scholarly journals Neural tube-ectoderm interactions are required for trigeminal placode formation

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4287-4295 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R. Stark ◽  
J. Sechrist ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser ◽  
C. Marcelle
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Trigeminal Ganglion ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Somite Stage ◽  
Tissue Interactions ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Cranial Sensory Ganglia ◽  
Placode Formation

Cranial sensory ganglia in vertebrates develop from the ectodermal placodes, the neural crest, or both. Although much is known about the neural crest contribution to cranial ganglia, relatively little is known about how placode cells form, invaginate and migrate to their targets. Here, we identify Pax-3 as a molecular marker for placode cells that contribute to the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal ganglion and use it, in conjunction with DiI labeling of the surface ectoderm, to analyze some of the mechanisms underlying placode development. Pax-3 expression in the ophthalmic placode is observed as early as the 4-somite stage in a narrow band of ectoderm contiguous to the midbrain neural folds. Its expression broadens to a patch of ectoderm adjacent to the midbrain and the rostral hindbrain at the 8- to 10-somite stage. Invagination of the first Pax-3-positive cells begins at the 13-somite stage. Placodal invagination continues through the 35-somite stage, by which time condensation of the trigeminal ganglion has begun. To challenge the normal tissue interactions leading to placode formation, we ablated the cranial neural crest cells or implanted barriers between the neural tube and the ectoderm. Our results demonstrate that, although the presence of neural crest cells is not mandatory for Pax-3 expression in the forming placode, a diffusible signal from the neuroectoderm is required for induction and/or maintenance of the ophthalmic placode.

scholarly journals A novel spalt gene expressed in branchial arches affects the ability of cranial neural crest cells to populate sensory ganglia

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
MEYER BAREMBAUM ◽  
MARIANNE BRONNER-FRASER
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Trigeminal Ganglion ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Differentiation Markers ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

Cranial neural crest cells differentiate into diverse derivatives including neurons and glia of the cranial ganglia, and cartilage and bone of the facial skeleton. Here, we explore the function of a novel transcription factor of the spalt family that might be involved in early cell-lineage decisions of the avian neural crest. The chicken spalt4 gene (csal4) is expressed in the neural tube, migrating neural crest, branchial arches and, transiently, in the cranial ectoderm. Later, it is expressed in the mesectodermal, but not neuronal or glial, derivatives of midbrain and hindbrain neural crest. After over-expression by electroporation into the cranial neural tube and neural crest, we observed a marked redistribution of electroporated neural crest cells in the vicinity of the trigeminal ganglion. In control-electroporated embryos, numerous, labeled neural crest cells (∼80% of the population) entered the ganglion, many of which differentiated into neurons. By contrast, few (∼30% of the population) spalt-electroporated neural crest cells entered the trigeminal ganglion. Instead, they localized in the mesenchyme around the ganglionic periphery or continued further ventrally to the branchial arches. Interestingly, little or no expression of differentiation markers for neurons or other cell types was observed in spalt-electroporated neural crest cells.

scholarly journals Twist Function Is Required for the Morphogenesis of the Cephalic Neural Tube and the Differentiation of the Cranial Neural Crest Cells in the Mouse Embryo

2002 ◽  
Vol 247 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Soo ◽  
Meredith P. O'Rourke ◽  
Poh-Lynn Khoo ◽  
Kirsten A. Steiner ◽  
Nicole Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Mouse Embryo ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

scholarly journals Tissue interactions affecting the migration and differentiation of neural crest cells in the chick embryo

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.D. Stern ◽  
K.B. Artinger ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Motor Axons ◽  
Root Region ◽  
Tissue Interactions ◽  
Catecholamine Fluorescence ◽  
Catecholaminergic Cells

A series of microsurgical operations was performed in chick embryos to study the factors that control the polarity, position and differentiation of the sympathetic and dorsal root ganglion cells developing from the neural crest. The neural tube, with or without the notochord, was rotated by 180 degrees dorsoventrally to cause the neural crest cells to emerge ventrally. In some embryos, the notochord was ablated, and in others a second notochord was implanted. Sympathetic differentiation was assessed by catecholamine fluorescence after aldehyde fixation. Neural crest cells emerging from an inverted neural tube migrate in a ventral-to-dorsal direction through the sclerotome, where they become segmented by being restricted to the rostral half of each sclerotome. Both motor axons and neural crest cells avoid the notochord and the extracellular matrix that surrounds it, but motor axons appear also to be attracted to the notochord until they reach its immediate vicinity. The dorsal root ganglia always form adjacent to the neural tube and their dorsoventral orientation follows the direction of migration of the neural crest cells. Differentiation of catecholaminergic cells only occurs near the aorta/mesonephros and in addition requires the proximity of either the ventral neural tube (floor plate/ventral root region) or the notochord. Prior migration of presumptive catecholaminergic cells through the sclerotome, however, is neither required nor sufficient for their adrenergic differentiation.

The regeneration of the cephalic neural crest, a problem revisited: the regenerating cells originate from the contralateral or from the anterior and posterior neural fold

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (11) ◽  
pp. 3393-3407 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Couly ◽  
A. Grapin-Botton ◽  
P. Coltey ◽  
N.M. Le Douarin
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Experimental Situation ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Fate Map ◽  
Somite Stage ◽  
Dorsal Neural Tube ◽  
Ventral Neural Tube ◽  
Branchial Arches

The mesencephalic and rhombencephalic levels of origin of the hypobranchial skeleton (lower jaw and hyoid bone) within the neural fold have been determined at the 5-somite stage with a resolution corresponding to each single rhombomere, by means of the quail-chick chimera technique. Expression of certain Hox genes (Hoxa-2, Hoxa-3 and Hoxb-4) was recorded in the branchial arches of chick and quail embryos at embryonic days 3 (E3) and E4. This was a prerequisite for studying the regeneration capacities of the neural crest, after the dorsal neural tube was resected at the mesencephalic and rhombencephalic level. We found first that excisions at the 5-somite stage extending from the midmesencephalon down to r8 are followed by the regeneration of neural crest cells able to compensate for the deficiencies so produced. This confirmed the results of previous authors who made similar excisions at comparable (or older) developmental stages. When a bilateral excision was followed by the unilateral homotopic graft of the dorsal neural tube from a quail embryo, thus mimicking the situation created by a unilateral excision, we found that the migration of the grafted unilateral neural crest (quail-labelled) is bilateral and compensates massively for the missing crest derivatives. The capacity of the intermediate and ventral neural tube to yield neural crest cells was tested by removing the chick rhombencephalic neural tube and replacing it either uni- or bilaterally with a ventral tube coming from a stage-matched quail. No neural crest cells exited from the ventral neural tube but no deficiency in neural crest derivatives was recorded. Crest cells were found to regenerate from the ends of the operated region. This was demonstrated by grafting fragments of quail neural fold at the extremities of the excised territory. Quail neural crest cells were seen migrating longitudinally from both the rostral and caudal ends of the operated region and filling the branchial arches located inbetween. Comparison of the behaviour of neural crest cells in this experimental situation with that showed by their normal fate map revealed that crest cells increase their proliferation rate and change their migratory behaviour without modifying their Hox code.

scholarly journals Dorsal hindbrain ablation results in rerouting of neural crest migration and changes in gene expression, but normal hyoid development

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (14) ◽  
pp. 2729-2739 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Saldivar ◽  
J.W. Sechrist ◽  
C.E. Krull ◽  
S. Ruffins ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Surgical Ablation ◽  
The Third ◽  
Somite Stage ◽  
Or Gene ◽  
Dorsal Hindbrain

Our previous studies have shown that hindbrain neural tube cells can regulate to form neural crest cells for a limited time after neural fold removal (Scherson, T., Serbedzija, G., Fraser, S. E. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1993). Development 188, 1049–1061; Sechrist, J., Nieto, M. A., Zamanian, R. T. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1995). Development 121, 4103–4115). In the present study, we ablated the dorsal hindbrain at later stages to examine possible alterations in migratory behavior and/or gene expression in neural crest populations rostral and caudal to the operated region. The results were compared with those obtained by misdirecting neural crest cells via rhombomere rotation. Following surgical ablation of dorsal r5 and r6 prior to the 10 somite stage, r4 neural crest cells migrate along normal pathways toward the second branchial arch. Similarly, r7 neural crest cells migrate primarily to the fourth branchial arch. When analogous ablations are performed at the 10–12 somite stage, however, a marked increase in the numbers of DiI/Hoxa-3-positive cells from r7 are observed within the third branchial arch. In addition, some DiI-labeled r4 cells migrate into the depleted hindbrain region and the third branchial arch. During their migration, a subset of these r4 cells up-regulate Hoxa-3, a transcript they do not normally express. Krox20 transcript levels were augmented after ablation in a population of neural crest cells migrating from r4, caudal r3 and rostral r3. Long-term survivors of bilateral ablations possess normal neural crest-derived cartilage of the hyoid complex, suggesting that misrouted r4 and r7 cells contribute to cranial derivatives appropriate for their new location. In contrast, misdirecting of the neural crest by rostrocaudal rotation of r4 through r6 results in a reduction of Hoxa-3 expression in the third branchial arch and corresponding deficits in third arch-derived structures of the hyoid apparatus. These results demonstrate that neural crest/tube progenitors in the hindbrain can compensate by altering migratory trajectories and patterns of gene expression when the adjacent neural crest is removed, but fail to compensate appropriately when the existing neural crest is misrouted by neural tube rotation.

scholarly journals FGF2 promotes skeletogenic differentiation of cranial neural crest cells

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (11) ◽  
pp. 2143-2152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjukta Sarkar ◽  
Anita Petiot ◽  
Andrew Copp ◽  
Patrizia Ferretti ◽  
Peter Thorogood
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors ◽  
Tissue Interactions ◽  
Membrane Bone ◽  
Cartilage Differentiation ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

The cranial neural crest gives rise to most of the skeletal tissues of the skull. Matrix-mediated tissue interactions have been implicated in the skeletogenic differentiation of crest cells, but little is known of the role that growth factors might play in this process. The discovery that mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) cause the major craniosynostosis syndromes implicates FGF-mediated signalling in the skeletogenic differentiation of the cranial neural crest. We now show that, in vitro, mesencephalic neural crest cells respond to exogenous FGF2 in a dose-dependent manner, with 0.1 and 1 ng/ml causing enhanced proliferation, and 10 ng/ml inducing cartilage differentiation. In longer-term cultures, both endochondral and membrane bone are formed. FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3 are all detectable by immunohistochemistry in the mesencephalic region, with particularly intense expression at the apices of the neural folds from which the neural crest arises. FGFRs are also expressed by subpopulations of neural crest cells in culture. Collectively, these findings suggest that FGFs are involved in the skeletogenic differentiation of the cranial neural crest.

scholarly journals Vital dye analysis of cranial neural crest cell migration in the mouse embryo

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.N. Serbedzija ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser ◽  
S.E. Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Somite Stage ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cell Migration ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Crest Cell

The spatial and temporal aspects of cranial neural crest cell migration in the mouse are poorly understood because of technical limitations. No reliable cell markers are available and vital staining of embryos in culture has had limited success because they develop normally for only 24 hours. Here, we circumvent these problems by combining vital dye labelling with exo utero embryological techniques. To define better the nature of cranial neural crest cell migration in the mouse embryo, premigratory cranial neural crest cells were labelled by injecting DiI into the amniotic cavity on embryonic day 8. Embryos, allowed to develop an additional 1 to 5 days exo utero in the mother before analysis, showed distinct and characteristic patterns of cranial neural crest cell migration at the different axial levels. Neural crest cells arising at the level of the forebrain migrated ventrally in a contiguous stream through the mesenchyme between the eye and the diencephalon. In the region of the midbrain, the cells migrated ventrolaterally as dispersed cells through the mesenchyme bordered by the lateral surface of the mesencephalon and the ectoderm. At the level of the hindbrain, neural crest cells migrated ventrolaterally in three subectodermal streams that were segmentally distributed. Each stream extended from the dorsal portion of the neural tube into the distal portion of the adjacent branchial arch. The order in which cranial neural crest cells populate their derivatives was determined by labelling embryos at different stages of development. Cranial neural crest cells populated their derivatives in a ventral-to-dorsal order, similar to the pattern observed at trunk levels. In order to confirm and extend the findings obtained with exo utero embryos, DiI (1,1-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindo-carbocyanine perchlorate) was applied focally to the neural folds of embryos, which were then cultured for 24 hours. Because the culture technique permitted increased control of the timing and location of the DiI injection, it was possible to determine the duration of cranial neural crest cell emigration from the neural tube. Cranial neural crest cell emigration from the neural folds was completed by the 11-somite stage in the region of the rostral hindbrain, the 14-somite stage in the regions of the midbrain and caudal hindbrain and not until the 16-somite stage in the region of the forebrain. At each level, the time between the earliest and latest neural crest cells to emigrate from the neural tube appeared to be 9 hours.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Regulative capacity of the cranial neural tube to form neural crest

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 1049-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Scherson ◽  
G. Serbedzija ◽  
S. Fraser ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Neural Tube Closure ◽  
Dorsal Midline ◽  
Dorsal Neural Tube ◽  
Ventral Neural Tube ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Regulative Capacity

In avian embryos, cranial neural crest cells emigrate from the dorsal midline of the neural tube shortly after neural tube closure. Previous lineage analyses suggest that the neural crest is not a pre-segregated population of cells within the neural tube; instead, a single progenitor in the dorsal neural tube can contribute to neurons in both the central and the peripheral nervous systems (Bronner-Fraser and Fraser, 1989 Neuron 3, 755–766). To explore the relationship between the ‘premigratory’ neural crest cells and the balance of the cells in the neural tube in the midbrain and hindbrain region, we have challenged the fate of these populations by ablating the neural crest either alone or in combination with the adjoining ventral portions of the neural tube. Focal injections of the vital dye, DiI, into the neural tissue bordering the ablated region demonstrate that cells at the same axial level, in the lateral and ventral neural tube, regulate to reconstitute a population of neural crest cells. These cells emigrate from the neural tube, migrate along normal pathways according to their axial level of origin and appear to give rise to a normal range of derivatives. This regulation following ablation suggests that neural tube cells normally destined to form CNS derivatives can adjust their prospective fates to form PNS and other neural crest derivatives until 4.5-6 hours after the time of normal onset of emigration from the neural tube.

scholarly journals TWIST1 interacts with adherens junction proteins during neural tube formation and regulates fate transition in cranial neural crest cells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica W Bertol ◽  
Shelby Johnston ◽  
Rabia Ahmed ◽  
Victoria K Xie ◽  
Lissette Cruz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Neural Tube Closure ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

Cell fate determination is a necessary and tightly regulated process for producing different cell types and structures during development. Cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs) are unique to vertebrate embryos and emerge from the neural fold borders into multiple cell lineages that differentiate into bone, cartilage, neurons, and glial cells. We previously reported that Irf6 genetically interacts with Twist1 during CNCC-derived tissue formation. Here, we investigated the mechanistic role of Twist1 and Irf6 at early stages of craniofacial development. Our data indicates that TWIST1 interacts with a/b/g-CATENINS during neural tube closure, and Irf6 is involved in the structural integrity of the neural tube. Twist1 suppresses Irf6 and other epithelial genes in CNCCs during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process and cell migration. Conversely, a loss of Twist1 leads to a sustained expression of epithelial and cell adhesion markers in migratory CNCCs. Disruption of TWIST1 phosphorylation in vivo leads to epidermal blebbing, edema, neural tube defects, and CNCC-derived structural abnormalities. Altogether, this study describes an uncharacterized function of Twist1 and Irf6 in the neural tube and CNCCs and provides new target genes of Twist1 involved in cytoskeletal remodeling. Furthermore, the association between DNA variations within TWIST1 putative enhancers and human facial morphology is also investigated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document