scholarly journals Μορφές ηγεσίας και όραμα στην Ελληνική Αστυνομία

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Γεώργιος Μαγουλιανίτης
Keyword(s):  
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Intellectual Curiosity ◽  
Extra Effort ◽  
Full Range Leadership ◽  
Multifactor Leadership ◽  
Questionnaire Form

Έχοντας κατά νου τα εξής δεδομένα: • Ότι η αλλαγή στην κοινωνία τα τελευταία χρόνια γίνεται με εκθετικούς ρυθμούς • Ότι το ανθρώπινο κεφάλαιο έχει μετατραπεί από υποστηρικτικό παράγοντα στο πιο σημαντικό στοιχείο του ενεργητικού των φορέων των • Ότι στους οργανισμούς προβάλλει κυρίαρχη η αναγκαιότητα ύπαρξης μιας σύγχρονης ηγεσίας με όραμα, προκειμένου να διαχειριστεί τις τεράστιες παγκόσμιες αλλαγές, οι οποίες μας επηρεάζουν καθημερινά • Ισχυρή προσωπική “πνευματική περιέργεια” (intellectual curiosity), ως προς την αναζήτηση και ανεύρεση των ηγετικών συμπεριφορών και χαρακτηριστικών τα οποία προσδιορίζουν τα ηγετικά στυλ στο χώρο της Ελληνικής Αστυνομίας, το ενδεχόμενο όραμα που προκύπτει ή ενυπάρχει σε αυτά, καθώς την εξ’ αυτών έκβαση της ηγεσίας, εκπόνησα την παρούσα διδακτορική διατριβή. Για τη διενέργεια της έρευνας επελέγη και έγινε χρήση του ερωτηματολογίου M.L.Q. - Πολυπαραγοντικό Ερωτηματολόγιο Ηγεσίας (Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Form – 5x), των Avolio και Bass, 2004. Το ερωτηματολόγιο είναι παγκοσμίως αναγνωρίσιμο και επιστημονικά έγκυρο. Το M.L.Q – 5X μετρά την έκταση των ηγετικών στυλ (Full Range Leadership), ήτοι: Μετασχηματιστική (Transformational), Διεκπεραιωτική (Transactional) και προς Αποφυγή Ηγεσία (Avoidant Leadership). Το M.L.Q., επίσης εξετάσει την έκβαση (Out comes) της ηγεσίας: Μεγαλύτερη Προσπάθεια (Extra Effort), Αποτελεσματικότητα (Effectiveness) και Ευχαρίστηση από την Ηγεσία (Satisfaction with Leadership). Η έρευνα στο Αστυνομικό Προσωπικό – Ανθυπαστυνόμοι, Αρχιφύλακες και Αστυφύλακες, οι οποίοι ανέρχονται σε 40.500 (περίπου) από τους 45.000 (περίπου) Αστυνομικούς (αρ.19, Ν.2800/2000), όλων των βαθμών – μέσω των τριακοσίων εβδομήντα έξι επιστραφέντων ερωτηματολογίων από διάφορες περιοχές της Ελλάδας, έδειξε ότι: • Η ηγεσία με το μεγαλύτερο σκορ είναι η L.F., η οποία ουσιαστικά αντιπροσωπεύει την έλλειψη ηγεσίας και ως εκ τούτου οράματος. Τα άλλα συστατικά (components) της ηγεσίας συμμετέχουν με μικρότερο ποσοστό. Τα στοιχεία αυτά κατά σειρά συμμετοχής, από το μεγαλύτερο στο μικρότερο είναι: LF, MBEA, II (B), CR, MBEP, IM, II (A), IS και ΙC • Οι παράγοντες (μορφές ηγεσίας) που αυξάνουν την επιπρόσθετη προσπάθεια είναι οι: IC, II (A), CR, LF και IS • Οι παράγοντες που αυξάνουν την αποτελεσματικότητα είναι οι: IC, II (A), CR, IS, LF και ΙΙ (Β) • Οι παράγοντες που αυξάνουν την ικανοποίηση είναι οι: CR, II (A), IC, MBEP, LF και ΙΙ (Β). Τα αποτελέσματα της έρευνας αποτελούν ένα πολύ χρήσιμο υλικό, ιδία στα χέρια των διοικούντων την Αστυνομία, για ασφαλή συμπεράσματα και περαιτέρω αξιοποίηση και προβληματισμό.

A Functional Moodel of Team Leadership for Sport

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 7-17
Author(s):  
Gershon Tenenbaum ◽  
Jeff Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Team Leadership ◽  
Goal Achievement ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Achievement Data ◽  
Coach Leadership ◽  
Multifactor Leadership

The purpose of this study was to propose and examine a new leadership framework, the Team Leadership Model for Sport. Specifically, the aim was to examine a functional leadership paradigm in sport where full range of leadership behaviors by the coach and by the collective athletes influence team cohesion, and thereby increase the likelihood of team goal achievement. Data were utilized from 518 NCAA Division I-III athletes from 36 softball teams and 13 baseball teams. The participants completed the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Avolio & Bass, 2004), the Team Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Avolio & Bass, 1996), the Group Environment Questionnaire (Carron, Brawley, & Widmeyer, 1985), and the Team Outcome Questionnaire that was developed for this study. Structural equation modeling indicated that the original hypothesized model did not fit the data, but an acceptable alternative model was established, which included transformational leadership and two transactional leadership variables influencing perceptions of cohesion. Transformational leadership had a significant positive path to cohesion, which in turn had a significant positive path to goal achievement. We discuss a potentially fruitful direction in the examination of team leadership, within which the first step involves a closer examination of measurement of coach leadership, shared athlete leadership, and cohesion.

scholarly journals Moderating Role of Decision-Making Situations between Leadership and Decision-Making in Services Providing Organizations

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 313-321
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD NAVEED RIAZ ◽  
MASUD AKHTAR ◽  
GILNAZ MURTAZA
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Leadership Styles ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Hierarchical Regression ◽  
Full Range Leadership ◽  
Multifactor Leadership ◽  
Decision Making Styles ◽  
Laissez Faire ◽  
Moderating Role

The present research investigated moderating role of decision-making situations between leadership styles and decision-making styles in services providing organizations of Pakistan. The study was based on Full Range Leadership Theory of Bass and Reggio (2006) which comprise of three leadership styles including transformational, transactional, and laissez faire style. The study incorporated five decision-making styles including rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant, and spontaneous style. The study comprised of three decision-making situations including certainty, risk and uncertainty. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Decision Situations Scale and General Decision-making Styles Questionnaire were administered on 1200 employees. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that certainty moderated between transformational style and rational style. Uncertainty moderated between transformational style and spontaneous style. Certainty moderated between transactional leadership and rational style. Uncertainty moderated between laissez faire and dependent, avoidant decision-making style. Overall, the present study contributes to style, situational and contingency theories of leadership. Keywords: Decision-Making Situations, Leadership Styles, Decision-Making Styles.

Leadership styles and organizational commitment: literature review

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rusliza Yahaya ◽  
Fawzy Ebrahim
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Organizational Commitment ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Full Range Leadership Model ◽  
Extra Effort ◽  
Full Range Leadership ◽  
Laissez Faire ◽  
The Impact

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between Bass’s (1985) leadership dimensions (transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire) and several outcome variables (employee extra effort, employee satisfaction with leader, leadership effectiveness) and organizational commitment. Design/methodology/approach – This is a systematic literature review. Findings – This review briefly discusses the conceptual framework and the Full Range Leadership Model (Bass, 1985) which include transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and laissez-faire leadership. Also discussed in this section were the abilities and the characteristics of transformational leaders. The leadership section was concluded with discussion on previous researches on transformational leadership. This review also provides a literature review on organizational commitment. Originality/value – Described in this paper are the various definitions of organizational commitment and the three-component model of commitment. This paper also described the antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment obtained from previous researches. This paper concluded with a discussion on the impact of transformational leadership on employee organizational commitment.

Executive Leadership in Australian Small Business

2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Judy H. Gray ◽  
Iain L. Densten ◽  
James C. Sarros
Keyword(s):  
Small Business ◽  
Small Businesses ◽  
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire ◽  
Executive Leadership ◽  
Business Leadership ◽  
Extra Effort ◽  
Multifactor Leadership ◽  
Laissez Faire ◽  
Bass And Avolio

This study represents the first in-depth investigation of leadership in Australian small businesses (fewer than 100 employees) and was based on a nationwide sample of 655 executives. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire — MLQ (Bass and Avolio, 1997) was used to examine transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership and the outcomes of extra effort and effectiveness. Significant differences among subgroups were identified according to gender, experience and level of seniority. This study is important for establishing new benchmarks for Australian small business leadership as perceived by executives themselves. Implications and directions for further research are examined.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Iklim Organisasi terhadap Perilaku Knowledge Sharing di PT T

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-62
Author(s):  
Cut Sarah
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Climate ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire ◽  
Knowledge Sharing Behavior ◽  
Multifactor Leadership ◽  
Questionnaire Form ◽  
Laissez Faire ◽  
Sharing Behavior

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kepemimpinan dan iklim organisasi terhadap perilaku knowledge sharing. Berdasarkan hasil uji regresi berganda pada 92 karyawan dengan menggunakan Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Form 5x-Short), Organizational Climate Instrument, dan Knowledge Sharing Behavior Questionnaire menunjukkan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan dari kepemimpinan dan iklim organisasi terhadap knowledge sharing. Hasil uji regresi berganda menunjukkan nilai R Squared dengan koefisien determinasi sebesar 0,261 = 26,1% yang berarti pengaruh kepemimpinan dan iklim organisasi terhadap knowledge sharing adalah sebesar 26,1% dan sisanya dipengaruhi oleh variabel lainnya. Jika dilihat lebih rinci menunjukkan bahwa variabel yang paling signifikan sumbangannya (nilai β) terhadap variabel knowledge sharing adalah iklim organisasi, diikuti oleh laissez faire, kepemimpinan tansformasional dan terkecil kepemimpinan transaksional. Hal ini menunjukkan penting untuk memperhatikan iklim organisasi untuk menunjang perilaku knowledge sharing di organisasi. Di samping itu hasil kepemimpinan transformasional menunjukkan koefisien negatif pada variabel laissez faire yang mengindikasikan pemimpin dan manajemen yang pasif terhadap bawahannya akan menurunkan tingkat knowledge sharing dalam organisasi.

Is the Full-Range Model of Leadership Really a Full-Range Model of Effective Leader Behavior?

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Michel ◽  
Brian D. Lyons ◽  
Jeewon Cho
Keyword(s):  
Field Study ◽  
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Job Attitudes ◽  
Group Level ◽  
Managerial Effectiveness ◽  
Managerial Practices ◽  
Effective Leader ◽  
Multifactor Leadership ◽  
Full Range Model

A field study was conducted to compare the three meta-categories assessed in the Managerial Practices Survey (MPS) with the “full-range” taxonomy assessed in the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). Dyadic and group-level analyses found that subordinate job attitudes and boss-rated managerial effectiveness were predicted better by the MPS meta-categories than by the MLQ meta-categories. Results also suggested that at least one of the three meta-categories from the MPS was more important in predicting each effectiveness outcome than any of the meta-categories from the MLQ. Implications germane to leadership theory and research are further discussed.

scholarly journals A Functional Model of Team Leadership for Sport

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 7-18
Author(s):  
Jeff Coleman Coleman ◽  
Gershon Tenenbaum Tenenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Functional Model ◽  
Team Leadership ◽  
Goal Achievement ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Achievement Data ◽  
Multifactor Leadership

The purpose of this study was to propose and examine a new leadership framework, the Team Leadership Model for Sport. Specifi cally, the aim was to examine a functional leadership paradigm in sport where full range of leadership behaviors by the coach and by the collective athletes infl uence team cohesion, and thereby increase the likelihood of team goal achievement. Data were utilized from 518 NCAA Division I-III athletes from 36 softball teams and 13 baseball teams. The participants completed the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Avolio & Bass, 2004), the Team Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Avolio & Bass, 1996), the Group Environment Questionnaire (Carron, Brawley, & Widmeyer, 1985), and the Team Outcome Questionnaire that was developed for this study. Structural equation modeling indicated that the original hypothesized model did not fi t the data, but an acceptable alternative model was established, which included transformational leadership and two transactional leadership variables infl uencing perceptions of cohesion. Transformational leadership had a signifi cant positive path to cohesion, which in turn had a signifi cant positive path to goal achievement. We discuss a potentially fruitful direction in the examination of team leadership, within which the fi rst step involves a closer examination of measurement of coach leadership, shared athlete leadership, and cohesion. Keywords: transformational, cohesion, shared leadership, baseball, softball

Swiss Armed Forces Militia System

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Stadelmann
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Leadership Style ◽  
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Extra Effort ◽  
Idealized Influence ◽  
Multifactor Leadership ◽  
Lower Ranking ◽  
Transformational Leadership Style ◽  
Positive Effect

This study examines the effects of transformational leadership on subordinates’ extra effort in the unique case of the Swiss Armed Forces’ militia system. The transformational leadership style of 201 superiors who were perceived as outstanding was examined in a first study using the German version of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5X). Relationships of transformational leadership with subordinates’ extra effort were found to be differentially moderated by “command structure” depending on whether the subordinates were militia personnel or military professionals. For military professionals, all components of transformational leadership on the part of lower-ranking superiors had a positive effect on subordinates’ extra effort. For militia personnel, only the interaction between “command structure” and idealized influence increased subordinates’ extra effort. A second study of 51 platoon leaders supported the augmentation effect postulated by transformational leadership theory.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document