scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of the Self- and Interviewer-Administered Versions of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e0136944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne H. Y. Chu ◽  
Sheryl H. X. Ng ◽  
David Koh ◽  
Falk Müller-Riemenschneider
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
The Self ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Development of the Korean Global Physical Activity Questionnaire: reliability and validity study

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 44-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junga Lee ◽  
Choae Lee ◽  
Jihee Min ◽  
Dong-Woo Kang ◽  
Ji-Young Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Cohen’S Kappa ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Cohen's Kappa ◽  
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

The goal of this study was to develop a Korean version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (K-GPAQ) and to examine its reliability and validity. The English version of the GPAQ was translated to the Korean language (K-GPAQ) via forward–backward translation. Reliability of the K-GPAQ was evaluated using a one-week interval test–retest method with 115 individuals. Criterion-related validity of the K-GPAQ was examined with 199 participants using accelerometers. Cohen’s kappa and Spearman’s correlation coefficients were used to measure test–retest reliability and validity, respectively. A Bland–Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between physical activity (PA) levels measured via K-GPAQ and the accelerometer. Coefficients for the reliability of the K-GPAQ showed moderate agreement for recreational PA and slight agreement for work-related PA (Cohen’s kappa: 0.60–0.67 for recreational PA and 0.30–0.38 for work-related PA and Spearman’s rho: 0.27–0.47 for work-related PA and 0.53–0.70 for recreational PA). Criterion validity of the total amount of PA, as measured by the K-GPAQ and the accelerometer, showed a weak but significant correlation ( r = 0.34, p < 0.01). The K-GPAQ is a reliable and valid questionnaire to measure PA although K-GPAQ overestimated PA levels.

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of the French version of the global physical activity questionnaire

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Rivière ◽  
Fatima Zahra Widad ◽  
Elodie Speyer ◽  
Marie-Line Erpelding ◽  
Hélène Escalon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
French Version ◽  
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Reliability and Validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire in Vietnam

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Au Bich Thuy ◽  
Leigh Blizzard ◽  
Michael Schmidt ◽  
Pham Hung Luc ◽  
Costan Magnussen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Noncommunicable Disease ◽  
Work Patterns ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Steps Per Day ◽  
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Background:The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) was developed as an improvement of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) for use in cross-cultural settings. This study compared the reliability and validity of GPAQ and IPAQ in Vietnam.Methods:251 adults were randomly selected from a population-based survey (n = 1978) of noncommunicable disease risk factors. GPAQ and IPAQ were administered on 2 occasions. Participants wore pedometers and logged their physical activity (PA) for 7 consecutive days.Results:Test-retest correlations of GPAQ measurements differed for participants (n = 153) with stable work patterns (work PA r = .43, total PA r = .39) and those (n = 98) with unstable work patterns (work PA r = −0.02, total PA r = −0.05). IPAQ measurements did not differ in this way. GPAQ reliability was poorer for transport (GPAQ r = .25, IPAQ r = .60) and for leisure (GPAQ r = .21, IPAQ r = .45) PA. GPAQ estimates of total PA for participants with stable work patterns were moderately correlated with IPAQ total PA (r = .32), steps per day (r = .39), and PA log (r = .31).Conclusions:The modifications made when designing GPAQ improved its reliability for persons with stable work patterns, but at the expense of poorer reliability for persons with more variable PA. GPAQ did not have superior validity to IPAQ.

scholarly journals Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (21) ◽  
pp. 4128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofen D. Keating ◽  
Ke Zhou ◽  
Xiaolu Liu ◽  
Michael Hodges ◽  
Jingwen Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Rigorous Research ◽  
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

This study aimed to systematically review previous studies on the reliability and concurrent validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). A systematic literature search was conducted (n = 26) using the online EBSCOHost databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to September 2019. A previously developed coding sheet was used to collect the data. The Modified Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was employed to assess risk of bias and study quality. It was found that GPAQ was primarily revalidated in adult populations in Asian and European countries. The sample size ranged from 43 to 2657 with a wide age range (i.e., 15–79 years old). Different populations yielded inconsistent results concerning the reliability and validity of the GPAQ. Short term (i.e., one- to two-week interval) and long-term (i.e., two- to three-month apart) test–retest reliability was good to very good. The concurrent validity using accelerometers, pedometers, and physical activity (PA) log was poor to fair. The GPAQ data and accelerometer/pedometer/PA log data were not compared using the same measurements in some validation studies. Studies with more rigorous research designs are needed before any conclusions concerning the concurrent validity of GPAQ can be reached.

Test-Retest Repeatability and Relative Validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire in a Developing Country Context

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (s1) ◽  
pp. S46-S53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oanh T.H. Trinh ◽  
Nguyen Do Nguyen ◽  
Hidde P. van der Ploeg ◽  
Michael J. Dibley ◽  
Adrian Bauman
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Activity Patterns ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Accelerometer Data ◽  
Wet Season ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Lifestyle Diseases ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Background:The increasing prevalence of chronic lifestyle diseases in developing countries warrants reliable and valid surveillance of physical activity levels in the population. This study assesses the test-retest repeatability and criterion validity of the WHO-recommended Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in Vietnamese adults during the dry and wet seasons.Methods:In 2007 a representative sample of 169 adults (25-64 years) was recruited to determine the GPAQ reliability and validity. GPAQ assesses time and intensity of physical activities spent during a usual week. To assess short and long term reliability, participants completed the GPAQ twice during the dry season 2 weeks apart and again 2 months later during the wet season. For validation purposes, participants wore an accelerometer during the 7 days before the first and last GPAQ assessments.Results:The total GPAQ score showed repeatability correlations of 0.69 after 2 weeks and of 0.55 after 2 months. Total GPAQ score and accelerometer data showed validity correlations of 0.34 and 0.20 in the dry and wet season, respectively. There was a difference in physical activity patterns between the dry and wet seasons.Conclusions:GPAQ is suitable for surveillance of physical activity among adults in Vietnam.

Mức độ vận động thể lực ở người bệnh tăng huyết áp tại bệnh viện đa khoa Trung tâm Tiền Giang năm 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-142
Author(s):  
Nguyễn Văn Trung ◽  
Huỳnh Thị Hồng Thu ◽  
Lê Thị Kiều Xuân ◽  
Đặng Văn Thạch
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Questionnaire

Nghiên cứu nhằm mục tiêu mô tả mức độ vận động thể lực (VĐTL) theo khuyến cáo ở người bệnh tăng huyết áp tại bệnh viện đa khoa Trung tâm Tiền Giang năm 2020. Thiết kế mô tả cắt ngang trên 279 người bệnh tăng huyết áp điều trị ngoại trú bằng phỏng vấn trực tiếp với công cụ GPAQ (Global physical activity questionnaire). Kết quả cho thấy người bệnh tăng huyết áp trong nghiên cứu có cường độ VĐTL đạt mức khuyến cáo là 70,6%. Đối tượng có học vấn trung học phổ thông trở lên tham gia VĐTL đạt khuyến cáo cao hơn (77,6% so với 63,9%) có ý nghĩa thống kê (p = 0,03). Người bệnh có công việc buôn bán liên quan cường độ VĐTL thấp hơn tiêu chuẩn với p = 0,01. Nghiên cứu nhận định sự tuân thủ VĐTL ở người bệnh còn hạn chế trong quản lý bệnh tăng huyết áp. Các yếu tố liên quan như sự hỗ trợ xã hội, đặc điểm côngtrình an sinh công cộng và yếu tố tâm lý nên được khảo sát ở nghiên cứu tiếp theo.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document