The Influence of Strength Training Experience on Explosive Strength Potentiation

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S299
Author(s):  
Mauro Batista ◽  
Valmor Tricoli ◽  
Carlos Ugrinowitsch
Keyword(s):  
Strength Training ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Explosive Strength

scholarly journals Efectos del entrenamiento de sobrecarga tradicional vs CrossFit sobre distintas expresiones de la fuerza (Effects of traditional strength training vs CrossFit on different expressions of strength)

Retos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 182-188
Author(s):  
Facundo Costa ◽  
Andrés Santiago Parodi Feye ◽  
Carlos Magallanes
Keyword(s):  
Strength Training ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Sport Performance ◽  
Strength Development ◽  
Maximal Strength ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Squat Jump ◽  
Explosive Strength ◽  
Back Squat ◽  
Endurance Strength

  El desarrollo de la fuerza es relevante tanto para el rendimiento como para la salud. El propósito del presente estudio fue determinar los efectos del CrossFit en comparación con entrenamiento tradicional sobre distintas manifestaciones de la fuerza. Catorce adultos entrenados de ambos sexos fueron divididos aleatoriamente en dos grupos para realizar 8 semanas de entrenamiento: un grupo (CF; edad: 24.9 ± 1.6 años) realizó CrossFit y el otro grupo (ET; edad: 28.7 ± 4.6 años) realizó entrenamiento de fuerza tradicional. La carga de ambos fue equiparada con relación a la duración de la parte central de las sesiones. Todos los sujetos fueron evaluados con tests de fuerza máxima (Back Squat, Bench Press y Dead Lift), fuerza resistencia (Squat y Push-ups) y fuerza explosiva (Squat Jump y Abalakov) pre y post intervención. Se verificaron mejoras en ambos grupos en todas las variables analizadas (p < 0,05), pero no se hallaron diferencias entre grupos como consecuencia de los distintos programas de entrenamiento. Se concluye que ambos programas de entrenamiento son similarmente efectivas para desarrollar la fuerza máxima, la fuerza explosiva y la fuerza resistencia en adultos entrenados. Abstract: Muscular strength development in its different expressions forms is relevant for both sport performance and health. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of CrossFit training in comparison with traditional resistance training on different expressions of strength. Fourteen adults of both sexes, with strength training experience, were randomly divided into two groups to perform 8 weeks of training: one group (CF; age: 24.9 ± 1.6yrs) performed CrossFit and the other group (ET; age: 28.7 ± 4.6yrs) performed traditional strength training. The training load of both programs was equated in relation to the duration of the main part of the sessions. All subjects were tested for maximal strength (Back Squat, Bench Press and Dead Lift), endurance strength (Squat and Push-ups) and explosive strength (Squat Jump and Abalakov) before and after the intervention. Significant improvements were verified in both groups post intervention for all the variables analyzed (p <0.05), but no significant differences were found between groups as a consequence of the different training programs. It is concluded that both training modalities are similarly effective in developing maximal strength, explosive strength and endurance strength in trained adults.

Explosive-strength training improves 5-km running time by improving running economy and muscle power

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Paavolainen ◽  
K. Hakkinen ◽  
I. Hamalainen ◽  
A. Nummela ◽  
H. Rusko
Keyword(s):  
Strength Training ◽  
Muscle Power ◽  
Running Economy ◽  
Running Time ◽  
Explosive Strength

scholarly journals Effects of Different Periodization Models in Strength Training on Physical and Motor Skills during 24 Weeks of Training

2021 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-133
Author(s):  
Déborah de Araújo Farias ◽  
Michel Moraes Gonçalves ◽  
Sérgio Eduardo Nassar ◽  
Euzébio de Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Strength Training ◽  
Motor Skills ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Progressive Increase ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Endurance Strength

Introduction: Periodization is the accurate manipulation of methodological variables of strength training (ST) to provide a progressive increase in the different manifestations of muscle strength. The most used models in ST are linear and undulatory periodization. Objective: Evaluate the effects of 24 weeks of training by applying three different models of ST periodization: Linear Periodization (LP), Weekly Undulating Periodization (WUP) and Daily Undulating Periodization (DUP) on: upper limb (UL) strength (submaximal and endurance), submaximal strength and power of the lower limbs (LL) and on other components of physical fitness (flexibility, agility and abdominal endurance strength). Methods: Experimental, longitudinal study, with a convenience sample, in which 29 people of both sexes participated, randomly allocated to the groups. Tests were performed pre- and post-intervention. ANOVA (two-way) of repeated measures was performed. Results: There was a significant increase in submaximal strength of the UL in the three periodization models: LP (p<0.001), the WUP (p=0.002) and DUP (p=0.001). There was also a significant increase in submaximal strength of the LL with LP (p=0.002), WUP (p<0.001) and with DUP (p=0.001). No significant intergroup differences were found in any test and time. Conclusion: In individuals without training experience, 24 weeks of TF provided gains in different manifestations of strength, regardless of the periodization model (LP, WUP or DUP). PL and WUP seem to be better at providing LL power gains in the horizontal jump.

scholarly journals The relationship between sprint performance and both lower and upper extremity explosive strength in young soccer players

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-14
Author(s):  
Gürken Diker ◽  
Sürhat Müniroğlu ◽  
Sadi Ön ◽  
Hüseyin Özkamçı ◽  
Abdulkerim Darendeli
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Team Sports ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Sprint Performance ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Jump Performance ◽  
Explosive Strength ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Relationship

Background and Study Aim. Sprint performance plays a major role in success of field-based team sports such as soccer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between sprinting performance and both lower and upper extremity explosive strength in young soccer players. Material and Methods. One hundred forty-seven soccer players (mean±SD; age 11.6±1.66 years, height 143.2±11.8 cm, body mass 37.1±10.2 kg and training experience 1.11±1.5 years) voluntarily participated in this study. The sprinting performance of each player was determined using their 5, 10, 20 and 30m single sprint times. The lower and upper extremity explosive strength were evaluated by standing long jump and medicine ball throwing tests respectively. Prior to the study, each of the players was given detailed information about the risks and injuries they could encounter during the study, and parental consent was obtained by their signatures on informed voluntary consent forms since the subjects were under the age of 18. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from Ankara University Medical Faculty’s Surgical and Medical Research Ethics Committee. Results. The results indicated a strong relationship between sprinting performance and horizontal jump performance (r=-.671 ̶ -.764; p=0.001) and also a large relationship between sprinting performance and upper extremity strength (r=-.633  ̶  -.703; p=0.001). The sprint performance (n=147) also significantly correlated with body weight (r=-.345  ̶  -.373; p=0.001) and height (r=-.445  ̶  -.505; p=0.001). Conclusions. The study results suggest that upper extremity strength is as important as the lower extremity strength for sprinting performance and that trainers should emphasize lower and upper extremity strength in training intended to improve sprinting performance.

scholarly journals Establishing Normative Data for 10RM Strength Scores in College-Aged Males

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Piper ◽  
Seth Furman ◽  
Thomas Smith ◽  
Michael Waller
Keyword(s):  
Strength Training ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Weight Category ◽  
College Age ◽  
Post Test ◽  
And Training

Training recommendations for novice to intermediate lifters, and numerous research studies, include loads that correspond to a 10RM, yet there is no normative data for college-age males available with which to make comparisons.   Therefore, the purpose of this study was to provide 10RM normative reference values for various strength exercises for 18 to 25-year-old males.  Cross-sectional performance and anthropometric data were obtained over the course of five years as part of a college basic strength training course under the direct supervision of an NSCA-CSCS*D.  All exercises were performed according to the guidelines established by the NSCA.  All testing and training occurred in the same facility and utilized the same equipment for testing and training.  Testing occurred prior to the structured training program began and then again upon completion of 12 weeks of training.   A total of 1095 subjects (age = 19.94 +1.633 years; height = 70.57 +3.017 inches; pre-test bodyweight = 188.30 +40.975 pounds; post-test bodyweight = 190.31 +40.688 pounds; years of strength training experience = 3.76 +2.484 years, ranging from zero experience up to 13 years) participated in the study.  Bodyweight categories were derived based upon two established classification systems used in competitive lifting sports.  Percentiles for each weight category were reported, where the weighted average method was used to determine the percentile break points.  These norms provide a range of possible 10RM loads as well as a reference to the strength levels, which could be useful for fitness professionals to more effectively assess and design resistance training programs. 

How to Improve Change-of-Direction Speed in Junior Team Sport Athletes—Horizontal, Vertical, Maximal, or Explosive Strength Training?

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 473-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Keller ◽  
André Koob ◽  
Dino Corak ◽  
Valerian von Schöning ◽  
Dennis-Peter Born
Keyword(s):  
Strength Training ◽  
Team Sport ◽  
Change Of Direction ◽  
Explosive Strength
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document