Local DNA synthesis is critical for DNA repair during oocyte maturation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Singh ◽  
S. Lava Kumar ◽  
Rohit Beniwal ◽  
Aradhana Mohanty ◽  
Bhawna Kushwaha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Oocyte Maturation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Defective Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Synthesis Inhibition

Mammalian oocytes can be very long-lived cells and thereby very likely to encounter DNA damage during their lifetime. Defective DNA repair may result in oocytes that are developmentally incompetent or give rise to progeny with congenital disorders. During oocyte maturation, damaged DNA is repaired primarily by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). Although these repair pathways have been studied extensively, the associated DNA synthesis is poorly characterized. Using porcine oocytes, we demonstrate that the DNA synthesis machinery is present during oocyte maturation and dynamically recruited to sites of DNA damage. DNA polymerase δ is identified as being crucial for oocyte DNA synthesis. Further, inhibiting synthesis causes DNA damage to accumulate and delays the progression of oocyte maturation. Importantly, inhibition of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) bypassed the delay of oocyte maturation caused by DNA synthesis inhibition. Finally, we found that ∼20% of unperturbed oocytes experienced spontaneously-arising damage during maturation. Cumulatively, our findings indicate that oocyte maturation requires damage-associated DNA synthesis that is monitored by the SAC.

scholarly journals Persistent DNA Repair Signaling and DNA Polymerase Theta Promote Broken Chromosome Segregation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delisa E Clay ◽  
Heidi S Bretscher ◽  
Erin Jezuit ◽  
Korie Bush ◽  
Donald T Fox
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Alternative End Joining ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Cycling cells must respond to double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Mis-segregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophila papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early-acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) to DSBs. This machinery persists as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a step-wise manner during mitosis. Repair signaling kinetics at DSBs depends on both monoubiquitination of the Fanconi Anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 and the alternative end- joining protein DNA Polymerase Theta. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis.

scholarly journals Recent Perspectives in Radiation-Mediated DNA Damage and Repair: Role of NHEJ and Alternative Pathways

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Kumar Sharma ◽  
Priyanka Shaw ◽  
Aman Kalonia ◽  
M.H. Yashavarddhan ◽  
Pankaj Chaudhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Alternative Nhej

Radiation is one of the causative agents for the induction of DNA damage in biological systems. There is various possibility of radiation exposure that might be natural, man-made, intentional, or non-intentional. Published literature indicates that radiation mediated cell death is primarily due to DNA damage that could be a single-strand break, double-strand breaks, base modification, DNA protein cross-links. The double-strand breaks are lethal damage due to the breakage of both strands of DNA. Mammalian cells are equipped with strong DNA repair pathways that cover all types of DNA damage. One of the predominant pathways that operate DNA repair is a non-homologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) that has various integrated molecules that sense, detect, mediate, and repair the double-strand breaks. Even after a well-coordinated mechanism, there is a strong possibility of mutation due to the flexible nature in joining the DNA strands. There are alternatives to NHEJ pathways that can repair DNA damage. These pathways are alternative NHEJ pathways and single-strand annealing pathways that also displayed a role in DNA repair. These pathways are not studied extensively, and many reports are showing the relevance of these pathways in human diseases. The chapter will very briefly cover the radiation, DNA repair, and Alternative repair pathways in the mammalian system. The chapter will help the readers to understand the basic and applied knowledge of radiation mediated DNA damage and its repair in the context of extensively studied NHEJ pathways and unexplored alternative NHEJ pathways.

scholarly journals The Intermediate Filament Synemin Regulates Non-Homologous End Joining in an ATM-Dependent Manner

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Sofia Deville ◽  
Anne Vehlow ◽  
Sarah Förster ◽  
Ellen Dickreuter ◽  
Kerstin Borgmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Intermediate Filament ◽  
Intermediate Filament Protein ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Filament Protein

The treatment resistance of cancer cells is a multifaceted process in which DNA repair emerged as a potential therapeutic target. DNA repair is predominantly conducted by nuclear events; yet, how extra-nuclear cues impact the DNA damage response is largely unknown. Here, using a high-throughput RNAi-based screen in three-dimensionally-grown cell cultures of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), we identified novel focal adhesion proteins controlling DNA repair, including the intermediate filament protein, synemin. We demonstrate that synemin critically regulates the DNA damage response by non-homologous end joining repair. Mechanistically, synemin forms a protein complex with DNA-PKcs through its C-terminal tail domain for determining DNA repair processes upstream of this enzyme in an ATM-dependent manner. Our study discovers a critical function of the intermediate filament protein, synemin in the DNA damage response, fundamentally supporting the concept of cytoarchitectural elements as co-regulators of nuclear events.

scholarly journals Transition from a meiotic to a somatic-like DNA damage response during the pachytene stage in mouse meiosis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Enguita-Marruedo ◽  
Marta Martín-Ruiz ◽  
Eva García ◽  
Ana Gil-Fernández ◽  
M. Teresa Parra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Chromosome Translocation ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Principal Mechanism ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
New Gene ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Late Stages

AbstractHomologous recombination (HR) is the principal mechanism of DNA repair acting during meiosis and is fundamental for the segregation of chromosomes and the increase of genetic diversity. Nevertheless, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) mechanisms also act during meiosis, mainly in response to exogenously-induced DNA damage in late stages of first meiotic prophase. In order to better understand the relationship between these two repair pathways, we studied the response to DNA damage during male mouse meiosis after gamma radiation. We clearly discerned two types of responses immediately after treatment. From leptotene to early pachytene, exogenous damage triggered the massive presence of γH2AX throughout the nucleus, which was associated with DNA repair mediated by HR components (DMC1 and RAD51). This early pathway finished with the sequential removal of DMC1 and RAD51 and was no longer inducible at mid pachytene. However, from mid pachytene to diplotene, γH2AX appeared as large discrete foci. This late repair pattern was mediated first by NHEJ, involving Ku70/80 and XRCC4, which were constitutively present, and 53BP1, which appeared at sites of damage soon after irradiation. Nevertheless, 24 hours after irradiation, a HR pathway involving RAD51 but not DMC1 mostly replaced NHEJ. Additionally, we observed the occurrence of synaptonemal complex bridges between bivalents, most likely representing chromosome translocation events that may involve DMC1, RAD51 or 53BP1. Our results reinforce the idea that the early “meiotic” repair pathway that acts by default at the beginning of meiosis is replaced from mid pachytene onwards by a “somatic-like” repair pattern. This shift might be important to resolve DNA damage (either endogenous or exogenous) that could not be repaired by the early meiotic mechanisms, for instance those in the sex chromosomes, which lack a homologous chromosome to repair with. This transition represents another layer of functional changes that occur in meiotic cells during mid pachytene, in addition to epigenetic reprograming, reactivation of transcription, expression of a new gene profile and acquisition of competence to proceed to metaphase.

scholarly journals HPF1-dependent histone ADP-ribosylation triggers chromatin relaxation to promote the recruitment of repair factors at sites of DNA damage

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Smith ◽  
Siham Zentout ◽  
Catherine Chapuis ◽  
Gyula Timinszky ◽  
Sebastien Huet
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Adp Ribosylation ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Chromatin Relaxation ◽  
The Impact

PARP1 activity is regulated by its cofactor HPF1. The binding of HPF1 on PARP1 controls the grafting of ADP-ribose moieties on serine residues of proteins nearby the DNA lesions, mainly PARP1 and histones. However, the impact of HPF1 on DNA repair regulated by PARP1 remains unclear. Here, we show that HPF1 controls both the number and the length of the ADP-ribose chains generated by PARP1 at DNA lesions. We demonstrate that HPF1-dependent histone ADP-ribosylation, rather than auto-modification of PARP1, triggers the rapid unfolding of the chromatin structure at the DNA damage sites and promotes the recruitment of the repair factors CHD4 and CHD7. Together with the observation that HPF1 contributes to efficient repair both by homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining, our findings highlight the key roles played by this PARP1 cofactor at early stages of the DNA damage response.

scholarly journals Oxidative DNA Damage in Neurons: Implication of Ku in Neuronal Homeostasis and Survival

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela De Zio ◽  
Matteo Bordi ◽  
Francesco Cecconi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Oxidative Dna Damage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Mitochondrial Activity ◽  
End Joining ◽  
High Accumulation ◽  
Neuronal Homeostasis ◽  
Defective Dna Repair

Oxidative DNA damage is produced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) which are generated by exogenous and endogenous sources and continuously challenge the cell. One of the most severe DNA lesions is the double-strand break (DSB), which is mainly repaired by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway in mammals. NHEJ directly joins the broken ends, without using the homologous template. Ku70/86 heterodimer, also known as Ku, is the first component of NHEJ as it directly binds DNA and recruits other NHEJ factors to promote the repair of the broken ends. Neurons are particularly metabolically active, displaying high rates of transcription and translation, which are associated with high metabolic and mitochondrial activity as well as oxygen consumption. In such a way, excessive oxygen radicals can be generated and constantly attack DNA, thereby producing several lesions. This condition, together with defective DNA repair systems, can lead to a high accumulation of DNA damage resulting in neurodegenerative processes and defects in neurodevelopment. In light of recent findings, in this paper, we will discuss the possible implication of Ku in neurodevelopment and in mediating the DNA repair dysfunction observed in certain neurodegenerations.

scholarly journals CometChip Enables Parallel Analysis of Multiple DNA Repair Activities

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Ge ◽  
Le P. Ngo ◽  
Simran Kaushal ◽  
Ian J. Tay ◽  
Elina Thadhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Comet Assay ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Parallel Analysis ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Nucleotide Excision ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

ABSTRACTDNA damage can be cytotoxic and mutagenic and is directly linked to aging, cancer, and heritable diseases. To counteract the deleterious effects of DNA damage, cells have evolved highly conserved DNA repair pathways. Many commonly used DNA repair assays are relatively low throughput and are limited to analysis of one protein or one pathway. Here, we have explored the capacity of the CometChip platform for parallel analysis of multiple DNA repair activities. Taking advantage of the versatility of the traditional comet assay and leveraging micropatterning techniques, the CometChip platform offers increased throughput and sensitivity compared to the traditional comet assay. By exposing cells to DNA damaging agents that create substrates of Base Excision Repair, Nucleotide Excision Repair, and Non-Homologous End Joining, we show that the CometChip is an effective method for assessing repair deficiencies in all three pathways. With these advanced applications of the CometChip platform, we expand the efficacy of the comet assay for precise, high-throughput, parallel analysis of multiple DNA repair activities.

scholarly journals Defective DNA damage repair leads to frequent catastrophic genomic events in murine and human tumors

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manasi Ratnaparkhe ◽  
John Wong ◽  
Pei-Chi Wei ◽  
Mario Hlevnjak ◽  
Thorsten Kolb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genomic Rearrangements ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Catastrophic Events ◽  
Mouse Tumors ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Target Dna ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractChromothripsis and chromoanasynthesis are catastrophic events leading to clustered genomic rearrangements. Whole-genome sequencing revealed frequent chromothripsis or chromoanasynthesis (n= 16/26) in brain tumors developing in mice deficient for factors involved in homologous-recombination-repair or non-homologous-end-joining. Catastrophic events were tightly linked to Myc/Mycn amplification, with increased DNA damage and inefficient apoptotic response already observable at early postnatal stages. Inhibition of repair processes and comparison of the mouse tumors with human medulloblastomas (n=68) and glioblastomas (n=32) identified chromothripsis as associated with MYC/MYCN gains and with DNA repair deficiencies, pointing towards therapeutic opportunities to target DNA repair defects in tumors with complex genomic rearrangements.

scholarly journals Distinct functions of POT1 proteins contribute to the regulation of telomerase recruitment to telomeres

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peili Gu ◽  
Shuting Jia ◽  
Taylor Takasugi ◽  
Valerie M. Tesmer ◽  
Jayakrishnan Nandakumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Telomere Length ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Dna Damage Responses ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractHuman shelterin components POT1 and TPP1 form a stable heterodimer that protects telomere ends from ATR-dependent DNA damage responses and regulates telomerase-dependent telomere extension. Mice possess two functionally distinct POT1 proteins. POT1a represses ATR/CHK1 DNA damage responses and the alternative non-homologous end-joining DNA repair pathway while POT1b regulates C-strand resection and recruits the CTC1-STN1-TEN1 (CST) complex to telomeres to mediate C-strand fill-in synthesis. Whether POT1a and POT1b are involved in regulating the length of the telomeric G-strand is unclear. Here we demonstrate that POT1b, independent of its CST function, enhances recruitment of telomerase to telomeres through three amino acids in its TPP1 interacting C-terminus. POT1b thus coordinates the synthesis of both telomeric G- and C-strands. In contrast, POT1a negatively regulates telomere length by inhibiting telomerase recruitment to telomeres. The identification of unique amino acids between POT1a and POT1b helps us understand mechanistically how human POT1 switches between end protective functions and promoting telomerase recruitment.

scholarly journals DROSHA is recruited to DNA damage sites by the MRN complex to promote non-homologous end-joining

2021 ◽  
pp. jcs.249706
Author(s):  
Matteo Cabrini ◽  
Marco Roncador ◽  
Alessandro Galbiati ◽  
Lina Cipolla ◽  
Antonio Maffia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Mrn Complex ◽  
Break Site ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Ends

The DNA damage response (DDR) is the signaling cascade that recognizes DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and promotes their resolution via the DNA repair pathways of Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) or Homologous Recombination (HR). We and others have shown that DDR activation requires DROSHA. However, whether DROSHA exerts its functions by associating with damage sites, what controls its recruitment and how DROSHA influences DNA repair, remains poorly understood. Here we show that DROSHA associates to DSBs independently from transcription. Neither H2AX, nor ATM nor DNA-PK kinase activities are required for its recruitment to break site. Rather, DROSHA interacts with RAD50 and inhibition of MRN by Mirin treatment abolishes this interaction. MRN inactivation by RAD50 knockdown or mirin treatment prevents DROSHA recruitment to DSB and, as a consequence, also 53BP1 recruitment. During DNA repair, DROSHA inactivation reduces NHEJ and boosts HR frequency. Indeed, DROSHA knockdown also increase the association of downstream HR factors such as RAD51 to DNA ends. Overall, our results demonstrate that DROSHA is recruited at DSBs by the MRN complex and direct DNA repair toward NHEJ.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document