Young Investigator: Analysis of Factors Associated With Clostridium Difficile Infection Among Hospitalized Patients With Underlying Pouchitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. S20
Author(s):  
Kistangari Gaurav ◽  
Gosai Falgun ◽  
Lopez Rocio ◽  
Shen Bo
2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoon A. Aldeyab ◽  
Susan Cliffe ◽  
Michael Scott ◽  
Peter Flanagan ◽  
Mary Kearney ◽  
...  

Anaerobe ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado ◽  
Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva ◽  
Maja Rupnik ◽  
Amanda Pontes Nader ◽  
Joana Starling de Carvalho ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S836-S837
Author(s):  
Khanh-Linh Le ◽  
Heather Young ◽  
Timothy C Jenkins ◽  
Robert Tapia ◽  
Katherine C Shihadeh

Abstract Background Prior to 2016, Denver Health Medical Center had a higher-than-expected rate of hospital onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI). A multifaceted CDI prevention plan was implemented, including the use of a probiotic as primary prevention for HO-CDI and antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in inpatients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. We aimed to study the effectiveness of probiotic use in this clinical context. Methods During the intervention, inpatient orders for a broad-spectrum antibiotic triggered a best practice advisory recommending once daily co-administration of 100 billion units of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus casei, L. rhamnosus, and L. acidophilus (BioK+ ®). To evaluate effectiveness and safety of this intervention, we performed a retrospective cohort study including adult inpatients who received > 24 hours of a broad-spectrum antibiotic between April 2016 and March 2018. The primary endpoint was the incidence of HO-CDI (> 3 days after admission) compared between patients who received antibiotics alone vs. antibiotics plus the probiotic. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of AAD, defined as a negative CDI test after antibiotic initiation, and the incidence of Lactobacillus species identified in clinical cultures. Results 3,291 patients were included; 1,835 received antibiotics alone and 1,456 received antibiotics plus the probiotic. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar, except patients in the antibiotic alone group had a greater incidence of cirrhosis and proton-pump inhibitor use (16.1% vs 10.1%, P < 0.001; 39.1% vs 31.5%, P < 0.001). Length of stay and antibiotic days of therapy were longer in the antibiotic plus probiotic group [6 days (IQR, 3–11) vs 6 days (IQR, 4–12), P = 0.014; 4 days (IQR, 3–7) vs 5 days (IQR, 3–7), P < 0.001]. The incidence of HO-CDI (37, 2% vs 35, 2.4%; P = 0.450) and AAD (231, 12.6% vs 199, 13.7%; P = 0.362) were similar between groups. Lactobacillus was identified in at least one clinical culture from 0.2% (3/1835) and 0.3% (4/1456) of patients in the antibiotic alone group and antibiotic plus probiotic group, respectively (P = 0.497). Conclusion In hospitalized patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics, co-administration of a probiotic did not appear to reduce the incidence of HO-CDI or AAD. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-Yuan Lee ◽  
Hsuan-Ling Hsiao ◽  
Chin-Yuan Chia ◽  
Chun-Wen Cheng ◽  
Tzu-Cheng Tsai ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Adeyinka Charles Adejumo ◽  
Terence Ndonyi Bukong

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI), a prevalent cause of diarrhea, is the most notorious hospital-acquired infection, resulting in an alarming mortality and health care utilization rates. Herein, we investigate the impact of cannabis use, which is gaining significant legalization for recreational use, on the risk of CDI. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We selected adult records (age ≥ 18 years) from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2014, and identified cannabis users and other clinical conditions using ICD-9-CM codes. With multivariate logistic modeling, we generated propensity scores for cannabis users and matched them to non-users in a 1:1 ratio (104,936:104,936). We then estimated the adjusted relative risk (aRR) for having CDI using conditional Possion regression models with generalized estimating equations [SAS 9.4]. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Among the matched hospitalizations (n=209,872), cannabis usage was associated with a reduced incidence of CDI (505.8[464.7-550.6] vs. 694.9[645.8-747.70] per 100,000 hospitalizations), resulting in a 27% reduced risk of CDI (aRR:0.73[0.65-0.81]; p-value:<0.0001). Non-dependent and dependent cannabis users respectively had 22% and 78% reduced likelihood of CDI when compared to non-cannabis users (0.78[0.69-0.90] & 0.22[0.12-0.40]). Furthermore, dependent users had less risk of CDI compared to non-dependent users (0.28[0.16-0.51]). Comparatively, abusive use of other substances like alcohol and tobacco was associated with increased risk for CDI (1.30[1.13-1.49] & 1.24[1.10-1.40]) DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Unlike alcohol and tobacco abuse which are associated with elevated risk for CDI, cannabis use, is related to a decreased risk of CDI amongst hospitalized patients. Further prospective and molecular mechanistic studies are required to elucidate how cannabis impacts CDI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document