Formation of the Federal Base for Evaluation Tools Funds: Prerequisites, Requirements, Results

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-14
Author(s):  
К. Раев ◽  
K. Raev ◽  
О. Якимчук ◽  
O. Yakimchuk ◽  
Е. Тимошина ◽  
...  

The article provides the prerequisites for the development of evaluation tools that can serve as an example forhigher educational institutions in the development of their own evaluation materials, as well as can be used in conducting procedures for state accreditation and independent evaluation of the educationquality. The requirements for evaluation tools and the source (platform) of these funds (the Federal Base of Evaluation Tools)are described. Intermediate results of the Federal Base functioning are presented.

Author(s):  
Aleksandr I. Bokarev ◽  
Еlena S. Denisova ◽  
Aleksandr M. Dobrenko ◽  
Vitaliy S. Serdyuk

Introduction. The article deals with implementation of tasks of specialists’ training by universities. The relevance is determined by a dropout trends in training years. The authors analyze the results of the specialists’ training and graduation; also they determine the goal and objectives of the research. The study purpose is to identify specialists’ training patterns and to develop methods to optimize the students’ number in training years according to the final results. Materials and Methods. Results of training and graduates’ number for 2012-2017 comprised material for the study. An approach to provide management of assignment for higher education professionals training has been developed, and it is the students’ number optimization methodology in years of study according to the final results. It links initial and final results into one line and predicts intermediate results that ensure fulfillment of graduates’ training orders not lower than the established final results. The following general scientific methods are used in the article: compilation, benchmarking, synthesis and normative forecasting. Results. Optimization methodologies in years of education concerning the final results were tested. The findings showed that the final result directly depends on the intermediate results; the students’ number decline can be brought to optimal values if initial and final results are determined and linked with each other. Discussion and Conclusion. The possibility to bring students’ number reduction into line with optimal values is proved theoretically and practically if the forecast of graduation is provided. Thus the forecast of optimal intermediate results is the main link for educational management methods development for specialists’ training tasks. It is an area for further research. The contribution to science consists in the development of methods for predicting the optimal number of students in the year regarding to the final result. The article’s materials will be useful to the permanent composition of professional educational institutions for the development of measures tar geted control in the educational process. Keywords: assignment on specialists’ training, students’ drop out, trends in specialists’ training, specialists’ graduation, optimization of students’ number Acknowledgments: The work was carried out within the research project “Quality management of professional education based on new information technologies”. The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewer.


Author(s):  
Valentyn Synii

The emergence of Baptist seminaries in Ukraine was influenced by Western churches or missions and in some cases by the Ukrainian diaspora, which had lived outside Ukraine for a long time. The decisive influence was exerted by representatives of churches, educational institutions and Christian universities in the United States. Seminaries went through a number of stages of their own development, during which the forms of collective leadership changed. The first stage is the emergence of seminaries and the harmonization of seminars to unified standards. In the first stage, immediately after the seminary was established, they had very friendly relations with local churches, the programs were very flexible and responded to the needs of the churches. Church leaders saw these initiatives as part of church ministry. The second stage is the extensive development of seminaries, by which the author means the involvement of additional resources in the work of seminaries and the growth of seminaries, associated with the number of students, and for some seminaries - the opening of branches or field programs. This type of growth was also due to the fact that seminaries began to become more independent of national churches, and partnerships with Western organizations became more formalized, which was most often seen in the participation of Western partners in the board of trustees. The third period is a reassessment of the work of seminaries. The beginning of this period is largely related to the global economic crisis of 2007-2008, and its result was the resumption of dialogue between seminaries and churches. The fourth period - institutional changes - is associated with the reaction of the Ukrainian state to the Bologna process and the adoption of the new Law of Ukraine "On Higher Education". The process of preparation for state accreditation and formation of a culture of openness in the national educational environment has begun.


2020 ◽  
pp. 34-46
Author(s):  
Денис Владимирович Макаров

Основная цель исследования - сопоставление основных критериев получения ученых званий, присваиваемых Министерством науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации и Номинационной комиссией Учебного комитета Русской Православной Церкви, а также изучение мотивации и обоснование необходимости получения учёных званий руководящими, научными и научно-педагогическими работниками высших духовных учебных заведений Русской Православной Церкви. Главным противоречием в получении работниками духовных образовательных организаций государственных учёных званий на сегодняшний день является половинчатая позиция Министерства науки и высшего образования по отношению к богословским учёным степеням и званиям. Это выражается в том, что при прохождении процедуры государственной аккредитации богословские учёные степени и звания учитываются, а при присвоении учёных званий и при приёме на работу (на должности профессора и доцента) - нет. Однако, сам факт признания богословских степеней при прохождении процедуры государственной аккредитации является значимым фактором обоснования необходимости получения церковных учёных званий руководящими, научными и научно-педагогическими работника ми высших духовных учебных заведений Русской Православной Церкви. Сопоставление основных критериев получения учёных званий, присваиваемых Министерством науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации и Номинационной комиссией Учебного комитета Русской Православной Церкви, показывает, что основные различия в том, что Номинационная комиссия признаёт государственные учёные степени и звания, а Министерство образования и науки не признаёт богословские степени и звания. The main goal of the study is to compare the main criteria for obtaining academic titles assigned by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation and the Nomination Commission of the Study Committee of the Russian Orthodox Church, as well as to study the motivation and justification for the need to obtain academic titles by leading, scientific and scientific pedagogical workers of higher theological educational institutions Russian Orthodox Church. The main contradiction in the receipt of state academic ranks by employees of spiritual educational organizations today is the halfhearted position of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in relation to theological academic degrees and ranks. This is expressed in the fact that when passing the procedure of state accreditation, theological academic degrees and ranks are taken into account, but when awarding academic ranks and when hiring (for the positions of professor and associate professor) - not. However, the very fact of recognition of theological degrees during the state accreditation procedure is a significant factor in substantiating the need for church scholars to receive leading, scientific and scientificpedagogical workers of high er theological educational institutions of the Russian Orthodox Church. A comparison of the main criteria for obtaining academic degrees assigned by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation and the Nomination Commission of the Study Committee of the Russian Orthodox Church shows that the main differences are that the Nomination Commission recogniz es state academic degrees and titles, and the Ministry of Education and Science does not recognize theological degrees and ranks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3A) ◽  
pp. 634-643
Author(s):  
Elena Nikolaevna Perevoshchikova ◽  
Irina Rafailovna Novik ◽  
Tatyana Konstantinovna Belyaeva ◽  
Rushan Anvyarovich Saberov ◽  
Irina Fedorovna Filchenkova

This article discusses the conceptual foundations of establishing an independent evaluation system (IES) of educational outcomes of future teachers. The following competencies and corresponding educational outcomes groups are identified: educational, psychological and pedagogical, methodological and subject competencies. There is a presentation form description of evaluation tools with organizational-methodical, content, and criterion-evaluation parts that help link the educational outcomes, teacher functionality, and appropriate professionally-oriented tasks and describe indicators of achieving educational outcomes as evaluated actions of the learner. The association of the selected parts with the principles of constructing evaluation of objectivity, validity, and openness of evaluation procedures tools is disclosed. The inclusion of evaluation tools and funds of evaluation tools involves their testing and examination. As a mechanism for implementing IES, it is proposed to use a digital platform including groups of evaluation tools adequate to the selected educational outcomes groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3C) ◽  
pp. 303-315
Author(s):  
Elena Nikolaevna Perevoshchikova ◽  
Ekaterina Yurevna Elizarova ◽  
Anastasia Vladimirovna Stafeeva ◽  
Rushan Anvyarovich Saberov ◽  
Irina Fedorovna Filchenkova

This article presents a structural model of an independent assessment of the educational results of future teachers. The properties, assumptions, and limitations of such a system are highlighted. It is shown that the system of independent evaluation of educational results is a subsystem of the system of higher pedagogical education and should have the properties of objectivity, should be an activity system, be built considering the criterion approach to evaluation, following the principle of cyclicity. The article identifies groups of educational results based on the coordination of competencies and labor actions of a teacher. The form of presentation of evaluation tools is justified. A digital platform was chosen to present the model, the cycles of evaluation of educational results, and the stages of functioning of the model of independent evaluation of educational results, students, and graduates in the field of training “Pedagogical Education” were determined.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. A. Matveeva

The article addresses the study of supply and demand in the field of independent voluntary accreditation of study programmes delivered by higher education institutions in Russia. The paper presents the results of the analysis of the activity of Russian and foreign accreditation organizations as well as the analysis of the effectiveness of the national monitoring system for professional and public accreditation and European quality assurance register for higher education EQAR. In author’s opinion, the current state of public accreditation is characterized not so much by the “accreditation boom” on the part of higher education institutions, as by the “accreditation bubble” on the part of accreditation organizations. At the same time, strict requirements for accreditation organizations that are included into European quality assurance register for higher education provide confidence and recognition for independent international accreditation, which makes it increasingly in demand, especially among the country’s leading universities. The paper dwells on the following trends in the development of independent accreditation procedures: 1) during the current decade the accreditation process is gaining momentum, which is characterized by the growth of number of accreditation organizations as well as educational institutions interested in obtaining accreditation; 2) the state supports and encourages the development of the independent accreditation system for quality assurance in higher education; 3) the voluntary accreditation enables educational organizations to get an independent assessment of study programmes and thus to receive “a bonus” before a state accreditation procedure; 4) the database of External Quality Assurance Reports (DEQAR) becomes a preferred instrument for higher education institutions, whereas they are interested in raising their transparency related to the quality of study programmes and their competitiveness in the global educational space. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document