Transducing positional information to the Hox genes: critical interaction of cdx gene products with position-sensitive regulatory elements

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (22) ◽  
pp. 4349-4358 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Charite ◽  
W. de Graaff ◽  
D. Consten ◽  
M.J. Reijnen ◽  
J. Korving ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Anteroposterior Patterning

Studies of pattern formation in the vertebrate central nervous system indicate that anteroposterior positional information is generated in the embryo by signalling gradients of an as yet unknown nature. We searched for transcription factors that transduce this information to the Hox genes. Based on the assumption that the activity levels of such factors might vary with position along the anteroposterior axis, we devised an in vivo assay to detect responsiveness of cis-acting sequences to such differentially active factors. We used this assay to analyze a Hoxb8 regulatory element, and detected the most pronounced response in a short stretch of DNA containing a cluster of potential CDX binding sites. We show that differentially expressed DNA binding proteins are present in gastrulating embryos that bind to these sites in vitro, that cdx gene products are among these, and that binding site mutations that abolish binding of these proteins completely destroy the ability of the regulatory element to drive regionally restricted expression in the embryo. Finally, we show that ectopic expression of cdx gene products anteriorizes expression of reporter transgenes driven by this regulatory element, as well as that of the endogenous Hoxb8 gene, in a manner that is consistent with them being essential transducers of positional information. These data suggest that, in contrast to Drosophila Caudal, vertebrate cdx gene products transduce positional information directly to the Hox genes, acting through CDX binding sites in their enhancers. This may represent the ancestral mode of action of caudal homologues, which are involved in anteroposterior patterning in organisms with widely divergent body plans and modes of development.

Conserved and distinct roles of kreisler in regulation of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Manzanares ◽  
S. Cordes ◽  
L. Ariza-McNaughton ◽  
V. Sadl ◽  
K. Maruthainar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Anteroposterior Patterning ◽  
Endogenous Gene ◽  
Transgenic Embryos ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Segmental Expression

During anteroposterior patterning of the developing hindbrain, the anterior expression of 3′ Hox genes maps to distinct rhombomeric boundaries and, in many cases, is upregulated in specific segments. Paralogous genes frequently have similar anterior boundaries of expression but it is not known if these are controlled by common mechanisms. The expression of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes extends from the posterior spinal cord up to the rhombomere (r) 4/5 boundary and both genes are upregulated specifically in r5. However, in this study, we have found that Hoxa3 expression is also upregulated in r6, showing that there are differences in segmental expression between paralogues. We have used transgenic analysis to investigate the mechanisms underlying the pattern of segmental expression of Hoxa3. We found that the intergenic region between Hoxa3 and Hoxa4 contains several enhancers, which summed together mediate a pattern of expression closely resembling that of the endogenous Hoxa3 gene. One enhancer specifically directs expression in r5 and r6, in a manner that reflects the upregulation of the endogenous gene in these segments. Deletion analysis localized this activity to a 600 bp fragment that was found to contain a single high-affinity binding site for the Maf bZIP protein Krml1, encoded by the kreisler gene. This site is necessary for enhancer activity and when multimerized it is sufficient to direct a kreisler-like pattern in transgenic embryos. Furthermore the r5/r6 enhancer activity is dependent upon endogenous kreisler and is activated by ectopic kreisler expression. This demonstrates that Hoxa3, along with its paralog Hoxb3, is a direct target of kreisler in the mouse hindbrain. Comparisons between the Krml1-binding sites in the Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 enhancers reveal that there are differences in both the number of binding sites and way that kreisler activity is integrated and restricted by these two control regions. Analysis of the individual sites revealed that they have different requirements for mediating r5/r6 and dorsal roof plate expression. Therefore, the restriction of Hoxb3 to r5 and Hoxa3 to r5 and r6, together with expression patterns of Hoxb3 in other vertebrate species suggests that these regulatory elements have a common origin but have later diverged during vertebrate evolution.

scholarly journals The pancreatic islet factor STF-1 binds cooperatively with Pbx to a regulatory element in the somatostatin promoter: importance of the FPWMK motif and of the homeodomain.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 7091-7097 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Peers ◽  
S Sharma ◽  
T Johnson ◽  
M Kamps ◽  
M Montminy
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Selection ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Cooperative Binding ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Target Sites

A number of homeodomain proteins have been shown to regulate cellular development by stimulating the transcription of specific target genes. In contrast to their distinct activities in vivo, however, most homeodomain proteins bind indiscriminately to potential target sites in vitro, suggesting the involvement of cofactors which specify target site selection. One such cofactor, termed extradenticle, has been shown to influence segmental morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster by binding cooperatively with certain homeodomain proteins to target regulatory elements. Here we demonstrate that STF-1, an orphan homeodomain protein required for pancreatic development in mammals, binds cooperatively to DNA with Pbx, the mammalian homolog of extradenticle. Cooperative binding with Pbx requires a pentapeptide motif (FPWMK) which is well conserved among a large subset of homeodomain proteins. The FPMWK motif is not sufficient to confer Pbx cooperativity on other homeodomain proteins, however; the N-terminal arm of the STF-1 homeodomain is also essential. As cooperative binding with Pbx occurs on only a subset of potential STF-1 target sites, our results suggest that Pbx may specify target gene selection in the developing pancreas by forming heterodimeric complexes with STF-1.

scholarly journals Two Pax-binding sites are required for early embryonic brain expression of an Engrailed-2 transgene

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 627-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.L. Song ◽  
G. Chalepakis ◽  
P. Gruss ◽  
A.L. Joyner
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transgenic Mice ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Developing Brain ◽  
Molecular Evidence ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Pax Genes

The temporally and spatially restricted expression of the mouse Engrailed (En) genes is essential for development of the midbrain and cerebellum. The regulation of En-2 expression was studied using in vitro protein-DNA binding assays and in vivo expression analysis in transgenic mice to gain insight into the genetic events that lead to regionalization of the developing brain. A minimum En-2 1.0 kb enhancer fragment was defined and found to contain multiple positive and negative regulatory elements that function in concert to establish the early embryonic mid-hindbrain expression. Furthermore, the mid-hindbrain regulatory sequences were shown to be structurally and functionally conserved in humans. The mouse paired-box-containing genes Pax-2, Pax-5 and Pax-8 show overlapping expression with the En genes in the developing brain. Significantly, two DNA-binding sites for Pax-2, Pax-5 and Pax-8 proteins were identified in the 1.0 kb En-2 regulatory sequences, and mutation of the binding sites disrupted initiation and maintenance of expression in transgenic mice. These results present strong molecular evidence that the Pax genes are direct upstream regulators of En-2 in the genetic cascade controlling mid-hindbrain development. These mouse studies, taken together with others in Drosophila and zebrafish on the role of Pax genes in controlling expression of En family members, indicate that a Pax-En genetic pathway has been conserved during evolution.

scholarly journals The MCP silencer of theDrosophila Abd-Bgene requires both Pleiohomeotic and GAGA factor for the maintenance of repression

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (11) ◽  
pp. 2163-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Busturia ◽  
Alan Lloyd ◽  
Fernando Bejarano ◽  
Michael Zavortink ◽  
Hua Xin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reporter Gene ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Homeotic Gene ◽  
Gaga Factor ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements ◽  
Silencer Element

Silencing of homeotic gene expression requires the function of cis-regulatory elements known as Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). The MCP silencer element of the Drosophila homeotic gene Abdominal-B has been shown to behave as a PRE and to be required for silencing throughout development. Using deletion analysis and reporter gene assays, we defined a 138 bp sequence within the MCP silencer that is sufficient for silencing of a reporter gene in the imaginal discs. Within the MCP138 fragment, there are four binding sites for the Pleiohomeotic protein (PHO) and two binding sites for the GAGA factor (GAF), encoded by the Trithorax-like gene. PHO and the GAF proteins bind to these sites in vitro. Mutational analysis of PHO and GAF binding sequences indicate that these sites are necessary for silencing in vivo. Moreover, silencing by MCP138 depends on the function of the Trithorax-like gene, and on the function of the PcG genes, including pleiohomeotic. Deletion and mutational analyses show that, individually, either PHO or GAF binding sites retain only weak silencing activity. However, when both PHO and GAF binding sites are present, they achieve strong silencing. We present a model in which robust silencing is achieved by sequential and facilitated binding of PHO and GAF.

scholarly journals Identification of regulatory elements required for Stra8 expression, in fetal ovarian germ cells of the mouse

Development ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. dev.194977
Author(s):  
Chun-Wei Feng ◽  
Guillaume Burnet ◽  
Cassy M. Spiller ◽  
Fiona Ka Man Cheung ◽  
Kallayanee Chawengsaksophak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Egfp Expression ◽  
Spatiotemporal Regulation ◽  
Targeted Mutation ◽  
Fetal Ovary

In mice, the entry of germ cells into meiosis critically depends on the expression of stimulated by retinoic acid gene 8 (Stra8). Stra8 is expressed specifically in pre-meiotic germ cells of females and males, at fetal and postnatal stages respectively, but the mechanistic details of its spatiotemporal regulation are yet to be defined. In particular, there has been considerable debate regarding whether retinoic acid is required, in vivo, to initiate Stra8 expression in the mouse fetal ovary. We show that the distinctive anterior-to-posterior pattern of Stra8 initiation, characteristic of germ cells in the fetal ovary, is faithfully recapitulated when 2.9 kb of the Stra8 promoter is used to drive eGFP expression. Using in vitro transfection assays of cut-down and mutant constructs we identified two functional retinoic acid responsive elements (RAREs) within this 2.9 kb regulatory element. We also show that the transcription factor DMRT1 enhances Stra8 expression, but only in the presence of RA and the most proximal RARE. Finally, we used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutation studies to demonstrate that both RAREs are required for optimal Stra8 expression levels, in vivo.

scholarly journals HNRNPA1 promotes recognition of splice site decoys by U2AF2 in vivo

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Howard ◽  
Hai Lin ◽  
Garam Kim ◽  
Jolene M Draper ◽  
Maximilian Haeussler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Splice Site ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Splice Sites ◽  
Spliceosome Assembly ◽  
Over Expression

AbstractAlternative pre-mRNA splicing plays a major role in expanding the transcript output of human genes. This process is regulated, in part, by the interplay of trans-acting RNA binding proteins (RBPs) with myriad cis-regulatory elements scattered throughout pre-mRNAs. These molecular recognition events are critical for defining the protein coding sequences (exons) within pre-mRNAs and directing spliceosome assembly on non-coding regions (introns). One of the earliest events in this process is recognition of the 3’ splice site by U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 2 (U2AF2). Splicing regulators, such as the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (HNRNPA1), influence spliceosome assembly both in vitro and in vivo, but their mechanisms of action remain poorly described on a global scale. HNRNPA1 also promotes proof reading of 3’ss sequences though a direct interaction with the U2AF heterodimer. To determine how HNRNPA1 regulates U2AF-RNA interactions in vivo, we analyzed U2AF2 RNA binding specificity using individual-nucleotide resolution crosslinking immunoprecipitation (iCLIP) in control- and HNRNPA1 over-expression cells. We observed changes in the distribution of U2AF2 crosslinking sites relative to the 3’ splice sites of alternative cassette exons but not constitutive exons upon HNRNPA1 over-expression. A subset of these events shows a concomitant increase of U2AF2 crosslinking at distal intronic regions, suggesting a shift of U2AF2 to “decoy” binding sites. Of the many non-canonical U2AF2 binding sites, Alu-derived RNA sequences represented one of the most abundant classes of HNRNPA1-dependent decoys. Splicing reporter assays demonstrated that mutation of U2AF2 decoy sites inhibited HNRNPA1-dependent exon skipping in vivo. We propose that HNRNPA1 regulates exon definition by modulating the interaction of U2AF2 with decoy or bona fide 3’ splice sites.

scholarly journals Genome-wide analysis of cis-regulatory changes in the metabolic adaptation of cavefish

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Krishnan ◽  
Chris W. Seidel ◽  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Jake VanCampen ◽  
Robert Peuß ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Metabolic Adaptation ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Cave Environment

AbstractChanges in cis-regulatory elements play important roles in adaptation and phenotypic evolution. However, their contribution to metabolic adaptation of organisms is less understood. Here we have utilized a unique vertebrate model, Astyanax mexicanus, different morphotypes of which survive in nutrient-rich surface and nutrient-deprived cave water to uncover gene regulatory networks in metabolic adaptation. We performed genome-wide epigenetic profiling in the liver tissue of one surface and two independently derived cave populations. We find that many cis-regulatory elements differ in their epigenetic status/chromatin accessibility between surface fish and cavefish, while the two independently derived cave populations have evolved remarkably similar regulatory signatures. These differentially accessible regions are associated with genes of key pathways related to lipid metabolism, circadian rhythm and immune system that are known to be altered in cavefish. Using in vitro and in vivo functional testing of the candidate cis-regulatory elements, we find that genetic changes within them cause quantitative expression differences. We characterized one cis-regulatory element in the hpdb gene and found a genomic deletion in cavefish that abolishes binding of the transcriptional repressor IRF2 in vitro and derepresses enhancer activity in reporter assays. Genetic experiments further validated a cis-mediated role of the enhancer and suggest a role of this deletion in the upregulation of hpdb in wild cavefish populations. Selection of this mutation in multiple independent cave populations supports its importance in the adaptation to the cave environment, providing novel molecular insights into the evolutionary trade-off between loss of pigmentation and adaptation to a food-deprived cave environment.

scholarly journals The human FLT1 regulatory element directs vascular expression and modulates angiogenesis pathways in vitro and in vivo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Stolper ◽  
Holly K. Voges ◽  
Michael See ◽  
Neda Rahmani Mehdiabadi ◽  
Gulrez Chahal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transgene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Cardiovascular Development ◽  
Vascular Expression

AbstractThere is growing evidence that mutations in non-coding cis-regulatory elements (CREs) disrupt proper development. However, little is known about human CREs that are crucial for cardiovascular development. To address this, we bioinformatically identified cardiovascular CREs based on the occupancy of the CRE by the homeodomain protein NKX2-5 and cardiac chromatin histone modifications. This search defined a highly conserved CRE within the FLT1 locus termed enFLT1. We show that the human enFLT1 is an enhancer capable of driving reporter transgene expression in vivo throughout the developing cardiovascular system of medaka. Deletion of the human enFLT1 enhancer (ΔenFLT1) triggered molecular perturbations in extracellular matrix organisation and blood vessel morphogenesis in vitro in endothelial cells derived from human embryonic stem cells and vascular defects in vivo in medaka. These findings highlight the crucial role of the human FLT1 enhancer and its function as a regulator and buffer of transcriptional regulation in cardiovascular development.

scholarly journals The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arya Zandvakili ◽  
Juli Uhl ◽  
Ian Campbell ◽  
Yuntao Charlie Song ◽  
Brian Gebelein
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Protease Gene ◽  
Precise Integration

AbstractHox genes encode a family of transcription factors that, despite having similar in vitro DNA binding preferences, regulate distinct genetic programs along the metazoan anterior-posterior axis. To better define mechanisms of Hox specificity, we compared and contrasted the ability of abdominal Hox factors to regulate two cis-regulatory elements within the Drosophila embryo. Both the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and Abdominal-A (Abd-A) Hox factors form cooperative complexes with the Extradenticle (Exd) and Homothorax (Hth) transcription factors to repress the distal-less leg selector gene via the DCRE, whereas only Abd-A interacts with Exd and Hth on the RhoA element to activate a rhomboid serine protease gene that stimulates Epidermal Growth Factor secretion. By swapping binding sites between these elements, we found that the RhoA Exd/Hth/Hox site configuration that mediates Abd-A specific activation can also convey transcriptional repression by both Ubx and Abd-A when placed into the DCRE, but only in one orientation. We further show that the orientation and spacing of Hox sites relative to additional transcription factor binding sites within the RhoA and DCRE elements is critical to mediate appropriate cell- and segment-specific output. These results indicate that the interaction between Hox, Exd, and Hth neither determines activation vs repression specificity nor defines Ubx vs Abd-A specificity. Instead the precise integration of Hox sites with additional TF inputs is required for accurate transcriptional output. Taken together, these studies provide new insight into the mechanisms of Hox target and regulatory specificity as well as the constraints placed on regulatory elements to convey appropriate outputs.Author SummaryThe Hox genes encode a family of transcription factors that give cells within each region along the developing body plan a unique identity in animals from worms to mammals. Surprisingly, however, most of the Hox factors bind the same or highly similar DNA sequences. These findings raise a paradox: How can proteins that have highly similar DNA binding properties perform different functions in the animal by regulating different sets of target genes? In this study, we address this question by studying how two Hox factors regulate the expression of target genes that specify leg development and the making of liver-like cells in the developing fly. By comparing and contrasting how Hox target genes are activated and/or repressed, we found that the same Hox binding sites can mediate either activation or repression in a manner that depends upon context. In addition, we found that a Hox binding site that is normally regulated by only one Hox factor, can also be used by more than one Hox factor swapped into another target gene. These findings indicate that the specificity of a Hox factor to regulate target genes does not rely solely upon DNA binding specificity but also requires regulatory specificity.

Segmental expression of Hoxa-2 in the hindbrain is directly regulated by Krox-20

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nonchev ◽  
C. Vesque ◽  
M. Maconochie ◽  
T. Seitanidou ◽  
L. Ariza-McNaughton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Lacz Reporter ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Selector Genes ◽  
Group 2

The hindbrain is a segmented structure divided into repeating metameric units termed rhombomeres (r). The Hox family, vertebrate homologs of the Drosophila HOM-C homeotic selector genes, are expressed in rhombomere-restricted patterns and are believed to participate in regulating segmental identities. Krox-20, a zinc finger gene, has a highly conserved pattern of expression in r3 and r5 and is functionally required for their maintenance in mouse embryos. Krox-20 has been shown to directly regulate the Hoxb-2 gene and we wanted to determine if it was involved in regulating multiple Hox genes as a part of its functional role. Hoxa-2 is the only known paralog of Hoxb-2, and we examined the patterns of expression of the mouse Hoxa-2 gene with particular focus on r3 and r5 in wild type and Krox-20−/− mutant embryos. There was a clear loss of expression in r3, which indicated that Hoxa-2 was downstream of Krox-20. Using transgenic analysis with E. coli lacZ reporter genes we have identified and mapped an r3/r5 enhancer in the 5′ flanking region of the Hoxa-2 gene. Deletion analysis narrowed this region to an 809 bp Bg/II fragment, and in vitro binding and competition assays with bacterially expressed Krox-20 protein identified two sites within the enhancer. Mutation of these Krox-20 sites in the regulatory region specifically abolished r3/r5 activity, but did not affect neural crest and mesodermal components. This indicated that the two Krox-20 sites are required in vivo for enhancer function. Furthermore, ectopic expression of Krox-20 in r4 was able to transactivate the Hoxa 2/lacZ reporter in this rhombomere. Together our findings suggest that Krox-20 directly participates in the transcriptional regulation of Hoxa-2 during hindbrain segmentation, and is responsible for the upregulation of the r3 and r5 domains of expression of both vertebrate group 2 Hox paralogs. Therefore, the segmental phenotypes in the Krox-20 mutants are likely to reflect the role of Krox-20 in directly regulating multiple Hox genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document