Policy in focus: fee-for-service woes, record health spending, and earlier HPV vaccination cuts cancer risk

Background: Life course theory creates a better framework to understand how oral health needs and challenges align with specific phases of the lifespan, care models, social programs, and changes in policy. Methods): Data are from the 2018 IBM Watson Multi-State Medicaid Marketscan Database (31 million claims) and the 2018 IBM Watson Dental Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims Database (45 million claims). Analysis compares per enrollee spending fee-for-service dental claims and medical spending on dental care from ages 0 to 89. Results: Dental utilization and spending are lower during the first 4 years of life and in young adulthood than in other periods of life. Stark differences in the timing, impact, and severity of caries, periodontal disease, and oral cancer are seen between those enrolled in Medicaid and commercial dental plans. Early childhood caries and oral cancer occur more frequently and at younger ages in Medicaid populations. Conclusions: This unique lifespan analysis of the U.S. multi-payer dental care system demonstrates the complexities of the current dental service environment and a lack of equitable access to oral healthcare. Practical Implications: Health policies should be focused on optimizing care delivery to provide effective preventive care at specific stages of the lifespan.

Download Full-text

Leveraging Clinical Decision Support and Integrated Medical-Dental Electronic Health Records to Implementing Precision in Oral Cancer Risk Assessment and Preventive Intervention

Journal of Personalized Medicine ◽

10.3390/jpm11090832 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (9) ◽

pp. 832

Author(s):

Donald B. Rindal ◽

Patricia L. Mabry

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Risk Assessment ◽

Oral Cancer ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Oropharyngeal Cancer ◽

Hpv Vaccination ◽

Cancer Risk Assessment ◽

Reduction Strategies ◽

Oral And Oropharyngeal Cancer ◽

Oral Cancer Risk

Introduction: Precision medicine is focused on serving the unique needs of individuals. Oral and oropharyngeal cancer risk assessment identifies individual risk factors while providing support to reduce risk. The objective is to examine potential current and future strategies to broadly implement evidence-based oral and oropharyngeal cancer risk assessment and screening in dental practices throughout the United States. Methods: Feasible and effective oral cancer risk assessment and risk reduction strategies, ripe for implementation in dental practice, were identified in the published literature. Results: The Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral for Treatment (SBIRT) model is a feasible approach to assessing individual oral cancer risk and providing risk reducing interventions in the dental setting. HPV is a more recently identified risk factor that dentistry is well positioned to address. Evidence supporting the utilization of specific risk assessment tools and risk reduction strategies is summarized and future opportunities discussed. Discussion: Current knowledge of risk factors for oral and oropharyngeal cancers support the recommendation for dental providers to routinely assess all patients for risk factors, educate them about their personal level of cancer risk, and recommend actions to reduce relevant risk factors. Individuals ages 9–26 should be asked about their HPV vaccination status, educated about HPV and oropharyngeal cancer and receive a recommendation to get the HPV vaccination.

Download Full-text

Characterizing Trends in Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Discourse on Reddit (2007-2015): An Observational Study (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.12480 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Yuki Lama ◽

Dian Hu ◽

Amelia Jamison ◽

Sandra Crouse Quinn ◽

David A. Broniatowski

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Sexual Behavior ◽

Human Papillomavirus ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Health Communication ◽

Sexual Activity ◽

Hpv Vaccine ◽

Hpv Vaccination ◽

Online Discussions ◽

Significant Difference

BACKGROUND Despite the introduction of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination as a preventive measure in 2006 for cervical and other cancers, uptake rates remain suboptimal, resulting in preventable cancer mortality. Social media, widely used for information seeking, can influence users’ knowledge and attitudes regarding HPV vaccination. Little is known regarding attitudes related to HPV vaccination on Reddit (a popular news aggregation site and online community), particularly related to cancer risk and sexual activity. Examining HPV vaccine–related messages on Reddit may provide insight into how HPV discussions are characterized on forums online and influence decision making related to vaccination. OBJECTIVE We observed how the HPV vaccine is characterized on Reddit over time and by user gender. Specifically, this study aimed to determine (1) if Reddit messages are more related to cancer risks or sexual behavior and (2) what other HPV vaccine–related discussion topics appear on Reddit. METHODS We gathered all public Reddit comments from January 2007 to September 2015. We manually annotated 400 messages to generate keywords and identify salient themes. We then measured the similarity between each comment and lists of keywords associated with sexual behavior and cancer risk using Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). Next, we used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to characterize remaining topics within the Reddit data. RESULTS We analyzed 22,729 messages containing the strings hpv or human papillomavirus and vaccin. LSA findings show that HPV vaccine discussions are significantly more related to cancer compared with sexual behavior from 2008 to 2015 (P<.001). We did not find a significant difference between genders in discussions of cancer and sexual activity (P>.05). LDA analyses demonstrated that although topics related to cancer risk and sexual activity were both frequently discussed (16.1% and 14.5% of word tokens, respectively), the majority of online discussions featured other topics. The most frequently discussed topic was politics associated with the vaccine (17.2%). Other topics included HPV disease and/or immunity (13.5%), the HPV vaccine schedule (11.5%), HPV vaccine side effects (9.7%), hyperlinks to outside sources (9.1%), and the risks and benefit of HPV vaccination (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS Reddit discourse on HPV vaccine encompasses a broad range of topics among men and women, with HPV political debates and cancer risk making up the plurality of the discussion. Our findings demonstrated that women and men both discussed HPV, highlighting that Reddit users do not perceive HPV as an issue that only pertains to women. Given the increasing use of social media as a source of health information, these results can inform the development of targeted online health communication strategies to promote HPV vaccination to young adult users of Reddit. Analyzing online discussions on Reddit can inform health communication efforts by identifying relevant, important HPV-related topics among online communities.

Download Full-text

Do Medicare Advantage Rebates Reduce Enrollees’ Out-of-Pocket Spending?

Medical Care Research and Review ◽

10.1177/1077558718807847 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 77 (5) ◽

pp. 474-482

Author(s):

Lauren Hersch Nicholas ◽

Shannon Wu

Keyword(s):

Survey Data ◽

Instrumental Variables ◽

Regression Models ◽

Health Spending ◽

Fee For Service ◽

Medicare Advantage

The majority of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans receive payments that exceed their costs of providing basic Medicare benefits. There is controversy about whether these payments are passed on to the enrollees as supplemental benefits or are retained by plans. We used survey data on MA beneficiaries’ actual out-of-pocket (OOP) spending linked to MA payment information to test whether higher plan payments and rebates lowered enrollee OOP spending. We used instrumental variables regression models to address concerns that plan payments and rebates may reflect anticipation of enrollees with particular health-spending profiles. We found that beneficiaries recovered only $0.65 of every $1.00 in payments exceeding fee-for-service spending through lower OOP spending but more than fully recovered the value of the rebates supporting supplemental benefits.

Download Full-text