scholarly journals The Knowledge of Colorectal Cancer Symptoms and Risk Factors among 10,078 Screening Participants: Are High Risk Individuals More Knowledgeable?

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e60366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin C. S. Wong ◽  
Hoyee W. Hirai ◽  
Arthur K. C. Luk ◽  
Thomas Y. T. Lam ◽  
Jessica Y. L. Ching ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15056-e15056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Bhamre ◽  
Jay Rashmi Anam ◽  
Manish Bhandare ◽  
Avanish Saklani

e15056 Background: Peritoneal recurrence/carcinomatosis (PC) after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is the second most common site of recurrence and carries a poor prognosis. PC present relatively in the later stage, are difficult to detect by conventional imaging on follow up, and have limited options to treat after diagnosis. Second look surgery is the only definite option to diagnose early PC and presents an opportunity for disease control by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC. Multiple studies have attempted to identify clinico-pathological risk factors that predict high chances of PC. Our aim is to analyze the recurrence patterns and survival in locally advanced colorectal cancer, in an attempt to identify high risk factors for PC, which can be used as an indication for second look surgery and prophylactic HIPEC in such cases. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained data of all colorectal cancer patients presenting to a tertiary cancer care referral center in India, from May 2010 to October 2015 was done. All patients who underwent surgery with curative intent and were clinico-pathological stage T4 and/or N2 M0 were included in the analysis. Results: 182 patients underwent curative resection with a clinico-pathological staging of T4 and/or N2 M0. There were 71 recurrences, out of which 30 (42.2%) were peritoneal, 7 (9.9%) were hepatic only while 34 (47.9 %) were non-hepatic systemic or multiple site. For a median follow up of 26 months, the estimated 3 year OS was 78 % while the 3 year DFS was 50.4 %. The median time to diagnosis of peritoneal recurrence was 13 months (4.7 – 55.7). The 3-year OS for patients with peritoneal recurrence was 48.6 % as against 57 % for liver only recurrence and 59.9 % for non liver systemic and multiple site recurrence, with a trend towards poorer survival for peritoneal recurrences, although non-significant (p – 0.377). Conclusions: Locally advanced colorectal cancer has a high risk of peritoneal recurrence which negatively impacts the survival. Well-designed RCTs need to be conducted to identify the high risk factors for PC and whether second look surgery and prophylactic HIPEC in such patients will improve survival with acceptable morbidity and mortality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Husbani Bt. Mohd Amin Rebuan ◽  
Myat Moe ◽  
Nur Qamilah Mohamad ◽  
Nurulhuda Mat Hassan ◽  
Hamidah Binti Othman

Background: In Malaysia, women had breast cancer always reported at their late stage. One of the causes is due to the delay in seeking medical attention. Poor knowledge about the breast cancer is one of the factors that cause the delay. Aim: This study was designed to assess the knowledge on breast cancer symptoms and risk factors, screening method, and practice among participants. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study done from 1st of March till 15th of March 2016 involving 89 nursing students from School of Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA). Data analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 21. Results: Eighty-nine participants responded. Majority of the students (>80.0%) knew the symptoms of breast cancer and common method of screening. Less than 50.0% knew the high risk factor for developing breast carcinoma. Less than 50.0% carried out the breast self-examination. Conclusion: Students had excellent knowledge on symptoms of breast carcinoma and its screening method. Majority (>50%) of the students were still not clear about high risk factors group. Lack of breast self-examination practice among students was noted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3621-TPS3621
Author(s):  
Megumi Ishiguro ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Keita Sasaki ◽  
...  

TPS3621 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) still remains controversial. Although the NCCN and ESMO guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with “high-risk features,” the survival benefit has not been confirmed. We reviewed the evidence levels for prognostic values of risk factors, because lack of their robustness is a major source of uncertainty regarding the optimal indication of adjuvant chemotherapy. Consequently, on top of the T-stage, three pathological factors—perineural invasion (Pn), tumor budding (BD), and desmoplastic reaction (DR)—were selected as robust risk factors of recurrence. Among the conventional factors, the prognostic value of Pn had been well validated in a multicenter study conducted by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR; Am J Surg Path 2013), but others were deemed suboptimal in terms of the prognostic value. BD and DR are novel tumor- and stroma-factors, respectively, associated with cancer microenvironment at the tumor front. According to the JSCCR and ITBCC 2016 criteria, tumors are graded as BD1, BD2, or BD3. The DR heterogeneity is categorized into Mature, Intermediate, and Immature patterns based on site-specific products of cancer-associated fibroblasts—keloid-like collagen and myxoid stroma. According to a recent prospective multicenter study, BD and DR characterization represent a higher level of prognostic value than other conventional factors (SACURA trial; J Clin Oncol 2019, Br J Cancer 2021). Based on the four selected risk factors, we can exclude the patient group with favorable prognosis (i.e., > 90% of 5-year RFS), which accounts for approximately 40% of the total population, resulting in enabling us to identify the concentrated population of high risk of developing recurrence. Methods: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) launched a randomized controlled phase III trial to evaluate the superiority of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) over observation only in stage II CRC patients aged 20–80 years having one or more of the following risk factors: pathological T4, Pn, BD3, and non-Mature DR. Patients are randomised, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to [A] observation, [B] capecitabine monotherapy for 6 months, or [C] capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for 3 months. A total of 1680 patients will be accrued from 54 Japanese institutions assuming 3-year RFS with [A] to be 82% and expected 5% increase in 3-year RFS for [B] and [C] with one-sided alpha of 2.5% and power of 80% for each pair comparison. Patient enrollment was started in January 2020 and 170 patients have been enrolled until January 2021. This trial has been registered at Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs031190186. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031190186.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasu Sheel ◽  
Leslie Azzis ◽  
Racehl Hinrichs ◽  
Thomas Imperiale

Background: Although colonoscopy (CY) may be considered the best screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC), annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT), which quantifies fecal hemoglobin is a viable alternative. Countries and healthcare systems using FIT-based screening may need to prioritize which FIT positive persons requires CY sooner (e.g. within the same fiscal year). We conducted a systematic review of published literature to understand how the yield/positive predictive value (PPV) of FIT could be improved.   Study Design: We performed a search of electronic databases for articles published between 2015 and June 2020. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened. Included studies fulfilled predetermined criteria and had descriptive and quantitative data extracted. We identified studies comparing the yield of FIT for advanced colorectal neoplasia ([AN], CRC plus advanced adenomas) among FIT positive persons to the yield of AN when FIT is combined with risk factors (age, sex, BMI, etc.). Data were extracted to find yield and efficiency of FIT alone vs FIT plus risk factors among FIT positive persons.   Results: From 623 titles reviewed, 4 studies met inclusion criteria. The objective of the studies was to increase the yield of AN or CRC in FIT positive patients. The number needed to scope (NNS) among FIT positives to detect AN significantly decreased for each study when looking at high risk groups as yield/PPV increased. The yield with FIT alone ranged from 24% to 46% and the NNS from 2.2 to 4.1. With risk factors, yield and NNS among those at high risk were 33.2 % to 75.6% and from 1.3 to 3.0, respectively.  Conclusion and Potential Impact: This systematic review quantifies how risk factors improve the yield for AN in FIT positive persons, which is information required for countries and health care settings with limited resources that need to direct CY resources to FIT positive patients at high risk for AN.  


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zessner-Spitzenberg ◽  
E Waldmann ◽  
L Jiricka ◽  
A Szymanska ◽  
A Asaturi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document