Association of MEG3 Hypermethylation and MiR-21 Upregulation with the Incidence in Iraqi Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 122-128
Author(s):  
Noha Mohammed Saleh ◽  
Hameed Majeed Jasim

Background: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) can be defined as a hematologic malignancy that distinguished by genetic defects and epigenetics alterations. LncRNA MEG3 was shown to play the role of tumour suppressor, and play a pivotal role in leukemogenesis, MEG3 hypermethylation has been reported to be related to different types of haematological malignancies. MIR-21 is regarded as a significant miRNA, it considered to play a vital role in AML progressions. Results: The levels of methylation in the MEG3 promoter region in AML patients were significantly increased than in healthy controls, as the MEG3 expression levels were significantly lowered (P ≤ 0.05) in AML patients in contrast with healthy controls. On the other hand, results showed elevated expression levels of miR-21 in AML patients compared with healthy controls. Conclusion: The present study indicates that the hypermethylation of MEG-3 promoter region could explain MEG-3 expression level loss. Our findings also revealed that the overexpression of miR-21 supports its function as an oncogene.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2040-2040
Author(s):  
Zheng Zhao ◽  
Sarah Daly ◽  
John Liu Yin ◽  
David Sweetser ◽  
Jacqueline Boultwood ◽  
...  

Abstract Deletions of 9q are recurring cytogenetic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In approximately one-third of cases del(9q) occurs in association with t(8;21). We have previously identified a 2.4Mb region located on 9q21.32–21.33 which is deleted in cases of del(9q) AML - the del(9q) commonly deleted region (CDR). This region encodes 11 genes which we have also previously shown not to be mutated in del(9q) AML. In order to further investigate the role of these genes in AML and in particular to elucidate the pathogenesis of del(9q) AML we have examined the expression of these genes in AML. RNA was extracted from the bone marrow or peripheral blood of patients with AML at the time of diagnosis. Patient samples from the following cytogenetic subgroups were included in this study: (1) del(9q) AML (n=8) - this includes 3 patients with associated t(8;21); (2) t(8;21) but no del(9q) (n=15); (3) Normal karyotype (n=6); (4) Complex Karyotype (n=6). Taqman assays were designed for 9 of the 11 genes located within the del(9q) CDR: FRMD3; ENSG00000148057; UBQLN1; GKAP42; Q9UF54; Q8N2B1; Q9H9A7; SLC28A3; NTRK2. For the other 2 genes within the region Taqman assays could not be performed because of uniformly low expression levels (Q8IZ41) and lack of specificity of primer-design (HNRPK). CD34-purified progenitors from normal individuals were used as controls. It was found that 6 of the 9 genes were significantly down-regulated in del(9q) AML (p<0.05): ENSG00000148057; UBQLN1; Q9UF54; Q8N2B1; Q9H9A7; NTRK2. Since del(9q) is commonly associated with t(8;21), cases of t(8;21) in which del(9q) was not present were also analysed for the expression levels of the del(9q) CDR genes. It was found that 5 of the 9 genes were significantly down regulated in t(8;21) AML (ENSG00000148057; Q9UF54; Q8N2B1; Q9H9A7; SLC28A3) (p<0.05). Only two of these genes were found to be down-regulated in AML of normal karyotype (Q9H9A7 and UBQLN1) (p<0.05) and no significant down-regulation was detected in any of these genes in AML of complex karyotype. Our findings indicate that several genes from within the del(9q) AML CDR are down-regulated in del(9q) AML. A similar pattern of down-regulation is found in cases of t(8;21) even in the absence of del(9q) AML. This suggests that down-regulation of one or more of these genes may be important in the pathogenesis of AML. It may therefore be hypothesized that this pattern of gene down-regulation provides a mechanism common to the development of AML with both del(9q) and t(8;21).


2017 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 581-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Menter ◽  
Boris Kuzmanic ◽  
Christoph Bucher ◽  
Michael Medinger ◽  
Joerg Halter ◽  
...  

RNA Biology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Congting Ye ◽  
Qian Zhou ◽  
Yiling Hong ◽  
Qingshun Quinn Li

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 2345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaira Ianniello ◽  
Alessandro Fatica

We are currently assisting in the explosion of epitranscriptomics, which studies the functional role of chemical modifications into RNA molecules. Among more than 100 RNA modifications, the N6-methyladenosine (m6A), in particular, has attracted the interest of researchers all around the world. m6A is the most abundant internal chemical modification in mRNA, and it can control any aspect of mRNA post-transcriptional regulation. m6A is installed by “writers”, removed by “erasers”, and recognized by “readers”; thus, it can be compared to the reversible and dynamic epigenetic modifications in histones and DNA. Given its fundamental role in determining the way mRNAs are expressed, it comes as no surprise that alterations to m6A modifications have a deep impact in cell differentiation, normal development and human diseases. Here, we review the proteins involved in m6A modification in mammals, m6A role in gene expression and its contribution to cancer development. In particular, we will focus on acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), which provides an initial indication of how alteration in m6A modification can disrupt normal cellular differentiation and lead to cancer.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3165-3165
Author(s):  
Lykke C. Grubach ◽  
Caroline Juhl-Christensen ◽  
Anita Rethmeier ◽  
Lene H. Olesen ◽  
Peter Hokland ◽  
...  

Abstract The Polycomb group (PcG) of genes is important for differentiation and X-chromosome silencing. Recently much attention has been afforded to the role of its aberrant expression in cancer, especially in relation to the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. We hypothesized that a deregulation in the expression profile may contribute to the development of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). To address this, we determined the RNA levels by RQ-PCR in diagnostic bone marrow samples from 126 patients and 20 healthy donors to delineate their expression profile of the PcG genes BMI-1, MEL18, SCML2, YY1 and EZH2. To address the interplay with downstream targets of PcG proteins, we also determined the expression of HOXA4, HOXA9 and MEIS1. These data were compared not only to the demographic and clinical data of the patients, but also to a large number of molecular assays already performed in these patients (Olesen LH et al. Br.J. Haematol. 2005 131(4):457–467; Rethmeier et al. Br.J. Haematol. 2006 133(3):276–283.). At first we noticed a striking heterogeneity in the expression profiles of the AML patients (Fig. 1). We also observed that HOXA9, MEIS1, SCML2, YY1, BMI-1 and EZH2 were significantly (p≤0.003) higher expressed in the patients compared to the healthy donors. Moreover, when patients were analyzed according to the three cytogenetic prognostic groups (normal, core-binding factor positive and complex), the expression profile of patients with the t(8,21) aberration was characterized by a significantly decreased expression of HOXA9 and MEIS1 and a higher one of SCML2, YY1 and BMI-1 than AML patients in general (p<0.003). When evaluating the impact of cytogenetic subgrouping, the expression levels of MEL18 and EZH2 significantly (p< 0.025) reflected highest expression in patients with adverse prognosis and lowest expression with patients exhibiting the most favourable prognosis. While the expression levels of the genes in focus did not correlate to course of disease, we observed that a direct relationship between transcript levels of PcG and PcG-related on the one hand and the DNA methyl transferases (DNMT’s), apoptosis and multidrug-resistance genes (p<0.001) on the other. In conclusion, in this study, which is the first to systematically analyze a series of PcG genes and genes regulated by PcG, we failed to demonstrate a correlation to the clinical outcome of patients with AML. On the other hand, our data strongly suggest that these genes might be involved in the leukaemogenic process by virtue of their relations to DNA methylation (DNMT1, DNMT3B), apoptosis (BAX, CASPASE 3) and multidrug resistance (MDR1, MRP1). Figure 1. Expression profiles of PcG or PcG-regulated genes in AML patients and healthy controls. A. Gene expression profile of all 126 AML patients included (black lines) compared to 20 healthy donors. B. Patients with CBF aberrations, t(8,21), n =7, or inv(16), n =12. The expression is calculated as 2−ΔCt *100), where ΔCt = CtTG−CtCG, CtTG is the Ct value of the target gene, and CtCG is the mean Ct value of the two control genes (B2M and ABL). Figure Figure


1987 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Tricot ◽  
M. A. Boogaerts ◽  
R. Vlietinck ◽  
M. P. Emonds ◽  
R. L. Verwilghen

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1449-1449
Author(s):  
Jaspal S Kaeda ◽  
Christian Oberender ◽  
Daniel Neuman ◽  
Theo Kim ◽  
Ken I Mills ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1449 Despite unprecedented success of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in treating chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients, optimum clinical management is still impeded by lack of reliable predictive and prognostic markers to identify those at risk of progression from chronic phase (CP) to advanced disease (AD), i.e. accelerated phase (AP) and blast crisis (BC). Significantly, SHP-1 (Src homology 2 domain-containing phosphates-1) is reported to bind to BCR-ABL1. Furthermore, SHP-1 knockout mice fail to thrive and develop a myeloproliferative-like disease, while point mutations have been detected in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) disorder. These observations are consistent with SHP-1 function as a negative regulator of PI3K-Akt pathway and a tumour suppressor. More recently data implied SHP-1 expression levels were prognostic and predictive of TKI response. Therefore we quantified SHP-1 mRNA levels in CML patients to assess these findings. In addition, we included acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and adult blood donor samples controls. SHP-1, BCR-ABL1 and GUSβ (endogenous control gene) and MSI2 mRNA levels were retrospectively assessed by Taqman quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction in 78 highly heterogeneous CML patients [median age of 50 years (20–76); M: 44; F: 34]; 54 in CP; 24 in AD (6 in AP and 18 in BC). Among the 78 patients 59 were treated with two or more agents. But 19, all in CP, were prescribed single drug only; Imatinib (n=11); nilotinib (n=6); dasatinib (n=1) and interferon + cytarabine (n=1). Sanger sequencing of the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain in 40 (CP: 27; AD: 13) of the 78 patients identified 18 (CP: 9; AD: 10) with one or more mutations. In 8 patients the mutations mapped to the P-loop, 3 had T315I in isolation or in combination with another KD variant and 7 had non-P-loop variants. Seventyseven diagnostic samples from AML patients (M: 42; F: 35) with a median age of 63 years (8–85) were included and 18 normal control (NC) samples from blood donors with median age 44 years (35–61). Target gene expression levels were reported as ratio to GUSβ. Samples with <5500 GUSβ copies were excluded from the study. SHP-1 expression was significantly higher (p=<0.0001) in CML patients (median: 31.54; range: 0.82–675.1) when compared with NC (median: 3.66; range: 1.40–6.36). Among the CML patients SHP-1 mRNA copies were significantly lower (p=<0.0002) in AD patients [median 14.0 (0.8–211.9)], compared with CP (median 37.7; range: 5.2–675.1). However, there was no significant difference between 9 patients failing to achieve a major molecular response (MMR) within 18 months and 7 patients who did. Furthermore, among the CP patients we observed no significant difference in SHP-1 mRNA levels between those patients prescribed 1 (n=18), 2 (n=7), or ≥3 TKI (n=8), which generally correlates with optimal, sub-optimal and/or failed response. Similarly, we found no significant difference in SHP-1 expression between mutated KD and wild type alleles in CP. The number of patients in BC was limited to assess this. Importantly, we observed no significant difference between AML and NC samples (p=0.801). But there was a significant difference between CML patients in AD and normal, p=<0.0001. We and others previously reported a significant increase in expression of MSI2, a stem cell renewal regulator, between CP and AD, but we found no correlation among 51 CML patients assessed for MSI2 and SHP-1 mRNA levels. We report here differential expression of the putative tumour suppressor SHP-1 in CML patients in CP and AD, with lower levels in the latter. However, SHP-1 expression in these two groups was higher than that detected in AML and NC samples. In contrast to earlier reports we did not observe a significant difference between those achieving and failing MMR within 18 months nor between patients with different degrees of response to TKI therapy. This variance may have been affected by the different time points of sample acquisition during the course of the treatment. Our data imply SHP-1 regulates or is regulated by BCR-ABL1. Moreover, it is reported that SHP-1 may counteract oncogenic effect of BCR-ABL1, however, we observed no correlation in mRNA levels between them in our 78 CML patients. The data presented here warrant a prospective study to assess whether SHP-1 expression levels is able to identify patients at risk of progression prior to other markers, e.g. BCR-ABL1 copy numbers. Disclosures: le Coutre: Novartis: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document