Conservation of regulatory elements controlling hairy pair-rule stripe formation

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 585-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Langeland ◽  
S.B. Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Drosophila Virilis ◽  
Control Individual ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Conserved Sequence ◽  
H Gene ◽  
Molecular Comparison ◽  
Pair Rule

The hairy (h) gene is one of two pair-rule loci whose striped expression is directly regulated by combinations of gap proteins acting through discrete upstream regulatory fragments, which span several kilobases. We have undertaken a comparative study of the molecular biology of h pair-rule expression in order to identify conserved elements in this complex regulatory system, which should provide important clues concerning the mechanism of stripe formation. A molecular comparison of the h locus in Drosophila virilis and Drosophila melanogaster reveals a conserved overall arrangement of the upstream regulatory elements that control individual pair-rule stripes. We demonstrate that upstream fragments from D. virilis will direct the proper expression of stripes in D. melanogaster, indicating that these are true functional homologs of the stripe-producing D. melanogaster regulatory elements, and that the network of trans-acting proteins that act upon these regulatory elements is highly conserved. We also demonstrate that the spatial relationships between specific h stripes and selected gap proteins are highly conserved. We find several tracts of extensive nucleotide sequence conservation within homologous stripe-specific regulatory fragments, which have facilitated the identification of functional subelements within the D. melanogaster regulatory fragment for h stripe 5. Some of the conserved nucleotide tracts within this regulatory fragment contain consensus binding sites for potential trans-regulatory (gap and other) proteins, while many appear devoid of known binding sites. This comparative approach, coupled with the analysis of reporter gene expression in gap mutant embryos suggests that the Kr and gt proteins establish the anterior and posterior borders of h stripe 5, respectively, through spatial repression. Other, as yet unidentified, proteins are certain to play a role in stripe activation, presumably acting through other conserved sequence tracts.

Glue protein genes in Drosophila virilis: their organization, developmental control of transcription and specific mRNA degradation

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-280
Author(s):  
U. Swida ◽  
L. Lucka ◽  
H. Kress
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Drosophila Virilis ◽  
Ecdysone Receptor ◽  
Sequence Motifs ◽  
Conserved Sequence ◽  
Conserved Sequence Motifs ◽  
Glue Protein ◽  
Flanking Region ◽  
Specific Mrna

The gene Lgp-1, which is localized in the intermoult puff 16A of D. virilis polytene chromosomes, encodes the major larval glue protein Igp-1. The gene consists of two exons interrupted by a short intron. In the 5′ flanking region of Lgp-1, we find putative ecdysone receptor binding sites and two proximal conserved sequence motifs which are possibly involved in gene regulation. The amino acid sequence deduced from the DNA sequence reveals a relationship to the 68C glue protein family of D. melanogaster. The size of the Lgp-1 transcripts decreases in late third instar larvae concomitantly with their disappearance. This is caused by deadenylation followed by distinct nucleolytic attacks in the 3′ untranslated region. Preliminary data suggest the presence of another glue protein gene in the 16A puff region which is related to the Lgp-1 gene.

scholarly journals Decoding functional regulatory maps via genomic evolutionary footprints in 63 green plants

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Tian ◽  
De-Chang Yang ◽  
Yu-Qi Meng ◽  
Jinpu Jin ◽  
Ge Gao
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Affinities ◽  
Green Plants ◽  
Regulatory Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Systems ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Systematic Identification

AbstractSystematic identification of functional transcriptional regulatory interactions is essential for understanding regulatory systems. Here, we firstly established genome-wide conservation landscapes for 63 green plants of seven lineages and then developed an algorithm FunTFBS to screen for functional regulatory elements and interactions by coupling base-varied binding affinities of transcription factors with the evolutionary footprints on their binding sites. Using the FunTFBS and the conservation landscapes, we further identified over two million functional interactions for 21,346 TFs, charting functional regulatory maps of these 63 plants. Our work provides plant community with valuable resources to decode plant transcriptional regulatory system and genome sequences.

Anterior repression of a Drosophila stripe enhancer requires three position-specific mechanisms

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (21) ◽  
pp. 4931-4940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Paulo Moura Andrioli ◽  
Vikram Vasisht ◽  
Ekaterina Theodosopoulou ◽  
Adam Oberstein ◽  
Stephen Small
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Sequence Repeat ◽  
Conserved Sequence ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Embryo Formation ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Specific Position ◽  
Pair Rule

The striped expression pattern of the pair-rule gene even skipped(eve) is established by five stripe-specific enhancers, each of which responds in a unique way to gradients of positional information in the earlyDrosophila embryo. The enhancer for eve stripe 2(eve 2) is directly activated by the morphogens Bicoid (Bcd) and Hunchback (Hb). As these proteins are distributed throughout the anterior half of the embryo, formation of a single stripe requires that enhancer activation is prevented in all nuclei anterior to the stripe 2 position. The gap genegiant (gt) is involved in a repression mechanism that sets the anterior stripe border, but genetic removal of gt (or deletion of Gt-binding sites) causes stripe expansion only in the anterior subregion that lies adjacent to the stripe border. We identify a well-conserved sequence repeat, (GTTT)4, which is required for repression in a more anterior subregion. This site is bound specifically by Sloppy-paired 1 (Slp1),which is expressed in a gap gene-like anterior domain. Ectopic Slp1 activity is sufficient for repression of stripe 2 of the endogenous eve gene,but is not required, suggesting that it is redundant with other anterior factors. Further genetic analysis suggests that the(GTTT)4-mediated mechanism is independent of the Gt-mediated mechanism that sets the anterior stripe border, and suggests that a third mechanism, downregulation of Bcd activity by Torso, prevents activation near the anterior tip. Thus, three distinct mechanisms are required for anterior repression of a single eve enhancer, each in a specific position. Ectopic Slp1 also represses eve stripes 1 and 3 to varying degrees,and the eve 1 and eve 3+7 enhancers each contain GTTT repeats similar to the site in the eve 2 enhancer. These results suggest a common mechanism for preventing anterior activation of three different eve enhancers.

scholarly journals A dual role for DNA-binding by Runt in activation and repression of sloppy paired transcription

2021 ◽  
pp. mbc.E20-08-0509
Author(s):  
Lisa Prazak ◽  
Yasuno Iwasaki ◽  
Ah-Ram Kim ◽  
Konstantin Kozlov ◽  
Kevin King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Quantitative Imaging ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Pair Rule

This work investigates the role of DNA-binding by Runt in regulating the sloppy-paired-1 ( slp1) gene, and in particular two distinct cis-regulatory elements that mediate regulation by Runt and other pair-rule transcription factors during Drosophila segmentation. We find that a DNA-binding defective form of Runt is ineffective at repressing both the distal (DESE) and proximal (PESE) early stripe elements of slp1 and is also compromised for DESE-dependent activation. The function of Runt-binding sites in DESE is further investigated using site-specific transgenesis and quantitative imaging techniques. When DESE is tested as an autonomous enhancer, mutagenesis of the Runt sites results in a clear loss of Runt-dependent repression but has little to no effect on Runt-dependent activation. Notably, mutagenesis of these same sites in the context of a reporter gene construct that also contains the PESE enhancer results in a significant reduction of DESE-dependent activation as well as the loss of repression observed for the autonomous mutant DESE enhancer. These results provide strong evidence that DNA-binding by Runt directly contributes to the regulatory interplay of interactions between these two enhancers in the early embryo.

scholarly journals DNABERT: pre-trained Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers model for DNA-language in genome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanrong Ji ◽  
Zhihan Zhou ◽  
Han Liu ◽  
Ramana V Davuluri
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Sequence Motifs ◽  
Semantic Relationship ◽  
Accurate Identification ◽  
Conserved Sequence ◽  
Genome Wide

Abstract Motivation Deciphering the language of non-coding DNA is one of the fundamental problems in genome research. Gene regulatory code is highly complex due to the existence of polysemy and distant semantic relationship, which previous informatics methods often fail to capture especially in data-scarce scenarios. Results To address this challenge, we developed a novel pre-trained bidirectional encoder representation, named DNABERT, to capture global and transferrable understanding of genomic DNA sequences based on up and downstream nucleotide contexts. We compared DNABERT to the most widely used programs for genome-wide regulatory elements prediction and demonstrate its ease of use, accuracy and efficiency. We show that the single pre-trained transformers model can simultaneously achieve state-of-the-art performance on prediction of promoters, splice sites and transcription factor binding sites, after easy fine-tuning using small task-specific labeled data. Further, DNABERT enables direct visualization of nucleotide-level importance and semantic relationship within input sequences for better interpretability and accurate identification of conserved sequence motifs and functional genetic variant candidates. Finally, we demonstrate that pre-trained DNABERT with human genome can even be readily applied to other organisms with exceptional performance. We anticipate that the pre-trained DNABERT model can be fined tuned to many other sequence analyses tasks. Availability and implementation The source code, pretrained and finetuned model for DNABERT are available at GitHub (https://github.com/jerryji1993/DNABERT). Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

scholarly journals Multi-omic profiling of pituitary thyrotropic cells and progenitors

BMC Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Z. Daly ◽  
Lindsey A. Dudley ◽  
Michael T. Peel ◽  
Stephen A. Liebhaber ◽  
Stephen C. J. Parker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Pituitary Gland ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Neuroendocrine Cells ◽  
Bzip Transcription Factor ◽  
Enhancer Element

Abstract Background The pituitary gland is a neuroendocrine organ containing diverse cell types specialized in secreting hormones that regulate physiology. Pituitary thyrotropes produce thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), a critical factor for growth and maintenance of metabolism. The transcription factors POU1F1 and GATA2 have been implicated in thyrotrope fate, but the transcriptomic and epigenomic landscapes of these neuroendocrine cells have not been characterized. The goal of this work was to discover transcriptional regulatory elements that drive thyrotrope fate. Results We identified the transcription factors and epigenomic changes in chromatin that are associated with differentiation of POU1F1-expressing progenitors into thyrotropes using cell lines that represent an undifferentiated Pou1f1 lineage progenitor (GHF-T1) and a committed thyrotrope line that produces TSH (TαT1). We compared RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, histone modification (H3K27Ac, H3K4Me1, and H3K27Me3), and POU1F1 binding in these cell lines. POU1F1 binding sites are commonly associated with bZIP transcription factor consensus binding sites in GHF-T1 cells and Helix-Turn-Helix (HTH) or basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) factors in TαT1 cells, suggesting that these classes of transcription factors may recruit or cooperate with POU1F1 binding at unique sites. We validated enhancer function of novel elements we mapped near Cga, Pitx1, Gata2, and Tshb by transfection in TαT1 cells. Finally, we confirmed that an enhancer element near Tshb can drive expression in thyrotropes of transgenic mice, and we demonstrate that GATA2 enhances Tshb expression through this element. Conclusion These results extend the ENCODE multi-omic profiling approach to the pituitary gland, which should be valuable for understanding pituitary development and disease pathogenesis. Graphical abstract

Androgen receptor: acting in the three-dimensional chromatin landscape of prostate cancer cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Harri Makkonen ◽  
Jorma J. Palvimo
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Loop Formation ◽  
Prostate Cancer Cells

AbstractAndrogen receptor (AR) acts as a hormone-controlled transcription factor that conveys the messages of both natural and synthetic androgens to the level of genes and gene programs. Defective AR signaling leads to a wide array of androgen insensitivity disorders, and deregulated AR function, in particular overexpression of AR, is involved in the growth and progression of prostate cancer. Classic models of AR action view AR-binding sites as upstream regulatory elements in gene promoters or their proximity. However, recent wider genomic screens indicate that AR target genes are commonly activated through very distal chromatin-binding sites. This highlights the importance of long-range chromatin regulation of transcription by the AR, shifting the focus from the linear gene models to three-dimensional models of AR target genes and gene programs. The capability of AR to regulate promoters from long distances in the chromatin is particularly important when evaluating the role of AR in the regulation of genes in malignant prostate cells that frequently show striking genomic aberrations, especially gene fusions. Therefore, in addition to the mechanisms of DNA loop formation between the enhancer bound ARs and the transcription apparatus at the target core promoter, the mechanisms insulating distally bound ARs from promiscuously making contacts and activating other than their normal target gene promoters are critical for proper physiological regulation and thus currently under intense investigation. This review discusses the current knowledge about the AR action in the context of gene aberrations and the three-dimensional chromatin landscape of prostate cancer cells.

scholarly journals Evolution of mouse circadian enhancers from transposable elements

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius Judd ◽  
Hayley Sanderson ◽  
Cédric Feschotte
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transposable Elements ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Mouse Liver ◽  
Integration Site ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Circadian Gene ◽  
Binding Motifs ◽  
Reporter Assays

Abstract Background Transposable elements are increasingly recognized as a source of cis-regulatory variation. Previous studies have revealed that transposons are often bound by transcription factors and some have been co-opted into functional enhancers regulating host gene expression. However, the process by which transposons mature into complex regulatory elements, like enhancers, remains poorly understood. To investigate this process, we examined the contribution of transposons to the cis-regulatory network controlling circadian gene expression in the mouse liver, a well-characterized network serving an important physiological function. Results ChIP-seq analyses reveal that transposons and other repeats contribute ~ 14% of the binding sites for core circadian regulators (CRs) including BMAL1, CLOCK, PER1/2, and CRY1/2, in the mouse liver. RSINE1, an abundant murine-specific SINE, is the only transposon family enriched for CR binding sites across all datasets. Sequence analyses and reporter assays reveal that the circadian regulatory activity of RSINE1 stems from the presence of imperfect CR binding motifs in the ancestral RSINE1 sequence. These motifs matured into canonical motifs through point mutations after transposition. Furthermore, maturation occurred preferentially within elements inserted in the proximity of ancestral CR binding sites. RSINE1 also acquired motifs that recruit nuclear receptors known to cooperate with CRs to regulate circadian gene expression specifically in the liver. Conclusions Our results suggest that the birth of enhancers from transposons is predicated both by the sequence of the transposon and by the cis-regulatory landscape surrounding their genomic integration site.

Conserved and distinct roles of kreisler in regulation of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Manzanares ◽  
S. Cordes ◽  
L. Ariza-McNaughton ◽  
V. Sadl ◽  
K. Maruthainar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Anteroposterior Patterning ◽  
Endogenous Gene ◽  
Transgenic Embryos ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Segmental Expression

During anteroposterior patterning of the developing hindbrain, the anterior expression of 3′ Hox genes maps to distinct rhombomeric boundaries and, in many cases, is upregulated in specific segments. Paralogous genes frequently have similar anterior boundaries of expression but it is not known if these are controlled by common mechanisms. The expression of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes extends from the posterior spinal cord up to the rhombomere (r) 4/5 boundary and both genes are upregulated specifically in r5. However, in this study, we have found that Hoxa3 expression is also upregulated in r6, showing that there are differences in segmental expression between paralogues. We have used transgenic analysis to investigate the mechanisms underlying the pattern of segmental expression of Hoxa3. We found that the intergenic region between Hoxa3 and Hoxa4 contains several enhancers, which summed together mediate a pattern of expression closely resembling that of the endogenous Hoxa3 gene. One enhancer specifically directs expression in r5 and r6, in a manner that reflects the upregulation of the endogenous gene in these segments. Deletion analysis localized this activity to a 600 bp fragment that was found to contain a single high-affinity binding site for the Maf bZIP protein Krml1, encoded by the kreisler gene. This site is necessary for enhancer activity and when multimerized it is sufficient to direct a kreisler-like pattern in transgenic embryos. Furthermore the r5/r6 enhancer activity is dependent upon endogenous kreisler and is activated by ectopic kreisler expression. This demonstrates that Hoxa3, along with its paralog Hoxb3, is a direct target of kreisler in the mouse hindbrain. Comparisons between the Krml1-binding sites in the Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 enhancers reveal that there are differences in both the number of binding sites and way that kreisler activity is integrated and restricted by these two control regions. Analysis of the individual sites revealed that they have different requirements for mediating r5/r6 and dorsal roof plate expression. Therefore, the restriction of Hoxb3 to r5 and Hoxa3 to r5 and r6, together with expression patterns of Hoxb3 in other vertebrate species suggests that these regulatory elements have a common origin but have later diverged during vertebrate evolution.

scholarly journals A Common Motif within the Negative Regulatory Regions of Multiple Factors Inhibits Their Transcriptional Synergy

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 6040-6050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge A. Iñiguez-Lluhí ◽  
David Pearce
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Proper Function ◽  
Protein Motif ◽  
Regulatory Regions ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Common Motif ◽  
Single Response ◽  
Dna Regulatory Elements

ABSTRACT DNA regulatory elements frequently harbor multiple recognition sites for several transcriptional activators. The response mounted from such compound response elements is often more pronounced than the simple sum of effects observed at single binding sites. The determinants of such transcriptional synergy and its control, however, are poorly understood. Through a genetic approach, we have uncovered a novel protein motif that limits the transcriptional synergy of multiple DNA-binding regulators. Disruption of these conserved synergy control motifs (SC motifs) selectively increases activity at compound, but not single, response elements. Although isolated SC motifs do not regulate transcription when tethered to DNA, their transfer to an activator lacking them is sufficient to impose limits on synergy. Mechanistic analysis of the two SC motifs found in the glucocorticoid receptor N-terminal region reveals that they function irrespective of the arrangement of the receptor binding sites or their distance from the transcription start site. Proper function, however, requires the receptor's ligand-binding domain and an engaged dimer interface. Notably, the motifs are not functional in yeast and do not alter the effect of p160 coactivators, suggesting that they require other nonconserved components to operate. Many activators across multiple classes harbor seemingly unrelated negative regulatory regions. The presence of SC motifs within them, however, suggests a common function and identifies SC motifs as critical elements of a general mechanism to modulate higher-order interactions among transcriptional regulators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document