Supporting women with breast cancer during pregnancy

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 340-341
Author(s):  
Grete Brauten-Smith

While offering specialist support, Breast Cancer Now is continuing to share the breast awareness message

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 137s-137s ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Jose ◽  
P. Augustine ◽  
A . Bindhu S ◽  
S. Rose Sebasitan ◽  
D. VA ◽  
...  

Background and context: Thiruvananthapuram has the highest breast cancer incidence in India and majority of cases are detected late pointing to the inefficiency of early detection programs. Primary health care providers do not advise regarding regular screening and most women never resort to any screening practices. Mammogram is not cost-effective and clinical breast examination (CBE) is not popular as a screening modality in our population. Aim: To describe the conduct, utilization and outcome of mass screening program conducted in Thiruvananthapuram. Strategy: A mass screening program with media publicity to motivate organizations and residential associations was planned. CBE was conducted by one of the five lady doctors who were trained by an expert breast surgeon at a tertiary care center to detect suspicious lumps. All suspicious cases referred to experts who would further evaluate the cases at a clinic outside the tertiary care center. Advocacy and expert service at accessible sites and availability of expert service outside the tertiary care center at convenient timings improved the acceptance of screening. Intersectoral coordination, community participation, accessible expert services and appropriate technology were followed. Program/Policy process: 9942 women had CBE along with breast awareness in 101 camps over 66 days and it was probably “the first ever marathon breast cancer screening campaign” in the world. Sociodemographic variables, details regarding previous screening, breast symptoms and known risk factors were collected. Anyone with suspicious findings was referred to experts. Outcomes: 868 (8.73%) women with suspicious findings were referred to experts who advised 258 mammograms and confirmed breast cancer in 16 women (1.61 per 1000 women). Mean age was 45.46 years. 82.5% had screening for the first time. Uniformity in examination, three levels of screening and minimum utilization of diagnostic procedures makes this campaign distinct from others. All participants are kept on follow-up through a free clinic maintained by a nonprofit NGO in Thiruvananthapuram. Effective planning and selfless service along with coordinated effort of an apex institution (Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram), a private medical college (Sree Gokulam Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram) and media partners were the key to success. What was learned: Early detection of breast cancer is possible by CBE, provided women can be motivated for regular screening and adequate expertise is available. CBE campaigns can improve screening behavior and breast awareness among women. Primary health care providers and mass media could educate women regarding the benefits of breast awareness and motivate them for regular screening. Proper referral system including certified intermediate referral centers should be in place to ensure the success of early detection by CBE.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 336-339
Author(s):  
ZEHRA PARVANI

Aim: The purpose of this systemic review is to explore the literature on breast self examination and on breast awareness. Objectives: To evaluate the importance of breast awareness. (1) To prove breast awareness is a an effective strategy for health promotion. (2) To clarify the difference between breast awareness and breast self examination. (3) To critique self breast examination as an effective method for screening breast cancers. Methodology: To review the literature supporting breast self examination and breast awareness Medline, CINAHL, Pubmed, Science Direct and Cochrane Databases were used. The key words “breast awareness”, “difference” and “breast self examination” were used in conjunction with “breast cancer”, “breast screening” and “health promotion” to search the recent articles of last 5 years from 2005 to 2010. Conclusions: It was concluded through the literature support that breast self-examination does not reduce breast cancer mortality whereas; breast awareness provides women with some knowledge about the breasts to fight breast disease and to reduce morbidity but not to reduce the mortality.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1027-1027
Author(s):  
A. Artmann ◽  
M. Heyne ◽  
M. Kiechle ◽  
N. Harbeck

1027 Background: In Germany, the particpation rate in gynecologic cancer and the Bavarian breast cancer screening program is only about 30%. Therefore, the impact of counseling and raising confidence in breast self examination (BSE) by a structured BSE training on breast awareness, acceptance of screening offer, and participation rate was evaluated. For evaluation of the training quality, specified MammaCare data sheets and questionnaires were used. Method: Since 2003, 167 women (mean age 35 y; range 19–65 y; 61% ≥40 y) got intensive breast cancer counceling and were professionally trained in MammaCare BSE; 41% had positive breast cancer family history. In their beginner’s course, trainees got general BSE information, covering breast anatomy, breast symptoms, breast cancer screening and therapy. Participants practised BSE, after training on tactually accurate silicone breast models with simulated lumps in order to discriminate normal nodularity from lumps. After 3 months, the supervision sessions included BSE evaluation and - again - professional instruction. In a model exam false positive and negative findings were documented. In breast exams, performance technique and breast tissue coverage were assessed. At both initial sessions and after 12 months, questionnaires on BSE practice, experience, and compliance, cancer worry, acceptance and participation at cancer screening programs were evaluated. Results: Breast cancer worry, anxiety, and lack of information were the main reasons for program participation. Within 3 months after the base course, mean decrease of breast cancer worry was about 95%. Participation in gynecologic and breast cancer screening (≥40 y) more than doubled (94% and 86%). Even after 12 months, these numbers remain consistent. 80% of participants practice BSE monthly, and 46% reported changes in lifestyle regarding nutrition and obesity. Conclusions: Our approach emphasizes importance of self confidence and awareness for participation in cancer screening, also in women with breast cancer family history. Counseling, BSE re-evaluation and reinforcement are correlated with decreased breast cancer worry, a main barrier against participation in breast and gynecologic cancer screening. [Table: see text]


1997 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise C.M. Toner ◽  
Nora Jodrell

Author(s):  
Chantal Simon ◽  
Hazel Everitt ◽  
Françoise van Dorp ◽  
Matt Burkes

Breast symptoms Benign breast disease Breast cancer screening Breast cancer Breast awareness means knowing what your breasts look and feel like normally. Evidence suggests that there is no need to follow a specific or detailed routine such as breast self-examination, but you should be aware of any changes in your breasts....


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 2869-2871
Author(s):  
Nadia Majid ◽  
Usman Ali Rahman ◽  
Muhammad Kaleem Akhter ◽  
Farzana Iqbal ◽  
Humiara Yousaf ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess level of awareness in nurses regarding risk factors related to carcinoma breast at a tertiary care public hospital Lahore Methods: It was a descriptive study. This study took place at Mayo Hospital Lahore. The nurses of different departments especially the oncology department were recruited. A sample of n=300 was recruited through random probability sampling methods. An adopted close ended questionnaire was applied. The data was interpreted and analyzed by SPSS version 25. The data was analyzed in the form of tables and graphs. Results: Of the participants nurses 67% knew that smoking is a risk factor for carcinoma breast. It was also found that 59% agreed that exposure to another person’s cigarettes smoke also can cause breast carcinoma. Results also suggest that 88% agreed that drinking more than one glass of alcohol a day also can cause breast cancer. Moreover results suggest 71% agreed that being overweight (BMI>25) also can cause breast carcinoma. Results also suggest that 54% agreed that being over 70 years old can lead to breast cancer. Conclusion: Overall knowledge related to risk factors of breast carcinoma among nurses was satisfactory. Top rating risk factors were, smoking cigarettes and family history. Moreover, nurses knowledge regarding breast carcinoma symptoms and signs was also good among participants MeSH: Carcinoma Breast, Awareness, Risk Factor


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1527-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Ezeome

1527 Background: Programs on breast cancer prevention inresource poor countries often emphasize cost effective interventions to increase the uptake of screening, breast awareness, and the use of breast self examination. The success of such programs depends on the response of women and health professionals to the presence of symptoms of breast cancer. Understanding the factors at play in these responses is a prerequisite for strategies to shorten delays and improve stage at diagnosis. This study was designed to assess the delays and define the causes of delays in getting medical treatment by patients with breast cancer at University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu, (UNTH-E), Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of consecutively presenting patients with breast cancer at the Surgical Oncology unit of the UNTH-E, Nigeria, was carried out between June 1999 and May 2005. A structured questionnaire was used to explore delays and the factors that influence delays in presentation and treatment of breast cancer. Results: One hundred and sixty four patients with breast cancer were interviewed. Most of them were married (71.2%), literate (84.7%), low (58.8%) or middle socioeconomic class (40%), and had access to hospitals within their area of residence. Most (81.6%) reported first for treatment at a modern health facility while 17.5% used alternative practitioners first. Twenty-six percent (42) presented within a month of noticing the symptoms while 45.3% (72) delayed for 3 months or more. In contrast, 17% (18) were seen at the site of definitive treatment within 1 month of seeking help at the initial hospital while 73.4% had a delay of more than 3 months after the initial hospital contact. Institutional or physician related delays were present in 44.5% of the cases while patient-related delays were present in 76.7% of cases. Only use of alternative practitioners as the first treatment point was significantly related to delays of more than 3 months before presentation (p = 0.029). Conclusions: For breast cancer prevention programs in Nigeria to succeed, they must, in addition to breast awareness and screening programs, address the institutional bottlenecks, the dearth of knowledge among primary care physicians, and improved referrals from alternative practitioners. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wondimu Ayele ◽  
Adamu Addissie ◽  
Andreas Wienke ◽  
Susanne Unverzagt ◽  
Ahmedin Jemal ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document