scholarly journals The Influence of Liraglutide for Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. E438-E444
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Qingmei Chen ◽  
Guangyin Huang ◽  
Lisha Wang
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Introduction: The efficacy of liraglutide to treat heart failure remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of liraglutide on heart failure. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through March 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of liraglutide on cardiac function of heart failure. Meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model. Results: Four RCTs involving 629 patients are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with the control group for heart failure, liraglutide treatment significantly can reduce NT-proBNP (Std. MD = -3.06; 95% CI = -5.78 to -0.34; P = .03), and improve 6MWT (Std. MD=1.10; 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.44; P < .00001), but has no remarkable influence on LVEF change (Std. MD=1.10; 95% CI = -1.97 to 3.98; P = 0.51), LVEDV change (Std. MD = 6.26; 95% CI = -1.45 to 13.97; P = .11), LVESV change (Std. MD = -13.47; 95% CI = -31.04 to 4.10; P = .13), hospitalization for heart failure (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.58; P = .27), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 1.55; 95% CI = -0.24 to 9.89; P = .64), and cardiac death (RR = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.61 to 2.04; P = .72). Conclusions: Liraglutide treatment has an important ability to reduce NT-proBNP and improve 6MWT for heart failure, but shows no important influence on LVEF, LVEDV, LVESV, hospitalization for heart failure, major adverse cardiovascular events, and cardiac death.

scholarly journals Colchicine for Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. E863-E867
Author(s):  
Chenchao Fu ◽  
Xin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background: The efficacy of colchicine administration for coronary heart disease remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of colchicine administration versus placebo on treatment efficacy for coronary heart disease. Methods: We have searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases through May 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of colchicine administration versus placebo in patients with coronary heart disease. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Results: Six RCTs involving 6,321 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control groups for coronary heart disease, colchicine intervention can significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio [OR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 0.92; P = .006), but revealed no obvious impact on mortality (OR=0.93; 95% CI=0.63 to 1.36; P = .69), serious adverse events (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.61; P = .41), or restenosis (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.64; P = .95). Conclusions: Colchicine treatment may be effective to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease.

scholarly journals Impact of Ketamine on Pain Management in Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2;23 (4;2) ◽  
pp. 135-148
Author(s):  
Zifeng Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Control Effect ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Time Required ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Background: The pain control effect of ketamine versus control in women during cesarean operation is not well determined. Objectives: The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ketamine versus control in cesarean section anesthesia for reducing the postoperative pain and analgesia. Study Design: We used meta-analysis to address this concern. Setting: Meta-analysis-based study. Methods: The databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ketamine versus control in controlling pain after cesarean section from inception to August 2018. Based on the Cochrane Handbook, the combined analysis was performed using Revman 5.3 software. Results: A total of 20 RCTs with 1,737 patients who underwent cesarean section were included. Meta-analysis showed that the pain score in the ketamine group was less than that of the control group (mean difference [MD], –1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], –1.61, –0.59; P < 0.0001). Application of ketamine during cesarean section also resulted in decreased consumption of morphine when compared with the control group (MD, –6.11 mg; 95% CI, –9.93, –2.29; P = 0.002). In addition, the first time required for analgesia was significantly longer in the ketamine group than that of the control group (MD, 72.48 minutes; 95% CI, 50.85, 94.11; P < 0.00001). Limitations: Limited patients were included with moderate strength. Conclusions: Ketamine supplementation during cesarean section reduces pain and morphine consumption and prolongs the postoperative analgesia. Key words: Ketamine, cesarean section, randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of L-Carnitine Treatment for Chronic Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolong Song ◽  
Huiyan Qu ◽  
Zongguo Yang ◽  
Jingfeng Rong ◽  
Wan Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background. Whether additional benefit can be achieved with the use of L-carnitine (L-C) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) remains controversial. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effects of L-C treatment in CHF patients. Methods. Pubmed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, Wanfang database, Chinese Biomedical (CBM) database, and Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals database (VIP) until September 30, 2016, were identified. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were systematically evaluated by two reviewers independently. Results. 17 RCTs with 1625 CHF patients were included in this analysis. L-C treatment in CHF was associated with considerable improvement in overall efficacy (OR = 3.47, P<0.01), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (WMD: 4.14%, P=0.01), strike volume (SV) (WMD: 8.21 ml, P=0.01), cardiac output (CO) (WMD: 0.88 L/min, P<0.01), and E/A (WMD: 0.23, P<0.01). Moreover, treatment with L-C also resulted in significant decrease in serum levels of BNP (WMD: −124.60 pg/ml, P=0.01), serum levels of NT-proBNP (WMD: −510.36 pg/ml, P<0.01), LVESD (WMD: −4.06 mm, P<0.01), LVEDD (WMD: −4.79 mm, P<0.01), and LVESV (WMD: −20.16 ml, 95% CI: −35.65 to −4.67, P<0.01). However, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality, 6-minute walk, and adverse events between L-C and control groups. Conclusions. L-C treatment is effective for CHF patients in improving clinical symptoms and cardiac functions, decreasing serum levels of BNP and NT-proBNP. And it has a good tolerance.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Tolerability of Ubrogepant for Acute Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Diao ◽  
Hang Yang ◽  
Yang Chun Zhou ◽  
Biao Du
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acute Attack ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Acute Migraine ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Objective: The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ubrogepant in patients with acute migraine. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to JULY, 2019. Randomized controlled trials of the efficacy and/or tolerability of ubrogepant for migraine were included. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 4 RCTs involving 4 163 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that:compared to the control group, the percentage of participants with PF, the percentage of participants with PR, the percentage of participants with SPF, the percentage of participants with SPR,the absence of phonophobia in sound，the absence of phonophobia in light and the absence of nausea (RR=1.31,95%CI:1.18~1.45，P<0.00001, RR=1.63,95%CI:1.46~1.82，P<0.00001, RR=1.22,95%CI:1.15~1.29，P<0.00001, RR=1.32,95%CI:1.22~1.42，P<0.00001, RR=1.16,95%CI:1.05~1.27，P=0.002), all the differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: For adult patients with acute migraine, ubrogepant could effectively abort the acute attack. High-quality, adequately powered RCTs are needed to fully evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ubrogepant for acute migraine.

scholarly journals The clinical efficacy of continuous renal replacement in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
sijia Ma ◽  
mingming Zhao ◽  
zhiyu Pan ◽  
jiao Fan ◽  
xuexue Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Review Author ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract：Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT) on patients with acute pancreatitis(AP). Methods: A comprehensive search of seven databases without language restrictions includes PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) and Wan fang database. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of acute pancreatitis with CRRT were searched. All the included literatures were published before December 2020. Two review authors independently selected the study and extracted the data according to the inclusion criteria. A third review author will and discuss with the first two review authors and resolve the differences. Weighted mean difference(WMD), risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for estimating the clinical efficacy of AP in CRRT and control treatment. Results: Fifty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were used in the meta-analysis, with a total of 3,382 effective samples. A comprehensive review of the system shows that the mortality rate of the CRRT group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(RR=0.44,95%CI0.34 to 0.57,P< 0.000001), the patients using CRRT had lower APACHE Ⅱ scores level(WMD=-3.78, 95%CI-4.66 to -2.90,P<0.00001),higher CRP, PCT,TNF-αand IL-6 clearance effect. According to liver function, the patients using CRRT had lower ALT and AST levels. In the same way, according to renal function, the patients using CRRT had lower SCr (WMD=-94.28, 95%CI-125.47 to -63.10, P<0.00001). The patients using CRRT also had higher ALB levels(WMD=2.32, 95%CI-1.05 to 3.59 ,P=0.0003). Moreover, Results shown no statistical difference in Serum potassium level (WMD=-0.00, 95%CI-0.31 to 0.31,P=1.00)between the two groups. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that treatment with CRRT for acute pancreatitis may be more beneficial than conventional treatment. However, high-quality studies with a larger sample size are still needed to confirm our results.

scholarly journals Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Hemiplegic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenyue Zhang ◽  
Shuye Pei ◽  
Juan Huang ◽  
Yao Tang ◽  
Huaidong Hu
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: Whether NMES helps the recovery of upper limb function in patients with hemiparesis has not been confirmed. We conducted this meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for upper limb hemiparesis after stroke.Methods: Data sources such as Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were searched for all relevant studies that were carried out before December 1, 2018.We selected the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which included chronic and acute stroke patients with upper extremity dysfunction. Then the intervention group which applied NMES was compared with a control group without NMES. Results: A total of 16 RCTs involving 691 patients were discerned from 248 searched articles. According to the forest plot ,NMES had a significant benefit on FMA-ue scale(SMD=0.44,95%CI 0.13 to 0.74,P=0.006).Also, NMES was positive for ARAT(SMD=0.31,95%CI 0.05 to 0.58,P=0.019)and MAL-AOU(SMD=0.59,95%CI 0.15 to1.04,P=0.009),but not for wrist MAS(SMD=-0.12,95%CI -0.43 to 0.19,P=0.434) or BI(SMD=0.51,95%CI -0.65 to 1.66,P=0.392).Conclusion: NMES application has beneficial impacts on upper extremity motor function in patients with stroke. This study suggests that NMES ought to be applied as a beneficial rehabilitation means in improving the upper function.

scholarly journals Butorphanol effectively prevents etomidate-induced myoclonus: a pooled analysis of 788 patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 353-360
Author(s):  
Yu Zhu ◽  
Chengmao Zhou ◽  
Qixiong He
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of pre-injection of butorphanol on etomidate-induced myoclonus during anesthesia induction. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the ability of butorphanol to prevent etomidate-induced myoclonus were collected by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang databases, from the day of database establishment until May 2017. The literature was screened independently by two evaluators, and the data were then extracted and independently evaluated. Finally, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. Results Eight RCTs were analyzed. The results of meta-analysis showed that: 1. compared with the control group, butorphanol was effective in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus [RR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.21]; 2. butorphanol was effective in preventing mild, moderate, and severe etomidate-induced myoclonus [RR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.63; RR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.27; and RR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.09]; 3. butorphanol did not increase the incidence of dizziness and nausea associated with etomidate. Conclusions Butorphanol could reduce the incidence and degree of etomidate-induced myoclonus. Notably, it did not increase the incidence of dizziness and nausea associated with etomidate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document