the contributors to this special issue is significant in terms of conceptualising the rights of children, and analysing the extent to which the law prioritises their welfare and protects their interests.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Ivy Wong ◽  
Anna I. R. van der Miesen ◽  
Tjonnie G. F. Li ◽  
Laura N. MacMullin ◽  
Doug P. VanderLaan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document