The reduction of diesel combustion noise by multiple fuel injections maintaining high indicated thermal efficiency is an object of the research reported in this article. There are two aspects of multiple fuel injection effects on combustion noise reduction. One is the reduction of the maximum rate of pressure rise in each combustion, and the other is the noise reduction effects by the noise canceling spike combustion. The engine employed in the simulations and experiments is a supercharged, single-cylinder direct-injection diesel engine, with a high pressure common rail fuel injection system. Simulations to calculate the combustion noise and indicated thermal efficiency from the approximated heat release by Wiebe functions were developed. In two-stage high temperature heat release combustion, the combustion noise can be reduced; however, the combustion noise in amplification frequencies must be reduced to achieve further combustion noise reduction, and an additional heat release was added ahead of the two-stage high temperature heat release combustion in Test 1. The simulations of the resulting three-stage high temperature heat release combustion were conducted by changing the heating value of the first heat release. In Test 2 where the optimum heat release shape for low combustion noise and high indicated thermal efficiency was investigated and the role of each of the heat releases in the three-stage high temperature heat release combustion was discussed. In Test 3, a genetic-based algorithm method was introduced to avoid the time-consuming loss and great care in preparing the calculations in Test 2, and the optimum heat release shape and frequency characteristics for combustion noise by the genetic-based algorithm method were speedily calculated. The heat release occurs after the top dead center, and the indicated thermal efficiency and overall combustion noise were 50.5% and 86.4 dBA, respectively. Furthermore, the optimum number of fuel injections and heat release shape of multiple fuel injections to achieve lower combustion noise while maintaining the higher indicated thermal efficiency were calculated in Test 4. The results suggest that the constant pressure combustion after the top dead center by multiple fuel injections is the better way to lower combustion noise; however, the excess fuel injected leads to a lower indicated thermal efficiency because the degree of constant volume becomes deteriorates.
Evaluation of Losses in the Cycle for a Diesel Engine and Improvement of Its Thermal Efficiency (The Influence of Heat Release Patterns on the Exergy Losses)
