Anatomical Location and Risk Factors for Advanced Adenomas in Asymptomatic Patients With No Family of Colorectal Cancer: High Risk in Proximal Colon for Female Smokers

2009 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. S165
Author(s):  
Joseph Anderson ◽  
Koorosh MoezArdalan
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasu Sheel ◽  
Leslie Azzis ◽  
Racehl Hinrichs ◽  
Thomas Imperiale

Background: Although colonoscopy (CY) may be considered the best screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC), annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT), which quantifies fecal hemoglobin is a viable alternative. Countries and healthcare systems using FIT-based screening may need to prioritize which FIT positive persons requires CY sooner (e.g. within the same fiscal year). We conducted a systematic review of published literature to understand how the yield/positive predictive value (PPV) of FIT could be improved.   Study Design: We performed a search of electronic databases for articles published between 2015 and June 2020. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened. Included studies fulfilled predetermined criteria and had descriptive and quantitative data extracted. We identified studies comparing the yield of FIT for advanced colorectal neoplasia ([AN], CRC plus advanced adenomas) among FIT positive persons to the yield of AN when FIT is combined with risk factors (age, sex, BMI, etc.). Data were extracted to find yield and efficiency of FIT alone vs FIT plus risk factors among FIT positive persons.   Results: From 623 titles reviewed, 4 studies met inclusion criteria. The objective of the studies was to increase the yield of AN or CRC in FIT positive patients. The number needed to scope (NNS) among FIT positives to detect AN significantly decreased for each study when looking at high risk groups as yield/PPV increased. The yield with FIT alone ranged from 24% to 46% and the NNS from 2.2 to 4.1. With risk factors, yield and NNS among those at high risk were 33.2 % to 75.6% and from 1.3 to 3.0, respectively.  Conclusion and Potential Impact: This systematic review quantifies how risk factors improve the yield for AN in FIT positive persons, which is information required for countries and health care settings with limited resources that need to direct CY resources to FIT positive patients at high risk for AN.  


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2S32-2S39 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Coulter

Numerous studies have shown that plasma carnitine levels are significantly lower in patients taking valproate than in controls. Free carnitine deficiency is not uncommon in these patients and also occurs in newborns with seizures and in patients taking other anticonvulsant drugs. Carnitine deficiency in epilepsy results from a variety of etiologic factors including underlying metabolic diseases, nutritional inadequacy, and specific drug effects. The relationship between carnitine deficiency and valproate-induced hepatotoxicity is unclear. Carnitine treatment does not always prevent the emergence of serious hepatotoxicity, but it does alleviate valproate-induced hyperammonemia. These studies suggest that specific risk factors for carnitine deficiency can be identified. Preliminary data suggest that carnitine treatment may benefit high-risk, symptomatic patients and those with free carnitine deficiency. Carnitine treatment is not likely to benefit low-risk, asymptomatic patients and those with normal carnitine levels. (J Child Neurol 1995;10(Suppl):2S32-2S39).


2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Melissa Holdren ◽  
Brittany Deller ◽  
Kevin Braden

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world and is the second most common cause of Canadian cancer-related deaths in men and the third most common in women. Most CRC appears to arise from the gradual development and advancement of colonic adenomatous polyps to cancerous tissue. This developmental process of CRC is the rationale for screening programs which aim to reduce CRC-related morbidity and mortality by early detection and removal of adenomatous polyps, specifically advanced adenomas. Although both the gFOBT and FIT function to detect occult bleeding in asymptomatic patients at average risk for CRC development, the mechanisms of these screening tests are distinct. gFOBT works by detecting the peroxidase activity of heme whereas FIT selectively detects human hemoglobin. The sensitivity in detecting CRC is higher for the FIT, with sensitivity of 0.79 compared to gFOBT with sensitivity of 0.36, they have similar specificities of 0.94 and 0.96, respectively. Currently, both the gFOBT and FIT are strongly recommended across Canada, with all provinces using the FIT, apart from Ontario and Manitoba which currently use the gFOBT to screen asymptomatic patients for CRC. A newer test, the sDNA test, identifies mutations in DNA that are shed by both adenomatous polyps and CRC cells. The sDNA test is more sensitive (0.92 95% CI 0.83-0.98) than both the gFOBT and FIT, however, is less specific and more expensive. Further data surrounding the sDNA test will be required prior to its implementation and recommendation for population based CRC screening in Canada. 


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anette Hjartåker ◽  
Bjarte Aagnes ◽  
Trude Eid Robsahm ◽  
Hilde Langseth ◽  
Freddie Bray ◽  
...  

Objective. A shift in the total incidence from left- to right-sided colon cancer has been reported and raises the question as to whether lifestyle risk factors are responsible for the changing subsite distribution of colon cancer. The present study provides a review of the subsite-specific risk estimates for the dietary components presently regarded as convincing or probable risk factors for colorectal cancer: red meat, processed meat, fiber, garlic, milk, calcium, and alcohol.Methods. Studies were identified by searching PubMed through October 8, 2012 and by reviewing reference lists. Thirty-two prospective cohort studies are included, and the estimates are compared by sex for each risk factor.Results. For alcohol, there seems to be a stronger association with rectal cancer than with colon cancer, and for meat a somewhat stronger association with distal colon and rectal cancer, relative to proximal colon cancer. For fiber, milk, and calcium, there were only minor differences in relative risk across subsites. No statement could be given regarding garlic. Overall, many of the subsite-specific risk estimates were nonsignificant, irrespective of exposure.Conclusion. For some dietary components the associations with risk of cancer of the rectum and distal colon appear stronger than for proximal colon, but not for all.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15056-e15056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Bhamre ◽  
Jay Rashmi Anam ◽  
Manish Bhandare ◽  
Avanish Saklani

e15056 Background: Peritoneal recurrence/carcinomatosis (PC) after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is the second most common site of recurrence and carries a poor prognosis. PC present relatively in the later stage, are difficult to detect by conventional imaging on follow up, and have limited options to treat after diagnosis. Second look surgery is the only definite option to diagnose early PC and presents an opportunity for disease control by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC. Multiple studies have attempted to identify clinico-pathological risk factors that predict high chances of PC. Our aim is to analyze the recurrence patterns and survival in locally advanced colorectal cancer, in an attempt to identify high risk factors for PC, which can be used as an indication for second look surgery and prophylactic HIPEC in such cases. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained data of all colorectal cancer patients presenting to a tertiary cancer care referral center in India, from May 2010 to October 2015 was done. All patients who underwent surgery with curative intent and were clinico-pathological stage T4 and/or N2 M0 were included in the analysis. Results: 182 patients underwent curative resection with a clinico-pathological staging of T4 and/or N2 M0. There were 71 recurrences, out of which 30 (42.2%) were peritoneal, 7 (9.9%) were hepatic only while 34 (47.9 %) were non-hepatic systemic or multiple site. For a median follow up of 26 months, the estimated 3 year OS was 78 % while the 3 year DFS was 50.4 %. The median time to diagnosis of peritoneal recurrence was 13 months (4.7 – 55.7). The 3-year OS for patients with peritoneal recurrence was 48.6 % as against 57 % for liver only recurrence and 59.9 % for non liver systemic and multiple site recurrence, with a trend towards poorer survival for peritoneal recurrences, although non-significant (p – 0.377). Conclusions: Locally advanced colorectal cancer has a high risk of peritoneal recurrence which negatively impacts the survival. Well-designed RCTs need to be conducted to identify the high risk factors for PC and whether second look surgery and prophylactic HIPEC in such patients will improve survival with acceptable morbidity and mortality.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3621-TPS3621
Author(s):  
Megumi Ishiguro ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Keita Sasaki ◽  
...  

TPS3621 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) still remains controversial. Although the NCCN and ESMO guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with “high-risk features,” the survival benefit has not been confirmed. We reviewed the evidence levels for prognostic values of risk factors, because lack of their robustness is a major source of uncertainty regarding the optimal indication of adjuvant chemotherapy. Consequently, on top of the T-stage, three pathological factors—perineural invasion (Pn), tumor budding (BD), and desmoplastic reaction (DR)—were selected as robust risk factors of recurrence. Among the conventional factors, the prognostic value of Pn had been well validated in a multicenter study conducted by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR; Am J Surg Path 2013), but others were deemed suboptimal in terms of the prognostic value. BD and DR are novel tumor- and stroma-factors, respectively, associated with cancer microenvironment at the tumor front. According to the JSCCR and ITBCC 2016 criteria, tumors are graded as BD1, BD2, or BD3. The DR heterogeneity is categorized into Mature, Intermediate, and Immature patterns based on site-specific products of cancer-associated fibroblasts—keloid-like collagen and myxoid stroma. According to a recent prospective multicenter study, BD and DR characterization represent a higher level of prognostic value than other conventional factors (SACURA trial; J Clin Oncol 2019, Br J Cancer 2021). Based on the four selected risk factors, we can exclude the patient group with favorable prognosis (i.e., > 90% of 5-year RFS), which accounts for approximately 40% of the total population, resulting in enabling us to identify the concentrated population of high risk of developing recurrence. Methods: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) launched a randomized controlled phase III trial to evaluate the superiority of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) over observation only in stage II CRC patients aged 20–80 years having one or more of the following risk factors: pathological T4, Pn, BD3, and non-Mature DR. Patients are randomised, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to [A] observation, [B] capecitabine monotherapy for 6 months, or [C] capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for 3 months. A total of 1680 patients will be accrued from 54 Japanese institutions assuming 3-year RFS with [A] to be 82% and expected 5% increase in 3-year RFS for [B] and [C] with one-sided alpha of 2.5% and power of 80% for each pair comparison. Patient enrollment was started in January 2020 and 170 patients have been enrolled until January 2021. This trial has been registered at Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs031190186. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031190186.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haibin Dong ◽  
Yutang Ren ◽  
Bo Jiang

Abstract Objectives Interval colorectal advanced adenoma (I-CRAA) carries insidious risk of interval colorectal cancer (I-CRC). The study aims to determine the frequency of I-CRAA after negative colonoscopy and discover the characteristics and the risk factors.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the information of the patients undergoing colonoscopy in the endoscopic center (2015-2019). Frequency of I-CRAA was calculated. The clinical features of I-CRAA were compared with sporadic colorectal advanced adenoma (Sp-CRAA). Results The frequency of I-CRAA was 0.71% (112/15759) per colonoscopy. I-CRAA was more likely to be located in the proximal colon (65.2% vs 34.8%, p<0.05) and has high pathological grade (5.4% vs 1.6%, p<0.05). Diabetes, family history of CRC, smoking, alcohol intake and diverticulosis are risk factors for I-CRAA(p<0.05). Excellent bowel preparation (OR 3.727; 95% CI 2.425–5.73, p<0.001) and higher adenoma detection rate (OR 1.924; 95% CI 1.153–3.21, p = 0.012) are helpful for the detection of I-CRAA. I-CRAA found within 1 year other than 2 or 3 years after the initial colonoscopy were usually found by an endoscopist with higher ADR.Conclusions I-CRAA is usually located in the proximal colon and has high pathological grade. Diabetes, diverticulosis, smoking history, alcohol intake, and family history of CRC are the risk factors. Its occurrence is more related to low-quality colonoscopy, especially within one year.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e60366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin C. S. Wong ◽  
Hoyee W. Hirai ◽  
Arthur K. C. Luk ◽  
Thomas Y. T. Lam ◽  
Jessica Y. L. Ching ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document