Being Informed: The Complexities of Knowledge, Deception and Consent When Transmitting HIV
The offence of inflicting grievous bodily harm under s. 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 has been confirmed as the most appropriate ground for convicting a reckless transmission of the HIV virus through sexual intercourse.1 An informed consent from the victim, along with a reasonable belief in that consent from the defendant, will now suffice as a defence to such a charge.2 However, it remains unclear how and when the victim must be informed of the relevant circumstances in order to provide consent to infected intercourse, and it is also undecided whether the defendant himself must divulge his HIV status in order to claim an honest belief in the victim's consent.3 Additionally, the fine line of consensual activity drawn in R v Brown4 appears to have been eroded by recent HIV transmission cases.5 This article outlines the development in relation to s. 20 to include HIV offences; it aims to untangle the recent authorities on knowledge, deception and consent in relation to both victims and perpetrators in reckless HIV transmission cases and suggests a way forward for the law in the shape of a new offence.