scholarly journals Quality indicators for ambulatory care for older adults with diabetes and comorbid conditions: A Delphi study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0208888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelena Petrosyan ◽  
Jan M. Barnsley ◽  
Kerry Kuluski ◽  
Barbara Liu ◽  
Walter P. Wodchis
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205435812199109
Author(s):  
Jay Hingwala ◽  
Amber O. Molnar ◽  
Priyanka Mysore ◽  
Samuel A. Silver

Background: Quality indicators can be used to identify gaps in care and drive frontline improvement activities. These efforts are important to prevent adverse events in the increasing number of ambulatory patients with advanced kidney disease in Canada, but it is unclear what indicators exist and the components of health care quality they measure. Objective: We sought to identify, categorize, and evaluate quality indicators currently in use across Canada for ambulatory patients with advanced kidney disease. Design: Environmental scan of quality indicators currently being collected by various organizations. Setting: We assembled a 16-member group from across Canada with expertise in nephrology and quality improvement. Patients: Our scan included indicators relevant to patients with chronic kidney disease in ambulatory care clinics. Measurements: We categorized the identified quality indicators using the Institute of Medicine and Donabedian frameworks. Methods: A 4-member panel used a modified Delphi process to evaluate the indicators found during the environmental scan using the American College of Physicians/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality criteria. The ratings were then shared with the full panel for further comments and approval. Results: The environmental scan found 28 quality indicators across 7 provinces, with 8 (29%) rated as “necessary” to distinguish high-quality from poor-quality care. Of these 8 indicators, 3 were measured by more than 1 province (% of patients on a statin, number of patients receiving a preemptive transplant, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at dialysis start); no indicator was used by more than 2 provinces. None of the indicators rated as necessary measured timely or equitable care, nor did we identify any measures that assessed the setting in which care occurs (ie, structure measures). Limitations: Our list cannot be considered as an exhaustive list of available quality indicators at hand in Canada. Our work focused on quality indicators for nephrology providers and programs, and not indicators that can be applied across primary and specialty providers. We also focused on indicator constructs and not the detailed definitions or their application. Last, our panel does not represent the views of other important stakeholders. Conclusions: Our environmental scan provides a snapshot of the scope of quality indicators for ambulatory patients with advanced kidney disease in Canada. This catalog should inform indicator selection and the development of new indicators based on the identified gaps, as well as motivate increased pan-Canadian collaboration on quality measurement and improvement. Trial registration: Not applicable as this article is not a systematic review, nor does it report results of a health intervention on human participants.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.P.J. Barendse ◽  
G. Rossi ◽  
S.P.J. Van Alphen

There is a lack of validated questionnaires for screening personality disorders (PDs) in older adults (e.g. Van Alphen et al., 2012). The development of measurement instruments is hampered because the criteria of DSM-IV-TR PD are not age-neutral that might lead to over- and underdiagnosis (Balsis et al., 2007). As far as we know only three measurement instruments have been specifically developed for older adults, including the Hetero- Anamnestic Personality questionnaire (HAP; Barendse et al., 2013). However, we did not find any articles concerning the criterion validity of all ten PDs in an elderly population. In this Delphi study, a panel of experts examined two research questions: (1) To what extend are the items of the HAP age-neutral? (2) Does the HAP detect all ten specific PD's of DSM-IV-TR, based on qualitative research?


2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 817-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Pinto Marques ◽  
Dalia Elena Romero Montilla ◽  
Wanessa da Silva de Almeida ◽  
Carla Lourenço Tavares de Andrade

OBJECTIVE To analyze the temporal evolution of the hospitalization of older adults due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions according to their structure, magnitude and causes. METHODS Cross-sectional study based on data from the Hospital Information System of the Brazilian Unified Health System and from the Primary Care Information System, referring to people aged 60 to 74 years living in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Souhteastern Brazil. The proportion and rate of hospitalizations due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions were calculated, both the global rate and, according to diagnoses, the most prevalent ones. The coverage of the Family Health Strategy and the number of medical consultations attended by older adults in primary care were estimated. To analyze the indicators’ impact on hospitalizations, a linear correlation test was used. RESULTS We found an intense reduction in hospitalizations due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions for all causes and age groups. Heart failure, cerebrovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases concentrated 50.0% of the hospitalizations. Adults older than 69 years had a higher risk of hospitalization due to one of these causes. We observed a higher risk of hospitalization among men. A negative correlation was found between the hospitalizations and the indicators of access to primary care. CONCLUSIONS Primary healthcare in the state of Rio de Janeiro has been significantly impacting the hospital morbidity of the older population. Studies of hospitalizations due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions can aid the identification of the main causes that are sensitive to the intervention of the health services, in order to indicate which actions are more effective to reduce hospitalizations and to increase the population’s quality of life.


2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1442-1450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Min ◽  
David Reuben ◽  
Arun Karlamangla ◽  
Arash Naeim ◽  
Katherine Prenovost ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. e0225344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Pel-Littel ◽  
Cynthia S. Hofman ◽  
Liesje Yu ◽  
Silke F. Metzelthin ◽  
Franca H. Leeuwis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5927-5927
Author(s):  
Jean Yared ◽  
Daisuke Goto ◽  
Eberechukwu Onukwugha ◽  
Rahul Khairnar ◽  
Brian Seal ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease of the elderly with a median age at diagnosis of 70 years. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a preferred treatment for younger patients but is also an option for older adults (i.e., patients >65 years) with good performance status. A previous SEER-Medicare study of MM patients diagnosed from 2000-2007 found that 5.8% underwent ASCT (Winn, et al. JNCI, 2015). The availability of ASCTs for older adults with MM has increased in the past decade due to improvement in supportive care and Medicare coverage approval. Apart from age and medical eligibility, several patient and contextual factors, such as comorbidity, may influence the receipt of ASCT in the MM population. There is limited information on the determinants of receipt of ASCT in older adults over the past decade in the US. Objective: To identify ASCT recipients among a cohort of elderly individuals with MM in order to determine characteristics associated with receiving ASCT. Specifically, this study identifies patient and contextual factors associated with the receipt of ASCT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry and linked Medicare claims (SEER-Medicare) data. We identified individuals aged 66 and above, with an incident diagnosis of MM between 2007 and 2011 as well as claims data from 2006 to 2012. We required continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A and B 12 months prior to and including the month of diagnosis and six months post-diagnosis. We required continuous Part D enrollment two months pre- and six months post-diagnosis. Patients were followed until death or censoring due to non-continuous Parts A and B enrollment after six months. ICD-9 and HCPCS codes were used to identify ASCT. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to measure the number of comorbid conditions at the time of MM diagnosis using claims one year prior to diagnosis. Student's t-test and Chi-square test of proportions were used to compare those who received ASCT to those who did not based on patient-level factors (i.e., age, gender, race, comorbidity status), geographic regions (i.e., Northeast, Midwest, West and South), and over time (diagnosed in 2007-2009 vs. diagnosed in 2010 to 2011). We also measured the time to ASCT for those who underwent ASCT. Results: Among 3,318 individuals with MM who met our inclusion criteria, 226 (6.8%) underwent ASCT during the follow-up period. ASCT recipients were younger, more likely to be male, white non-Hispanic, and have fewer comorbid conditions (Table 1). The median time from MM diagnosis to ASCT was 278 days. The rate of ASCT among recipients aged 66-69 was 23.2%, 7.3% among recipients aged 70-74, and 0.84% among those aged 75+ (p<0.001). The rate of ASCT was higher among males (8.5%) than females (5.2%) (p<0.001). Rates of ASCT were higher among those who were non-Hispanic white (8.1%), compared to those who were non-Hispanic black (3.5%) or of another race/ethnicity (4.1%) (p<0.001). Among those with CCI=0, 9.9% underwent ASCT, while 7.2% of those with CCI=1 underwent ASCT and 2.7% of those with CCI>1 underwent ASCT (p<0.001). Rates of ASCT were similar across the geographic regions (p=0.15). Of those who were diagnosed in 2007-2009, 6.0% received transplant, while 7.8% of those who were diagnosed in 2010-2011 received transplant (p=0.04). Conclusion: ASCT is performed in less than 1 in 10 patients aged 66 and older. A greater proportion of ASCT recipients were non-Hispanic white, male, diagnosed at a younger age, and had a lower comorbidity burden compared to non-transplant patients. Comparing the pre-2007 estimate from the aforementioned study to our early (2007-09) and late (2010-11) period estimates, our results illustrate an upward trend in ASCT over the past decade. We were unable to identify smoldering MM patients who would not be candidates for ASCT. This may bias our estimates downward. The aforementioned previous study found that 62% of recipients were 66-69, 32% of recipients were 70-74, while 6% were 75+ (Winn, et al. JNCI, 2015). These rates did not differ greatly from our findings indicating that the age distribution of ASCT recipients has remained stable over a 10 year period of observation. Future studies should investigate the implications of these differences for post-transplant outcomes among older MM patients. Disclosures Goto: Novartis AG: Research Funding. Onukwugha:Takeda: Research Funding; IMPAQ International: Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare: Research Funding. Seal:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment, Equity Ownership. Romanus:Takeda: Employment. Yong:Takeda: Employment. Slejko:Takeda: Research Funding; PhRMA: Research Funding; National Pharmaceutical Council: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document