أثر اختلاف نمطي الفصول الافتراضية (المتزامنة - غير المتزامنة) المدعومة بمراسي التعلم الإلكترونية على تنمية مهارات البرمجة لدى طلاب الصف الأول الثانوي = The Effect of the Difference in the Two Patterns of Virtual Classes (Synchronous - Asynchronous) Supported by Electronic Anchored Learning on the Development of Some Programming Skills among High School Students

2017 ◽  
pp. 11-60
Author(s):  
إيناس أحمد أنور محمد جودة ◽  
ماهر إسماعيل صبري ◽  
حنان محمد السيد صالح عمار
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Virtual Classes ◽  
Programming Skills ◽  
The Difference

scholarly journals SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMBAYARAN BEASISWA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT (WP)

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evasaria M Sipayung ◽  
Yosi Yonata ◽  
Chrevita J Rende
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Information System ◽  
High School Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Or Education ◽  
Education Development ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
Product Method ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Selection Of

Anak Pelangi Indonesia (API) Foundation is a non-profit foundation that offers scholarship programs for elementary, middle and high school students. This institute is supported by donaturs who give contribution to the Foundation. The donation is processed to be a cost that is used to pay Sumbangan Pembinaan Pendidikan (SPP) or Education Development Donation of each student. Currently, the provision of monthly donor fund is at uncertain amount so that the Foundation needs to determine the students of whom SPP will be firstly paid. However, the funding needs of each student are different due to the different amount of SPP and a giving fine from the school for the tardiness in paying the tuition. From these matters, the Foundation finds it difficult in deciding which students whose the tuition will be paid first. The solution to this problem is to use the four criteria referring to the tuition payment, namely the difference of pay date, fine, rank, and the amount of payment. The four criteria is then given the same integrity which is 25% for each criteria and counted by using Weighted Product (WP) method. The result of this research is an information system to the selection of scholarship payment using Weight Product method that takes the biggest value from the calculation result as a reference in deciding which students of whom SPP will be initially paid in accordance with the current fund condition.

scholarly journals Teaching Solar System Topic through Predict-Observe-Explain-Apply (POEA) Strategy: A Path to Students’ Conceptual Change

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugi Supriatna ◽  
Achmad Samsudin ◽  
Ridwan Efendi
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Solar System ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Students ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference

The misconception of the Solar System topic is still found in students so that it becomes one of the obstacles in the learning process. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of Predict-Observe-Explain-Apply (POEA) learning to change the junior high school students' conception in the Solar System topic. Quasi-experimental research with the non-equivalent control group design was conducted in one of the private junior high schools in Bandung city. Samples were selected based on the test of the average significance of the pretest score of the population. Furthermore, 30 students of the experimental class and 32 students of control class were selected. The research instrument, which consisted of 15 four-tier diagnostic test questions about Solar System were used to collect data before and after treatment. The tests were analyzed quantitatively by using the Mann-Whitney statistical test to determine the significance of the difference in the acceptable conception changes (Acceptable Change) of students in the experimental class with changes in the conception of students in the control class. The results of the research show that the implementation of POEA learning is significantly more effective than POE learning in changing the conception of Solar System topic. The findings of this study can be an alternative for junior high school teachers in planning learning about the Solar System, especially in an effort to change students' misconception about the Solar System.

The Development of Internet of Things Learning Kit to Enhancing Programming Skills for High School Students

2021 ◽  
pp. 430-438
Author(s):  
Nutthakarn Moeikao ◽  
Non Jarungsirawat ◽  
Issara Kanjug ◽  
Charuni Samat
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Internet Of Things ◽  
School Students ◽  
Programming Skills

scholarly journals An Investigation of the Social Network System Competencies of High School Students in Japan

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (05) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masami Yoshida
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Social Network ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Network System ◽  
School Students ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
The Social ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference

We investigated the Social Network System (SNS) competencies of high school students in Japan. Student groups (from cities or regional areas) and the opinions of their teachers were compared. Twenty-five UNESCO criteria in three competency categories were selected. By two-way analysis of variance and paired-comparisons, we detected a significant difference in the opinions of students and teachers. Although the magnitude of the difference was small, by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons, the city and regional groups also differed from each other. Performance criteria items of risk awareness were valued the highest and most important in all groups; whereas technical skills and socio-cultural skills were reported as less proficient and less important by all groups. Classification of SNS-type was used, and the data of SNS sites with which the students were familiar and the mean values of related performance criteria items were applied to view the situation of students. By this approach, we confirmed that students are savvy in navigating socializing SNSs. Based on our findings, we propose important learning and societal-public activities relevant to SNSs.

scholarly journals Effect of Jigsaw Strategy and Learning Style to Conceptual Understanding on Senior High School Students

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (19) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Amiruddin Kade ◽  
I Nyoman Sudana Degeng ◽  
Muhammad Nur Ali
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Senior High School ◽  
School Students ◽  
Learning Style Inventory ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Senior High School Students

Conceptual understanding should have serious attention due to the low score of Physics subject on national examination in Palu. The difference between learning style and jigsaw strategy is able to combine abstract conceptualization and active experiment towards the conceptual understanding for students whose learning style is converger and diverger. The research design was quasi experiment. The sample is the eleventh class of Senior High School students in Palu that are chosen using cluster random sampling (multistage), that is, 167 students. The research instrument was Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (KLSI) of conceptual understanding test on Physics (Tes Pemahaman Konsep Fisika or TPKF). The data was analyzed by using ANOVA, with the significant level is 5%. The result shows that: (1) cooperative learning strategy of jigsaw type has more benefits than direct learning strategy in conceptual understanding on Physics, (2) student group of which learning style was converger has higher conceptual understanding than that of which learning style was diverger, (3) there are interaction influence between learning strategy and learning style towards the conceptual understanding on Physics

An Experimental Evaluation of a Method for Simplifying Electronic Maintenance

1971 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas K. Elliott ◽  
Reid P. Joyce
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Air Force ◽  
Test Equipment ◽  
Scoring Methods ◽  
Hand Tools ◽  
School Students ◽  
Training Time ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cost

Two groups of subjects solved the same set of 13 troubleshooting and repair problems in seven solid-state-circuit modules which contained as many as five stages each. Both groups used the same hand tools and test equipment. One group was composed of 41 conventionally trained Air Force 5-and 7-level technicians who normally maintain such equipment as part of their Jobs. The technicians used the same troubleshooting techniques they ordinarily used on their jobs, and they were provided with a performance aid resembling an Air Force technical order. The other group was composed of 20 high-school students with no prior training or experience in electronics. Their training for this study consisted of a 12-hour course in the use of hand tools and test equipment and in the use of the proceduralized troubleshooting aid evaluated in this study. The aid indicated which check to make based upon the outcome of previous checks. Using the proceduralized troubleshooting aid, the high-school students took significantly less troubleshooting time than did the experienced technicians using normal techniques; however, the technicians required significantly less repair time and made significantly fewer errors than did the students. These differences may be accounted for in part by differences in the tasks and scoring methods for the two groups, and there were no differences between the two groups on a number of other measures. However, the difference in training time and, therefore, cost of training between the two groups was so great as to suggest the possibility that job-relevant training and proceduralization of the task can introduce substantial savings, even after the cost of developing the special performance aids required by proceduralized troubleshooting is subtracted.

scholarly journals Pengaruh pembelajaran process oriented-guided inquiry learning berkonteks isu-isu sosiosaintifik dalam pembelajaran asam basa terhadap keterampilan berargumentasi siswa SMA kelas XI

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arum Setyaningsih ◽  
Sri Rahayu ◽  
Fauziatul Fajaroh ◽  
Parmin Parmin
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Scientific Literacy ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
School Students ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Process Oriented ◽  
The Difference

Kemampuan berargumentasi merupakan salah satu aspek dalam kemampuan berliterasi sains. Rendahnya skor pada survei PISA siswa Indonesia menunjukkan rendahnya kemampuan mereka dalam berargumen. Untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan keterampilan berargumentasi dan kualitas argumentasi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran Process Oriented-Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) berkonteks isu-isu sosiosaintifik, POGIL, dan konvensional pada materi asam basa. Rancangan penelitian adalah eksperimen semu posstest only design. Sampel terdiri dari tiga kelas di salah satu SMAN di Kota Malang. Data diperoleh dari hasil tes keterampilan berargumentasi tertulis siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik terhadap keterampilan berargumentasi siswa di ketiga kelas penelitian (p=0.000). Kualitas argumentasi dianalisis menggunakan kerangka analitik Osborne. Pencapaian level argumentasi siswa kelas POGIL berkonteks isu-isu sosiosaintifik lebih tinggi daripada kelas POGIL dan konvensional. The effect of process oriented-guided inquiry learning with socioscientific issue contexts on high school students’ argument skills  AbstractThe argumentation ability is one of aspect of scientific literacy. The low scores on PISA survey of Indonesian students showed their low ability in argumentation. To address this problem,  this study aims to investigate the difference of students’argumentation skills who were taught using POGIL with socioscientific issues context, POGIL, and conventional learning. Research design was quasi-experimental postest only design. The sample consisted of three classes of a public senior high school in Malang. The data were obtained from students’ written argumentation. The result of this study showed significantly different statistic on students’argumetation skills in three classes (p=0,000). The quality of students’argumetation were classified using analytical framework by Osborne. Achievement of the argument level of POGIL class students contexted sociosaintific issues higher than POGIL class and conventional class.

scholarly journals The Difference in School Well-Being in High School Students with Full-Day Scholl and Half Day School Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulifa Rahma ◽  
Rr. Karina Putri Pramitadewi ◽  
Risna Hotmauli Tambun Saribu ◽  
Faizah Faizah ◽  
Yuliezar Perwiradara
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Day School ◽  
School Systems ◽  
School Students ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Full Day
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document