scholarly journals A simplified questionnaire for self-assessment of hirsutism in population-based studies

2015 ◽  
Vol 172 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ligia Gabrielli ◽  
Estela M L Aquino
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Adult Health ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Body Hair ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Independent Medical Examination ◽  
Self Administered Questionnaire

ObjectiveThe measurement of excess body hair is not straightforward. As the modified Ferriman–Gallwey (mFG) score is unsuitable for self-assessment and requires specialist training, a short, self-administered questionnaire to identify hirsutism was constructed and validated for large-scale application, particularly targeting population-based studies.DesignA validation study was conducted to assess a new hirsutism questionnaire.MethodsA total of 90 women aged 35–72 years who were enrolled in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) were evaluated. A self-administered instrument containing four questions was designed to evaluate five body areas: upper lip, chin, chest, lower abdomen, and thighs with respect to the current distribution of body hair and that before 35 years of age. A score of 0–4 was attributed to each region based on drawings provided in the instrument. Test–retest reliability was evaluated by reformulating the initial questions. An independent medical examination was conducted to apply the gold standard, the mFG score.ResultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87–0.99). A cut-off score of 5 showed the best balance between sensitivity (85%) and specificity (90%), with 88.9% accuracy. Spearman's correlation between current and past body hair score was calculated at 0.82 (P=0.000), and showed a test–retest reliability of 0.49, with a trend toward similar answers regarding changes in the quantity of body hair over time, irrespective of how the questions were asked (P=0.000).ConclusionThe accuracy and internal consistency of this self-administered questionnaire for the identification of hirsutism were good. Therefore, this questionnaire represents a useful tool for self-assessment of hirsutism in population-based studies.

External Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire in Spanish Mothers

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Torres-Giménez ◽  
Alba Roca-Lecumberri ◽  
Bàrbara Sureda ◽  
Susana Andrés-Perpiña ◽  
Bruma Palacios-Hernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Maternal Mental Health ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Outpatient Unit ◽  
Auc Value ◽  
Postpartum Bonding ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract The aim of the present study was to validate the Spanish Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ) against external criteria of bonding disorder, as well as to establish its test-retest reliability. One hundred fifty-six postpartum women consecutively recruited from a perinatal mental health outpatient unit completed the PBQ at 4–6 weeks postpartum. Four weeks later, all mothers completed again the PBQ and were interviewed using the Birmingham Interview for Maternal Mental Health to establish the presence of a bonding disorder. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) value for the PBQ total score of 0.93, 95% CI [0.88, 0.98], with the optimal cut-off of 13 for detecting bonding disorders (sensitivity: 92%, specificity: 87%). Optimal cut-off scores for each scale were also obtained. The test-retest reliability coefficients were moderate to good. Our data confirm the validity of PBQ for detecting bonding disorders in Spanish population.

Validation of a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Self-Assessment Tool

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditi Senthilnathan ◽  
Sree S. Kolli ◽  
Leah A. Cardwell ◽  
Irma Richardson ◽  
Steven R. Feldman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hidradenitis Suppurativa ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Multiple Scales ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Self Administration ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Dermatology Clinic ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating dermatologic condition presenting with recurrent abscesses. While there are multiple scales to determine HS severity, none are designed for self-administration. A validated severity self-assessment tool may facilitate survey research and improve communication by allowing patients to objectively report their HS severity between clinic visits. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess a self-administered HS measure. Methods: An HS self-assessment tool (HSSA) with 10 photographs of different Hurley stages was developed. The tool was administered to patients diagnosed with HS who visited the Wake Forest Baptist Health dermatology clinic over a span of 2 months. Physician-administered Hurley stage was recorded to determine criterion validity. To assess test-retest reliability of the measure, patients completed the HSSA again at least 30 minutes after the first completion. Results: Twenty-four patients completed the measure, and 20 of these patients completed it twice. Agreement between physician-determined Hurley stage and self-determined Hurley stage was 66.7% with a weighted kappa of 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.84). The weighted kappa for agreement between patients’ initial and second completion of the HSSA was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64-0.99). Conclusions: The self-administered measure provides moderate agreement with physician-determined Hurley stage and good test-retest reliability.

scholarly journals Large-scale analysis of test–retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (12) ◽  
pp. 5472-5477 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Zeynep Enkavi ◽  
Ian W. Eisenberg ◽  
Patrick G. Bissett ◽  
Gina L. Mazza ◽  
David P. MacKinnon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Large Scale Analysis ◽  
Behavioral Tasks ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The ability to regulate behavior in service of long-term goals is a widely studied psychological construct known as self-regulation. This wide interest is in part due to the putative relations between self-regulation and a range of real-world behaviors. Self-regulation is generally viewed as a trait, and individual differences are quantified using a diverse set of measures, including self-report surveys and behavioral tasks. Accurate characterization of individual differences requires measurement reliability, a property frequently characterized in self-report surveys, but rarely assessed in behavioral tasks. We remedy this gap by (i) providing a comprehensive literature review on an extensive set of self-regulation measures and (ii) empirically evaluating test–retest reliability of this battery in a new sample. We find that dependent variables (DVs) from self-report surveys of self-regulation have high test–retest reliability, while DVs derived from behavioral tasks do not. This holds both in the literature and in our sample, although the test–retest reliability estimates in the literature are highly variable. We confirm that this is due to differences in between-subject variability. We also compare different types of task DVs (e.g., model parameters vs. raw response times) in their suitability as individual difference DVs, finding that certain model parameters are as stable as raw DVs. Our results provide greater psychometric footing for the study of self-regulation and provide guidance for future studies of individual differences in this domain.

Test-Retest Reliability of a Student Self-Assessment of Professional Behaviors

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Valerie Carroll ◽  
Esther Castro ◽  
Karen DeFranco ◽  
Rachel Fazio ◽  
Laura Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Self Assessment ◽  
Professional Behaviors ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Association and Predictive Value Analysis for Resting Heart Rate and Diabetes Mellitus on Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in General Population

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-Hui Tang ◽  
Fangfang Zeng ◽  
Zhongtao Li ◽  
Linuo Zhou
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Value Analysis

Background.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of DM and resting HR on CAN in a large sample derived from a Chinese population.Materials and Methods.We conducted a large-scale, population-based, cross-sectional study to explore the relationships of CAN with DM and resting HR. A total of 387 subjects were diagnosed with CAN in our dataset. The associations of CAN with DM and resting HR were assessed by a multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis (using subjects without CAN as a reference group) after controlling for potential confounding factors. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive performance of resting HR and DM.Results.A tendency toward increased CAN prevalence with increasing resting HR was reported (Pfor trend<0.001). MLR analysis showed that DM and resting HR were very significantly and independently associated with CAN (P<0.001for both). Resting HR alone or combined with DM (DM-HR) both strongly predicted CAN (AUC = 0.719, 95% CI 0.690–0.748 for resting HR and AUC = 0.738, 95% CI 0.710–0.766 for DM-HR).Conclusion.Our findings signify that resting HR and DM-HR have a high value in predicting CAN in the general population.

Test–Retest Reliability of the Child Occupational Self-Assessment (COSA)

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 6902350010p1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisha M. Ohl ◽  
Emily Crook ◽  
Diane MacSaveny ◽  
Alanna McLaughlin
Keyword(s):  
Self Assessment ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Reliability of Autism-Tics, AD/HD, and other Comorbidities (A–TAC) Inventory in a Test-Retest Design

2014 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Larson ◽  
Eva Norén Selinus ◽  
Clara Hellner Gumpert ◽  
Thomas Nilsson ◽  
Nóra Kerekes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Intraclass Correlations ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The Autism-Tics, AD/HD, and other Comorbidities (A–TAC) inventory is used in epidemiological research to assess neurodevelopmental problems and coexisting conditions. Although the A–TAC has been applied in various populations, data on retest reliability are limited. The objective of the present study was to present additional reliability data. The A–TAC was administered by lay assessors and was completed on two occasions by parents of 400 individual twins, with an average interval of 70 days between test sessions. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were analysed with intraclass correlations and Cohen's κ. A–TAC showed excellent test-retest intraclass correlations for both autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (each at .84). Most modules in the A–TAC had intra- and inter-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients of ≥ .60. Cohen's κ indicated acceptable reliability. The current study provides statistical evidence that the A–TAC yields good test-retest reliability in a population-based cohort of children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document