Chromosomes attain a metaphase position on half-spindles in the absence of an opposing spindle pole

1992 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-130
Author(s):  
R.J. Leslie
Keyword(s):  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Normal Density ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
In Vivo Experiments ◽  
Culture Cells ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Metastable Condition ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

To examine the relative roles of chromosomes, spindle poles and microtubules in the formation of the metaphase spindle and metakinesis, I have experimentally placed an extra centrosome-free pronucleus close to a forming bipolar spindle in a living cell. The chromosomes from the extra nucleus induce the formation of an extra half-spindle from one pole of the otherwise normal bipolar spindle with chromosomes positioned at the putative metaphase plate. I conclude that chromosomes determine the location of half-spindles by sustaining a higher than normal density of microtubules. These results are surprising for two reasons: first, because previous in vivo experiments in tissue culture cells show that mono-oriented chromosomes with functional attachments to spindle microtubules do not support half-spindle formation but oscillate unstably or move to one spindle pole. Additionally, the generally accepted view is that chromosomes attain a metastable condition at the metaphase plate as a result of a balance between forces directed to opposite spindle poles. However, our observation that chromosomes on extra half-spindles attain a metastable position in the absence of an opposing spindle pole, suggests that Ostergren's model does not account for metakinesis in sea urchin embryos.

scholarly journals Interaction of NuMA protein with the kinesin Eg5: its possible role in bipolar spindle assembly and chromosome alignment

2013 ◽  
Vol 451 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Iwakiri ◽  
Sachiko Kamakura ◽  
Junya Hayase ◽  
Hideki Sumimoto
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Mitotic Apparatus ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Interphase Cells ◽  
Correct Alignment ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Bipolar spindle assembly in mitotic cells is a prerequisite to ensure correct alignment of chromosomes for their segregation to each daughter cell; spindle microtubules are tethered at plus ends to chromosomes and focused at minus ends to either of the two spindle poles. NuMA (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein) is present solely in the nucleus in interphase cells, but relocalizes during mitosis to the spindle poles to play a crucial role in spindle assembly via focusing spindle microtubules to each pole. In the present study we show that the kinesin-5 family motor Eg5 is a protein that directly interacts with NuMA, using a proteomics approach and various binding assays both in vivo and in vitro. During mitosis Eg5 appears to interact with NuMA in the vicinity of the spindle poles, whereas the interaction does not occur in interphase cells, where Eg5 is distributed throughout the cytoplasm but NuMA exclusively localizes to the nucleus. Slight, but significant, depletion of Eg5 in HeLa cells by RNA interference results in formation of less-focused spindle poles with misaligned chromosomes in metaphase; these phenotypes are similar to those induced by depletion of NuMA. Since NuMA is less accumulated at the spindle poles in Eg5-depleted cells, Eg5 probably contributes to spindle assembly via regulating NuMA localization. Furthermore, depletion of cytoplasmic dynein induces mislocalization of NuMA and phenotypes similar to those observed in NuMA-depleted cells, without affecting Eg5 localization to the spindles. Thus dynein appears to control NuMA function in conjunction with Eg5.

O-171 Altered meiotic spindle morphology and composition in in vitro matured oocytes

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Karamtzioti ◽  
G Tiscornia ◽  
D Garcia ◽  
A Rodriguez ◽  
I Vernos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Software Analysis ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Non Parametric

Abstract Study question How does the meiotic spindle tubulin PTMs of MII oocytes matured in vitro compare to that of MII oocytes matured in vivo? Summary answer MII cultured in vitro present detyrosinated tubulin in the spindle microtubules, while MII oocytes matured in vivo do not. What is known already A functional spindle is required for chromosomal segregation during meiosis, but the role of tubulin post-translational modifications (PTMs) in spindle meiotic dynamics remains poorly characterized. In contrast with GVs matured in vitro within the cumulus oophorous, in vitro maturation of denuded GVs to the MII stage (GV-MII) is associated with spindle abnormalities, chromosome misalignment and compromised developmental potential. Although aneuploidy rates in GV-MII are not higher than in vivo matured MII, disorganized chromosomes may contribute to compromised developmental potential. However, to date, spindle PTMs morphology of GV-MII has not been compared to that of in vivo cultured MII oocytes. Study design, size, duration GV (n = 125), and MII oocytes (n = 24) were retrieved from hormonally stimulated women, aged 20 to 35 years old. GVs were matured to the MII stage in vitro in G-2 PLUS medium for 30h; the maturation rate was 68,2%; the 46 GV-MII oocytes obtained were vitrified, stored, and warmed before fixing and subjecting to immunofluorescent analysis. In vivo matured MII oocytes donated to research were used as controls. Participants/materials, setting, methods Women were stimulated using a GnRH antagonist protocol, with GnRH agonist trigger. Trigger criterion was ≥2 follicles ≥18mm; oocytes were harvested 36h later. Spindle microtubules were incubated with antibodies against alpha tubulin and tubulin PTMs (acetylation, tyrosination, polyglutamylation, Δ2-tubulin, and detyrosination); chromosomes were stained with Hoechst 33342 and samples subjected to confocal immunofluorescence microscopy (ZEISS LSM780), with ImageJ software analysis. Differences in spindle morphometric parameters were assessed by non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher’s exact tests. Main results and the role of chance Qualitatively, Δ2-tubulin, tyrosination and polyglutamylation were similar for both groups. Acetylation was also present in both groups, albeit in different patterns: while in vivo matured MII oocytes showed acetylation at the poles, GV-MII showed a symmetrical distribution of signal intensity, but discontinuous signal on individual microtubule tracts, suggesting apparent islands of acetylation. In contrast, detyrosination was detected in in vivo matured MII oocytes but was absent from GV-MII. Regarding spindle pole morphology, of the four possible phenotypes described in the literature (double flattened and double focused; flattened-focused, focused-flattened, with the first word characterizing the cortex side of the spindle), we observed double flat shaped spindle poles in 86% of GV-MII oocytes (25/29) as opposed to 40.5% (15/37) for the in vivo matured MII oocytes (p = 0.0004, Fisher’s exact test). Further morphometric analysis of the spindle size (maximum projection, major and minor axis length) and the metaphase plate position (proximal to distal ratio, angle) revealed decreased spindle size in GV-MII oocytes (p = 0.019, non parametric Kruskal- Wallis test). Limitations, reasons for caution Oocytes retrieved from hyperstimulation cycles could be intrinsically impaired since they failed to mature in vivo. Our conclusions should not be extrapolated to IVM in non-stimulated cycles, as in this model, the cumulus oophorus is a major factor in oocyte maturation and correlation with spindle dynamics has been inferred. Wider implications of the findings The metaphase II spindle stability compared to the mitotic or metaphase I meiotic one justifies the presence of PTMs such as acetylation and glutamylation, which are found in stable, long-lived microtubules. The significance of the absence of detyrosinated microtubules in the MII-GV group remains to be determined Trial registration number not applicable

scholarly journals Microtubule pivoting enables mitotic spindle assembly in S. cerevisiae

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly K. Fong ◽  
Trisha N. Davis ◽  
Charles L. Asbury
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Force Generation ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Assembly ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Pole Component

To assemble a bipolar spindle, microtubules emanating from two poles must bundle into an antiparallel midzone, where plus end–directed motors generate outward pushing forces to drive pole separation. Midzone cross-linkers and motors display only modest preferences for antiparallel filaments, and duplicated poles are initially tethered together, an arrangement that instead favors parallel interactions. Pivoting of microtubules around spindle poles might help overcome this geometric bias, but the intrinsic pivoting flexibility of the microtubule–pole interface has not been directly measured, nor has its importance during early spindle assembly been tested. By measuring the pivoting of microtubules around isolated yeast spindle poles, we show that pivoting flexibility can be modified by mutating a microtubule-anchoring pole component, Spc110. By engineering mutants with different flexibilities, we establish the importance of pivoting in vivo for timely pole separation. Our results suggest that passive thermal pivoting can bring microtubules from side-by-side poles into initial contact, but active minus end–directed force generation will be needed to achieve antiparallel alignment.

scholarly journals CENP-32 is required to maintain centrosomal dominance in bipolar spindle assembly

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1225-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Ohta ◽  
Laura Wood ◽  
Iyo Toramoto ◽  
Ken-Ichi Yagyu ◽  
Tatsuo Fukagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Additional Data ◽  
Weak Interactions ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Central Spindle ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Bipolar Spindles

Centrosomes nucleate spindle formation, direct spindle pole positioning, and are important for proper chromosome segregation during mitosis in most animal cells. We previously reported that centromere protein 32 (CENP-32) is required for centrosome association with spindle poles during metaphase. In this study, we show that CENP-32 depletion seems to release centrosomes from bipolar spindles whose assembly they had previously initiated. Remarkably, the resulting anastral spindles function normally, aligning the chromosomes to a metaphase plate and entering anaphase without detectable interference from the free centrosomes, which appear to behave as free asters in these cells. The free asters, which contain reduced but significant levels of CDK5RAP2, show weak interactions with spindle microtubules but do not seem to make productive attachments to kinetochores. Thus CENP-32 appears to be required for centrosomes to integrate into a fully functional spindle that not only nucleates astral microtubules, but also is able to nucleate and bind to kinetochore and central spindle microtubules. Additional data suggest that NuMA tethers microtubules at the anastral spindle poles and that augmin is required for centrosome detachment after CENP-32 depletion, possibly due to an imbalance of forces within the spindle.

Parthenogenesis and cytoskeletal organization in ageing mouse eggs

Development ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-145
Author(s):  
Michelle Webb ◽  
Sarah K. Howlett ◽  
Bernard Maro
Keyword(s):  
Critical Concentration ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Cytoskeletal Organization ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Mouse Egg ◽  
Parthenogenetic Embryos

The cytoskeletal organization of the mouse egg changes during ageing in vivo and in vitro. The earliest change observed is the disappearance of the microfilament-rich area overlying the meiotic spindle. This is followed by the migration of the spindle towards the centre of the egg. Finally the spindle breaks down and the chromosomes are no longer organized on a metaphase plate. This spindle disruption may result from changes in the microtubule nucleating material found at the spindle poles and from an increase in the critical concentration for tubulin polymerization. It is possible to correlate the changes in the cytoskeletal organization of the egg occurring during ageing with the different types of parthenogenetic embryos obtained after ethanol activation. These observations strengthen the hypothesis that the actin-rich cortical area that overlies the meiotic spindle forms a domain to which the meiotic cleavage furrow is restricted and provides some insights into the mechanisms by which different types of parthenogenetic embryos are generated.

scholarly journals Kinetochore-mediated outward force promotes spindle pole separation in fission yeast

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (22) ◽  
pp. 2802-2813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Shirasugi ◽  
Masamitsu Sato
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Motor Proteins ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Double Knockout ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Bipolar Spindles ◽  
Meiosis I

Bipolar spindles are organized by motor proteins that generate microtubule-­dependent forces to separate the two spindle poles. The fission yeast Cut7 (kinesin-5) is a plus-end-directed motor that generates the outward force to separate the two spindle poles, whereas the minus-end-directed motor Pkl1 (kinesin-14) generates the inward force. Balanced forces by these antagonizing kinesins are essential for bipolar spindle organization in mitosis. Here, we demonstrate that chromosomes generate another outward force that contributes to the bipolar spindle assembly. First, it was noted that the cut7 pkl1 double knockout failed to separate spindle poles in meiosis I, although the mutant is known to succeed it in mitosis. It was assumed that this might be because meiotic kinetochores of bivalent chromosomes joined by cross-overs generate weaker tensions in meiosis I than the strong tensions in mitosis generated by tightly tethered sister kinetochores. In line with this idea, when meiotic mono-oriented kinetochores were artificially converted to a mitotic bioriented layout, the cut7 pkl1 mutant successfully separated spindle poles in meiosis I. Therefore, we propose that spindle pole separation is promoted by outward forces transmitted from kinetochores to spindle poles through microtubules.

scholarly journals The association of Plk1 with the astrin–kinastrin complex promotes formation and maintenance of a metaphase plate

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. jcs251025
Author(s):  
Zoë Geraghty ◽  
Christina Barnard ◽  
Pelin Uluocak ◽  
Ulrike Gruneberg
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Chromosome Congression ◽  
Chromosome Alignment

ABSTRACTErrors in mitotic chromosome segregation can lead to DNA damage and aneuploidy, both hallmarks of cancer. To achieve synchronous error-free segregation, mitotic chromosomes must align at the metaphase plate with stable amphitelic attachments to microtubules emanating from opposing spindle poles. The astrin–kinastrin (astrin is also known as SPAG5 and kinastrin as SKAP) complex, also containing DYNLL1 and MYCBP, is a spindle and kinetochore protein complex with important roles in bipolar spindle formation, chromosome alignment and microtubule–kinetochore attachment. However, the molecular mechanisms by which astrin–kinastrin fulfils these diverse roles are not fully understood. Here, we characterise a direct interaction between astrin and the mitotic kinase Plk1. We identify the Plk1-binding site on astrin as well as four Plk1 phosphorylation sites on astrin. Regulation of astrin by Plk1 is dispensable for bipolar spindle formation and bulk chromosome congression, but promotes stable microtubule–kinetochore attachments and metaphase plate maintenance. It is known that Plk1 activity is required for effective microtubule–kinetochore attachment formation, and we suggest that astrin phosphorylation by Plk1 contributes to this process.

scholarly journals MICROTUBULE BIOGENESIS AND CELL SHAPE IN OCHROMONAS

1973 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 340-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Benjamin Bouck ◽  
David L. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Shape ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Vegetative Cells ◽  
External Wall ◽  
Cell Form ◽  
Attachment Sites ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Mitotic Cells

In the first of two companion papers which attempt to correlate microtubules and their nucleating sites with developmental and cell division patterns in the unicellular flagellate, Ochromonas, the distribution of cytoplasmic and mitotic microtubules and various kinetosome-related fibers are detailed. Of the five kinetosome-related fibers, which have been found in Ochromonas, two, the kineto-beak fibers and the rhizoplast fibers are utilized as attachment sites for distinct groups of microtubules. The set of microtubules attached to the kineto-beak fibers apparently shape the anterior beak region of the cell whereas the rhizoplast microtubules appear to extend into and shape the tail in vegetative cells. In mitotic cells a rhizoplast is found at each spindle pole apparently serving as foci for the spindle microtubules. These findings are discussed in relation to the less well defined attachment sites for vegetative and mitotic microtubules in other kinds of cells. It is noted that the effects of depolymerizing microtubules in vivo might be easily quantitated in whole populations since no external wall or pellicle contributes to the maintenance or the biogenesis of the characteristic cell form of Ochromonas.

scholarly journals Centriole number and the reproductive capacity of spindle poles.

1985 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 887-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Sluder ◽  
C L Rieder
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Reproductive Capacity ◽  
Centriole Duplication ◽  
Voltage Electron ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Mother And Daughter ◽  
Pericentriolar Material ◽  
History Of ◽  
Bipolar Spindles

The reproduction of spindle poles is a key event in the cell's preparation for mitosis. To gain further insight into how this process is controlled, we systematically characterized the ultrastructure of spindle poles whose reproductive capacity had been experimentally altered. In particular, we wanted to determine if the ability of a pole to reproduce before the next division is related to the number of centrioles it contains. We used mercaptoethanol to indirectly induce the formation of monopolar spindles in sea urchin eggs. We followed individually treated eggs in vivo with a polarizing microscope during the induction and development of monopolar spindles. We then fixed each egg at one of three predetermined key stages and serially semithick sectioned it for observation in a high-voltage electron microscope. We thus know the history of each egg before fixation and, from earlier studies, what that cell would have done had it not been fixed. We found that spindle poles that would have given rise to monopolar spindles at the next mitosis have only one centriole whereas spindle poles that would have formed bipolar spindles at the next division have two centrioles. By serially sectioning each egg, we were able to count all centrioles present. In the twelve cells examined, we found no cases of acentriolar spindle poles or centriole reduplication. Thus, the reproductive capacity of a spindle pole is linked to the number of centrioles it contains. Our experimental results also show, contrary to existing reports, that the daughter centriole of a centrosome can acquire pericentriolar material without first becoming a parent. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the splitting apart of mother and daughter centrioles is an event that is distinct from, and not dependent on, centriole duplication.

scholarly journals Centriole and PCM cooperatively recruit CEP192 to spindle poles to promote bipolar spindle assembly

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takumi Chinen ◽  
Kaho Yamazaki ◽  
Kaho Hashimoto ◽  
Ken Fujii ◽  
Koki Watanabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
A549 Cells ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Scaffold Proteins ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Pericentriolar Material ◽  
Mitotic Cells

The pericentriolar material (PCM) that accumulates around the centriole expands during mitosis and nucleates microtubules. Here, we show the cooperative roles of the centriole and PCM scaffold proteins, pericentrin and CDK5RAP2, in the recruitment of CEP192 to spindle poles during mitosis. Systematic depletion of PCM proteins revealed that CEP192, but not pericentrin and/or CDK5RAP2, was crucial for bipolar spindle assembly in HeLa, RPE1, and A549 cells with centrioles. Upon double depletion of pericentrin and CDK5RAP2, CEP192 that remained at centriole walls was sufficient for bipolar spindle formation. In contrast, through centriole removal, we found that pericentrin and CDK5RAP2 recruited CEP192 at the acentriolar spindle pole and facilitated bipolar spindle formation in mitotic cells with one centrosome. Furthermore, the perturbation of PLK1, a critical kinase for PCM assembly, efficiently suppressed bipolar spindle formation in mitotic cells with one centrosome. Overall, these data suggest that the centriole and PCM scaffold proteins cooperatively recruit CEP192 to spindle poles and facilitate bipolar spindle formation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document