Effects of a direct-fed microbial on digestive-tract morphology of Holstein bull calves and performance and carcass characteristics of Holstein steers11Appreciation is expressed to Nutrition Physiology Co. LLC (Guymon, OK) for partial financial support. Thanks to Elanco Animal Health, Ft. Dodge Animal Health, and DSM Nutrition for product support and Arizona Dairy Co. LLC for providing cattle used in Exp. 2. We thank J. English, K. Cannon, and S. Sanders for technical support.

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.J. Dick ◽  
G.C. Duff ◽  
S.W. Limesand ◽  
S.P. Cuneo ◽  
D.K. Knudson ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diyan Li ◽  
Shilin Tian ◽  
Wei Zhu ◽  
Yuan Su ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The microbiota of the digestive and reproductive systems has a prominent role in animal health and performance, but the extent of its contribution is difficult to determine. In chickens, the effect of host genetics on the reproductive and digestive tract microbiota is unclear, and the means by which digestive/reproductive microbiomes help improve egg production in chicken are unknown.Results: To gain insight into this, we examined genomes from 128 chickens reared under identical conditions and described their digestive (crop, gizzard and small intestine) and reproductive tract (vagina, uterus and isthmus) microbiota. Although the diversity, composition and predicted function of the digestive and reproductive tract microbiota exhibited notable microbiota variation substantially between different parts, host genetics had limited effects on the reproductive and digestive tract microbial community. The digestive and reproductive tract microbiota had a significant effect on egg production (accounting for 52.31% - 98.86% of the variance), after correcting for host genetic effects; in particular, the uterus and isthmus microbiota accounted for an average of 93.59% and 98.86%, respectively, of variance in egg production. We further identified four reproductive tract microbial species which were related to immune system, Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides salanitronis, Bacteroides barnesiae and Clostridium leptum, that were significantly positively correlated with egg production. Chickens with a lower abundance of these species had produced significantly fewer eggs at 300 days of age (37.13 vs. 113.75) than those with a higher abundance of these microorganisms. These taxa indicate potential roles play in promoting reproductive performance. Especially uterus and isthmus tract microbiota were major factors in regulating the chicken egg production.Conclusions: Host genetics has limited effect on digestive/reproductive microbiome composition. The distinct site-associated chicken microbiome may be determined by the differences of their physical function. These findings may help design strategies for controlling and altering the digestive/reproductive tract microbiota in chickens to improve egg production.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diyan Li ◽  
Shilin Tian ◽  
Wei Zhu ◽  
Yuan Su ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The microbiota of the digestive and reproductive systems has a prominent role in animal health and performance, but the extent of its contribution is difficult to determine. In chickens, the effect of host genetics on the reproductive and digestive tract microbiota is unclear, and the means by which digestive/reproductive microbiomes help improve egg production in chicken are unknown. Results: To gain insight into this, we examined genomes from 128 chickens reared under identical conditions and described their digestive (crop, gizzard and small intestine) and reproductive tract (vagina, uterus and isthmus) microbiota. Although the diversity, composition and predicted function of the digestive and reproductive tract microbiota exhibited notable microbiota variation substantially between different parts, host genetics had limited effects on the reproductive and digestive tract microbial community. The digestive and reproductive tract microbiota had a significant effect on egg production (accounting for 52.31% - 98.86% of the variance), after correcting for host genetic effects; in particular, the uterus and isthmus microbiota accounted for an average of 93.59% and 98.86%, respectively, of variance in egg production. We further identified four reproductive tract microbial species which were related to immune system, Bacteroides fragilis , Bacteroides salanitronis , Bacteroides barnesiae and Clostridium leptum , that were significantly positively correlated with egg production. Chickens with a lower abundance of these species had produced significantly fewer eggs at 300 days of age (37.13 vs. 113.75) than those with a higher abundance of these microorganisms. We speculated that these microorganisms regulate chicken reproductive activity by mediating its immune system. Conclusions: Host genetics has limited effect on digestive/reproductive microbiome composition. The distinct site-associated chicken microbiome may be determined by the differences of their physical function. These findings may help design strategies for controlling and altering the digestive/reproductive tract microbiota in chickens to improve egg production.


Author(s):  
B M Scott ◽  
A V Fisher ◽  
R A Cooper ◽  
J A Kirk

Kirk and Cooper (1983) reported two experiments in which the growth performance and carcass conformation of intensively fed dairy-bred bulls was improved by sequential implantation with Zeranol®. Two further studies have been conducted in which there has been repeat implantation of Zeranol® and detailed carcass dissection to measure precisely the effects on carcass quality.In trial A, 16 Holstein bull calves were purchased from pedigree breeders and weaned at eight weeks of age, when they were divided into two groups of eight, balanced by weight. From 8 to 12 weeks they were given commercial rearing pellets followed by a. commercial pencil and hay was given ad libitum. From 12 weeks onwards a cereal mix was offered ad libitum, formulated to give 13 MJ/kg dry matter, 160 g/kg crude protein. Hay was withdrawn from 14 weeks of age. At eight weeks of age, half the animals were implanted with 36 mg Zeranol® (Ralgro, Crown Chemical Company, Kent), and re-implanted a further three times every 70 days. Five blood samples were taken from all animals over a 15h period at about 8, 14, 33 and 43 weeks of age.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Shadi Arshid Muslim Saraireh

The study aimed to investigate the role of business incubators in economic development and creativity in Jordanian universities. The study population included Mutah University students who were enrolled in the entrepreneurship program during the academic year 2019-2020. A random sample of 208 male and female students voluntarily participated in the study. A questionnaire that examined four dimensions was used to collect data. These dimensions included: the training and consulting dimension, the technical support and performance evaluation dimension, the administrative and office services dimension, and the financial support dimension. The validity and reliability of these dimensions were also confirmed. The results revealed the important role of business incubators in economic development and creativity in Jordanian universities. They also showed that the training and consulting dimension ranked higher than the other dimensions. The following dimension was the administrative and office services. The technical support and performance evaluation dimension came in third place whereas the financial support dimension came in last. The results also demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference at the level of (α≤0.05) in students' perceptions of the role of business incubators in economic development and creativity in Jordanian universities in terms of gender. In contrast, there was a statistically significant difference according to the faculty variable in favor of scientific faculties.   Received: 7 September 2020 / Accepted: 10 November 2020 / Published: 17 January 2021


2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 4984-4990 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Xie ◽  
G. C. Duff ◽  
L. W. Hall ◽  
J. D. Allen ◽  
C. D. Burrows ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document