scholarly journals Percutaneous MR-guided prostate cancer cryoablation technical updates and literature review

BJR|Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 20180043
Author(s):  
Pierre de Marini ◽  
Roberto Luigi Cazzato ◽  
Julien Garnon ◽  
Behnam Shaygi ◽  
Guillaume Koch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ultrasound Guidance ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Mri Guidance ◽  
Main Challenge ◽  
Interventional Mr ◽  
Mr Fluoroscopy ◽  
Real Time Visualization ◽  
Clinically Significant

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor in males. The benefits in terms of overall reduction in specific mortality due to the widespread use of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening and the advancements in the curative treatments (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) appear to have reached a plateau. There remains, however, the questions of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of such patients. Currently, the main challenge in the treatment of patients with clinically organ-confined PCa is to offer an oncologically efficient treatment with as little morbidity as possible. Amongst the arising novel curative techniques for PCa, cryoablation (CA) is the most established one, which is also included in the NICE and AUA guidelines. CA is commonly performed under ultrasound guidance with the inherent limitations associated with this technique. The recent advancements in MRI have significantly improved the accuracy of detecting and characterizing a clinically significant PCa. This, alongside the development of wide bore interventional MR scanners, has opened the pathway for in bore PCa treatment. Under MRI guidance, PCa CA can be used either as a standard whole gland treatment or as a tumor targeted one. With MR-fluoroscopy, needle guidance capability, multiplanar and real-time visualization of the iceball, MRI eliminates the inherent limitations of ultrasound guidance and can potentially lead to a lower rate of local complications. The aim of this review article is to provide an overview about PCa CA with a more specific insight on MR guided PCa CA; the limitations, challenges and applications of this novel technique will be discussed.

scholarly journals Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linghui Liang ◽  
Feng Qi ◽  
Yifei Cheng ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Dongliang Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Detection Efficiency ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Medical University

AbstractTo analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with negative biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) who didn’t need prostate biopsies (PBs). A total of 1,012 male patients who underwent PBs in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from March 2018 to November 2019, of 225 had prebiopsy negative bpMRI (defined as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS 2.1) score less than 3). The detection efficiency of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) was assessed according to age, digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate volume (PV) on bpMRI, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD). The definition of CSPCa for Gleason score > 6. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify predictive factors of absent CSPCa on PBs. Moreover, absent CSPCa contained clinically insignificant prostate cancer (CIPCa) and benign result. The detection rates of present prostate cancer (PCa) and CSPCa were 27.11% and 16.44%, respectively. Patients who were diagnosed as CSPCa had an older age (P < 0.001), suspicious DRE (P < 0.001), a smaller PV (P < 0.001), higher PSA value (P = 0.008) and higher PSAD (P < 0.001) compared to the CIPCa group and benign result group. PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 (P = 0.004) and suspicious DRE (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of absent CSPCa on BPs. The negative forecast value of bpMRI for BP detection of CSPCa increased with decreasing PSAD, mainly in patients with naive PB (P < 0.001) but not in prior negative PB patients. 25.33% of the men had the combination of negative bpMRI, PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 and PB naive, and none had CSPCa on repeat PBs. The incidence of PB was determined, CSPCa was 1.59%, 0% and 16.67% in patients with negative bpMRI and PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3, patients with negative bpMRI, PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 and biopsy naive and patients with negative bpMRI, PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 and prior negative PB, separately. We found that a part of patients with negative bpMRI, a younger age, no suspicious DRE and PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 may securely avoid PBs. Conversely PB should be considered in patients regardless of negative bpMRI, especially who with a greater age, obviously suspicious DRE, significantly increased PSA value, a significantly small PV on MRI and PSAD > 0.15 ng/ml/cm3.

scholarly journals Who’s too old to screen? Prostate cancer in elderly men

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Mistry ◽  
Wesley Mayer ◽  
Rose Khavari ◽  
Gustavo Ayala ◽  
Brian Miles
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Threshold Value ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Cancer De La Prostate ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Elderly Men ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Positive Core ◽  
Clinically Significant

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin malignancyaffecting men and is the second leading cause of cancerrelateddeath in North America. The incidence of prostate cancerincreases dramatically with age. However, many healthauthorities advocate the cessation of routine prostate cancer testingin men older than 75 because of the belief that most patientswill have a clinically insignificant cancer and will not benefit fromtherapy. The true prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancerin elderly men is not known.Methods: We analyzed 1446 needle biopsies of the prostate inmen aged 75 or older. All pathological reviews were conductedby the pathology department at the Methodist Hospital in Houston,Tex. Data were collected from pathology reports, hospital andclinic databases, and medical records when available. Dataobtained included age at biopsy, serum prostate-specific antigen(PSA) levels, number of positive core biopsies and Gleasongrade. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata. Clinicallysignificant cancer was defined by the pathological presence ofGleason grade 6 adenocarcinoma in more than 1 biopsy coreor the presence of any Gleason 4 or 5 component in the biopsy.Results: The median age of the patients included in the studywas 78.8 and 95% of the patients were between the ages of 75and 85. The mean serum PSA level for patients biopsied was10.4 μg/L. Of all biopsies reviewed, 53% were positive for prostatecancer and 78% of these would be defined as clinically significantcancer. Regression analysis revealed age to be a significant(p < 0.05) factor for increased Gleason grade in positive biopsies.Logistic regression revealed age as a significant factor (p <0.05) for clinically significant prostate cancer even when controllingfor PSA. A serum PSA threshold value of 6.5 μg/L would havemissed 38% of significant cancers and a threshold of 4.0 μg/Lwould have missed 8% of significant cancers.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the prevalence of clinicallysignificant prostate cancer in the elderly population may be higherthan previously thought. As the population continues to livelonger and healthier lives, it will become more common to confrontprostate cancer morbidity in the eldery population. Usinghigher serum PSA thresholds to eliminate unnecessary biopsies inolder men does not appear to help identify patients at greaterrisk of having clinically significant prostate cancer. Patients withprostate cancer having aggressive clinical features may benefitfrom treatment of their prostate cancer well into their eighth andninth decades of life. Testing and diagnostic recommendationsshould reflect the potential benefit of identifying patients withaggressive prostate cancer even after age 75.Introduction : Le cancer de la prostate est le type de cancer noncutané le plus fréquent chez les hommes et la seconde causede décès lié au cancer en importance en Amérique du Nord.L’incidence du cancer de la prostate augmente grandement avecl’âge. Néanmoins, de nombreuses autorités en matière de santéavancent l’idée de mettre fin au dépistage systématique du cancerde la prostate chez les hommes de plus de 75 ans en raisonde la croyance selon laquelle la plupart des patients présenterontun cancer non significatif sur le plan clinique et ne bénéficierontpas d’un traitement. La véritable prévalence des cas decancer de la prostate cliniquement significatif chez les hommesâgés n’est pas établie.Méthodes : Nous avons analysé 1446 échantillons de biopsie àl’aiguille prélevés au niveau de la prostate chez des patients de75 ans ou plus. Toutes les analyses de pathologie ont été effectuéespar le service de pathologie du Methodist Hospital deHouston, au Texas. Les données ont été tirées des rapports depathologie, des bases de données des hôpitaux et des cliniques,et des dossiers médicaux lorsque possible. Les données obtenuesincluaient l’âge au moment de la biopsie, les valeurs d’antigèneprostatique spécifique (APS), le nombre de microbiopsies positiveset le score de Gleason. Les analyses statistiques ont été effectuéesà l’aide du système Stata. Le cancer cliniquement significatifest défini comme la présence d’un adénocarcinome avec un scorede Gleason de 6 dans plus d’une zone de biopsie ou un scorede Gleason de 4 ou 5 dans toute partie de l’échantillon.Résultats : L’âge moyen des patients inclus était de 78,8 ans et95 % des patients avaient entre 75 et 85 ans. La valeur moyennede l’APS chez les patients ayant subi une biopsie était de 10,4 μg/L.De tous les échantillons examinés, 53 % confirmaient la présenced’un cancer de la prostate, et le cancer était défini comme étantcliniquement significatif dans 78 % de ces cas. Une analyse derégression a révélé que l’âge était un facteur significatif (p <0,05) lié à un score de Gleason plus élevé dans les biopsies positives.Une analyse de régression logistique a révélé que l’âge étaitaussi un facteur significatif (p < 0,05) lié à un cancer de la prostatecliniquement significatif même en tenant compte du taux d’APS.Une valeur seuil d’APS de 6,5 μg/L serait passée à côté de 38 %des cas de cancer significatif, alors qu’une valeur seuil d’APSde 4,0 μg/L serait passée à côté de 8 % des cancers significatifs.Conclusion : Nos observations portent à croire que la prévalencedu cancer de la prostate significatif sur le plan clinique chezles patients âgés pourrait être plus élevée qu’on le croit. Avecl’augmentation de l’espérance de vie, l’incidence de la morbiditéliée au cancer de la prostate augmentera. Le recours àdes valeurs seuils d’APS plus élevées pour éliminer les cas debiopsies non nécessaires chez les hommes âgés ne semble pasaider à cerner les patients présentant un risque plus élevé de cancerde la prostate cliniquement significatif. Les patients atteintsde cancer de la prostate cliniquement agressif peuvent bénéficierd’un traitement contre le cancer même lorsqu’ils dépassentlargement les 80 ou les 90 ans. Les recommandations concernantle dépistage et le diagnostic devraient refléter les avantages potentielsliés au dépistage d’un cancer de la prostate agressif, mêmeaprès 75 ans.

Multiparametric ultrasound and micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriano Basso Dias ◽  
Ciara O’Brien ◽  
Jean-Michel Correas ◽  
Sangeet Ghai
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cognitive Fusion ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Multiparametric Ultrasound ◽  
Targeted Biopsies

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous cancer diagnosed in males. Traditional tools for screening and diagnosis, such as prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), present low accuracy for PCa detection. Multiparametric MRI has become a game changer in the PCa diagnosis pathway and MRI-targeted biopsies are currently recommended for males at risk of clinically significant PCa, even in biopsy-naïve patients. Recent advances in ultrasound have also emerged with the goal to provide a readily accessible and cost-effective tool for detection of PCa. These newer techniques include elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, as well as improved B-mode and Doppler techniques. These modalities can be combined to define a novel ultrasound approach, multiparametric ultrasound. High frequency Micro-ultrasound has emerged as a promising imaging technology for PCa diagnosis. Initial results have shown high sensitivity of Micro-ultrasound in detecting PCa in addition to its potential in improving the accuracy of targeted biopsies, based on targeting under real-time visualization, rather than relying on cognitive/fusion software MRI-transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Tumour-Associated Circulating Endothelial Cells as a Screening Biomarker for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Chakrit Bhakdi ◽  
Prapat Suriyaphol ◽  
Ponpan Thaicharoen ◽  
Sebastian Tobias Karl Grote ◽  
Chulaluk Komoltri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Index Test ◽  
Psa Testing ◽  
Diagnostic Potential ◽  
Clinically Significant

Even though more than 350,000 men die from prostate cancer every year, broad-based screening for the disease remains a controversial topic. Guidelines demand that the only commonly accepted screening tool, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, must be followed by prostate biopsy if results are elevated. Due to the procedure’s low positive predictive value (PPV), however, over 80% of biopsies are performed on healthy men or men with clinically insignificant cancer—prompting calls for new ways of vetting equivocal PSA readings prior to the procedure. Responding to the challenge, the present study investigated the diagnostic potential of tumour-associated circulating endothelial cells (tCECs), which have previously been described as a novel, blood-based biomarker for clinically significant cancers. Specifically, the objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a tCEC-based blood test to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4) in high-risk patients. Performed in a blinded, prospective, single-centre set-up, it compared a novel tCEC index test with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy biopsy as a reference on a total of 170 patients and found that a tCEC add-on test will almost double the PPV of a standalone PSA test (32% vs. 17%; p = 0.0012), while retaining a negative predictive value above 90%.

scholarly journals Multiparametric MRI in Biopsy Guidance for Prostate Cancer: Fusion-Guided

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason T. Rothwax ◽  
Arvin K. George ◽  
Bradford J. Wood ◽  
Peter A. Pinto
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Focal Therapy ◽  
Multiparametric Mri ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Innovative Methods ◽  
Early Phase Trials ◽  
Clinically Significant

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common solid-organ malignancy among American men and the second most deadly. Current guidelines recommend a 12-core systematic biopsy following the finding of an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, this strategy fails to detect an unacceptably high percentage of clinically significant cancers, leading researchers to develop new, innovative methods to improve the effectiveness of prostate biopsies. Multiparametric-MRI (MP-MRI) has emerged as a promising instrument in identifying suspicious regions within the prostate that require special attention on subsequent biopsy. Fusion platforms, which incorporate the MP-MRI into the biopsy itself and provide active targets within real-time imaging, have shown encouraging results in improving the detection rate of significant cancer. Broader applications of this technology, including MRI-guided focal therapy for prostate cancer, are in early phase trials.

Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Two Multicomponent Regimens in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 878-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall Millikan ◽  
Peter F. Thall ◽  
Sang-Joon Lee ◽  
Donnah Jones ◽  
M.W. Cannon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Group Setting ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Androgen Independent

Purpose: Several multicomponent regimens have been reported to be useful in advanced androgen-independent prostate cancer. We used a randomized phase II design to evaluate and compare two such regimens. Patients were accrued primarily in the community setting. Patients and Methods: Patients with progressive, androgen-independent prostate cancer were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: either ketoconazole/doxorubicin alternating with vinblastine/estramustine (KA/VE) or paclitaxel, estramustine, and oral etoposide (TEE). Patients were prospectively stratified on the basis of disease volume. The primary end points were response and overall survival time. Results: A total of 75 patients were registered; 71 are included in the analysis. By the criterion of an 80% prostate-specific antigen reduction maintained for at least 8 weeks, 11 (30%) of 37 patients in the TEE arm responded, whereas 11 (32%) of 34 assigned to KA/VE responded. Median survival was 16.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.5 to 21.2 months) in the TEE arm and 23.4 months (95% CI, 12.9 to 30.6 months) for patients treated with KA/VE. Many patients (24%) failed to complete at least 6 weeks of therapy, including five (8%) treatment-related early deaths. Conclusion: Each of these regimens produced clinically significant responses, and the observed median survival (18.9 months for all 71 patients) compares favorably with previously published results, especially in the community setting. Nonetheless, it is apparent that these first-generation regimens must be applied judiciously, and thus we view efforts at better patient selection and the development of more tolerable therapies as higher priorities than carrying either of these regimens to phase III evaluation in the cooperative group setting.

Prostate-specific antigen velocity as a predictive biomarker in a prospective prostate cancer screening study (IMPACT study).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
Christos Mikropoulos ◽  
Christina Selkirk ◽  
Sibel Saya ◽  
Elizabeth Bancroft ◽  
Tokhir Dadaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Genetic Predisposition ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Impact Study ◽  
Screening Study ◽  
Brca1 Carriers ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Negative Controls

16 Background: We retrospectively assessed the clinical application of Prostate Specific Antigen Velocity (PSA V) in the IMPACT study (Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted screening in men at higher genetic risk and controls). This is a case-control prostate cancer (PrCa) screening study for men with a known genetic predisposition to PrCa; participants with a single PSA reading above 3ng/ml are offered diagnostic TRUS prostate biopsies (PB). Methods: We calculated PSA velocity (PSA V) using all three validated methods, including the arithmetic mean, the linear regression and the first and last readings equations. Pearson chi-square test was used to compare PSA V between four genetic groups: BRCA1 carriers and BRCA1 negative controls and BRCA2 carriers and BRCA2 negative controls. Results: PSA V data were evaluated in 191 men who underwent a PB with a total of 57 PrCas diagnosed. PSA V using both a threshold of 0ng/ml/year and 0.75ng/ml/year in any of the three methods was not predictive of PrCa diagnosis in BRCA1/2 controls and BRCA1 carriers. Conversely, BRCA2 carriers with a PSA V over 0.75ng/ml/year (by linear regression) were 5 times more likely to be diagnosed with PrCa [95%CI=1.5-14; p=0.003]. Interestingly PSA V using linear regression was predictive of clinically significant tumours as defined by Gleason Score (GS) >= 7. Regardless of their genetic status, men with a PSA V over 0.75/ng/ml/year were 3 times more likely to have a clinically significant PrCa [95% CI: 1.006-11.107; p=0.045] whereas men with a BRCA2 mutation were 12 times more likely [95%CI: 1.1-98; p=0.039]. Conclusions: PSA V is an important tool for identifying which men with a BRCA2 mutation would benefit from a prostatic biopsy and could be incorporated into a predictive model, along with the total PSA value. PSA V also predicts for tumour aggressiveness regardless of genetic predisposition, but more so for those with a known high risk gene mutation. Clinical trial information: NCT00261456.

Population-based prostate cancer screening using a prospective, blinded, paired screen-positive comparison of PSA and fast MRI: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5513-5513 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Eldred-Evans ◽  
Paula Burak ◽  
Martin John Connor ◽  
Emily Day ◽  
Martin Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Mri Scan ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Fast Mri ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Mri Score

5513 Background: The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test can lead to under- and over-diagnosis of prostate cancer and has not been recommended for population screening. A fast MRI scan might overcome the limitations of PSA. IP1-PROSTAGRAM is the first study to evaluate the performance of a 15-minute non-contrast MRI for prostate cancer screening in comparison to PSA. Methods: IP1-PROSTAGRAM was a prospective, population-based, screen-positive paired-cohort study. Men aged 50-69 years in the UK were invited for prostate cancer screening through seven primary care practices or community-based recruitment. Participants underwent a PSA and MRI scan (T2-weighted and diffusion). MRI was scored using PIRADS version 2.0 without knowledge of PSA; screen-positive MRI (defined as either PIRADS score 3-5 or 4-5) were compared against a screen-positive PSA defined as ≥3ng/ml. If any test was screen-positive, a systematic 12-core biopsy was performed with MRI-ultrasound image-fusion targeted biopsy to MRI suspicious areas, as appropriate. Clinically-significant cancer was defined as any Gleason score ≥3+4. The primary outcome was the proportion of screen-positive MRI at different scores; important secondary outcomes were the number of clinically-significant and insignificant cancers detected. Results: 2034 men were invited to participate of whom 408 consented and 406 were screened by both PSA and MRI (10/Oct/2018-15/May/2019). The proportion with a screen-positive MRI (score 3-5) was higher than the proportion with a screen-positive PSA (17.7% [95%CI 14.3-21.8] vs. 9.9% [95%CI 7.3-13.2]; p < 0.001). A screen-positive MRI (score 4-5) was similar to a screen-positive PSA (10.6% [95%CI 7.9-14.0] vs. 9.9% [95%CI 7.3-13.2], p = 0.71). An MRI score 3-5 or 4-5 used to denote a screen-positive MRI, compared to PSA alone, detected 14, 11 and 7 clinically-significant cancers, respectively. There were 7, 5 and 6 clinically-insignificant cancers detected, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: When screening the general population for prostate cancer, MRI using a score of 4-5 to define a screen-positive test, compared to PSA alone at ≥3ng/ml, could lead to more men diagnosed with clinically-significant cancer without increasing the number of men biopsied or diagnosed with clinically-insignificant cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03702439 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document