scholarly journals RNA-Seq analysis revealed genes associated with drought stress response in kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. e0199774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyvan Mahdavi Mashaki ◽  
Vanika Garg ◽  
Ali Asghar Nasrollahnezhad Ghomi ◽  
Himabindu Kudapa ◽  
Annapurna Chitikineni ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akbar Shabani ◽  
◽  
Alireza Zebarjadi ◽  
Ali Mostafaei ◽  
Mohsen Saeidi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (No. 8) ◽  
pp. 368-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gunes ◽  
N. Cicek ◽  
A. Inal ◽  
M. Alpaslan ◽  
F. Eraslan ◽  
...  

Uptake of mineral nutrients in chickpea cultivars might be an important response in drought tolerance. An experiment under controlled conditions was carried out to study the genotypic response of 11 chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars to drought and its relations with N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Mn and B uptake and uptake efficiency. Plants were grown either optimal or drought stress implemented at pre- (early drought stress, EDS) and post-anthesis (late drought stress, LDS) stages. Growth reduction of the cultivars as a response to drought significantly differed. The results of the study indicated that EDS had less detrimental effects on growth and nutrient uptake than LDS conditions. In general, drought tolerant chickpea cultivars accumulated more N, P, K, Ca, Zn, Mn and B in both drought stress treatments except for Zn and Mn uptake in LDS treatment. The total nutrient uptake efficiency of the cultivars were also very significantly correlated with the growth reduction ration (GR) both in EDS and LDS treatments giving correlation coefficients (r) of –7859 and –0.7678, p < 0.01, respectively.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e1071004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Sankalp Mishra ◽  
Vijaykant Dixit ◽  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Lalit Agarwal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Bhaskarla ◽  
Gaurav Zinta ◽  
Rebecca Ford ◽  
Mukesh Jain ◽  
Rajeev K. Varshney ◽  
...  

Drought adversely affects crop production across the globe. The root system immensely contributes to water management and the adaptability of plants to drought stress. In this study, drought-induced phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of two contrasting chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes were compared at the vegetative, reproductive transition, and reproductive stages. At the vegetative stage, drought-tolerant genotype maintained higher root biomass, length, and surface area under drought stress as compared to sensitive genotype. However, at the reproductive stage, root length and surface area of tolerant genotype was lower but displayed higher root diameter than sensitive genotype. The shoot biomass of tolerant genotype was overall higher than the sensitive genotype under drought stress. RNA-seq analysis identified genotype- and developmental-stage specific differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to drought stress. At the vegetative stage, a total of 2161 and 1873 DEGs, and at reproductive stage 4109 and 3772 DEGs, were identified in the tolerant and sensitive genotypes, respectively. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed enrichment of biological categories related to cellular process, metabolic process, response to stimulus, response to abiotic stress, and response to hormones. Interestingly, the expression of stress-responsive transcription factors, kinases, ROS signaling and scavenging, transporters, root nodulation, and oxylipin biosynthesis genes were robustly upregulated in the tolerant genotype, possibly contributing to drought adaptation. Furthermore, activation/repression of hormone signaling and biosynthesis genes was observed. Overall, this study sheds new insights on drought tolerance mechanisms operating in roots with broader implications for chickpea improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document