High resolution breakpoint junction mapping of proximally extended D4Z4 deletions in FSHD1 reveals evidence for a founder effect.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an inherited myopathy clinically characterized by weakness in the facial, shoulder girdle and upper arm muscles. FSHD is caused by chromatin relaxation of the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat, mostly by a repeat contraction, facilitating ectopic expression of DUX4 in skeletal muscle. Genetic diagnosis for FSHD is generally based on the sizing and haplotyping of the D4Z4 repeat on chromosome 4 by Southern blotting, molecular combing or single-molecule optical mapping, which is usually straight forward but can be complicated by atypical rearrangements of the D4Z4 repeat. One of these rearrangements is a D4Z4 proximally-extended deletion (DPED) allele, where not only the D4Z4 repeat is partially deleted, but also sequences immediately proximal to the repeat are lost, which can impede accurate diagnosis in all genetic methods. Previously, we identified several DPED alleles in FSHD and estimated the size of the proximal deletions by a complex pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern blot strategy. Here, using next generation sequencing, we have defined the breakpoint junctions of these DPED alleles at the base pair resolution in 12 FSHD families and 4 control individuals facilitating a PCR-based diagnosis of these DPED alleles. Our results show that half of the DPED alleles are derivates of an ancient founder allele. For some DPED alleles we found that genetic elements are deleted such as DUX4c, FRG2, DBE-T and myogenic enhancers necessitating re-evaluation of their role in FSHD pathogenesis.

Lysine Methyltransferase Inhibitors Impair H4K20me2 and 53BP1 Foci in Response to DNA Damage in Sarcomas, a Synthetic Lethality Strategy

BackgroundChromatin is dynamically remodeled to adapt to all DNA-related processes, including DNA damage responses (DDR). This adaptation requires DNA and histone epigenetic modifications, which are mediated by several types of enzymes; among them are lysine methyltransferases (KMTs).MethodsKMT inhibitors, chaetocin and tazemetostat (TZM), were used to study their role in the DDR induced by ionizing radiation or doxorubicin in two human sarcoma cells lines. The effect of these KMT inhibitors was tested by the analysis of chromatin epigenetic modifications, H4K16ac and H4K20me2. DDR was monitored by the formation of γH2AX, MDC1, NBS1 and 53BP1 foci, and the induction of apoptosis.ResultsChaetocin and tazemetostat treatments caused a significant increase of H4K16 acetylation, associated with chromatin relaxation, and increased DNA damage, detected by the labeling of free DNA-ends. These inhibitors significantly reduced H4K20 dimethylation levels in response to DNA damage and impaired the recruitment of 53BP1, but not of MDC1 and NBS1, at DNA damaged sites. This modification of epigenetic marks prevents DNA repair by the NHEJ pathway and leads to cell death.ConclusionKMT inhibitors could function as sensitizers to DNA damage-based therapies and be used in novel synthetic lethality strategies for sarcoma treatment.

HPF1-dependent histone ADP-ribosylation triggers chromatin relaxation to promote the recruitment of repair factors at sites of DNA damage

PARP1 activity is regulated by its cofactor HPF1. The binding of HPF1 on PARP1 controls the grafting of ADP-ribose moieties on serine residues of proteins nearby the DNA lesions, mainly PARP1 and histones. However, the impact of HPF1 on DNA repair regulated by PARP1 remains unclear. Here, we show that HPF1 controls both the number and the length of the ADP-ribose chains generated by PARP1 at DNA lesions. We demonstrate that HPF1-dependent histone ADP-ribosylation, rather than auto-modification of PARP1, triggers the rapid unfolding of the chromatin structure at the DNA damage sites and promotes the recruitment of the repair factors CHD4 and CHD7. Together with the observation that HPF1 contributes to efficient repair both by homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining, our findings highlight the key roles played by this PARP1 cofactor at early stages of the DNA damage response.

Parental Conflicting Role Mediates Regulation of The Chromatin Structure in The Mouse Zygote

Parental pronuclei (PN) are asymmetrical in several points but the underlying mechanism for this is still unclear. Recently, a theory has been become broadly accepted that sperm are more than mere vehicles to carry the paternal haploid genome into oocytes. Here, in order to reveal the formation mechanisms for parental asymmetrically relaxed chromatin structure in zygotes, we investigated histone mobility in parthenogenetic-, androgenic-, ROSI-, ELSI-, tICSI-, and ICSI-zygotes with several numbers of PNs with the use of zygotic fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, a method previous established by our group. The results showed that sperm played a role to cause chromatin compaction in both parental PNs. Interestingly, during spermiogenesis, male germ cells acquired this ability and its resistance. On the other hand, oocytes harbored chromatin relaxation ability. Furthermore, the chromatin relaxation factor was competed for between PNs. Thus, these results indicated that the parental asymmetrically relaxed chromatin structure was established as a result of a competition between the PNs for the chromatin relaxation factor that opposed the chromatin compaction effect by sperm. Together, it was suggested that parental germ cells cooperated for their just arisen newborn zygotes by playing a distinct role in the regulation of chromatin structure.

CHD7 and 53BP1 regulate distinct pathways for the re-ligation of DNA double-strand breaks

Chromatin structure is dynamically reorganized at multiple levels in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Yet, how the different steps of chromatin reorganization are coordinated in space and time to differentially regulate DNA repair pathways is insufficiently understood. Here, we identify the Chromodomain Helicase DNA Binding Protein 7 (CHD7), which is frequently mutated in CHARGE syndrome, as an integral component of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) DSB repair pathway. Upon recruitment via PARP1-triggered chromatin remodeling, CHD7 stimulates further chromatin relaxation around DNA break sites and brings in HDAC1/2 for localized chromatin de-acetylation. This counteracts the CHD7-induced chromatin expansion, thereby ensuring temporally and spatially controlled ‘chromatin breathing’ upon DNA damage, which we demonstrate fosters efficient and accurate DSB repair by controlling Ku and LIG4/XRCC4 activities. Loss of CHD7-HDAC1/2-dependent cNHEJ reinforces 53BP1 assembly at the damaged chromatin and shifts DSB repair to mutagenic NHEJ, revealing a backup function of 53BP1 when cNHEJ fails.

Novel nuclear role of HDAC6 in prognosis and therapeutic target for colorectal cancer

Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) inhibition is a potential treatment of a wide range of cancer types via the acetylation of diverse proteins in the cytoplasm. However, the regulation of histone acetylation and the maintenance of higher-order chromatin structure remains unidentified. Here, we investigated the effect of selective inhibition of HDAC6 by histone acetylation, chromatin relaxation assays, co-immunoprecipitation, acetylome peptide array and in vivo RNA microarray. Our data shows that nuclear HDAC6 physically interacts with the Histone 4 lysine 12 residue, and that HDAC6 inhibition increases acetylation specifically at this residue in several cancer types. Inhibition induces major chromatin structure modulation, but has no equivalent effect on knockout HDAC6-/- MEF cells. We identified several novel HDAC6-deacetylated substrates and high expression of HDAC6 in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue association with reduced levels of H4K12ac and independent of the key CRC driver mutations, but positively associated with EGFR expression. Furthermore, in vivo HDAC6 inhibition induces significant tumor regression in a CRC xenograft mice model with significant changes in the expression of functional nuclear genes. We also demonstrated that a DNA damaging agent in combination with selective HDAC6 inhibition is effective and acts synergistically, inducing chromatin relaxation and increased cell death in CRC cells. CRC tissues (Normal versus tumor; n=58 matched pairs) together with TCGA data analysis of 467 CRC patients showed that high HDAC6 expression is associated with metastasis, overall and disease-free survival, and is an independent risk factor of CRC stage progression. Our findings designate a new role for nuclear HDAC6 both in cancer prognosis and as a new therapeutic target for CRC and other types of cancer.HighlightHistone deacetylases 6 activity; Chromatin relaxation; Histone modifications; Gene array; DOX: doxorubicin; OXA: oxaliplatin; 5-FU: fluorouracil; Ac: acetylation; MNase: Micrococal nuclease.

VRK1 Phosphorylates Tip60/KAT5 and Is Required for H4K16 Acetylation in Response to DNA Damage

Dynamic remodeling of chromatin requires acetylation and methylation of histones, frequently affecting the same lysine residue. These alternative epigenetic modifications require the coordination of enzymes, writers and erasers, mediating them such as acetylases and deacetylases. In cells in G0/G1, DNA damage induced by doxorubicin causes an increase in histone H4K16ac, a marker of chromatin relaxation. In this context, we studied the role that VRK1, a chromatin kinase activated by DNA damage, plays in this early step. VRK1 depletion or MG149, a Tip60/KAT5 inhibitor, cause a loss of H4K16ac. DNA damage induces the phosphorylation of Tip60 mediated by VRK1 in the chromatin fraction. VRK1 directly interacts with and phosphorylates Tip60. Furthermore, the phosphorylation of Tip60 induced by doxorubicin is lost by depletion of VRK1 in both ATM +/+ and ATM−/− cells. Kinase-active VRK1, but not kinase-dead VRK1, rescues Tip60 phosphorylation induced by DNA damage independently of ATM. The Tip60 phosphorylation by VRK1 is necessary for the activating acetylation of ATM, and subsequent ATM autophosphorylation, and both are lost by VRK1 depletion. These results support that the VRK1 chromatin kinase is an upstream regulator of the initial acetylation of histones, and an early step in DNA damage responses (DDR).

Penetration into Cancer Cells via Clathrin-Dependent Mechanism Allows L-Asparaginase from Rhodospirillum rubrum to Inhibit Telomerase

The anticancer effect of L-asparaginases (L-ASNases) is attributable to their ability to hydrolyze L-asparagine in the bloodstream and cancer cell microenvironment. Rhodospirillum rubrum (RrA) has dual mechanism of action and plays a role in the suppression of telomerase activity. The aim of this work was to investigate the possible mechanism of RrA penetration into human cancer cells. Labeling of widely used L-ASNases by fluorescein isothiocyanate followed by flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy demonstrated that only RrA can interact with cell membranes. The screening of inhibitors of receptor-mediated endocytosis demonstrated the involvement of clathrin receptors in RrA penetration into cells. Confocal microscopy confirmed the cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of RrA in human breast cancer SKBR3 cells. Two predicted nuclear localization motifs allow RrA to penetrate into the cell nucleus and inhibit telomerase. Chromatin relaxation promoted by different agents can increase the ability of RrA to suppress the expression of telomerase main catalytic subunit. Our study demonstrated for the first time the ability of RrA to penetrate into human cancer cells and the involvement of clathrin receptors in this process.

DUX4 Expression in FSHD Muscles: Focus on Its mRNA Regulation

Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is the most frequent muscular disease in adults. FSHD is characterized by a weakness and atrophy of a specific set of muscles located in the face, the shoulder, and the upper arms. FSHD patients may present different genetic defects, but they all present epigenetic alterations of the D4Z4 array located on the subtelomeric part of chromosome 4, leading to chromatin relaxation and, ultimately, to the aberrant expression of one gene called DUX4. Once expressed, DUX4 triggers a cascade of deleterious events, eventually leading to muscle dysfunction and cell death. Here, we review studies on DUX4 expression in skeletal muscle to determine the genetic/epigenetic factors and regulatory proteins governing DUX4 expression, with particular attention to the different transcripts and their very low expression in muscle.