Role of segment polarity genes in the definition and maintenance of cell states in the Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Martinez Arias ◽  
N.E. Baker ◽  
P.W. Ingham
Keyword(s):  
Positional Information ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Segment Polarity Genes ◽  
Restricted Domains ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Polarity Gene

Segment polarity genes are expressed and required in restricted domains within each metameric unit of the Drosophila embryo. We have used the expression of two segment polarity genes engrailed (en) and wingless (wg) to monitor the effects of segment polarity mutants on the basic metameric pattern. Absence of patched (ptc) or naked (nkd) functions triggers a novel sequence of en and wg patterns. In addition, although wg and en are not expressed on the same cells absence of either one has effects on the expression of the other. These observations, together with an analysis of mutant phenotypes during development, lead us to suggest that positional information is encoded in cell states defined and maintained by the activity of segment polarity gene products.

Cell patterning in the Drosophila segment: spatial regulation of the segment polarity gene patched

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 291-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hidalgo ◽  
P. Ingham
Keyword(s):  
Broad Band ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Normal Pattern ◽  
Anterior Portion ◽  
Spatial Regulation ◽  
Segment Polarity Genes ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Polarity Gene

Intrasegmental patterning in the Drosophila embryo requires the activity of the segment polarity genes. The acquisition of positional information by cells during embryogenesis is reflected in the dynamic patterns of expression of several of these genes. In the case of patched, early ubiquitous expression is followed by its repression in the anterior portion of each parasegment; subsequently each broad band of expression splits into two narrow stripes. In this study we analyse the contribution of other segment polarity gene functions to the evolution of this pattern; we find that the first step in patched regulation is under the control of engrailed whereas the second requires the activity of both cubitus interruptusD and patched itself. Furthermore, the products of engrailed, wingless and hedgehog are essential for maintaining the normal pattern of expression of patched.

The segment polarity gene armadillo interacts with the wingless signaling pathway in both embryonic and adult pattern formation

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 1029-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Peifer ◽  
C. Rauskolb ◽  
M. Williams ◽  
B. Riggleman ◽  
E. Wieschaus
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Imaginal Discs ◽  
Protein Accumulation ◽  
Segment Polarity Genes ◽  
Adult Pattern ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Lethal Allele ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Polarity Gene

The segment polarity genes of Drosophila were initially defined as genes required for pattern formation within each embryonic segment. Some of these genes also function to establish the pattern of the adult cuticle. We have examined the role of the armadillo (arm) gene in this latter process. We confirmed and extended earlier findings that arm and the segment polarity gene wingless are very similar in their effects on embryonic development. We next discuss the role of arm in pattern formation in the imaginal discs, as determined by using a pupal lethal allele, by analyzing clones of arm mutant tissue in imaginal discs, and by using a transposon carrying arm to produce adults with a reduced level of arm. Together, these experiments established that arm is required for the development of all imaginal discs. The requirement for arm varies along the dorsal-ventral and proximal-distal axes. Cells that require the highest levels of arm are those that express the wingless gene. Further, animals with reduced arm levels have phenotypes that resemble those of weak alleles of wingless. We present a description of the patterns of arm protein accumulation in imaginal discs. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results for the role of arm and wingless in pattern formation.

Cell patterning in the Drosophila segment: engrailed and wingless antigen distributions in segment polarity mutant embryos

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 119 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 105-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel van den Heuvel ◽  
John Klingensmith ◽  
Norbert Perrimon ◽  
Roel Nusse
Keyword(s):  
Cell Communication ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Current View ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Cellular Interactions ◽  
Protein Distribution ◽  
Cubitus Interruptus ◽  
Segment Polarity Genes ◽  
Segment Polarity

By a complex and little understood mechanism, segment polarity genes control patterning in each segment of the Drosophila embryo. During this process, cell to cell communication plays a pivotal role and is under direct control of the products of segment polarity genes. Many of the cloned segment polarity genes have been found to be highly conserved in evolution, providing a model system for cellular interactions in other organisms. In Drosophila, two of these genes, engrailed and wingless, are expressed on either side of the parasegment border, wingless encodes a secreted molecule and engrailed a nuclear protein with a homeobox. Maintenance of engrailed expression is dependent on wingless and vice versa. To investigate the role of other segment polarity genes in the mutual control between these two genes, we have examined wingless and engrailed protein distribution in embryos mutant for each of the segment polarity genes. In embryos mutant for armadillo, dishevelled and porcupine, the changes in engrailed expression are identical to those in wingless mutant embryos, suggesting that their gene products act in the wingless pathway. In embryos mutant for hedgehog, fused, cubitus interruptus Dominant and gooseberry, expression of engrailed is affected to varying degrees. However wingless expression in the latter group decays in a similar way earlier than engrailed expression, indicating that these gene products might function in the maintenance of wingless expression. Using double mutant embryos, epistatic relationships between some segment polarity genes have been established. We present a model showing a current view of segment polarity gene interactions.

scholarly journals Interactions between fused, a segment-polarity gene in Drosophila, and other segmentation genes

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 417-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Limbourg-Bouchon ◽  
D. Busson ◽  
C. Lamour-Isnard
Keyword(s):  
Double Mutant ◽  
Posterior Part ◽  
Germ Band ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Segmentation Genes ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Polarity Gene

Fused (fu) is a segment polarity gene whose product is maternally required in the posterior part of each segment. To define further the role of fused and determine how it interacts with other segmentation genes, we examined the phenotypes obtained by combining fused with mutations of pair rule, homeotic and other segment polarity loci. When it was possible, we also looked at the distribution of corresponding proteins in fused mutant embryos. We observed that fused-naked (fu;nkd) double mutant embryos display a phenotypic suppression of simple mutant phenotypes: both naked cuticle and denticle belts, which would normally have been deleted by one of the two mutants alone, were restored. In fused mutant embryos, engrailed (en) and wingless (wg) expression was normal until germ band extension, but partially and completely disappeared respectively during germ band retraction. In the fu;nkd double mutant embryo, en was expressed as in nkd mutant at germ band extension, but later this expression was restricted and became normal at germ band retraction. On the contrary, wg expression disappeared as in fu simple mutant embryos. We conclude that the requirements for fused, naked and wingless activities for normal segmental patterning are not absolute, and propose mechanisms by which these genes interact to specify anterior and posterior cell fates.

Regulation of wingless transcription in the Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 283-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.W. Ingham ◽  
A. Hidalgo
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Signal Transduction Pathway ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Transduction Pathway ◽  
Segment Polarity Genes ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Polarity Gene

The segment polarity gene wingless (wg) is expressed in a complex pattern during embryogenesis suggesting that it plays multiple roles in the development of the embryo. The best characterized of these is its role in cell pattening in each parasegment, a process that requires the activity of other segment polarity genes including patched (ptc) and hedgehog (hh). Here we present further evidence that ptc and hh encode components of a signal transduction pathway that regulate the expression of wg transcription following its activation by pair-rule genes. We also show that most other aspects of wg expression are independent of this regulatory network.

scholarly journals Successive specification of Drosophila neuroblasts NB 6-4 and NB 7-3 depends on interaction of the segment polarity genes wingless, gooseberry and naked cuticle

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (17) ◽  
pp. 3253-3261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirupama Deshpande ◽  
Rainer Dittrich ◽  
Gerhard M. Technau ◽  
Joachim Urban
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Dorsoventral Patterning ◽  
Expression Domain ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Segment Polarity Genes ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Unique Identity

The Drosophila central nervous system derives from neural precursor cells, the neuroblasts (NBs), which are born from the neuroectoderm by the process of delamination. Each NB has a unique identity, which is revealed by the production of a characteristic cell lineage and a specific set of molecular markers it expresses. These NBs delaminate at different but reproducible time points during neurogenesis (S1-S5) and it has been shown for early delaminating NBs (S1/S2) that their identities depend on positional information conferred by segment polarity genes and dorsoventral patterning genes. We have studied mechanisms leading to the fate specification of a set of late delaminating neuroblasts, NB 6-4 and NB 7-3, both of which arise from the engrailed (en) expression domain, with NB 6-4 delaminating first. In contrast to former reports, we did not find any evidence for a direct role of hedgehog in the process of NB 7-3 specification. Instead, we present evidence to show that the interplay of the segmentation genes naked cuticle (nkd) and gooseberry (gsb), both of which are targets of wingless (wg) activity, leads to differential commitment to NB 6-4 and NB 7-3 cell fate. In the absence of either nkd or gsb, one NB fate is replaced by the other. However, the temporal sequence of delamination is maintained, suggesting that formation and specification of these two NBs are under independent control.

Control of Drosophila head segment identity by the bZIP homeotic gene cnc

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mohler ◽  
J.W. Mahaffey ◽  
E. Deutsch ◽  
K. Vani
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Bzip Transcription Factor ◽  
Homeotic Gene ◽  
Head Region ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Mandibular Segment ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Polarity Gene

Mutational analysis of cap'n'collar (cnc), a bZIP transcription factor closely related to the mammalian erythroid factor NF-E2 (p45), indicates that it acts as a segment-specific selector gene controlling the identity of two cephalic segments. In the mandibular segment, cnc has a classical homeotic effect: mandibular structures are missing in cnc mutant larvae and replaced with duplicate maxillary structures. We propose that cnc functions in combination with the homeotic gene Deformed to specify mandibular development. Labral structures are also missing in cnc mutant larvae, where a distinct labral primordia is not properly maintained in the developing foregut, as observed by the failure to maintain and elaborate patterns of labral-specific segment polarity gene expression. Instead, the labral primordium fuses with the esophageal primordium to contribute to formation of the esophagus. The role of cnc in labral development is reciprocal to the role of homeotic gene forkhead, which has an identical function in the maintenance of the esophageal primordium. This role of homeotic selector genes for the segment-specific maintenance of segment polarity gene expression is a unique feature of segmentation in the preoral head region of Drosophila.

The porcupine gene is required for wingless autoregulation in Drosophila

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 4037-4044 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S. Manoukian ◽  
K.B. Yoffe ◽  
E.L. Wilder ◽  
N. Perrimon
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Paracrine Signaling ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Positive Feedback Loop ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Feedback Pathway ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Polarity Gene

The Drosophila segment polarity gene wingless (wg) is required in the regulation of engrailed (en) expression and the determination of cell fates in neighboring cells. This paracrine wg activity also regulates transcription of wg itself, through a positive feedback loop including en activity. In addition, wg has a second, more direct autoregulatory requirement that is distinct from the en-dependent feedback loop. Four gene products, encoded by armadillo (arm), dishevelled (dsh), porcupine (porc) and zeste-white 3 (zw3), have been previously implicated as components of wg paracrine signaling. Here we have used three different assays to assess the requirements of these genes in the more direct wg autoregulatory pathway. While the activities of dsh, zw3 and arm appear to be specific to the paracrine feedback pathway, the more direct autoregulatory pathway requires porc.

scholarly journals Induction of a secondary body axis in Xenopus by antibodies to beta-catenin.

1993 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
P D McCrea ◽  
W M Brieher ◽  
B M Gumbiner
Keyword(s):  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Axis ◽  
Beta Catenin ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Embryonic Patterning ◽  
Xenopus Embryos ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Polarity Gene

We have obtained evidence that a known intracellular component of the cadherin cell-cell adhesion machinery, beta-catenin, contributes to the development of the body axis in the frog Xenopus laevis. Vertebrate beta-catenin is homologous to the Drosophila segment polarity gene product armadillo, and to vertebrate plakoglobin (McCrea, P. D., C. W. Turck, and B. Gumbiner. 1991. Science (Wash. DC). 254: 1359-1361.). Beta-Catenin was found present in all Xenopus embryonic stages examined, and associated with C-cadherin, the major cadherin present in early Xenopus embryos. To test beta-catenin's function, affinity purified Fab fragments were injected into ventral blastomeres of developing four-cell Xenopus embryos. A dramatic phenotype, the duplication of the dorsoanterior embryonic axis, was observed. Furthermore, Fab injections were capable of rescuing dorsal features in UV-ventralized embryos. Similar phenotypes have been observed in misexpression studies of the Wnt and other gene products, suggesting that beta-catenin participates in a signaling pathway which specifies embryonic patterning.

Pattern formation in Drosophila head development: the role of the orthodenticle homeobox gene

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (11) ◽  
pp. 3561-3572 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Royet ◽  
R. Finkelstein
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Significant Progress ◽  
Medial Head ◽  
Head Development ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Polarity Gene

Significant progress has been made towards understanding how pattern formation occurs in the imaginal discs that give rise to the limbs of Drosophila melanogaster. Here, we examine the process of regional specification that occurs in the eye-antennal discs, which form the head of the adult fruitfly. We demonstrate genetically that there is a graded requirement for the activity of the orthodenticle homeobox gene in forming specific structures of the developing head. Consistent with this result, we show that OTD protein is expressed in a graded fashion across the disc primordia of these structures and that different threshold levels of OTD are required for the formation of specific subdomains of the head. Finally, we provide evidence suggesting that otd acts through the segment polarity gene engrailed to specify medial head development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document