scholarly journals Incidence of Comorbidities in Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Tamoxifen or an Aromatase Inhibitor: An Australian Population-Based Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huah Shin Ng ◽  
Bogda Koczwara ◽  
David Roder ◽  
Theo Niyonsenga ◽  
Agnes Vitry
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitor ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Breast Cancer Cohort

Background The development of comorbidities has become increasingly relevant with longer-term cancer survival. Objective To assess the pattern of comorbidities among Australian women with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. Design Retrospective cohort study using Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data (10% sample) from January 2003 to December 2014. Dispensing claims data were used to identify comorbidities and classified with the Rx-Risk-V model. The breast cancer cohort had tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor dispensed between 2004 and 2011 with no switching between types of endocrine therapy. Comparisons were made between the breast cancer cohort and specific control groups (age- and sex-matched at 1:10 ratio without any dispensing of anti-neoplastic agents during the study period) for the development of five individual comorbidities over time using Cox regression models. Results Women treated with tamoxifen had a higher incidence of cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, and pain or pain-inflammation, but a lower incidence of hyperlipidaemia compared with non-cancer control groups, as indicated by PBS data. Women treated with aromatase inhibitors were more likely to develop cardiovascular conditions, osteoporosis, and pain or pain-inflammation compared with non-cancer control groups. The risks of hyperlipidaemia and osteoporosis were significantly lower among tamoxifen users compared with aromatase inhibitor users. Conclusions Women with hormone-dependent breast cancer treated with an endocrine therapy had a higher risk of developing specified comorbid conditions than women without cancer, with different comorbidity profiles for those on tamoxifen versus aromatase inhibitors. Further research into the causes and mechanism of development and management of comorbidities after cancer is needed.

scholarly journals Cancer Treatment–Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL): State of the Art and Proper Management in Breast Cancer Patients on Endocrine Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Diana ◽  
Francesca Carlino ◽  
Emilio Francesco Giunta ◽  
Elisena Franzese ◽  
Luigi Pio Guerrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Bone Health ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Antiresorptive Agents

Opinion statementAbout 70–80% of early breast cancer (BC) patients receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for at least 5 years. ET includes in the majority of cases the use of aromatase inhibitors, as upfront or switch strategy, that lead to impaired bone health. Given the high incidence and also the high prevalence of BC, cancer treatment–induced bone loss (CTIBL) represents the most common long-term adverse event experimented by patients with hormone receptor positive tumours. CTIBL is responsible for osteoporosis occurrence and, as a consequence, fragility fractures that may negatively affect quality of life and survival expectancy. As recommended by main international guidelines, BC women on aromatase inhibitors should be carefully assessed for their fracture risk at baseline and periodically reassessed during adjuvant ET in order to early detect significant worsening in terms of bone health. Antiresorptive agents, together with adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, should be administered in BC patients during all course of ET, especially in those at high risk of osteoporotic fractures, as calculated by tools available for clinicians. Bisphosphonates, such as zoledronate or pamidronate, and anti-RANKL antibody, denosumab, are the two classes of antiresorptive drugs used in clinical practice with similar efficacy in preventing bone loss induced by aromatase inhibitor therapy. The choice between them, in the absence of direct comparison, should be based on patients’ preference and compliance; the different safety profile is mainly related to the route of administration, although both types of drugs are manageable with due care, since most of the adverse events are predictable and preventable. Despite advances in management of CTIBL, several issues such as the optimal time of starting antiresorptive agents and the duration of treatment remain unanswered. Future clinical trials as well as increased awareness of bone health are needed to improve prevention, assessment and treatment of CTIBL in these long-term survivor patients.

scholarly journals Breast cancer survival and survival gap apportionment in sub-Saharan Africa (ABC-DO): a prospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e1203-e1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie McCormack ◽  
Fiona McKenzie ◽  
Milena Foerster ◽  
Annelle Zietsman ◽  
Moses Galukande ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Survival ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Sub Saharan

scholarly journals Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer survival in comparison to other detection methods: A retrospective cohort study

2009 ◽  
Vol 100 (8) ◽  
pp. 1479-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaaki Kawai ◽  
Shinichi Kuriyama ◽  
Akihiko Suzuki ◽  
Yoshikazu Nishino ◽  
Takanori Ishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Screening Mammography ◽  
Breast Cancer Survival ◽  
Detection Methods

scholarly journals Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (21) ◽  
pp. 2255-2269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold J. Burstein ◽  
Sarah Temin ◽  
Holly Anderson ◽  
Thomas A. Buchholz ◽  
Nancy E. Davidson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitor ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Clinical Practice Guideline ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Tamoxifen Treatment ◽  
Adjuvant Tamoxifen ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

PurposeTo update the ASCO clinical practice guideline on adjuvant endocrine therapy on the basis of emerging data on the optimal duration of treatment, particularly adjuvant tamoxifen.MethodsASCO convened the Update Committee and conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials from January 2009 to June 2013 and analyzed three historical trials. Guideline recommendations were based on the Update Committee's review of the evidence. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease recurrence, and adverse events.ResultsThis guideline update reflects emerging data on duration of tamoxifen treatment. There have been five studies of tamoxifen treatment beyond 5 years of therapy. The two largest studies with longest reported follow-up show a breast cancer survival advantage with 10-year durations of tamoxifen use. In addition to modest gains in survival, extended therapy with tamoxifen for 10 years compared with 5 years was associated with lower risks of breast cancer recurrence and contralateral breast cancer.RecommendationsPrevious ASCO guidelines recommended treatment of women who have hormone receptor–positive breast cancer and are premenopausal with 5 years of tamoxifen, and those who are postmenopausal a minimum of 5 years of adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor (in sequence). If women are pre- or perimenopausal and have received 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, they should be offered 10 years total duration of tamoxifen. If women are postmenopausal and have received 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, they should be offered the choice of continuing tamoxifen or switching to an aromatase inhibitor for 10 years total adjuvant endocrine therapy.

scholarly journals Cohort study of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy, breast cancer recurrence and mortality

2013 ◽  
Vol 108 (7) ◽  
pp. 1515-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Makubate ◽  
P T Donnan ◽  
J A Dewar ◽  
A M Thompson ◽  
C McCowan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Recurrence

Survival outcome and treatment tolerability for postmenopausal females with early stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer treated with different adjuvant hormonal lines (TAM vs. AI vs. switching strategy) for 5 years

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atef Youssef Riyad ◽  
Dalia Abdelghany Elkhodary ◽  
Wesam Reda Farag Elghamry ◽  
Islam Abdelrahman Kamel Mohamed Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitor ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Hormonal Treatment ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Adjuvant Hormonal Treatment ◽  
Her 2

Abstract Background The standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal female patients with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer was 5 years of tamoxifen, but recurrence and side effects restrict its usefulness. The aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole or exemestane or letrozole) was compared with tamoxifen for 5 years or started after completing 2-3 years of tamoxifen in postmenopausal female patients diagnosed with early breast cancer at "Ain Shams University Hospitals" Objective The aim of the study was to measure survival outcome and treatment tolerability for postmenopausal females with Hormone Receptor Positive early breast cancer who received adjuvant hormonal treatment with tamoxifen [TAM] only for 5 years versus those who received adjuvant hormonal treatment with tamoxifen [TAM] for 2 years switching to aromatase inhibitors [AI] in the sequential 3 years versus those who received adjuvant hormonal treatment with aromatase inhibitors [AI] solely for 5 years. Patients and methods This study included 100 postmenopausal women with early breast cancer who presented at the Clinical Oncology Department, Ain Shams University, in the interval from January 2010 until December 2015. Conclusion Similar disease free survival and overall survival were observed among the three studied groups. Switching tamoxifen to aromatase inhibitors provides better tolerability in terms of endometrial thickness when compared to 5 years of tamoxifen monotherapy. Patients who administer aromatase inhibitor included in the switching strategy experience less osteoporosis and less generalized bone pain compared to upfront aromatase inhibitor to 5 years. There was a significant improvement of disease free survival (DFS) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2) negative patients receiving any adjuvant hormonal treatment line for five years in comparison to HER 2 positive patients receiving the same adjuvant hormonal treatment for five years.

Abstract 16083: Risk of Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction in Women With and Without History of Breast Cancer: The Pathways Heart Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamal S Rana ◽  
Heather Greenlee ◽  
Richard Cheng ◽  
Cecile A Laurent ◽  
Hanjie Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
White Women ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Introduction: Incidence of heart failure (HF), specifically with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), is rising in the general population, yet is understudied. To provide a population-based estimate of HF in breast cancer (BC) survivors, we compared risk of HF in women with and without BC history in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) integrated health system. Methods: Data were extracted from KPNC electronic health records. All invasive BC cases diagnosed from 2005-2013 were identified and matched 1:5 with non-BC controls on birth year, race/ethnicity, and KPNC membership at BC diagnosis. Cox regression models assessed the hazard of HF by EF status: HFpEF (EF ≥ 45%), HF with reduced EF (HFrEF; EF < 45%), and unknown EF. Women with prior history of HF were excluded. Models were adjusted for factors known to affect BC risk or CVD and for prevalent CVD at BC diagnosis. We also examined case subgroups who received cardiotoxic chemotherapy, left-sided radiation therapy, and/or endocrine therapy, versus their controls. Results: A total of 14,804 women diagnosed with invasive BC and with no history of HF were identified and matched to 74,034 women without BC history. Women were on average 61 years at BC diagnosis and 65% white. Women with HFpEF were older and more likely to have hypertension (p<0.05). Among all cases vs. controls, there was increased risk of HFrEF (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.98) but not HFpEF or unknown EF (figure). Compared to their controls, women treated with chemotherapy were more than 3-times likely to develop HFrEF (HR: 3.26, 95% CI: 2.2, 4.8) and more than 1.5-times likely to develop HFpEF (HR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.24). Women who received left-sided radiation therapy had nearly double the risk of developing HFrEF (HR=1.85, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.84). No associations were found among women who received endocrine therapy. Conclusions: Increased surveillance is warranted for women with BC receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy for development of both HFrEF and HFpEF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document