scholarly journals DNA Double-Strand Breaks Induce the Nuclear Actin Filaments Formation in Cumulus-Enclosed Oocytes but Not in Denuded Oocytes

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e0170308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Hong Sun ◽  
Mo Yang ◽  
Feng-Yun Xie ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Lili Zhang ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chetan C Rawal ◽  
Christopher P Caridi ◽  
Irene Chiolo

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are particularly challenging to repair in pericentromeric heterochromatin because of the increased risk of aberrant recombination in highly repetitive sequences. Recent studies have identified specialized mechanisms enabling ‘safe’ homologous recombination (HR) repair in heterochromatin. These include striking nuclear actin filaments (F-actin) and myosins that drive the directed motion of repair sites to the nuclear periphery for ‘safe' repair. Here, we summarize our current understanding of the mechanisms involved, and propose how they might operate in the context of a phase-separated environment.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chetan C Rawal ◽  
Christopher P Caridi ◽  
Irene Chiolo

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are particularly challenging to repair in pericentromeric heterochromatin because of the increased risk of aberrant recombination in highly repetitive sequences. Recent studies have identified specialized mechanisms enabling ‘safe’ homologous recombination (HR) repair in heterochromatin. These include striking nuclear actin filaments (F-actin) and myosins that drive the directed motion of repair sites to the nuclear periphery for ‘safe' repair. Here, we summarize our current understanding of the mechanisms involved, and propose how they might operate in the context of a phase-separated environment.


eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany J Belin ◽  
Terri Lee ◽  
R Dyche Mullins

Actin filaments assemble inside the nucleus in response to multiple cellular perturbations, including heat shock, protein misfolding, integrin engagement, and serum stimulation. We find that DNA damage also generates nuclear actin filaments—detectable by phalloidin and live-cell actin probes—with three characteristic morphologies: (i) long, nucleoplasmic filaments; (ii) short, nucleolus-associated filaments; and (iii) dense, nucleoplasmic clusters. This DNA damage-induced nuclear actin assembly requires two biologically and physically linked nucleation factors: Formin-2 and Spire-1/Spire-2. Formin-2 accumulates in the nucleus after DNA damage, and depletion of either Formin-2 or actin's nuclear import factor, importin-9, increases the number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), linking nuclear actin filaments to efficient DSB clearance. Nuclear actin filaments are also required for nuclear oxidation induced by acute genotoxic stress. Our results reveal a previously unknown role for nuclear actin filaments in DNA repair and identify the molecular mechanisms creating these nuclear filaments.


2019 ◽  
Vol 244 (15) ◽  
pp. 1362-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Dialynas ◽  
Laetitia Delabaere ◽  
Irene Chiolo

Repairing DNA double-strand breaks is particularly challenging in pericentromeric heterochromatin, where the abundance of repeated sequences exacerbates the risk of ectopic recombination. In Drosophila Kc cells, accurate homologous recombination repair of heterochromatic double-strand breaks relies on the relocalization of repair sites to the nuclear periphery before Rad51 recruitment and strand invasion. This movement is driven by Arp2/3-dependent nuclear actin filaments and myosins’ ability to walk along them. Conserved mechanisms enable the relocalization of heterochromatic repair sites in mouse cells, and defects in these pathways lead to massive ectopic recombination in heterochromatin and chromosome rearrangements. In Drosophila polytene chromosomes, extensive DNA movement is blocked by a stiff structure of chromosome bundles. Repair pathways in this context are poorly characterized, and whether heterochromatic double-strand breaks relocalize in these cells is unknown. Here, we show that damage in heterochromatin results in relaxation of the heterochromatic chromocenter, consistent with a dynamic response. Arp2/3, the Arp2/3 activator Scar, and the myosin activator Unc45, are required for heterochromatin stability in polytene cells, suggesting that relocalization enables heterochromatin repair also in this tissue. Together, these studies reveal critical roles for actin polymerization and myosin motors in heterochromatin repair and genome stability across different organisms and tissue types. Impact statement Heterochromatin relies on dedicated pathways for ‘safe’ recombinational repair. In mouse and fly cultured cells, DNA double-strand break repair requires the movement of damaged sites away from the heterochromatin ‘domain’ via nuclear actin filaments and myosins. Here, we explore the importance of these pathways in Drosophila salivary gland cells, which feature a stiff bundle of endoreduplicated polytene chromosomes. Repair pathways in polytene chromosomes are largely obscure and how nuclear dynamics operate in this context is unknown. We show that heterochromatin relaxes in response to damage, and relocalization pathways are necessary to prevent abnormal repair and promote the stability of heterochromatic sequences. These results deepen our understanding of DNA damage response mechanisms in polytene chromosomes, revealing unexpected dynamics. It also provides a first understanding of nuclear dynamics responding to replication damage and rDNA breaks, providing a new understanding of the importance of nuclear architecture in genome stability. We expect these discoveries will shed light on tumorigenic processes, including therapy-induced cancer relapses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixi Xu ◽  
Dongyi Xu

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document