Balloon Compression Rhizolysis in the Surgical Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia

Neurosurgery ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 908-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl J. Belber ◽  
Richard A. Rak
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Fogarty Catheter ◽  
Short Operative Time ◽  
Balloon Compression ◽  
Patients Experience ◽  
Endotracheal Anesthesia

Abstract To overcome some of the disadvantages of the current percutaneous surgical approaches to trigeminal neuralgia, we offer balloon compression rhizolysis (BCR) as an alternative. Guided by fluoroscopy, a 4 French Fogarty catheter is introduced into Meckl's cave, and its balloon is inflated tightly for a few minutes with soluble contrast agent to compress the gasserian ganglion and rootlets, under light endotracheal anesthesia. All patients experience immediate pain relief, with mild numbness in all three divisions, but with corneal sparing. Often, weakness of ipsilateral mastication appears transiently. In 33 procedures performed in 25 patients aged 48 to 86, with a follow-up period of 6 months to 7 years, there were 25 long-lasting cures (76%) and 8 recurrences. These results are fully comparable to those of other “destructive” procedures. There was no anesthetic complication and no mortality. The advantages of this procedure, besides its efficacy and low rate of dysesthesia, include absence of discomfort for the patient, short operative time, technical ease for the neurosurgeon, minimal morbidity, and no risk to corneal sensation. We think that microvascular decompression (MVD) should be the first operation considered for trigeminal neuralgia, but we advocate BCR as the procedure of choice in the aged and medically infirm, especially when V1 pain is present, in patients with multiple sclerosis, for recurrences after other procedures, and in virtually any situation in which MVD is, for some reason, not feasible.

Percutaneous microcompression of the gasserian ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia

1990 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 546-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramiro D. Lobato ◽  
Juan J. Rivas ◽  
Rosario Sarabia ◽  
Eduardo Lamas
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Intraluminal Pressure ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Fogarty Catheter ◽  
Short Operative Time ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Technical Errors ◽  
Early Failures ◽  
Anesthetic Complications ◽  
Fine Print

✓ The authors report 144 cases of trigeminal neuralgia treated by percutaneous microcompression of the trigeminal ganglion (PMTG). The operation was performed under short-lasting barbiturate anesthesia without endotracheal intubation. Meckel's cave was cannulated with a No. 4 Fogarty catheter and the balloon was inflated for 1 minute. The average intraluminal pressure required for adequate compression of the ganglion was about 1200 mm Hg. All patients were initially relieved of their neuralgia. In a follow-up period ranging from 6 months to 4½ years, 14 patients (9.7%) developed recurrence of pain between 10 and 35 months after surgery. Eleven patients underwent a second PMTG. All nine early failures and 10 of the 11 late recurrences occurred in cases with technical deficiencies. Most of the minor surgical complications observed were also related to avoidable technical errors. There were no anesthetic complications and no deaths. All patients developed mild to moderate postoperative hemifacial numbness with or without objective hypesthesia. Both subjective and objective deficits gradually diminished with time and were well tolerated. One year after the operation nearly 40% of the patients still had patches of slightly decreased sensation in one or more trigeminal divisions and 16% had mild dysesthesia. Anesthesia dolorosa or keratitis was not reported. The PMTG procedure is easy to perform and requires a short operative time and a brief period of hospitalization. It is well tolerated by patients, who describe it as a totally pain-free experience. Morbidity is minimal and recurrence of neuralgia does not seem to be higher than with alternative procedures.

Alternative customized instrumentation and technique for percutaneous balloon compression rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 1938-1941
Author(s):  
Robert A. Scranton ◽  
Kushal Shah ◽  
Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
The United States ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Effective Solution ◽  
Balloon Compression ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon Compression

OBJECTIVETrigeminal neuralgia is a debilitating disease that can be treated effectively by a number of modalities. Percutaneous balloon compression rhizotomy of the gasserian ganglion is an important technique that can be offered as a primary or secondary strategy after failure of medical therapy. However, the commercial kit for this procedure was discontinued in the United States in early 2016 and therefore is not currently available. The authors describe a low-cost, effective solution for continuing to offer this procedure using equipment already available in most hospitals.METHODSThe authors provide a detailed equipment list with step-by-step instructions on how to prepare all the necessary items and perform a percutaneous balloon compression rhizotomy.RESULTSThe custom “homemade” kit and technique described have been utilized successfully since June 2016 in 34 patients. The kit is a low-cost alternative, and its application does not add any operative time beyond that required for the previously commercially available kit.CONCLUSIONSPercutaneous balloon compression rhizotomy of the gasserian ganglion is an important technique that should be readily available to patients who are not medically fit for microvascular decompression and need immediate relief of their pain. The alternative kit described here can be assembled easily using equipment that is readily available in most hospitals.

Unconventional Facial Entry Points Confirmed Using a 3D CT Reconstruction–Guided Stereotactic Approach to Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Series of Case Reports

Pain Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1551-1558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Guo ◽  
Zhijia Wang ◽  
Kai Li ◽  
Chao Du ◽  
Xingli Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Anatomical Variation ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Entry Points

Abstract Objectives Patients with trigeminal neuralgia who are refractory to medical therapy may choose to undergo Gasserian ganglion percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation. However, in cases where the foramen ovale is difficult to access due to various anatomical anomalies, the typical estimation of the facial entry point is suboptimal. Methods Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction imaging performed before surgery revealed anatomical variations in each of the four adult patient cases that made it more difficult to successfully access the foramen ovale (FO) for percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation. Using measurements collected from preoperative imaging that showed each specific anatomical variation in the FO, researchers marked alternate facial entry points that would allow successful probe placement into the FO and recorded the arc angle data in the stereotactic instrument. Results Patients were evaluated during follow-up visits ranging from seven to 26 months after surgery and asked to rate postoperative pain using a visual analog scale. These scores decreased from 10 to 3 in all four patients by the third day after the procedure. There were no permanent complications or morbidities from the surgery. One patient experienced mild facial numbness; however, this side effect subsided within three months after surgery. During the follow-up period, no patient reported pain recurrence. Conclusions The expectation for clinicians approaching trigeminal nerve block using a peri-oral approach should be to expect a great degree of potential variability in terms of both distances from the corner of the mouth and needle angle taken to successfully navigate the anatomy and access the foramen ovale.

TM2-4 Long term outcome of percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. e13.3-e12 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Bhargava ◽  
P Cristaldi ◽  
P Franceschini ◽  
P Eldridge ◽  
J Osman-Farah
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Balloon Compression ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon Compression ◽  
Anaesthesia Dolorosa

ObjectivesPercutaneous balloon compression (PBC) can be offered to medically refractory patients with trigeminal neuralgia who are unsuitable for microvascular decompression. Its associated with up to 4% risk of anaesthesia dolorosa which increases with duration and severity of compression and is more common with repeat procedures. We audited our outcomes for this procedure over last 7 years.DesignRetrospective audit of prospectively collected data.SubjectsAll patients undergoing PBC at our centre.MethodsTheatre and radiology records reviewed to identify patients. Case notes and radiology reviewed for history, diagnosis, details of procedure, immediate symptom relief, complications, further procedures and last follow up. Descriptive, comparative Kaplan Meir analysis undertaken.ResultsTotal 93 patients (4 b/l), 165 procedures. Average follow up 36 months. 24 patients had MS, 17 patients had atypical pain. All except 4 patients had good immediate pain relief. No patient developed anaesthesia dolorosa, 2 patients had transient diplopia, 1 maxillary hematoma and 1 infection. 56 experienced recurrence, 43 needed further surgical intervention. 25 PBC twice, 11 thrice, 4 four times and 1 five times. Average time to first recurrence=32 months. 85% pain free at 1 year and 70% at 2 years.ConclusionsPBC is an effective procedure. With conservative approach, this procedure can be safely repeated.

scholarly journals Radiofrequency Thermoablation of the Gasserian Ganglion Versus the Peripheral Branches of the Trigeminal Nerve for Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized, Control Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (22.2) ◽  
pp. 147-154
Author(s):  
Neerja Bharti
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Facial Pain ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Radiofrequency Thermoablation

Background: Trigeminal neuralgia is the most painful condition of facial pain leading to impairment of routine activities. Although radiofrequency thermoablation (RFT) of the Gasserian ganglion is widely used for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia in patients having ineffective pain relief with medical therapy, the incidence of complications like hypoesthesia, neuroparalytic keratitis, and masticatory muscles weakness is high. Recent case reports have shown the effectiveness of RFT of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve for relief of refractory chronic facial pain conditions including trigeminal neuralgia. Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of RFT of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve with RFT of the Gasserian ganglion for the management of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial. Setting: Tertiary care hospital and medical education and research institute. Methods: A total of 40 adult patients of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The control group received RFT of the Gasserian ganglion while the study group received RFT of the peripheral branches of trigeminal nerve. The procedures were performed in the operation room under all aseptic precautions with fluoroscopic guidance. Post-procedure, the patients were assessed for loss of sensation along the nerve distribution and the adequacy of pain relief on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The patients were followed up for 3 month to assess the quality of pain relief by the NRS and the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scale. Improvement in pain was considered excellent if patients had complete pain relief without any medication, good if there was significant reduction in pain (> 50%) with or without medication, and poor if there was less than 50% reduction in pain with medications. Patients were also assessed for numbness and any other side effects. Patients’ satisfaction with the procedure was recorded. Results: Nineteen patients in the control group and 18 in study group had effective pain relief of up to 3 months. Their pain scores were comparable at all time intervals, though the number of patients receiving supplementary medications was more in study group at 2 months (P = 0.015). The patients showed overall satisfaction score of 8.5 (8-9) and 8 (7-9) in control and study groups respectively. The average procedure duration was 30 (30-38) minutes in the control group and 28 (25-40) minutes in the study group. Most of the patients in both groups had mild numbness after the procedure. One patient in the control group had lower eyelid swelling and another had mild weakness of the masseter muscle, which resolved few days later. No major complication was reported in the study group except for 1 patient who reported local ecchymosis. Limitations: The main limitation of the study is that the patients and the investigator performing the procedure were not blinded, though the person who assessed the patient during follow-up was blinded to the group assignment. Another limitation is that we could not follow up with the patients after 3 months due to time constraints. Conclusion: We found that radiofrequency thermoablation of the peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve is an effective and safe procedure for the management of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Key words: Idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia, radiofrequency thermoablation, Gasserian ganglion, peripheral nerve branches, pain, trigeminal nerve

Comparison of percutaneous balloon compression and glycerol rhizotomy for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia

2010 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 486-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Kouzounias ◽  
Göran Lind ◽  
Gastón Schechtmann ◽  
Jaleh Winter ◽  
Bengt Linderoth
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Recurrence Time ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Balloon Compression ◽  
Duration Of Effect ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon Compression ◽  
Chi Square Test

Object The aim of this study was to compare percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) and percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy (PRGR) in terms of effectiveness, complications, and technical aspects. Methods Sixty-six consecutive PBC procedures were performed in 45 patients between January 2004 and December 2008, and 120 PRGR attempts were performed in 101 patients between January 2006 and December 2008. The PRGR procedures were not completed due to technical reasons in 19 cases. Five patients in the Balloon Compression Group and 9 patients in the Glycerol Group were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. The medical records and the intraoperative fluoroscopic images from the remaining cases were retrospectively examined, and the follow-up was completed with telephone contact, when necessary. The 2 groups were compared in terms of initial effect, duration of effect, and rates of complications as well as severity and type of complications. Results The rates for immediate pain relief were 87% for patients treated with glycerol injection and 85% for patients treated with balloon compression. The Kaplan-Meier plots for the 2 treatment modalities were similar. The 50% recurrence time was 21 months for the balloon procedure and 16 months for the glycerol procedure. When the groups were broken down by the “previous operations” criterion, the 50% recurrence time was 24 months for the Glycerol First Procedure Group, 6 months for the Balloon First Procedure Group, 8 months for the Glycerol Previous Procedures Group, and 21 months for the Balloon Previous Procedures Group. The rates of complications (excluding numbness) were 11% for PRGR and 23% for PBC, and this difference was statistically significant (chi-square test, p = 0.04). Conclusions Both PRGR and PBC are effective techniques for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, with PRGR presenting some advantages in terms of milder and fewer complications and allowing lighter anesthesia without compromise of analgesia. For these reasons the authors consider PRGR as the first option for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia in patients who are not suitable candidates or are not willing to undergo microvascular decompression, while PBC is reserved for patients in whom the effect of PRGR has proven to be short or difficult to repeat due to cisternal fibrosis.

A 20-year review of percutaneous balloon compression of the trigeminal ganglion

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 913-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Skirving ◽  
Noel G. Dan
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Ganglion ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Balloon Compression ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon ◽  
Percutaneous Balloon Compression ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes and complication rates associated with percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of the trigeminal ganglion over a long follow-up period. Methods. This retrospective review was conducted in 496 patients with typical symptoms of unilateral trigeminal neuralgia who underwent 531 PBCs of the trigeminal ganglion between 1980 and 1999. The mean length of follow up was 10.7 years. The treatment used was a modification of that first described by Mullan and Lichtor in 1983. There were nine technical failures. Of the 522 successful procedures, prompt pain relief ensued in all patients except one. Recurrence of pain was found in 95 patients (19.2%) within 5 years and in 158 patients (31.9%) over the entire study period. Symptomatic dysesthesias occurred in 19 patients (3.8%), but corneal anesthesia and anesthesia dolorosa did not. Conclusions. In this review the authors present data on the largest cohort of patients with the longest follow up for this procedure in the current literature. The balance between the recurrence rate and troublesome sensory complications achieved in this series is favorable when compared with previously published studies on outcomes of PBC and the two alternative percutaneous methods, radiofrequency thermocoagulation and glycerol rhizolysis. The PBC procedure has additional advantages in that it is relatively straightforward and quick, and can be performed during a brief period of general anesthesia with no discomfort to the patient. This makes it an attractive first choice in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

Quantitative Sensory Changes Following Gasserian Ganglion Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in Patients with Medical Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Consecutive Case Series

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (05) ◽  
pp. 423-429
Author(s):  
Torge Huckhagel ◽  
Lars Bohlmann ◽  
Manfred Westphal ◽  
Jan Regelsberger ◽  
Iris-Carola Eichler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Gasserian Ganglion ◽  
Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background and Objective Microsurgical vascular nerve decompression and percutaneous ablative interventions aiming at the Gasserian ganglion are promising treatment modalities for patients with medical refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Apart from clinical reports on a variable manifestation of facial hypoesthesia, the long-term impact of trigeminal ganglion radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) on sensory characteristics has not yet been determined using quantitative methods. Material and Methods We performed standardized quantitative sensory testing according to the established protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain in a cohort of patients with classical (n = 5) and secondary (n = 11) TN before and after percutaneous Gasserian ganglion RFT (mean follow-up: 6 months). The test battery included thermal detection and thermal pain thresholds as well as mechanical detection and mechanical pain sensitivity measures. Clinical improvement was also assessed by means of renowned pain intensity and impairment questionnaires (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale), pain numeric rating scale, and anti-neuropathic medication reduction at follow-up. Results All clinical parameters developed favorably following percutaneous thermocoagulation. Only mechanical and vibration detection thresholds of the affected side of the face were located below the reference frame of the norm population before and after the procedure. Statistically significant persistent changes in quantitative sensory variables caused by the intervention could not be detected in our patient sample. Conclusion Our data suggest that TN patients improving considerably after RFT do not undergo substantial long-term alterations regarding quantitative sensory perception.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document