scholarly journals Nurses and physicians attitudes towards factors related to hospitalized patient safety

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0260926
Author(s):  
Iwona Malinowska-Lipień ◽  
Agnieszka Micek ◽  
Teresa Gabryś ◽  
Maria Kózka ◽  
Krzysztof Gajda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Working Conditions ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Safety Attitudes ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Nurses And Physicians ◽  
Hospitalized Patient ◽  
Medical Wards ◽  
Stress Recognition

Introduction The attitudes of healthcare staff towards patients’ safety, including awareness of the risk for adverse events, are significant elements of an organization’s safety culture. Aim of research To evaluate nurses and physicians’ attitudes towards factors influencing hospitalized patient safety. Materials and methods The research included 606 nurses and 527 physicians employed in surgical and medical wards in 21 Polish hospitals around the country. The Polish adaptation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used to evaluate the factors influencing attitudes towards patient safety. Results Both nurses and physicians scored highest in stress recognition (SR) (71.6 and 80.86), while they evaluated working conditions (WC) the lowest (45.82 and 52,09). Nurses achieved statistically significantly lower scores compared to physicians in every aspect of the safety attitudes evaluation (p<0.05). The staff working in surgical wards obtained higher scores within stress recognition (SR) compared to the staff working in medical wards (78.12 vs. 73.72; p = 0.001). Overall, positive working conditions and effective teamwork can contribute to improving employees’ attitudes towards patient safety. Conclusions The results help identify unit level vulnerabilities associated with staff attitudes toward patient safety. They underscore the importance of management strategies that account for staff coping with occupational stressors to improve patient safety.

scholarly journals The Association between the Participation of Quality Control Circle and Patient Safety Culture

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (23) ◽  
pp. 8872
Author(s):  
Ni-Hu Tang ◽  
Shang-Feng Tsai ◽  
Jaw-Horng Liou ◽  
Yuan-Hui Lai ◽  
Shih-An Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Working Conditions ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Safety Climate ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
Safety Attitudes ◽  
Stress Recognition

Promoting patient safety culture (PSC) is a critical issue for healthcare providers. Quality control circles program (QCCP) can be used as an effective tool to foster long-lasting improvements on the quality of medical institution. The effect of QCCP on PSC is still unknown. This was a retrospective study conducted with matching data. A safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) was used for the evaluation of PSC. The association between all scores of six subscales of SAQ and the participation QCCP were analyzed with both the Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests. A total of 2718 valid questionnaires were collected. Most participants of QCCP were females (78.9%), nurses (52.6%), non-supervisors (92.2%), aged <40 years old (64.8%), degree of specialist or university graduates (78%), and with work experience of <10 years (61.6%). Of all participants, the highest scores were in the dimension of safety climate (74.11 ± 17.91) and the lowest scores in the dimension of working conditions (68.90 ± 18.84). The participation of QCCP was associated with higher scores in four dimensions, namely: teamwork climate (p = 0.006), safety climate (p = 0.037), perception of management (p = 0.009), and working conditions (p = 0.015). The participation or not of QCCP had similar results in the dimension of job satisfaction and stress recognition. QCCP was associated with SAQ in subjects with the following characteristics: female, nurse, non-supervisor, aged >50 years old, higher education degrees and with longer working experiences in the hospital. In this first study on the association between each dimension of SAQ and the implementation of QCCP, we found that QCCP interventions were associated with better PSC. QCCP had no benefits in the dimensions of job satisfaction and stress recognition.

scholarly journals Patient safety attitudes of frontline healthcare workers in Lahore: A multicenter study

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javed Akram ◽  
Shehnoor Azhar ◽  
Khalid Saeed Khan ◽  
Arifa Aman
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Working Conditions ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Safety Attitudes ◽  
Frontline Healthcare Workers ◽  
Stress Recognition

Objectives: To evaluate patient safety attitudes of the frontline health workers in a hospital of Lahore, Pakistan. Methods: A self-administered Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) survey was deployed in five hospitals across Lahore, Pakistan (July 2019 to June 2020). A total of 1250 consecutive consenting nurses and postgraduate trainee physicians of under five years working experience were recruited. Assessment for each of the six subdomains (teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, stress recognition, perception of management, working conditions) was done on a 0-100 scale. Multivariate analyses examined their relationship with job cadre (nurses and physicians), duration of respondents’ work experience (< 2 years, 3 - 4 years, > 4 years), and hospital sector (private and public). Results: The response rate was 97% (1212 individuals; 765 nurses, 447 physicians). Nurses scored less than physicians in teamwork climate (-2.4, 95% CI -4.5 – -0.2, p=0.02) and stress recognition (-10.6, 95% CI -13.5 – -7.7, p<0.001), but more in perception of management (4.2, 95% CI 1.5 – 6.8, p=0.002) and working conditions (3.4, 95% CI 0.66 – 6.2, p=0.01). Increasing work experience was related to greater scores in all subdomains. Private hospitals scored generally higher than public ones. Conclusion: Duration of job experience was positively correlated with patient safety attitudes of hospital staff. These finding could serve as the baseline to shape staff perceptions by cadre in both public and private sector hospitals. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4964 How to cite this:Arkam J, Azhar S, Khan KS, Aman A. Patient safety attitudes of frontline healthcare workers in Lahore: A multicenter study. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(1):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4964 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Assessment of patient safety culture during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary a-level hospital in China

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Hsuan Huang ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Hsin-Hung Wu ◽  
Lee Yii-Ching
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Working Conditions ◽  
Emotional Exhaustion ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Team Building ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Safety Attitudes

PurposeThe aims of this study are to (1) evaluate physicians and nurses' perspectives on patient safety culture amid the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) integrate the emotional exhaustion of physicians and nurses into an evaluation of patient safety culture to provide insights into appropriate implications for medical care.Design/methodology/approachPatient safety culture was assessed with the Chinese version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to validate the structure of the data (i.e. reliability and validity), and Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to identify relationships between safety-related dimensions.FindingsSafety climate was strongly associated with working conditions and teamwork climate. In addition, working conditions was highly correlated with perceptions of management and job satisfaction, respectively. It is worth noting that the stress and emotional exhaustion of the physicians and nurses during this epidemic were high and needed attention.Practical implicationsFor healthcare managers and practitioners, team-building activities, power of public opinions, IoT-focused service, and Employee Assistance Programs are important implications for inspiring the patient safety-oriented culture during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic.Originality/valueThis paper considers the role of emotional state into patient safety instrument, a much less understood but equally important dimension in the field of patient safety.

scholarly journals Factors influencing the patient safety climate in intensive care units: cross-sectional study

BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranielle de Lima Silva Nunes ◽  
Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo Silva ◽  
Juliana Carvalho de Lima ◽  
Dayse Edwiges Carvalho ◽  
Cristina Alves Bernardes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Safety Climate ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Safety Attitudes ◽  
Safety Attitudes Questionnaire ◽  
Patient Safety Climate ◽  
Factors Influencing

Abstract Background Measuring the patient safety climate of a health service provides important information about the safety status at a given time. This study aimed to determine the factors influencing the patient safety climate in Intensive Care Units. Methods An analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2017 and 2018 in two adult Intensive Care Units of a Brazilian Teaching Hospital. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire instrument was applied with the multidisciplinary teams to determine the factors influencing the patient safety climate. Data were double entered into a database and processed using the R (version 3.5.0) statistical software. Position, central tendency and dispersion measures were taken and absolute and relative frequencies, mean and confidence intervals were calculated for the quantitative variables. Linear regression was performed to verify the effect of variables on the SAQ domains. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.25 were selected for multivariate analysis. Results A total of 84 healthcare providers participated in the study. The mean Safety Attitudes Questionnaire score was 59.5, evidencing a negative climate. The following factors influenced the safety climate: time since course completion, professional category, type of employment contract, complementary professional training, and weekly workload. Conclusions The factors identified indicate items for planning improvements in communication, teamwork, work processes, and management involvement, aiming to ensure care safety and construct a supportive safety climate.

scholarly journals The safety attitudes questionnaire for out-of-hours service in primary healthcare—Psychometric properties of the Croatian version

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242065
Author(s):  
Jasna Mesarić ◽  
Diana Šimić ◽  
Milica Katić ◽  
Ellen Catharina Tveter Deilkås ◽  
Dag Hofoss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
Process Of Care ◽  
Out Of Hours ◽  
Safety Attitudes ◽  
Safety Attitudes Questionnaire ◽  
Stress Recognition

The aim of the study was to assess the reliability and construct validity of the Croatian translation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire—Ambulatory version (SAQ-AV) in the out-of-hours (OOH) primary care setting. A cross-sectional observational study using anonymous web-survey was carried out targeting a convenience sample of 358 health professionals working in the Croatian OOH primary care service. The final sample consisted of 185 questionnaires (response rate 51.7%). Psychometric properties were assessed using exploratory hierarchical factor analysis with Schmid-Leiman rotation to bifactor solution, McDonald’s ω, and Cronbach’s α. Five group factors were identified: Organization climate, Teamwork climate, Stress recognition, Ambulatory process of care, and Perceptions of workload. Items loading on the Stress recognition and Perceptions of workload factor had low loadings on the general factor. Cronbach’s α ranged between 0.79 and 0.93. All items had corrected item-total correlation above 0.5. McDonalds’ ω total for group factors ranged between 0.76 and 0.91. Values of ω general for factors Organization climate, Teamwork climate, and Ambulatory process of care ranged between 0.41 and 0.56. McDonalds’ ω general for Stress recognition and Perceptions of workload were 0.13 and 0.16, respectively. Even though SAQ-AV may not be a reliable tool for international comparisons, subsets of items may be reliable tools in several national settings, including Croatia. Results confirmed that Stress recognition is not a dimension of patient safety culture, while Ambulatory process of care might be. Future studies should investigate the relationship of patient safety culture to treatment outcome.

scholarly journals 54 Patient Safety Culture at a Teaching Hospital in Kuala Lumpur

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv13-iv17
Author(s):  
Karthikayini Krishnasamy ◽  
Maw Pin Tan ◽  
Mohd Idzwan Zakaria
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Working Conditions ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Safety Climate ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
Inpatient Falls ◽  
Stress Recognition

Abstract Introduction Patient safety, such as inpatient falls, is a global problem, accounting for increasing compensation costs from our healthcare facilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient safety culture among healthcare providers. Method An online survey was developed within the hospital staff portal at the University of Malaya Medical Centre, with a dialogue box appearing on the launching of the portal website inviting the members of staff to participate in the survey. The survey contained a safety assessment questionnaire (SAQ) which measures the patient safety culture. The SAQ consists of 36 items measuring the six domains: teamwork climate, job satisfaction, safety climate, stress recognition, working conditions, and perception of management. Each domain is assigned a percentage score, and comparisons of scores according to healthcare disciplines were then made. Results 5275 (80%) responded to the online SAQ which was sent out to all 6562 healthcare professionals employed, by the hospital. The teamwork and safety climate was poor among supporting staff, with scores of 56.7 and 59.8 respectively. Job satisfaction (62.9), perception of ward management (56.8), and hospital management (53.2), and working conditions (44.7) were less among the clinicians. Stress recognition (36.5) was in alarmingly low among the nurses. Conclusion A comprehensive unit-based safety programme will be conducted in response to the SAQ findings, and should incorporate objective falls the outcome in order to convince the hospital hierarchy of the need for urgent solutions to lower the rates of inpatient falls.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing the Patient Safety Climate in Intensive Care Units: Cross-sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranielle de Lima Silva Nunes ◽  
Ana Elisa Bauer de Camargo Silva ◽  
Juliana Carvalho de Lima ◽  
Dayse Edwiges Carvalho ◽  
Cristina Alves Bernardes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Safety Climate ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Safety Attitudes ◽  
Safety Attitudes Questionnaire ◽  
Patient Safety Climate ◽  
Factors Influencing

Abstract Background:Measuring the patient safety climate of a health service provides important information about the safety status at a given time. This study aimed to determine the factors influencing the patient safety climate in Intensive Care Units.Methods:An analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2017 and 2018 in two adult Intensive Care Units of a Brazilian Teaching Hospital. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire instrument was applied with the multidisciplinary teams to determine the factors influencing the patient safety climate. Data were double entered into a database and processed using the R (version 3.5.0) statistical software. Position, central tendency and dispersion measures were taken and absolute and relative frequencies, mean and confidence intervals were calculated for the quantitative variables. Linear regression was performed to verify the effect of variables on the SAQ domains. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.25 were selected for multivariate analysis.Results:A total of 84 healthcare providers participated in the study. The mean Safety Attitudes Questionnaire score was 59.5, evidencing a negative climate. The following factors influenced the safety climate: time since course completion, professional category, type of employment contract, complementary professional training, and weekly workload. Conclusions:The factors identified indicate items for planning improvements in communication, teamwork, work processes, and management involvement, aiming to ensure care safety and construct a supportive safety climate.

scholarly journals Interdisciplinary Differences in Patient Safety Culture within a Teaching Hospital in a South East Asia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthikayini Krishnasamy ◽  
Maw Pin Tan ◽  
Mohd Idzwan Zakaria
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Percentage Agreement ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Stress Recognition

Background: Patient safety represents a global issue which leads to potentially avoidable morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to determine the inter-professional differences in patient safety culture in a tertiary university hospital. Method: A cross-sectional study using the Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ) self-administered electronically in the English and Malay languages to evaluate safety culture domains. A positive percentage agreement score of 60% was considered satisfactory. Comparisons were made between clinicians, nurses, allied health professionals, ward attendants and support staff. Results: Of 6562 potential respondents, 5724 (80.4%) completed the questionnaire; 3930 (74.5%) women, 2263 (42.9%) nurses, and 1812 (34.2%) had 6-10 years of working experience. The mean overall positive percentage agreement scores were 66.2 (range=31.1 to 84.7%), with job satisfaction (72.3±21.9%) and stress recognition (58.3±25.6%) representing the highest and lowest mean domain scores respectively. Discussion: Differences were observed between all five job categories. Linear regression analyses revealed that the other four job categories scored lower in teamwork, safety culture, job satisfaction, and working conditions compared to nurses. Conclusions: The overall mean SAQ score was above the satisfactory level, with unsatisfactory percentage agreement scores in the stress recognition domain. Interventions to improve patient safety culture should be developed, focusing on stress management.

scholarly journals Comprehensive interventions of safety culture to improve patient safety: A longitudinal follow-up in northeast China

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuang Zhao ◽  
Qing Chang ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Qijun Wu ◽  
Nan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Emergency Plans ◽  
Safety Attitudes ◽  
Improve Patient

Abstract Background: Safety culture in hospitals can affect patient disease processes and health status. However, comprehensive measures to improve patient safety and effective methods to precisely assess the outcomes are limited in China. Methods: A cohort study was carried out in a tertiary hospital in China. Medical caregivers received comprehensive interventions such as a study on emergency plans and professional skills training to improve safety culture at the beginning of January 2017. A total of 553 caregivers in March, 299 caregivers in June and 284 caregivers in December in the same year participated in the three evaluation surveys. The safety attitude questionnaire (SAQ), the dimension frequency and number of events reported in the hospital survey of patient safety culture (HSOPSC) and a questionnaire on barriers to reporting adverse events were used to examine the safety culture changes before, during and at the end of intervention implementation. Results: The scores for dimension teamwork climate, job satisfaction and perception of management in the SAQ were significantly increased (p < 0.05). The scores for the 17 items in the barriers to reporting adverse events questionnaire were significantly increased (p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in the scores for the dimension frequency and number of events reported in the HSOPSC after the interventions. Conclusion: Our findings showed that the interventions improved safety attitudes, and the barriers to reporting adverse events decreased, suggesting that the comprehensive interventions used were helpful for improving the safety culture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document