scholarly journals Does anonymity matter? Examining quality of online peer assessment and students’ attitudes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiko Kobayashi
Keyword(s):  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
Student Engagement ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Negative Statements ◽  
Students Attitudes ◽  
Online Peer Assessment ◽  
Blended Course ◽  
Us University

The study investigated the effects of anonymity on online peer assessment and compared three different conditions. Fifty-eight preservice teachers at a mid-size US university engaged in a series of online peer assessments during fall 2017. Peer assessment was embedded in a blended course as a required asynchronous activity using the Canvas learning management system. Students were randomly assigned to three different peer assessment conditions: anonymous, partially anonymous, and identifiable. They were asked to provide feedback comments and rate the quality of peers’ work. The researcher examined to what extent three different conditions had influenced the quality of feedback comments, measured quantitatively through the number of words and negative statements. At the end of the semester, a survey that included a 5-point Likert scale and several open-ended questions was also distributed to analyse students’ perceptions about peer assessment and anonymity. The results indicate that although students prefer anonymity, it may not be a necessary condition for increasing student engagement.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF PROSPECTIVE PHYSICS TEACHERS� FEEDBACK ON ONLINE PEER-ASSESSMENT IMPLEMENTATION

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-48
Author(s):  
K. Khusaini
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Smart Phone ◽  
Physics Teachers ◽  
Back Ground ◽  
Online Peer Assessment ◽  
Teaching Physics

This study aimed to analyse prospective physics teachers feedback during the implementation of online peer-assessment in Teaching Physics in English course. Twenty prospective physics teachers participated in this study. They were familiar with the use of smart phone in their daily life. They tend to communicate using social media such as WhatsApp application. The students have practiced in using paper based peer-assessment in other courses, but they have not applied it in online method providing real time feedback and score. The implementation of online peer-assessment challenged the students to assess their peer objectively. The lecturers feedback influence students skills how to evaluate their peer performance. Several factors may influence the quality of students online peer-assessment such as students culture back ground, implementation of the online peer-assessment, and practicants performance.

Effects of Anonymity and Accountability During Online Peer Assessment

2011 ◽  
pp. 302-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunita Wadhwa ◽  
Henry Schulz ◽  
Bruce L. Mann
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Methods Course ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Online Peer Assessment ◽  
Peer Accountability ◽  
Published Research ◽  
Web Based Education

A 2´2 experiment was conducted to determine the effects of anonymity (anonymous vs. named) and peer-accountability (more-accountable vs. less-accountable) on peer over-marking, and on the criticality and quality of peer comments during online peer assessment. Thirty-six graduate students in a Web-based education research methods course were required to critique two published research articles as a part of their course. Peer assessment was carried out on the first critique. Students were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. Peer assessors were randomly assigned three students’ critiques to assess. Peer assessors and the students being assessed were from the same group. Peer assessors assigned a numeric mark and commented on students’ critiques. The four main results were: First, significantly fewer peer assessors over-marked (i.e., assigned a higher mark relative to the instructor) in the anonymous group as compared to the named group (p < .04). Second, peer assessors in the anonymous group provided a significantly higher number of critical comments (i.e., weaknesses) as compared to the named group (p < .01). Third, peer assessors in the named groupand the more-accountable group made a significantly higher number of quality comments (i.e., cognitive statements indicating strengths and weakness along with reasoned responses and suggestions for improvement), compared to the peer assessors in the anonymous group and the less-accountable group (p < .01). Lastly, the students’ responses to the questionnaire indicated that they found the peer assessment process helpful. This study suggests that in online peer assessment, the anonymity and the degree of peer-accountability affect peer marking and comments.

scholarly journals Online Peer Assessment in a First Cycle University Degree – Which Challenges?

2020 ◽  
pp. 141-150
Author(s):  
Maria De Jesus C. Relvas ◽  
Maria Do Carmo Teixeira Pinto ◽  
Isolina Oliveira ◽  
Alda Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Online Assessment ◽  
Digital Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tasks ◽  
Online Peer Assessment ◽  
University Degree

Authenticity and transparency constitute two essential dimensions in the digital assessment of competences. Authenticity emphasises the importance of the complexity inherent to online assessment tasks related to real life contexts and are recognised as relevant by students, teachers and potential employers. Transparency has to do with the students’ involvement in the assessment tasks, through the democratisation and knowledge of the used strategies. Self-, co- and peer assessment are powerful instruments in the transparency operationalisation. The current study presents the peer assessment (PA) implementation process in a first cycle university degree curricular unit, in online context. The study was planned according to the following purposes: (a) to identify peer assessment potentialities and constraints in first cycle university degrees; (b) to analyse the questions that are brought forward among students by the application of a scoring rubric; (c) to reflect on the obtained results, aiming at the improvement of the implementation process and its applicability to other curricular units. In this essay, the authors present and discuss the obtained results, and propose recommendations to improve the quality of the peer assessment process.

Assessment of Individual Student Performance in Online Team Projects

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Alden
Keyword(s):  
Student Performance ◽  
Group Process ◽  
Online Courses ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Individual Student ◽  
Assessment Practice ◽  
Group Project ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Team Projects

The use of team projects has been shown to be beneficial in higher education. There is also general agreement that team efforts should be assessed and that the grading ought to represent both (1) the quality of the product developed jointly by the team as well as (2) the degree of participation and quality of contribution by each individual student involved in the group process. The latter grading requirement has posed a challenge to faculty so the question addressed in this paper is “How should individual team members in online courses be assessed for the extent and quality of their contributions to the group project?” To answer this question, four common team member evaluation practices were reviewed and compared to seven criteria representing positive attributes of an assessment practice in an online learning environment. Whereas the Peer Assessment practice received the greatest support in the literature in face-to-face courses, this study that considered the perceptions of graduate faculty and students recommended the Faculty Review practice as the default assessment

Managing an Enterprise and Ethical Dilemmas in Accountancy

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-151
Author(s):  
Jolanta Wiśniewska
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Ethical Dilemmas ◽  
Business Management ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Accounting System ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
A Company

The purpose of this article is to present the correlation between management of an economic entity and the development of ethical accounting dilemmas in the era of high-risk business. In the globalisation era and recurring economic crises, realisation of the objectives of a company takes place under high risk conditions. It is therefore necessary to use a proper management system. The necessary condition for making all decisions is to have relevant information. The value and relevance of these decisions depend on the quality of information which they have been based on. Lack of ethics in accounting has a direct impact on the company's management, which is based on information generated by the accounting system of the company. Ethical dilemmas arising in accounting are also ethical dilemmas arising in the process of business management. 

THE PROCESS OF DIGITALIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Муса Увайсович Ярычев
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Education System ◽  
New Teacher ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Quality Of Education ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Teacher Competencies ◽  
Important Condition ◽  
E Learning

В статье рассматривается вопрос о цифровизации школы, как важном условии повышения качества образования. Организованная при помощи электронных форм среда обучения предоставляет ученикам большую самостоятельность. Необходимым условием совершенствования системы образования выступает создание новых, необходимых для цифровой экономики компетенций педагога. The article considers the issue of school digitalization as an important condition for improving the quality of education. The e-learning environment provides students with greater independence. A necessary condition for improving the education system is the creation of new teacher competencies necessary for the digital economy.

The Power of Giving Feedback: Outcomes from Implementing an Online Peer Assessment System

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Financial Accounting ◽  
Writing Assignments ◽  
Quality Feedback ◽  
Course Work ◽  
Case Writing ◽  
Online Peer Assessment ◽  
Giving Feedback

ABSTRACTThis paper describes an online system that facilitates peer assessment of students' course work and then uses data from individual case writing assignments in introductory financial accounting to empirically examine associations between peer assessment and case writing performance. Through this description and empirical analysis, the paper addresses the following questions: (1) Why use peer assessment? (2) How does online peer assessment work? (3) Is student peer assessment reliable? (4) What do students think of peer assessment? (5) Does student peer assessment contribute to academic performance? Three key findings from this study are that students at the sophomore level were able to generate reasonably reliable feedback for peers, they valued the experiences involved in providing peer feedback, and giving quality feedback had a more significant and enduring impact on students' accounting case analyses than did receiving quality feedback, after controlling for differences in accounting knowledge and case writing skills.

Statistical assessment of peer opinions in higher education rankings

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Ghiasi ◽  
Grigorios Fountas ◽  
Panagiotis Anastasopoulos ◽  
Fred Mannering
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Parameter Estimates ◽  
Individual Parameter ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
College And University ◽  
Higher Education Rankings ◽  
College Of Engineering

Purpose Unlike many other quantitative characteristics used to determine higher education rankings, opinion-based peer assessment scores and the factors that may influence them are not well understood. Using peer scores of US colleges of engineering as reported annually in US News and World Report (USNews) rankings, the purpose of this paper is to provide some insights into peer assessments by statistically identifying factors that influence them. Design/methodology/approach With highly detailed data, a random parameters linear regression is estimated to statistically identify the factors determining a college of engineering’s average USNews peer assessment score. Findings The findings show that a wide variety of college- and university-specific attributes influence average peer impressions of a university’s college of engineering including the size of the faculty, the quality of admitted students and the quality of the faculty measured by their citation data and other factors. Originality/value The paper demonstrates that average peer assessment scores can be readily and accurately predicted with observable data on the college of engineering and the university as a whole. In addition, the individual parameter estimates from the statistical modeling in this paper provide insights as to how specific college and university attributes can help guide policies to improve an individual college’s average peer assessment scores and its overall ranking.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document