scholarly journals A benchmarking procedure for PIGE related differential cross-sections

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
M. Axiotis ◽  
A. Lagoyannis ◽  
S. Fazinić ◽  
S. Harrisopulos ◽  
M. Kokkoris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Light Element ◽  
Thick Target ◽  
A Priori Knowledge ◽  
Differential Cross Sections ◽  
The World

The application of standard-less PIGE requires the a priori knowledge of the differential cross section of the reaction used for the quantification of each detected light element. Towards this end, a lot of datasets have been published the last few years from several laboratories around the world. The discrepancies found can be resolved by applying a rigorous benchmarking procedure through the measurement of thick target yields. Such a procedure is proposed in the present paper and is applied in the case of the 19F(p,p’γ)19F reaction.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Compton (Incoherent) and Rayleigh (Coherent) Differential Cross Sections of Scattering for Rhodium 103Rh45 and Tantalum181Ta73 by Employing CSC model

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 554-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baghdad Science Journal
Keyword(s):  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Form Factors ◽  
Differential Cross Sections ◽  
The Cross

The differential cross section for the Rhodium and Tantalum has been calculated by using the Cross Section Calculations (CSC) in range of energy(1keV-1MeV) . This calculations based on the programming of the Klein-Nashina and Rayleigh Equations. Atomic form factors as well as the coherent functions in Fortran90 language Machine proved very fast an accurate results and the possibility of application of such model to obtain the total coefficient for any elements or compounds.

scholarly journals Differential cross-section measurements for the 7Li(p,p0)7Li, 7Li(p,p1)7Li, 7Li(p,α0)4He, 19F(p,p0)19F, 19F(p,α0)16O and 19F(p,α1,2)16O reactions

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
V. Paneta ◽  
A. Lagoyannis ◽  
A. Kafkarkou ◽  
M. Kokkoris
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Differential Cross Sections ◽  
Variable Energy

Differential cross sections of the 7Li(p,p0)7Li, 7Li(p,p1)7Li, 7Li(p,α0)4He, 19F(p,p0), 19F(p,α0)16O and 19F(p,α1,2)16O reactions have been determined for proton energies Elab=1500-7000 keV, using a variable energy step and for detection angles between 140-170 degrees in steps of 10 degrees. To validate the obtained results, benchmarking measurements were performed, using thick and mirror-polished BaF2 and LiF targets. The experimental data are compared to data from literature, when available, and similarities and discrepancies are presented and analyzed.

scholarly journals Observation of Odderon effects at LHC energies: a real extended Bialas–Bzdak model study

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Csörgő ◽  
I. Szanyi
Keyword(s):  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Scattering Amplitude ◽  
Proton Collision ◽  
Differential Cross Sections ◽  
Proton Antiproton ◽  
Proton Proton ◽  
Elastic Proton

AbstractThe unitarily extended Bialas–Bzdak model of elastic proton–proton scattering is applied, without modifications, to describe the differential cross-section of elastic proton–antiproton collisions in the TeV energy range, and to extrapolate these differential cross-sections to LHC energies. In this model-dependent study we find that the differential cross-sections of elastic proton–proton collision data at 2.76 and 7 TeV energies differ significantly from the differential cross-section of elastic proton–antiproton collisions extrapolated to these energies. The elastic proton–proton differential cross-sections, extrapolated to 1.96 TeV energy with the help of this extended Bialas–Bzdak model do not differ significantly from that of elastic proton–antiproton collisions, within the theoretical errors of the extrapolation. Taken together these results provide a model-dependent, but statistically significant evidence for a crossing-odd component of the elastic scattering amplitude at the at least 7.08 sigma level. From the reconstructed Odderon and Pomeron amplitudes, we determine the $$\sqrt{s}$$ s dependence of the corresponding total and differential cross-sections.

A STATE-TO-STATE QUANTUM DYNAMICAL STUDY OF THE H + HBr REACTION

2008 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 777-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
BINA FU ◽  
YONG ZHOU ◽  
DONG H. ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Collision Energy ◽  
Differential Cross Sections ◽  
Exchange Processes ◽  
Abstraction Reaction ◽  
Constraint Model ◽  
Rovibrational State

The time-dependent wave packet method was used to calculate the state-to-state differential cross sections for abstraction and exchange processes in the title reaction on the Kurosaki–Takayanagi potential energy surface [Kurosaki Y, Takayanagi T, J Chem Phys119:7838, 2003], with the reactant HBr initially in the ground rovibrational state. It is found that the trend in the product distributions is similar for abstraction and exchange processes, but the differential cross sections are very different. For the exchange reaction, the product is mainly scattered in the backward hemisphere for collision energy up to 2.0 eV, although forward scattering gradually shows up in high collision energies. While for abstraction reaction, the differential cross section changes substantially with the collision energy, moving from predominantly backward peaked at low collision energy to predominantly forward peaked at high collision energy. The rovibrational state resolved differential cross section at collision energy of 2.0 eV exhibits two peaks for the abstraction reaction, one is around the angle of 50°, and the other at 0°. It is found that the peaks around 50°, are below the corresponding maximum j' lines provided by the kinematic constraint model, while the forward-scattered peaks straddle both sides of the kinematic limit, and are likely contributed from both the direct and the migratory reaction mechanisms as proposed by Zare and coworkers.

scholarly journals First results of the differential cross sections of 9Be(d,d0) at energies and angles suitable for Elastic Backscattering Spectroscopy

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
E. Ntemou ◽  
M. Kokkoris ◽  
A. Lagoyannis ◽  
C. Lungu ◽  
K. Mergia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Energy Range ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Differential Cross Sections ◽  
Tandem Accelerator ◽  
First Results ◽  
Elastic Backscattering

The differential cross sections of the 9Be(d,d0) elastic scattering were determined in the present work in the energy range of Ed,lab = 740 - 2200 keV in variable steps, mainly 20 keV at five backscattering angles (120o, 140o, 150o, 160o and 170o). The measurements were performed at the 5.5 MV TN11 HV Tandem Accelerator of the N.C.S.R. “Demokritos” implementing a high precision goniometer. The target used was a thin Si3N4 target with a Beryllium layer on top. The obtained differential cross section values are compared to the ones existing in literature and the observed similarities and discrepancies are discussed.

ISOSPIN DECOMPOSITION OF pp → NNππ CROSS SECTIONS — DO WE SEE A SIGN OF Δ(1600) EXCITATION IN THE nnπ+π+ CHANNEL?

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (02n03) ◽  
pp. 450-453
Author(s):  
◽  
T. SKORODKO ◽  
M. BASHKANOV ◽  
D. BOGOSLOWSKY ◽  
H. CALÉN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Pion Production ◽  
Significant Contribution ◽  
Differential Cross Sections ◽  
Pp Collisions ◽  
Theoretical Predictions ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
The Cross

The two-pion production in pp-collisions has been investigated in exclusive measurements from threshold up to Tp = 1.36 GeV . Total and differential cross sections have been obtained for the channels pnπ+π0, ppπ+π-, ppπ0π0 and also nnπ+π+. For intermediate incident energies Tp > 1 GeV , i.e. in the region, which is beyond the Roper excitation but at the onset of ΔΔ excitation the total ppπ0π0 cross section falls behind theoretical predictions by as much as an order of magnitude near 1.2 GeV, whereas the nnπ+π+ cross section is a factor of five larger than predicted. A model-unconstrained isospin decompostion of the cross section points to a significant contribution of an isospin 3/2 resonance other than the Δ(1232). As a possible candidate the Δ(1600) is discussed.

Differential cross-section measurements in positron–argon collisions

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 505-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Finch ◽  
Á. Kövér ◽  
M. Charlton ◽  
G. Laricchia
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Inelastic Scattering ◽  
Energy Range ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Coupling Effect ◽  
Channel Coupling ◽  
Scattering Cross

Differential cross sections for elastic scattering and ionization in positron–argon collisions as a function of energy (40–150 eV) are reported at 60°. Of particular interest is the energy range 55–60 eV, where earlier measurements by the Detroit group found a drop in the elastic-scattering cross section of a factor of 2. This structure has been tentatively attributed to a cross channel-coupling effect with an open inelastic-scattering channel, most likely ionization. Our results indicate that ionization remains an important channel over the same energy range and only begins to decrease at an energy above 60 eV.

scholarly journals Erratum to: Measurement of differential cross sections and W+/W− cross-section ratios for W boson production in association with jets at $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Aaboud ◽  
◽  
G. Aad ◽  
B. Abbott ◽  
O. Abdinov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
W Boson ◽  
Atlas Detector ◽  
Boson Production ◽  
Differential Cross Sections ◽  
8 Tev ◽  
W Boson Production

Two additions impacting tables 3 and 4 in ref. [1] are presented in the following. No significant impact is found for other results or figures in ref. [1].

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document