Dominant effects of RET receptor misexpression and ligand-independent RET signaling on ureteric bud development

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (7) ◽  
pp. 1375-1386 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Srinivas ◽  
Z. Wu ◽  
C.M. Chen ◽  
V. D'Agati ◽  
F. Costantini
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Development ◽  
Collecting Duct ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Independent Form ◽  
Normal Expression ◽  
Bud Growth

During kidney development, factors from the metanephric mesenchyme induce the growth and repeated branching of the ureteric bud, which gives rise to the collecting duct system and also induces nephrogenesis. One signaling pathway known to be required for this process includes the receptor tyrosine kinase RET and co-receptor GFR(α)-1, which are expressed in the ureteric bud, and the secreted ligand GDNF produced in the mesenchyme. To examine the role of RET signaling in ureteric bud morphogenesis, we produced transgenic mice in which the pattern of RET expression was altered, or in which a ligand-independent form of RET kinase was expressed. The Hoxb7 promoter was used to express RET throughout the ureteric bud branches, in contrast to its normal expression only at the bud tips. This caused a variable inhibition of ureteric bud growth and branching reminiscent of, but less severe than, the RET knockout phenotype. Manipulation of the level of GDNF, in vitro or in vivo, suggested that this defect was due to insufficient rather than excessive RET signaling. We propose that RET receptors expressed ectopically on ureteric bud trunk cells sequester GDNF, reducing its availability to the normal target cells at the bud tips. When crossed to RET knockout mice, the Hoxb7/RET transgene, which encoded the RET9 isoform, supported normal kidney development in some RET−/− animals, indicating that the other major isoform, RET51, is not required in this organ. Expression of a Hoxb7/RET-PTC2 transgene, encoding a ligand-independent form of RET kinase, caused the development of abnormal nodules, outside the kidney or at its periphery, containing branched epithelial tubules apparently formed by deregulated growth of the ureteric bud. This suggests that RET signaling is not only necessary but is sufficient to induce ureteric bud growth, and that the orderly, centripetal growth of the bud tips is controlled by the spatially and temporally regulated expression of GDNF and RET.

scholarly journals Genetic Dissection of Cadherin Function during Nephrogenesis

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1474-1487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulf Dahl ◽  
Anders Sjödin ◽  
Lionel Larue ◽  
Glenn L. Radice ◽  
Stefan Cajander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Development ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Genetic Dissection ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Metanephric Kidney ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Deficient Mice

ABSTRACT The distinct expression of R-cadherin in the induced aggregating metanephric mesenchyme suggests that it may regulate the mesenchymal-epithelial transition during kidney development. To address whether R-cadherin is required for kidney ontogeny, R-cadherin-deficient mice were generated. These mice appeared to be healthy and were fertile, demonstrating that R-cadherin is not essential for embryogenesis. The only kidney phenotype of adult mutant animals was the appearance of dilated proximal tubules, which was associated with an accumulation of large intracellular vacuoles. Morphological analysis of nephrogenesis in R-cadherin −/− mice in vivo and in vitro revealed defects in the development of both ureteric bud-derived cells and metanephric mesenchyme-derived cells. First, the morphology and organization of the proximal parts of the ureteric bud epithelium were altered. Interestingly, these morphological changes correlated with an increased rate of apoptosis and were further supported by perturbed branching and patterning of the ureteric bud epithelium during in vitro differentiation. Second, during in vitro studies of mesenchymal-epithelial conversion, significantly fewer epithelial structures developed from R-cadherin −/− kidneys than from wild-type kidneys. These data suggest that R-cadherin is functionally involved in the differentiation of both mesenchymal and epithelial components during metanephric kidney development. Finally, to investigate whether the redundant expression of other classic cadherins expressed in the kidney could explain the rather mild kidney defects in R-cadherin-deficient mice, we intercrossed R-cadherin −/− mice with cadherin-6−/− , P-cadherin −/−, and N-cadherin +/− mice. Surprisingly, however, in none of the compound knockout strains was kidney development affected to a greater extent than within the individual cadherin knockout strains.

Sulphated proteoglycan is required for collecting duct growth and branching but not nephron formation during kidney development

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Davies ◽  
M. Lyon ◽  
J. Gallagher ◽  
D. Garrod
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Development ◽  
Collecting Duct ◽  
Sodium Chlorate ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Nephron Differentiation ◽  
Bud Growth ◽  
Nephron Development ◽  
Sulphated Glycosaminoglycans ◽  
Sulphated Proteoglycan ◽  
Hepatocyte Growth

Kidney epithelia have separate origins; collecting ducts develop by ureteric bud growth and arborisation, nephrons by induced mesenchyme-epithelium transition. Both express sulphated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) which are strikingly upregulated during nephron differentiation. However, sodium chlorate, an inhibitor of GAG sulphation, and the GAG-degrading enzymes heparitinase plus chondroitinase, did not prevent nephron development. In contrast, ureteric bud growth and branching were reversibly inhibited by the above reagents, the inhibition correlating quantitatively with sulphated GAG deprivation caused by a range of chlorate concentrations. Growth and branching could be independently restored during GAG deprivation by hepatocyte growth factor and phorbol-12-myristate acetate (PMA) respectively. Together these signalling effectors stimulated both branch initiation and growth. Thus growth and morphogenesis of ureteric bud involve distinct signalling pathways both regulated by GAGs.

FGF-7 modulates ureteric bud growth and nephron number in the developing kidney

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Qiao ◽  
R. Uzzo ◽  
T. Obara-Ishihara ◽  
L. Degenstein ◽  
E. Fuchs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Body Volume ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Nephron Number ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Kidney Size ◽  
Bud Growth ◽  
Collecting System

The importance of proportioning kidney size to body volume was established by clinical studies which demonstrated that in-born defecits of nephron number predispose the kidney to disease. As the kidney develops, the expanding ureteric bud or renal collecting system induces surrounding metanephric mesenchyme to proliferate and differentiate into nephrons. Thus, it is likely that nephron number is related to ureteric bud growth. The expression patterns of mRNAs encoding Fibroblast Growth Factor-7 (FGF-7) and its high affinity receptor suggested that FGF-7 signaling may play a role in regulating ureteric bud growth. To test this hypothesis we examined kidneys from FGF-7-null and wild-type mice. Results of these studies demonstrate that the developing ureteric bud and mature collecting system of FGF-7-null kidneys is markedly smaller than wild type. Furthermore, morphometric analyses indicate that mature FGF-7-null kidneys have 30+/−6% fewer nephrons than wild-type kidneys. In vitro experiments demonstrate that elevated levels of FGF-7 augment ureteric bud growth and increase the number of nephrons that form in rodent metanephric kidney organ cultures. Collectively, these results demonstrate that FGF-7 levels modulate the extent of ureteric bud growth during development and the number of nephrons that eventually form in the kidney.

Differential expression of collagen- and laminin-binding integrins mediates ureteric bud and inner medullary collecting duct cell tubulogenesis

2004 ◽  
Vol 287 (4) ◽  
pp. F602-F611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Chen ◽  
Richard Roberts ◽  
Martin Pohl ◽  
Sanjay Nigam ◽  
Jordan Kreidberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Collecting Duct ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Integrin Subunit ◽  
Integrin Expression ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Laminin Receptors ◽  
Temporal And Spatial

Inner medullary collecting ducts (IMCD) are terminally differentiated structures derived from the ureteric bud (UB). UB development is mediated by changes in the temporal and spatial expression of integrins and their respective ligands. We demonstrate both in vivo and in vitro that the UB expresses predominantly laminin receptors (α3β1-, α6β1-, and α6β4-integrins), whereas the IMCD expresses both collagen (α1β1- and α2β1-integrins) and laminin receptors. Cells derived from the IMCD, but not the UB, undergo tubulogenesis in collagen-I (CI) gels in an α1β1- and α2β1-dependent manner. UB cells transfected with the α2-integrin subunit undergo tubulogenesis in CI, suggesting that collagen receptors are required for branching morphogenesis in CI. In contrast, both UB and IMCD cells undergo tubulogenesis in CI/Matrigel gels. UB cells primarily utilize α3β1- and α6-integrins, whereas IMCD cells mainly employ α1β1 for this process. These results demonstrate a switch in integrin expression from primarily laminin receptors in the early UB to both collagen and laminin receptors in the mature IMCD, which has functional consequences for branching morphogenesis in three-dimensional cell culture models. This suggests that temporal and spatial changes in integrin expression could help organize the pattern of branching morphogenesis of the developing collecting system in vivo.

Prorenin receptor controls renal branching morphogenesis via Wnt/β-catenin signaling

2017 ◽  
Vol 312 (3) ◽  
pp. F407-F417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renfang Song ◽  
Adam Janssen ◽  
Yuwen Li ◽  
Samir El-Dahr ◽  
Ihor V. Yosypiv
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Development ◽  
Collecting Duct ◽  
Terminal Differentiation ◽  
Molecular Transport ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Prorenin Receptor ◽  
Accessory Subunit

The prorenin receptor (PRR) is a receptor for renin and prorenin, and an accessory subunit of the vacuolar proton pump H+-ATPase. Renal branching morphogenesis, defined as growth and branching of the ureteric bud (UB), is essential for mammalian kidney development. Previously, we demonstrated that conditional ablation of the PRR in the UB in PRRUB−/− mice causes severe defects in UB branching, resulting in marked kidney hypoplasia at birth. Here, we investigated the UB transcriptome using whole genome-based analysis of gene expression in UB cells, FACS-isolated from PRRUB−/−, and control kidneys at birth (P0) to determine the primary role of the PRR in terminal differentiation and growth of UB-derived collecting ducts. Three genes with expression in UB cells that previously shown to regulate UB branching morphogenesis, including Wnt9b, β-catenin, and Fgfr2, were upregulated, whereas the expression of Wnt11, Bmp7, Etv4, and Gfrα1 was downregulated. We next demonstrated that infection of immortalized UB cells with shPRR in vitro or deletion of the UB PRR in double-transgenic PRRUB−/−/ BatGal+ mice, a reporter strain for β-catenin transcriptional activity, in vivo increases β-catenin activity in the UB epithelia. In addition to UB morphogenetic genes, the functional groups of differentially expressed genes within the downregulated gene set included genes involved in molecular transport, metabolic disease, amino acid metabolism, and energy production. Together, these data demonstrate that UB PRR performs essential functions during UB branching and collecting duct morphogenesis via control of a hierarchy of genes that control UB branching and terminal differentiation of the collecting duct cells.

LIF, the ES-cell inhibition factor, reversibly blocks nephrogenesis in cultured mouse kidney rudiments

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Bard ◽  
A.S. Ross
Keyword(s):  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Mouse Kidney ◽  
Leukaemia Inhibitory Factor ◽  
Es Cell ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Cell Inhibition ◽  
Striking Effect

Mouse kidney induction proceeds in vitro much as it does in vivo: the ureteric bud bifurcates to give collecting ducts while the mesenchyme condenses into aggregates which epithelialise and then elongate into tubules with glomerular and other nephron structures. We report here that the factor known as LIF (leukaemia inhibitory factor), which regulates the differentiation and growth of embryonic-stem (ES) and other cells in culture, has little effect in vitro on growth or on ureteric-bud morphogenesis other than to stimulate the bifurcation process. It does however exert a striking effect on the mesenchyme. At about four times the concentration required to inhibit ES-cell differentiation, LIF strongly but reversibly blocks the effects of metanephric mesenchyme induction: although mesenchyme condenses around growing duct tips, the number of mature nephrons that form over 6 days is reduced by 75% or more. The few nephrons that do develop in the presence of LIF probably come from mesenchyme already induced at the time of culture and are indistinguishable from those that form in controls as assayed by morphology, by X-gal staining of endogenous galactosidase and by antibodies to brush-border and CD15 antigens. There is a further unexpected feature of rudiments cultured in LIF which is absent in controls: they contain an unexpectedly high number of stable epithelialised aggregates that express laminin around their periphery and which do not develop further. These results argue that the process of nephrogenesis involves at least two distinct stages which can be blocked by LIF: the effect of the initial induction and the future development of epithelialised aggregates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The metanephric blastema differentiates into collecting system and nephron epithelia in vitro

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (10) ◽  
pp. 3207-3214 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Qiao ◽  
D. Cohen ◽  
D. Herzlinger
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Mesenchymal Cells ◽  
Lacz Gene ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Ureteric Buds ◽  
Collecting System ◽  
Metanephric Blastema

The kidney forms from two tissue populations derived from intermediate mesoderm, the ureteric bud and metanephric mesenchyme. It is currently accepted that metanephric mesenchyme is committed to differentiating into nephrons while the ureteric bud is restricted to forming the renal collecting system. To test this hypothesis, we transferred lacZ into pure metanephric mesenchyme isolated from gestation day 13 rat embryos. The fate of tagged mesenchymal cells and their progeny was characterized after co-culture with isolated ureteric buds. When induced to differentiate by the native inducer of kidney morphogenesis, lineage-tagged mesenchymal cells exhibit the potential to differentiate into collecting system epithelia, in addition to nephrons. The fate of cells deriving from isolated ureteric buds was also examined and results of these lacZ gene transfer experiments indicate that the majority of ureteric bud cells differentiate into the renal collecting system. These cell fate studies combined with in situ morphological observations raise the possibility that collecting system morphogenesis in vivo occurs by growth of the ureteric bud and recruitment of mesenchymal cells from the metanephric blastema. Thus, metanephric mesenchyme may be a pluripotent renal stem population.

scholarly journals Kidney Organoids and Tubuloids

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fjodor A. Yousef Yengej ◽  
Jitske Jansen ◽  
Maarten B. Rookmaaker ◽  
Marianne C. Verhaar ◽  
Hans Clevers
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput Screening ◽  
Drug Targets ◽  
Kidney Development ◽  
Disease Modeling ◽  
Kidney Diseases ◽  
Collecting Duct ◽  
Distal Tubule ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Kidney Organoids

In the past five years, pluripotent stem cell (PSC)-derived kidney organoids and adult stem or progenitor cell (ASC)-based kidney tubuloids have emerged as advanced in vitro models of kidney development, physiology, and disease. PSC-derived organoids mimic nephrogenesis. After differentiation towards the kidney precursor tissues ureteric bud and metanephric mesenchyme, their reciprocal interaction causes self-organization and patterning in vitro to generate nephron structures that resemble the fetal kidney. ASC tubuloids on the other hand recapitulate renewal and repair in the adult kidney tubule and give rise to long-term expandable and genetically stable cultures that consist of adult proximal tubule, loop of Henle, distal tubule, and collecting duct epithelium. Both organoid types hold great potential for: (1) studies of kidney physiology, (2) disease modeling, (3) high-throughput screening for drug efficacy and toxicity, and (4) regenerative medicine. Currently, organoids and tubuloids are successfully used to model hereditary, infectious, toxic, metabolic, and malignant kidney diseases and to screen for effective therapies. Furthermore, a tumor tubuloid biobank was established, which allows studies of pathogenic mutations and novel drug targets in a large group of patients. In this review, we discuss the nature of kidney organoids and tubuloids and their current and future applications in science and medicine.

scholarly journals OrganIn VitroCulture: What Have We Learned about Early Kidney Development?

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Rak-Raszewska ◽  
Peter V. Hauser ◽  
Seppo Vainio
Keyword(s):  
Regenerative Medicine ◽  
Kidney Development ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Renal Development ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Chemical Inducers ◽  
Open Platform ◽  
Artificial Environment

When Clifford Grobstein set out to study the inductive interaction between tissues in the developing embryo, he developed a method that remained important for the study of renal development until now. From the late 1950s on,in vitrocultivation of the metanephric kidney became a standard method. It provided an artificial environment that served as an open platform to study organogenesis. This review provides an introduction to the technique of organ culture, describes how the Grobstein assay and its variants have been used to study aspects of mesenchymal induction, and describes the search for natural and chemical inducers of the metanephric mesenchyme. The review also focuses on renal development, starting with ectopic budding of the ureteric bud, ureteric bud branching, and the generation of the nephron and presents the search for stem cells and renal progenitor cells that contribute to specific structures and tissues during renal development. It also presents the current use of Grobstein assay and its modifications in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering today. Together, this review highlights the importance ofex vivokidney studies as a way to acquire new knowledge, which in the future can and will be implemented for developmental biology and regenerative medicine applications.

scholarly journals Generation of kidney ureteric bud and collecting duct organoids that recapitulate kidney branching morphogenesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zipeng Zeng ◽  
Biao Huang ◽  
Riana K. Parvez ◽  
Yidan Li ◽  
Jyunhao Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Kidney Development ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Collecting Duct ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Primary Mouse ◽  
Collecting System

AbstractKidney organoids model development and diseases of the nephron but not the contiguous epithelial network of the kidney’s collecting duct (CD) system. Here, we report the generation of an expandable, 3D branching ureteric bud (UB) organoid culture model that can be derived from primary UB progenitors from mouse and human fetal kidneys, or generated de novo from pluripotent human stem cells. UB organoids differentiate into CD organoids in vitro, with differentiated cell types adopting spatial assemblies reflective of the adult kidney collecting system. Aggregating 3D-cultured nephron progenitor cells with UB organoids in vitro results in a reiterative process of branching morphogenesis and nephron induction, similar to kidney development. Combining efficient gene editing with the UB organoid model will facilitate an enhanced understanding of development, regeneration and diseases of the mammalian collecting system.One sentence summaryCollecting duct organoids derived from primary mouse and human ureteric bud progenitor cells and human pluripotent stem cells provide an in vitro platform for genetic dissection of development, regeneration and diseases of the mammalian collecting system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document