scholarly journals Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – A retrospective cohort study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. e0187040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woonji Jang ◽  
Christopher Flatley ◽  
Ristan M. Greer ◽  
Sailesh Kumar
Neonatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Emily J.J. Horn-Oudshoorn ◽  
Marijn J. Vermeulen ◽  
Kelly J. Crossley ◽  
Suzan C.M. Cochius-den Otter ◽  
J. Marco Schnater ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The oxygenation index (OI) is a marker for respiratory disease severity and adverse neonatal outcomes. The oxygen saturation index (OSI) is an alternative that allows for continuous noninvasive monitoring, but evidence for clinical use in critically ill neonates is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the OSI as compared to the OI in term neonates with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted including all live-born infants with an isolated CDH between June 2017 and December 2020. Paired values of the OI and OSI in the first 24 h after birth were collected. The relation between OI and OSI measurements was assessed, taking into account arterial pH, body temperature, and preductal versus postductal location of oxygen saturation measurement or arterial blood sampling. The predictive values for pulmonary hypertension, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy, and survival at discharge were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 33 subjects included, 398 paired values of the OI (median 5.8 [3.3–17.2]) and OSI (median 7.3 [3.6–14.4]) were collected. The OI and OSI correlated strongly (<i>r</i> = 0.77, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The OSI values corresponding to the clinically relevant OI values (10, 15, 20, and 40) were 8.9, 10.9, 12.9, and 20.9, respectively. The predictive values of the OI and OSI were comparable for all adverse neonatal outcomes. No difference was found in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the OI and the OSI for adverse neonatal outcomes. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The OSI could replace the OI in clinical practice in infants with a CDH.


2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 390-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Juurlink ◽  
Tara Gomes ◽  
Astrid Guttmann ◽  
Chelsea Hellings ◽  
Marco L. A. Sivilotti ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy M Valent ◽  
Eric S Hall ◽  
Emily A DeFranco

Objective To determine the influence of obesity on neonatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology. Methods Population-based retrospective cohort study of all non-anomalous, live births in Ohio from 2007 to 2011, comparing differences in the frequency of adverse neonatal outcomes of women who conceived with assisted reproductive technology versus spontaneously conceived pregnancies and stratified by obesity status. Primary outcome was a composite of neonatal morbidities defined as ≥1 of the following: neonatal death, Apgar score of <7 at 5 min, assisted ventilation, neonatal intensive care unit admission, or transport to a tertiary care facility. Results Rates of adverse neonatal outcomes were significantly higher for assisted reproductive technology pregnancies than spontaneously conceived neonates; non-obese 25% versus 8% and obese 27% versus 10%, p < 0.001. Assisted reproductive technology was associated with a similar increased risk for adverse outcomes in both obese (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11–1.59) and non-obese women (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.18–1.51) even after adjustment for coexisting risk factors. This increased risk was driven by higher preterm births in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies; obese (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.86–1.31) and non-obese (aOR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.00–1.32). Discussion Assisted reproductive technology is associated with a higher risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Obesity does not appear to adversely modify perinatal risks associated with assisted reproductive technology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica M. Turner ◽  
Sailesh Kumar

The aim of this study was to assess if women with a low first trimester maternal pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) level are at increased risk of emergency cesarean (EmCS) for intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC) and/or adverse neonatal outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study performed at Mater Mother’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, between 2016 and 2018. All women with a singleton, euploid, non-anomalous fetus with a documented PAPP-A level measured between 10 +0 and 13 +6 weeks gestation during the study period were included. Data were extracted from the institution’s perinatal database and dichotomized according to PAPP-A level (≤0.4 Multiples of Medium (MoM) vs. >0.4 MoM). The primary outcomes were EmCS-IFC and a composite of severe adverse neonatal outcomes (SCNO). Nine thousand sixty-one pregnancies were included, 3.3% with a PAPP-A ≤ 0.4 MoM. Low maternal PAPP-A was not associated with an increased risk of EmCS-IFC (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24–2.46, p = 0.66) or SCNO (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.39–1.07, p = 0.09). Low PAPP-A was associated with increased odds of pre-eclampsia, preterm birth and birthweight < 10th centile. In conclusion, low maternal PAPP-A level is not associated with an increased risk of EmCS IFC or adverse neonatal outcomes despite greater odds of low-birthweight infants and preterm birth.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sau Xiong Ang ◽  
Chie-Pein Chen ◽  
Fang-Ju Sun ◽  
Chen-Yu Chen

Abstract Background: Acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP) and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome are two uncommon disorders that mimic each other clinically, but are distinct pathophysiologically. This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between AFLP and HELLP syndrome.Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary referral center in Taiwan between June 2004 and April 2020. We used the Swansea Criteria to diagnose AFLP, and the Tennessee Classification System to diagnose HELLP syndrome. Maternal characteristics, laboratory data, complications, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed.Results: During the study period, 21 women had AFLP and 80 women had HELLP syndrome. There was a higher rate of preeclampsia (95.0% versus 23.8%) in the HELLP syndrome group compared to the AFLP group. However, the AFLP group had more other maternal complications including jaundice (85.7% versus 13.8%), acute kidney injury (61.9% versus 15.0%), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (66.7% versus 8.8%), and sepsis (47.6% versus 10.0%) compared to the HELLP syndrome group. Nevertheless, higher rates of small for gestational age neonates (57.1% versus 33.3%), neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (39.2% versus 8.3%) and neonatal sepsis (34.2% versus 12.5%) were noted in the HELLP syndrome group.Conclusions: AFLP is associated with a higher rate of multiple organ dysfunction in mothers, whereas HELLP syndrome is associated with a higher rate of neonatal morbidity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document